/* Support routines for Value Range Propagation (VRP).
- Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Contributed by Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>.
This file is part of GCC.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with GCC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to
-the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
-Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
+the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
+Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */
#include "config.h"
#include "system.h"
sub-graph in find_assert_locations. */
static sbitmap found_in_subgraph;
-/* Loop structure of the program. Used to analyze scalar evolutions
- inside adjust_range_with_scev. */
-static struct loops *cfg_loops;
-
/* Local functions. */
static int compare_values (tree val1, tree val2);
of values that SSA name N_I may take. */
static value_range_t **vr_value;
-/* Given a comparison code, return its opposite. Note that this is *not*
- the same as inverting its truth value (invert_tree_comparison). Here we
- just want to literally flip the comparison around.
-
- So, '<' gets '>', '<=' gets '>='. Both '==' and '!=' are returned
- unchanged. */
-
-static enum tree_code
-opposite_comparison (enum tree_code code)
-{
- switch (code)
- {
- case EQ_EXPR:
- case NE_EXPR:
- case ORDERED_EXPR:
- case UNORDERED_EXPR:
- case LTGT_EXPR:
- case UNEQ_EXPR:
- return code;
- case GT_EXPR:
- return LT_EXPR;
- case GE_EXPR:
- return LE_EXPR;
- case LT_EXPR:
- return GT_EXPR;
- case LE_EXPR:
- return GE_EXPR;
- case UNGT_EXPR:
- return UNLT_EXPR;
- case UNGE_EXPR:
- return UNLE_EXPR;
- case UNLT_EXPR:
- return UNGT_EXPR;
- case UNLE_EXPR:
- return UNGE_EXPR;
- default:
- gcc_unreachable ();
- }
-}
-
-
-/* Return true if EXPR computes a non-zero value. */
-
-bool
-expr_computes_nonzero (tree expr)
-{
- /* Type casts won't change anything, so just strip them. */
- STRIP_NOPS (expr);
-
- /* Calling alloca, guarantees that the value is non-NULL. */
- if (alloca_call_p (expr))
- return true;
-
- /* The address of a non-weak symbol is never NULL, unless the user
- has requested not to remove NULL pointer checks. */
- if (flag_delete_null_pointer_checks
- && TREE_CODE (expr) == ADDR_EXPR
- && DECL_P (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))
- && !DECL_WEAK (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)))
- return true;
-
- /* IOR of any value with a nonzero value will result in a nonzero
- value. */
- if (TREE_CODE (expr) == BIT_IOR_EXPR
- && integer_nonzerop (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1)))
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
/* Return true if ARG is marked with the nonnull attribute in the
current function signature. */
set_value_range (to, from->type, from->min, from->max, from->equiv);
}
+/* Set value range VR to a non-negative range of type TYPE. */
+
+static inline void
+set_value_range_to_nonnegative (value_range_t *vr, tree type)
+{
+ tree zero = build_int_cst (type, 0);
+ set_value_range (vr, VR_RANGE, zero, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type), vr->equiv);
+}
/* Set value range VR to a non-NULL range of type TYPE. */
}
-/* Return value range information for VAR. Create an empty range
- if none existed. */
+/* Return value range information for VAR.
+
+ If we have no values ranges recorded (ie, VRP is not running), then
+ return NULL. Otherwise create an empty range if none existed for VAR. */
static value_range_t *
get_value_range (tree var)
tree sym;
unsigned ver = SSA_NAME_VERSION (var);
+ /* If we have no recorded ranges, then return NULL. */
+ if (! vr_value)
+ return NULL;
+
vr = vr_value[ver];
if (vr)
return vr;
/* Create a default value range. */
- vr_value[ver] = vr = xmalloc (sizeof (*vr));
+ vr_value[ver] = vr = XNEW (value_range_t);
memset (vr, 0, sizeof (*vr));
/* Allocate an equivalence set. */
/* If VAR is a default definition, the variable can take any value
in VAR's type. */
sym = SSA_NAME_VAR (var);
- if (var == var_ann (sym)->default_def)
+ if (var == default_def (sym))
{
/* Try to use the "nonnull" attribute to create ~[0, 0]
anti-ranges for pointers. Note that this is only valid with
|| !is_gimple_min_invariant (vr->max));
}
+/* Like tree_expr_nonnegative_p, but this function uses value ranges
+ obtained so far. */
+
+static bool
+vrp_expr_computes_nonnegative (tree expr)
+{
+ return tree_expr_nonnegative_p (expr);
+}
-/* Like expr_computes_nonzero, but this function uses value ranges
+/* Like tree_expr_nonzero_p, but this function uses value ranges
obtained so far. */
static bool
vrp_expr_computes_nonzero (tree expr)
{
- if (expr_computes_nonzero (expr))
+ if (tree_expr_nonzero_p (expr))
return true;
/* If we have an expression of the form &X->a, then the expression
gcc_assert (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val1))
== POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val2)));
- /* Do some limited symbolic comparisons. */
- if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val1)))
- {
- /* We can determine some comparisons against +INF and -INF even
- if the other value is an expression. */
- if (val1 == TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (val1))
- && TREE_CODE (val2) == MINUS_EXPR)
- {
- /* +INF > NAME - CST. */
- return 1;
- }
- else if (val1 == TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (val1))
- && TREE_CODE (val2) == PLUS_EXPR)
- {
- /* -INF < NAME + CST. */
- return -1;
- }
- else if (TREE_CODE (val1) == MINUS_EXPR
- && val2 == TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (val2)))
- {
- /* NAME - CST < +INF. */
- return -1;
- }
- else if (TREE_CODE (val1) == PLUS_EXPR
- && val2 == TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (val2)))
- {
- /* NAME + CST > -INF. */
- return 1;
- }
- }
-
if ((TREE_CODE (val1) == SSA_NAME
|| TREE_CODE (val1) == PLUS_EXPR
|| TREE_CODE (val1) == MINUS_EXPR)
|| TREE_CODE (val2) == MINUS_EXPR))
{
tree n1, c1, n2, c2;
+ enum tree_code code1, code2;
/* If VAL1 and VAL2 are of the form 'NAME [+-] CST' or 'NAME',
return -1 or +1 accordingly. If VAL1 and VAL2 don't use the
same name, return -2. */
if (TREE_CODE (val1) == SSA_NAME)
{
+ code1 = SSA_NAME;
n1 = val1;
c1 = NULL_TREE;
}
else
{
+ code1 = TREE_CODE (val1);
n1 = TREE_OPERAND (val1, 0);
c1 = TREE_OPERAND (val1, 1);
+ if (tree_int_cst_sgn (c1) == -1)
+ {
+ c1 = fold_unary_to_constant (NEGATE_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (c1), c1);
+ if (!c1)
+ return -2;
+ code1 = code1 == MINUS_EXPR ? PLUS_EXPR : MINUS_EXPR;
+ }
}
if (TREE_CODE (val2) == SSA_NAME)
{
+ code2 = SSA_NAME;
n2 = val2;
c2 = NULL_TREE;
}
else
{
+ code2 = TREE_CODE (val2);
n2 = TREE_OPERAND (val2, 0);
c2 = TREE_OPERAND (val2, 1);
+ if (tree_int_cst_sgn (c2) == -1)
+ {
+ c2 = fold_unary_to_constant (NEGATE_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (c2), c2);
+ if (!c2)
+ return -2;
+ code2 = code2 == MINUS_EXPR ? PLUS_EXPR : MINUS_EXPR;
+ }
}
/* Both values must use the same name. */
if (n1 != n2)
return -2;
- if (TREE_CODE (val1) == SSA_NAME)
+ if (code1 == SSA_NAME
+ && code2 == SSA_NAME)
+ /* NAME == NAME */
+ return 0;
+
+ /* If overflow is defined we cannot simplify more. */
+ if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (val1))
+ || flag_wrapv)
+ return -2;
+
+ if (code1 == SSA_NAME)
{
- if (TREE_CODE (val2) == SSA_NAME)
- /* NAME == NAME */
- return 0;
- else if (TREE_CODE (val2) == PLUS_EXPR)
+ if (code2 == PLUS_EXPR)
/* NAME < NAME + CST */
return -1;
- else if (TREE_CODE (val2) == MINUS_EXPR)
+ else if (code2 == MINUS_EXPR)
/* NAME > NAME - CST */
return 1;
}
- else if (TREE_CODE (val1) == PLUS_EXPR)
+ else if (code1 == PLUS_EXPR)
{
- if (TREE_CODE (val2) == SSA_NAME)
+ if (code2 == SSA_NAME)
/* NAME + CST > NAME */
return 1;
- else if (TREE_CODE (val2) == PLUS_EXPR)
+ else if (code2 == PLUS_EXPR)
/* NAME + CST1 > NAME + CST2, if CST1 > CST2 */
return compare_values (c1, c2);
- else if (TREE_CODE (val2) == MINUS_EXPR)
+ else if (code2 == MINUS_EXPR)
/* NAME + CST1 > NAME - CST2 */
return 1;
}
- else if (TREE_CODE (val1) == MINUS_EXPR)
+ else if (code1 == MINUS_EXPR)
{
- if (TREE_CODE (val2) == SSA_NAME)
+ if (code2 == SSA_NAME)
/* NAME - CST < NAME */
return -1;
- else if (TREE_CODE (val2) == PLUS_EXPR)
+ else if (code2 == PLUS_EXPR)
/* NAME - CST1 < NAME + CST2 */
return -1;
- else if (TREE_CODE (val2) == MINUS_EXPR)
+ else if (code2 == MINUS_EXPR)
/* NAME - CST1 > NAME - CST2, if CST1 < CST2. Notice that
C1 and C2 are swapped in the call to compare_values. */
return compare_values (c2, c1);
if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (val1) || !is_gimple_min_invariant (val2))
return -2;
- /* We cannot compare overflowed values. */
- if (TREE_OVERFLOW (val1) || TREE_OVERFLOW (val2))
- return -2;
-
if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val1)))
- return tree_int_cst_compare (val1, val2);
+ {
+ /* We cannot compare overflowed values. */
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (val1) || TREE_OVERFLOW (val2))
+ return -2;
+
+ return tree_int_cst_compare (val1, val2);
+ }
else
{
tree t;
/* Return 1 if VAL is inside value range VR (VR->MIN <= VAL <= VR->MAX),
0 if VAL is not inside VR,
- -2 if we cannot tell either way. */
+ -2 if we cannot tell either way.
+
+ FIXME, the current semantics of this functions are a bit quirky
+ when taken in the context of VRP. In here we do not care
+ about VR's type. If VR is the anti-range ~[3, 5] the call
+ value_inside_range (4, VR) will return 1.
+
+ This is counter-intuitive in a strict sense, but the callers
+ currently expect this. They are calling the function
+ merely to determine whether VR->MIN <= VAL <= VR->MAX. The
+ callers are applying the VR_RANGE/VR_ANTI_RANGE semantics
+ themselves.
+
+ This also applies to value_ranges_intersect_p and
+ range_includes_zero_p. The semantics of VR_RANGE and
+ VR_ANTI_RANGE should be encoded here, but that also means
+ adapting the users of these functions to the new semantics. */
static inline int
value_inside_range (tree val, value_range_t *vr)
{
- int cmp1, cmp2;
+ tree cmp1, cmp2;
- cmp1 = compare_values (val, vr->min);
- if (cmp1 == -2 || cmp1 == 2)
+ cmp1 = fold_binary_to_constant (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, val, vr->min);
+ if (!cmp1)
return -2;
- cmp2 = compare_values (val, vr->max);
- if (cmp2 == -2 || cmp2 == 2)
+ cmp2 = fold_binary_to_constant (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, val, vr->max);
+ if (!cmp2)
return -2;
- return (cmp1 == 0 || cmp1 == 1) && (cmp2 == -1 || cmp2 == 0);
+ return cmp1 == boolean_true_node && cmp2 == boolean_true_node;
}
}
-/* Return true if VR includes the value zero, false otheriwse. */
+/* Return true if VR includes the value zero, false otherwise. FIXME,
+ currently this will return false for an anti-range like ~[-4, 3].
+ This will be wrong when the semantics of value_inside_range are
+ modified (currently the users of this function expect these
+ semantics). */
static inline bool
range_includes_zero_p (value_range_t *vr)
return (value_inside_range (zero, vr) == 1);
}
+/* Return true if T, an SSA_NAME, is known to be nonnegative. Return
+ false otherwise or if no value range information is available. */
+
+bool
+ssa_name_nonnegative_p (tree t)
+{
+ value_range_t *vr = get_value_range (t);
+
+ if (!vr)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Testing for VR_ANTI_RANGE is not useful here as any anti-range
+ which would return a useful value should be encoded as a VR_RANGE. */
+ if (vr->type == VR_RANGE)
+ {
+ int result = compare_values (vr->min, integer_zero_node);
+
+ return (result == 0 || result == 1);
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Return true if T, an SSA_NAME, is known to be nonzero. Return
+ false otherwise or if no value range information is available. */
+
+bool
+ssa_name_nonzero_p (tree t)
+{
+ value_range_t *vr = get_value_range (t);
+
+ if (!vr)
+ return false;
+
+ /* A VR_RANGE which does not include zero is a nonzero value. */
+ if (vr->type == VR_RANGE && !symbolic_range_p (vr))
+ return ! range_includes_zero_p (vr);
+
+ /* A VR_ANTI_RANGE which does include zero is a nonzero value. */
+ if (vr->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE && !symbolic_range_p (vr))
+ return range_includes_zero_p (vr);
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+
+/* When extracting ranges from X_i = ASSERT_EXPR <Y_j, pred>, we will
+ initially consider X_i and Y_j equivalent, so the equivalence set
+ of Y_j is added to the equivalence set of X_i. However, it is
+ possible to have a chain of ASSERT_EXPRs whose predicates are
+ actually incompatible. This is usually the result of nesting of
+ contradictory if-then-else statements. For instance, in PR 24670:
+
+ count_4 has range [-INF, 63]
+
+ if (count_4 != 0)
+ {
+ count_19 = ASSERT_EXPR <count_4, count_4 != 0>
+ if (count_19 > 63)
+ {
+ count_18 = ASSERT_EXPR <count_19, count_19 > 63>
+ if (count_18 <= 63)
+ ...
+ }
+ }
+
+ Notice that 'if (count_19 > 63)' is trivially false and will be
+ folded out at the end. However, during propagation, the flowgraph
+ is not cleaned up and so, VRP will evaluate predicates more
+ predicates than necessary, so it must support these
+ inconsistencies. The problem here is that because of the chaining
+ of ASSERT_EXPRs, the equivalency set for count_18 includes count_4.
+ Since count_4 has an incompatible range, we ICE when evaluating the
+ ranges in the equivalency set. So, we need to remove count_4 from
+ it. */
+
+static void
+fix_equivalence_set (value_range_t *vr_p)
+{
+ bitmap_iterator bi;
+ unsigned i;
+ bitmap e = vr_p->equiv;
+ bitmap to_remove = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
+
+ /* Only detect inconsistencies on numeric ranges. */
+ if (vr_p->type == VR_VARYING
+ || vr_p->type == VR_UNDEFINED
+ || symbolic_range_p (vr_p))
+ return;
+
+ EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (e, 0, i, bi)
+ {
+ value_range_t *equiv_vr = vr_value[i];
+
+ if (equiv_vr->type == VR_VARYING
+ || equiv_vr->type == VR_UNDEFINED
+ || symbolic_range_p (equiv_vr))
+ continue;
+
+ if (equiv_vr->type == VR_RANGE
+ && vr_p->type == VR_RANGE
+ && !value_ranges_intersect_p (vr_p, equiv_vr))
+ bitmap_set_bit (to_remove, i);
+ else if ((equiv_vr->type == VR_RANGE && vr_p->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ || (equiv_vr->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE && vr_p->type == VR_RANGE))
+ {
+ /* A range and an anti-range have an empty intersection if
+ their end points are the same. FIXME,
+ value_ranges_intersect_p should handle this
+ automatically. */
+ if (compare_values (equiv_vr->min, vr_p->min) == 0
+ && compare_values (equiv_vr->max, vr_p->max) == 0)
+ bitmap_set_bit (to_remove, i);
+ }
+ }
+
+ bitmap_and_compl_into (vr_p->equiv, to_remove);
+ BITMAP_FREE (to_remove);
+}
+
/* Extract value range information from an ASSERT_EXPR EXPR and store
it in *VR_P. */
to flip around the comparison code to create the proper range
for VAR. */
limit = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
- cond_code = opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
+ cond_code = swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
}
type = TREE_TYPE (limit);
|| symbolic_range_p (limit_vr)))
limit_vr = NULL;
- /* Special handling for integral types with super-types. Some FEs
- construct integral types derived from other types and restrict
- the range of values these new types may take.
-
- It may happen that LIMIT is actually smaller than TYPE's minimum
- value. For instance, the Ada FE is generating code like this
- during bootstrap:
-
- D.1480_32 = nam_30 - 300000361;
- if (D.1480_32 <= 1) goto <L112>; else goto <L52>;
- <L112>:;
- D.1480_94 = ASSERT_EXPR <D.1480_32, D.1480_32 <= 1>;
-
- All the names are of type types__name_id___XDLU_300000000__399999999
- which has min == 300000000 and max == 399999999. This means that
- the ASSERT_EXPR would try to create the range [3000000, 1] which
- is invalid.
-
- The fact that the type specifies MIN and MAX values does not
- automatically mean that every variable of that type will always
- be within that range, so the predicate may well be true at run
- time. If we had symbolic -INF and +INF values, we could
- represent this range, but we currently represent -INF and +INF
- using the type's min and max values.
-
- So, the only sensible thing we can do for now is set the
- resulting range to VR_VARYING. TODO, would having symbolic -INF
- and +INF values be worth the trouble? */
- if (TREE_CODE (limit) != SSA_NAME
- && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
- && TREE_TYPE (type))
- {
- if (cond_code == LE_EXPR || cond_code == LT_EXPR)
- {
- tree type_min = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type);
- int cmp = compare_values (limit, type_min);
-
- /* For < or <= comparisons, if LIMIT is smaller than
- TYPE_MIN, set the range to VR_VARYING. */
- if (cmp == -1 || cmp == 0)
- {
- set_value_range_to_varying (vr_p);
- return;
- }
- }
- else if (cond_code == GE_EXPR || cond_code == GT_EXPR)
- {
- tree type_max = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type);
- int cmp = compare_values (limit, type_max);
-
- /* For > or >= comparisons, if LIMIT is bigger than
- TYPE_MAX, set the range to VR_VARYING. */
- if (cmp == 1 || cmp == 0)
- {
- set_value_range_to_varying (vr_p);
- return;
- }
- }
- }
-
- /* The new range has the same set of equivalences of VAR's range. */
+ /* Initially, the new range has the same set of equivalences of
+ VAR's range. This will be revised before returning the final
+ value. Since assertions may be chained via mutually exclusive
+ predicates, we will need to trim the set of equivalences before
+ we are done. */
gcc_assert (vr_p->equiv == NULL);
vr_p->equiv = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
add_equivalence (vr_p->equiv, var);
LIMIT's range was ~[0, 0], the assertion 'VAR != LIMIT' does
not imply that VAR's range is [0, 0]. So, in the case of
anti-ranges, we just assert the inequality using LIMIT and
- not its anti-range. */
- if (limit_vr == NULL
- || limit_vr->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ not its anti-range.
+
+ If LIMIT_VR is a range, we can only use it to build a new
+ anti-range if LIMIT_VR is a single-valued range. For
+ instance, if LIMIT_VR is [0, 1], the predicate
+ VAR != [0, 1] does not mean that VAR's range is ~[0, 1].
+ Rather, it means that for value 0 VAR should be ~[0, 0]
+ and for value 1, VAR should be ~[1, 1]. We cannot
+ represent these ranges.
+
+ The only situation in which we can build a valid
+ anti-range is when LIMIT_VR is a single-valued range
+ (i.e., LIMIT_VR->MIN == LIMIT_VR->MAX). In that case,
+ build the anti-range ~[LIMIT_VR->MIN, LIMIT_VR->MAX]. */
+ if (limit_vr
+ && limit_vr->type == VR_RANGE
+ && compare_values (limit_vr->min, limit_vr->max) == 0)
{
- min = limit;
- max = limit;
+ min = limit_vr->min;
+ max = limit_vr->max;
}
else
{
- min = limit_vr->min;
- max = limit_vr->max;
+ /* In any other case, we cannot use LIMIT's range to build a
+ valid anti-range. */
+ min = max = limit;
}
/* If MIN and MAX cover the whole range for their type, then
if (cond_code == LT_EXPR)
{
tree one = build_int_cst (type, 1);
- max = fold (build (MINUS_EXPR, type, max, one));
+ max = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type, max, one);
}
set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
if (cond_code == GT_EXPR)
{
tree one = build_int_cst (type, 1);
- min = fold (build (PLUS_EXPR, type, min, one));
+ min = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, min, one);
}
set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
else
gcc_unreachable ();
- /* If VAR already had a known range and the two ranges have a
- non-empty intersection, we can refine the resulting range.
- Since the assert expression creates an equivalency and at the
- same time it asserts a predicate, we can take the intersection of
- the two ranges to get better precision. */
+ /* If VAR already had a known range, it may happen that the new
+ range we have computed and VAR's range are not compatible. For
+ instance,
+
+ if (p_5 == NULL)
+ p_6 = ASSERT_EXPR <p_5, p_5 == NULL>;
+ x_7 = p_6->fld;
+ p_8 = ASSERT_EXPR <p_6, p_6 != NULL>;
+
+ While the above comes from a faulty program, it will cause an ICE
+ later because p_8 and p_6 will have incompatible ranges and at
+ the same time will be considered equivalent. A similar situation
+ would arise from
+
+ if (i_5 > 10)
+ i_6 = ASSERT_EXPR <i_5, i_5 > 10>;
+ if (i_5 < 5)
+ i_7 = ASSERT_EXPR <i_6, i_6 < 5>;
+
+ Again i_6 and i_7 will have incompatible ranges. It would be
+ pointless to try and do anything with i_7's range because
+ anything dominated by 'if (i_5 < 5)' will be optimized away.
+ Note, due to the wa in which simulation proceeds, the statement
+ i_7 = ASSERT_EXPR <...> we would never be visited because the
+ conditional 'if (i_5 < 5)' always evaluates to false. However,
+ this extra check does not hurt and may protect against future
+ changes to VRP that may get into a situation similar to the
+ NULL pointer dereference example.
+
+ Note that these compatibility tests are only needed when dealing
+ with ranges or a mix of range and anti-range. If VAR_VR and VR_P
+ are both anti-ranges, they will always be compatible, because two
+ anti-ranges will always have a non-empty intersection. */
+
var_vr = get_value_range (var);
- if (var_vr->type == VR_RANGE
- && vr_p->type == VR_RANGE
- && value_ranges_intersect_p (var_vr, vr_p))
+
+ /* We may need to make adjustments when VR_P and VAR_VR are numeric
+ ranges or anti-ranges. */
+ if (vr_p->type == VR_VARYING
+ || vr_p->type == VR_UNDEFINED
+ || var_vr->type == VR_VARYING
+ || var_vr->type == VR_UNDEFINED
+ || symbolic_range_p (vr_p)
+ || symbolic_range_p (var_vr))
+ goto done;
+
+ if (var_vr->type == VR_RANGE && vr_p->type == VR_RANGE)
{
- /* Use the larger of the two minimums. */
- if (compare_values (vr_p->min, var_vr->min) == -1)
- min = var_vr->min;
- else
- min = vr_p->min;
+ /* If the two ranges have a non-empty intersection, we can
+ refine the resulting range. Since the assert expression
+ creates an equivalency and at the same time it asserts a
+ predicate, we can take the intersection of the two ranges to
+ get better precision. */
+ if (value_ranges_intersect_p (var_vr, vr_p))
+ {
+ /* Use the larger of the two minimums. */
+ if (compare_values (vr_p->min, var_vr->min) == -1)
+ min = var_vr->min;
+ else
+ min = vr_p->min;
- /* Use the smaller of the two maximums. */
- if (compare_values (vr_p->max, var_vr->max) == 1)
- max = var_vr->max;
+ /* Use the smaller of the two maximums. */
+ if (compare_values (vr_p->max, var_vr->max) == 1)
+ max = var_vr->max;
+ else
+ max = vr_p->max;
+
+ set_value_range (vr_p, vr_p->type, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* The two ranges do not intersect, set the new range to
+ VARYING, because we will not be able to do anything
+ meaningful with it. */
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr_p);
+ }
+ }
+ else if ((var_vr->type == VR_RANGE && vr_p->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ || (var_vr->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE && vr_p->type == VR_RANGE))
+ {
+ /* A range and an anti-range will cancel each other only if
+ their ends are the same. For instance, in the example above,
+ p_8's range ~[0, 0] and p_6's range [0, 0] are incompatible,
+ so VR_P should be set to VR_VARYING. */
+ if (compare_values (var_vr->min, vr_p->min) == 0
+ && compare_values (var_vr->max, vr_p->max) == 0)
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr_p);
else
- max = vr_p->max;
+ {
+ tree min, max, anti_min, anti_max, real_min, real_max;
+
+ /* We want to compute the logical AND of the two ranges;
+ there are three cases to consider.
+
+
+ 1. The VR_ANTI_RANGE range is completely within the
+ VR_RANGE and the endpoints of the ranges are
+ different. In that case the resulting range
+ should be whichever range is more precise.
+ Typically that will be the VR_RANGE.
+
+ 2. The VR_ANTI_RANGE is completely disjoint from
+ the VR_RANGE. In this case the resulting range
+ should be the VR_RANGE.
+
+ 3. There is some overlap between the VR_ANTI_RANGE
+ and the VR_RANGE.
+
+ 3a. If the high limit of the VR_ANTI_RANGE resides
+ within the VR_RANGE, then the result is a new
+ VR_RANGE starting at the high limit of the
+ the VR_ANTI_RANGE + 1 and extending to the
+ high limit of the original VR_RANGE.
+
+ 3b. If the low limit of the VR_ANTI_RANGE resides
+ within the VR_RANGE, then the result is a new
+ VR_RANGE starting at the low limit of the original
+ VR_RANGE and extending to the low limit of the
+ VR_ANTI_RANGE - 1. */
+ if (vr_p->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ {
+ anti_min = vr_p->min;
+ anti_max = vr_p->max;
+ real_min = var_vr->min;
+ real_max = var_vr->max;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ anti_min = var_vr->min;
+ anti_max = var_vr->max;
+ real_min = vr_p->min;
+ real_max = vr_p->max;
+ }
+
- set_value_range (vr_p, vr_p->type, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
+ /* Case 1, VR_ANTI_RANGE completely within VR_RANGE,
+ not including any endpoints. */
+ if (compare_values (anti_max, real_max) == -1
+ && compare_values (anti_min, real_min) == 1)
+ {
+ set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, real_min,
+ real_max, vr_p->equiv);
+ }
+ /* Case 2, VR_ANTI_RANGE completely disjoint from
+ VR_RANGE. */
+ else if (compare_values (anti_min, real_max) == 1
+ || compare_values (anti_max, real_min) == -1)
+ {
+ set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, real_min,
+ real_max, vr_p->equiv);
+ }
+ /* Case 3a, the anti-range extends into the low
+ part of the real range. Thus creating a new
+ low for the real range. */
+ else if ((compare_values (anti_max, real_min) == 1
+ || compare_values (anti_max, real_min) == 0)
+ && compare_values (anti_max, real_max) == -1)
+ {
+ min = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (var_vr->min),
+ anti_max,
+ build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (var_vr->min), 1));
+ max = real_max;
+ set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
+ }
+ /* Case 3b, the anti-range extends into the high
+ part of the real range. Thus creating a new
+ higher for the real range. */
+ else if (compare_values (anti_min, real_min) == 1
+ && (compare_values (anti_min, real_max) == -1
+ || compare_values (anti_min, real_max) == 0))
+ {
+ max = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (var_vr->min),
+ anti_min,
+ build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (var_vr->min), 1));
+ min = real_min;
+ set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
+ }
+ }
}
+
+ /* Remove names from the equivalence set that have ranges
+ incompatible with VR_P. */
+done:
+ fix_equivalence_set (vr_p);
}
}
+/* Wrapper around int_const_binop. If the operation overflows and we
+ are not using wrapping arithmetic, then adjust the result to be
+ -INF or +INF depending on CODE, VAL1 and VAL2. */
+
+static inline tree
+vrp_int_const_binop (enum tree_code code, tree val1, tree val2)
+{
+ tree res;
+
+ if (flag_wrapv)
+ return int_const_binop (code, val1, val2, 0);
+
+ /* If we are not using wrapping arithmetic, operate symbolically
+ on -INF and +INF. */
+ res = int_const_binop (code, val1, val2, 0);
+
+ if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (val1)))
+ {
+ int checkz = compare_values (res, val1);
+ bool overflow = false;
+
+ /* Ensure that res = val1 [+*] val2 >= val1
+ or that res = val1 - val2 <= val1. */
+ if ((code == PLUS_EXPR
+ && !(checkz == 1 || checkz == 0))
+ || (code == MINUS_EXPR
+ && !(checkz == 0 || checkz == -1)))
+ {
+ overflow = true;
+ }
+ /* Checking for multiplication overflow is done by dividing the
+ output of the multiplication by the first input of the
+ multiplication. If the result of that division operation is
+ not equal to the second input of the multiplication, then the
+ multiplication overflowed. */
+ else if (code == MULT_EXPR && !integer_zerop (val1))
+ {
+ tree tmp = int_const_binop (TRUNC_DIV_EXPR,
+ TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (val1)),
+ val1, 0);
+ int check = compare_values (tmp, val2);
+
+ if (check != 0)
+ overflow = true;
+ }
+
+ if (overflow)
+ {
+ res = copy_node (res);
+ TREE_OVERFLOW (res) = 1;
+ }
+
+ }
+ else if (TREE_OVERFLOW (res)
+ && !TREE_OVERFLOW (val1)
+ && !TREE_OVERFLOW (val2))
+ {
+ /* If the operation overflowed but neither VAL1 nor VAL2 are
+ overflown, return -INF or +INF depending on the operation
+ and the combination of signs of the operands. */
+ int sgn1 = tree_int_cst_sgn (val1);
+ int sgn2 = tree_int_cst_sgn (val2);
+
+ /* Notice that we only need to handle the restricted set of
+ operations handled by extract_range_from_binary_expr.
+ Among them, only multiplication, addition and subtraction
+ can yield overflow without overflown operands because we
+ are working with integral types only... except in the
+ case VAL1 = -INF and VAL2 = -1 which overflows to +INF
+ for division too. */
+
+ /* For multiplication, the sign of the overflow is given
+ by the comparison of the signs of the operands. */
+ if ((code == MULT_EXPR && sgn1 == sgn2)
+ /* For addition, the operands must be of the same sign
+ to yield an overflow. Its sign is therefore that
+ of one of the operands, for example the first. */
+ || (code == PLUS_EXPR && sgn1 > 0)
+ /* For subtraction, the operands must be of different
+ signs to yield an overflow. Its sign is therefore
+ that of the first operand or the opposite of that
+ of the second operand. A first operand of 0 counts
+ as positive here, for the corner case 0 - (-INF),
+ which overflows, but must yield +INF. */
+ || (code == MINUS_EXPR && sgn1 >= 0)
+ /* For division, the only case is -INF / -1 = +INF. */
+ || code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == FLOOR_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == CEIL_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == EXACT_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == ROUND_DIV_EXPR)
+ return TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (res));
+ else
+ return TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (res));
+ }
+
+ return res;
+}
+
+
/* Extract range information from a binary expression EXPR based on
the ranges of each of its operands and the expression code. */
extract_range_from_binary_expr (value_range_t *vr, tree expr)
{
enum tree_code code = TREE_CODE (expr);
+ enum value_range_type type;
tree op0, op1, min, max;
int cmp;
value_range_t vr0 = { VR_UNDEFINED, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE, NULL };
&& code != ROUND_DIV_EXPR
&& code != MIN_EXPR
&& code != MAX_EXPR
+ && code != BIT_AND_EXPR
&& code != TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR
&& code != TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR
&& code != TRUTH_AND_EXPR
- && code != TRUTH_OR_EXPR
- && code != TRUTH_XOR_EXPR)
+ && code != TRUTH_OR_EXPR)
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
return;
}
+ /* The type of the resulting value range defaults to VR0.TYPE. */
+ type = vr0.type;
+
/* Refuse to operate on VARYING ranges, ranges of different kinds
- and symbolic ranges. TODO, we may be able to derive anti-ranges
- in some cases. */
- if (vr0.type == VR_VARYING
- || vr1.type == VR_VARYING
- || vr0.type != vr1.type
- || symbolic_range_p (&vr0)
- || symbolic_range_p (&vr1))
+ and symbolic ranges. As an exception, we allow BIT_AND_EXPR
+ because we may be able to derive a useful range even if one of
+ the operands is VR_VARYING or symbolic range. TODO, we may be
+ able to derive anti-ranges in some cases. */
+ if (code != BIT_AND_EXPR
+ && code != TRUTH_AND_EXPR
+ && code != TRUTH_OR_EXPR
+ && (vr0.type == VR_VARYING
+ || vr1.type == VR_VARYING
+ || vr0.type != vr1.type
+ || symbolic_range_p (&vr0)
+ || symbolic_range_p (&vr1)))
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
ivopts is generating expressions with pointer multiplication
in them. */
if (code == PLUS_EXPR)
- set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ {
+ if (range_is_nonnull (&vr0) || range_is_nonnull (&vr1))
+ set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ else if (range_is_null (&vr0) && range_is_null (&vr1))
+ set_value_range_to_null (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ else
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ }
else
{
/* Subtracting from a pointer, may yield 0, so just drop the
if (code == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR
|| code == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR
|| code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
- || code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
- || code == TRUTH_XOR_EXPR)
+ || code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR)
{
- /* Boolean expressions cannot be folded with int_const_binop. */
- min = fold_binary (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.min, vr1.min);
- max = fold_binary (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.max, vr1.max);
+ /* If one of the operands is zero, we know that the whole
+ expression evaluates zero. */
+ if (code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
+ && ((vr0.type == VR_RANGE
+ && integer_zerop (vr0.min)
+ && integer_zerop (vr0.max))
+ || (vr1.type == VR_RANGE
+ && integer_zerop (vr1.min)
+ && integer_zerop (vr1.max))))
+ {
+ type = VR_RANGE;
+ min = max = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 0);
+ }
+ /* If one of the operands is one, we know that the whole
+ expression evaluates one. */
+ else if (code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
+ && ((vr0.type == VR_RANGE
+ && integer_onep (vr0.min)
+ && integer_onep (vr0.max))
+ || (vr1.type == VR_RANGE
+ && integer_onep (vr1.min)
+ && integer_onep (vr1.max))))
+ {
+ type = VR_RANGE;
+ min = max = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 1);
+ }
+ else if (vr0.type != VR_VARYING
+ && vr1.type != VR_VARYING
+ && vr0.type == vr1.type
+ && !symbolic_range_p (&vr0)
+ && !symbolic_range_p (&vr1))
+ {
+ /* Boolean expressions cannot be folded with int_const_binop. */
+ min = fold_binary (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.min, vr1.min);
+ max = fold_binary (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.max, vr1.max);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
+ }
}
else if (code == PLUS_EXPR
- || code == MULT_EXPR
|| code == MIN_EXPR
|| code == MAX_EXPR)
{
+ /* If we have a PLUS_EXPR with two VR_ANTI_RANGEs, drop to
+ VR_VARYING. It would take more effort to compute a precise
+ range for such a case. For example, if we have op0 == 1 and
+ op1 == -1 with their ranges both being ~[0,0], we would have
+ op0 + op1 == 0, so we cannot claim that the sum is in ~[0,0].
+ Note that we are guaranteed to have vr0.type == vr1.type at
+ this point. */
+ if (code == PLUS_EXPR && vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ {
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* For operations that make the resulting range directly
proportional to the original ranges, apply the operation to
the same end of each range. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
+ min = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min);
+ max = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max);
}
- else if (code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
+ else if (code == MULT_EXPR
+ || code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
|| code == FLOOR_DIV_EXPR
|| code == CEIL_DIV_EXPR
|| code == EXACT_DIV_EXPR
|| code == ROUND_DIV_EXPR)
{
- tree zero;
-
- /* Divisions are a bit tricky to handle, depending on the mix of
- signs we have in the two range, we will need to divide
- different values to get the minimum and maximum values for
- the new range. If VR1 includes zero, the result is VARYING. */
- if (range_includes_zero_p (&vr1))
+ tree val[4];
+ size_t i;
+
+ /* If we have an unsigned MULT_EXPR with two VR_ANTI_RANGEs,
+ drop to VR_VARYING. It would take more effort to compute a
+ precise range for such a case. For example, if we have
+ op0 == 65536 and op1 == 65536 with their ranges both being
+ ~[0,0] on a 32-bit machine, we would have op0 * op1 == 0, so
+ we cannot claim that the product is in ~[0,0]. Note that we
+ are guaranteed to have vr0.type == vr1.type at this
+ point. */
+ if (code == MULT_EXPR
+ && vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE
+ && (flag_wrapv || TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (op0))))
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
}
- /* We have three main variations to handle for VR0: all negative
- values, all positive values and a mix of negative and
- positive. For each of these, we need to consider if VR1 is
- all negative or all positive. In total, there are 6
- combinations to handle. */
- zero = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 0);
- if (compare_values (vr0.max, zero) == -1)
- {
- /* VR0 is all negative. */
- if (compare_values (vr1.min, zero) == 1)
- {
- /* If VR1 is all positive, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MIN / VR1.MIN, VR0.MAX / VR1.MAX]. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
- }
- else
- {
- /* If VR1 is all negative, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MAX / VR1.MIN, VR0.MIN / VR1.MAX]. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr1.max, zero) == -1);
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- }
- }
- else if (range_includes_zero_p (&vr0))
+ /* Multiplications and divisions are a bit tricky to handle,
+ depending on the mix of signs we have in the two ranges, we
+ need to operate on different values to get the minimum and
+ maximum values for the new range. One approach is to figure
+ out all the variations of range combinations and do the
+ operations.
+
+ However, this involves several calls to compare_values and it
+ is pretty convoluted. It's simpler to do the 4 operations
+ (MIN0 OP MIN1, MIN0 OP MAX1, MAX0 OP MIN1 and MAX0 OP MAX0 OP
+ MAX1) and then figure the smallest and largest values to form
+ the new range. */
+
+ /* Divisions by zero result in a VARYING value. */
+ if (code != MULT_EXPR
+ && (vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE || range_includes_zero_p (&vr1)))
{
- /* VR0 is a mix of negative and positive values. */
- if (compare_values (vr1.min, zero) == 1)
- {
- /* If VR1 is all positive, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MIN / VR1.MIN, VR0.MAX / VR1.MIN]. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- }
- else
- {
- /* If VR1 is all negative, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MAX / VR1.MAX, VR0.MIN / VR1.MAX]. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr1.max, zero) == -1);
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- }
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
}
- else
+
+ /* Compute the 4 cross operations. */
+ val[0] = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min);
+
+ val[1] = (vr1.max != vr1.min)
+ ? vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max)
+ : NULL_TREE;
+
+ val[2] = (vr0.max != vr0.min)
+ ? vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min)
+ : NULL_TREE;
+
+ val[3] = (vr0.min != vr0.max && vr1.min != vr1.max)
+ ? vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max)
+ : NULL_TREE;
+
+ /* Set MIN to the minimum of VAL[i] and MAX to the maximum
+ of VAL[i]. */
+ min = val[0];
+ max = val[0];
+ for (i = 1; i < 4; i++)
{
- /* VR0 is all positive. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr0.min, zero) == 1);
- if (compare_values (vr1.min, zero) == 1)
- {
- /* If VR1 is all positive, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MIN / VR1.MAX, VR0.MAX / VR1.MIN]. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- }
- else
+ if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (min) || TREE_OVERFLOW (min)
+ || !is_gimple_min_invariant (max) || TREE_OVERFLOW (max))
+ break;
+
+ if (val[i])
{
- /* If VR1 is all negative, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MAX / VR1.MAX, VR0.MIN / VR1.MIN]. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr1.max, zero) == -1);
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
+ if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (val[i]) || TREE_OVERFLOW (val[i]))
+ {
+ /* If we found an overflowed value, set MIN and MAX
+ to it so that we set the resulting range to
+ VARYING. */
+ min = max = val[i];
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (compare_values (val[i], min) == -1)
+ min = val[i];
+
+ if (compare_values (val[i], max) == 1)
+ max = val[i];
}
}
}
else if (code == MINUS_EXPR)
{
- /* For MINUS_EXPR, apply the operation to the opposite ends of
- each range. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- }
- else
- gcc_unreachable ();
-
- /* If MAX overflowed, then the result depends on whether we are
- using wrapping arithmetic or not. */
- if (TREE_OVERFLOW (max))
- {
- /* If we are using wrapping arithmetic, set the result to
- VARYING. */
- if (flag_wrapv)
+ /* If we have a MINUS_EXPR with two VR_ANTI_RANGEs, drop to
+ VR_VARYING. It would take more effort to compute a precise
+ range for such a case. For example, if we have op0 == 1 and
+ op1 == 1 with their ranges both being ~[0,0], we would have
+ op0 - op1 == 0, so we cannot claim that the difference is in
+ ~[0,0]. Note that we are guaranteed to have
+ vr0.type == vr1.type at this point. */
+ if (vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
}
- /* Otherwise, set MAX to +INF. */
- max = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ /* For MINUS_EXPR, apply the operation to the opposite ends of
+ each range. */
+ min = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max);
+ max = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min);
}
-
- /* If MIN overflowed, then the result depends on whether we are
- using wrapping arithmetic or not. */
- if (TREE_OVERFLOW (min))
+ else if (code == BIT_AND_EXPR)
{
- /* If we are using wrapping arithmetic, set the result to
- VARYING. */
- if (flag_wrapv)
+ if (vr0.type == VR_RANGE
+ && vr0.min == vr0.max
+ && tree_expr_nonnegative_p (vr0.max)
+ && TREE_CODE (vr0.max) == INTEGER_CST)
+ {
+ min = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 0);
+ max = vr0.max;
+ }
+ else if (vr1.type == VR_RANGE
+ && vr1.min == vr1.max
+ && tree_expr_nonnegative_p (vr1.max)
+ && TREE_CODE (vr1.max) == INTEGER_CST)
+ {
+ type = VR_RANGE;
+ min = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 0);
+ max = vr1.max;
+ }
+ else
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
}
+ }
+ else
+ gcc_unreachable ();
- /* Otherwise, set MIN to -INF. */
- min = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ /* If either MIN or MAX overflowed, then set the resulting range to
+ VARYING. */
+ if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (min) || TREE_OVERFLOW (min)
+ || !is_gimple_min_invariant (max) || TREE_OVERFLOW (max))
+ {
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
}
cmp = compare_values (min, max);
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
}
else
- set_value_range (vr, vr0.type, min, max, NULL);
+ set_value_range (vr, type, min, max, NULL);
}
return;
}
- /* Refuse to operate on varying and symbolic ranges. Also, if the
- operand is neither a pointer nor an integral type, set the
- resulting range to VARYING. TODO, in some cases we may be able
- to derive anti-ranges (like non-zero values). */
- if (vr0.type == VR_VARYING
- || (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0))
- && !POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
- || symbolic_range_p (&vr0))
+ /* Refuse to operate on symbolic ranges, or if neither operand is
+ a pointer or integral type. */
+ if ((!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0))
+ && !POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
+ || (vr0.type != VR_VARYING
+ && symbolic_range_p (&vr0)))
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
determining if it evaluates to NULL [0, 0] or non-NULL (~[0, 0]). */
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (expr)) || POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
{
- if (range_is_nonnull (&vr0) || expr_computes_nonzero (expr))
+ if (range_is_nonnull (&vr0) || tree_expr_nonzero_p (expr))
set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
else if (range_is_null (&vr0))
set_value_range_to_null (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
}
/* Handle unary expressions on integer ranges. */
- if ((code == NOP_EXPR || code == CONVERT_EXPR)
- && (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (vr0.min)) != TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (expr))))
+ if (code == NOP_EXPR || code == CONVERT_EXPR)
{
+ tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (op0);
+ tree outer_type = TREE_TYPE (expr);
+
+ /* If VR0 represents a simple range, then try to convert
+ the min and max values for the range to the same type
+ as OUTER_TYPE. If the results compare equal to VR0's
+ min and max values and the new min is still less than
+ or equal to the new max, then we can safely use the newly
+ computed range for EXPR. This allows us to compute
+ accurate ranges through many casts. */
+ if (vr0.type == VR_RANGE
+ || (vr0.type == VR_VARYING
+ && TYPE_PRECISION (outer_type) > TYPE_PRECISION (inner_type)))
+ {
+ tree new_min, new_max, orig_min, orig_max;
+
+ /* Convert the input operand min/max to OUTER_TYPE. If
+ the input has no range information, then use the min/max
+ for the input's type. */
+ if (vr0.type == VR_RANGE)
+ {
+ orig_min = vr0.min;
+ orig_max = vr0.max;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ orig_min = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (inner_type);
+ orig_max = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (inner_type);
+ }
+
+ new_min = fold_convert (outer_type, orig_min);
+ new_max = fold_convert (outer_type, orig_max);
+
+ /* Verify the new min/max values are gimple values and
+ that they compare equal to the original input's
+ min/max values. */
+ if (is_gimple_val (new_min)
+ && is_gimple_val (new_max)
+ && tree_int_cst_equal (new_min, orig_min)
+ && tree_int_cst_equal (new_max, orig_max)
+ && compare_values (new_min, new_max) <= 0
+ && compare_values (new_min, new_max) >= -1)
+ {
+ set_value_range (vr, VR_RANGE, new_min, new_max, vr->equiv);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
/* When converting types of different sizes, set the result to
VARYING. Things like sign extensions and precision loss may
change the range. For instance, if x_3 is of type 'long long
int' and 'y_5 = (unsigned short) x_3', if x_3 is ~[0, 0], it
is impossible to know at compile time whether y_5 will be
~[0, 0]. */
+ if (TYPE_SIZE (inner_type) != TYPE_SIZE (outer_type)
+ || TYPE_PRECISION (inner_type) != TYPE_PRECISION (outer_type))
+ {
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Conversion of a VR_VARYING value to a wider type can result
+ in a usable range. So wait until after we've handled conversions
+ before dropping the result to VR_VARYING if we had a source
+ operand that is VR_VARYING. */
+ if (vr0.type == VR_VARYING)
+ {
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
}
if (code == NEGATE_EXPR
&& !TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
{
- /* Negating an anti-range doesn't really do anything to it. The
- new range will also not take on the same range of values
- excluded by the original anti-range. */
- if (vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ /* NEGATE_EXPR flips the range around. */
+ min = (vr0.max == TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr)) && !flag_wrapv)
+ ? TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr))
+ : fold_unary_to_constant (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.max);
+
+ max = (vr0.min == TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr)) && !flag_wrapv)
+ ? TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr))
+ : fold_unary_to_constant (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.min);
+
+ }
+ else if (code == NEGATE_EXPR
+ && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
+ {
+ if (!range_includes_zero_p (&vr0))
{
- copy_value_range (vr, &vr0);
+ max = fold_unary_to_constant (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.min);
+ min = fold_unary_to_constant (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.max);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (range_is_null (&vr0))
+ set_value_range_to_null (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ else
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
}
-
- /* NEGATE_EXPR flips the range around. */
- min = (vr0.max == TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
- ? TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr))
- : fold_unary_to_constant (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.max);
-
- max = (vr0.min == TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
- ? TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr))
- : fold_unary_to_constant (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.min);
}
else if (code == ABS_EXPR
&& !TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
{
+ /* -TYPE_MIN_VALUE = TYPE_MIN_VALUE with flag_wrapv so we can't get a
+ useful range. */
+ if (flag_wrapv
+ && ((vr0.type == VR_RANGE
+ && vr0.min == TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
+ || (vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE
+ && vr0.min != TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr))
+ && !range_includes_zero_p (&vr0))))
+ {
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* ABS_EXPR may flip the range around, if the original range
included negative values. */
min = (vr0.min == TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
max = fold_unary_to_constant (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.max);
- /* If the range was reversed, swap MIN and MAX. */
- if (compare_values (min, max) == 1)
+ cmp = compare_values (min, max);
+
+ /* If a VR_ANTI_RANGEs contains zero, then we have
+ ~[-INF, min(MIN, MAX)]. */
+ if (vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ {
+ if (range_includes_zero_p (&vr0))
+ {
+ tree type_min_value = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr));
+
+ /* Take the lower of the two values. */
+ if (cmp != 1)
+ max = min;
+
+ /* Create ~[-INF, min (abs(MIN), abs(MAX))]
+ or ~[-INF + 1, min (abs(MIN), abs(MAX))] when
+ flag_wrapv is set and the original anti-range doesn't include
+ TYPE_MIN_VALUE, remember -TYPE_MIN_VALUE = TYPE_MIN_VALUE. */
+ min = (flag_wrapv && vr0.min != type_min_value
+ ? int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR,
+ type_min_value,
+ integer_one_node, 0)
+ : type_min_value);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* All else has failed, so create the range [0, INF], even for
+ flag_wrapv since TYPE_MIN_VALUE is in the original
+ anti-range. */
+ vr0.type = VR_RANGE;
+ min = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 0);
+ max = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* If the range contains zero then we know that the minimum value in the
+ range will be zero. */
+ else if (range_includes_zero_p (&vr0))
+ {
+ if (cmp == 1)
+ max = min;
+ min = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 0);
+ }
+ else
{
- tree t = min;
- min = max;
- max = t;
+ /* If the range was reversed, swap MIN and MAX. */
+ if (cmp == 1)
+ {
+ tree t = min;
+ min = max;
+ max = t;
+ }
}
}
else
extract_range_from_unary_expr (vr, expr);
else if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_comparison)
extract_range_from_comparison (vr, expr);
- else if (vrp_expr_computes_nonzero (expr))
- set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
else if (is_gimple_min_invariant (expr))
set_value_range (vr, VR_RANGE, expr, expr, NULL);
else
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
-}
+ /* If we got a varying range from the tests above, try a final
+ time to derive a nonnegative or nonzero range. This time
+ relying primarily on generic routines in fold in conjunction
+ with range data. */
+ if (vr->type == VR_VARYING)
+ {
+ if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (expr))
+ && vrp_expr_computes_nonnegative (expr))
+ set_value_range_to_nonnegative (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ else if (vrp_expr_computes_nonzero (expr))
+ set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ }
+}
-/* Given a range VR, a loop L and a variable VAR, determine whether it
+/* Given a range VR, a LOOP and a variable VAR, determine whether it
would be profitable to adjust VR using scalar evolution information
for VAR. If so, update VR with the new limits. */
static void
-adjust_range_with_scev (value_range_t *vr, struct loop *l, tree var)
+adjust_range_with_scev (value_range_t *vr, struct loop *loop, tree stmt,
+ tree var)
{
tree init, step, chrec;
- bool init_is_max;
+ bool init_is_max, unknown_max;
/* TODO. Don't adjust anti-ranges. An anti-range may provide
better opportunities than a regular range, but I'm not sure. */
if (vr->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
return;
- chrec = analyze_scalar_evolution (l, var);
+ chrec = instantiate_parameters (loop, analyze_scalar_evolution (loop, var));
if (TREE_CODE (chrec) != POLYNOMIAL_CHREC)
return;
- init = CHREC_LEFT (chrec);
- step = CHREC_RIGHT (chrec);
+ init = initial_condition_in_loop_num (chrec, loop->num);
+ step = evolution_part_in_loop_num (chrec, loop->num);
/* If STEP is symbolic, we can't know whether INIT will be the
minimum or maximum value in the range. */
- if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (step))
+ if (step == NULL_TREE
+ || !is_gimple_min_invariant (step))
return;
- /* FIXME. When dealing with unsigned types,
- analyze_scalar_evolution sets STEP to very large unsigned values
- when the evolution goes backwards. This confuses this analysis
- because we think that INIT is the smallest value that the range
- can take, instead of the largest. Ignore these chrecs for now. */
- if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (step)) && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (step)))
+ /* Do not adjust ranges when chrec may wrap. */
+ if (scev_probably_wraps_p (chrec_type (chrec), init, step, stmt,
+ current_loops->parray[CHREC_VARIABLE (chrec)],
+ &init_is_max, &unknown_max)
+ || unknown_max)
return;
- /* Do not adjust ranges when using wrapping arithmetic. */
- if (flag_wrapv)
- return;
-
- /* If STEP is negative, then INIT is the maximum value the range
- will take. Otherwise, INIT is the minimum value. */
- init_is_max = (tree_int_cst_sgn (step) < 0);
-
if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (init))
&& (vr->type == VR_VARYING || vr->type == VR_UNDEFINED))
{
/* For VARYING or UNDEFINED ranges, just about anything we get
from scalar evolutions should be better. */
+ tree min = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (init));
+ tree max = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (init));
+
if (init_is_max)
- set_value_range (vr, VR_RANGE, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (init)),
- init, vr->equiv);
+ max = init;
else
- set_value_range (vr, VR_RANGE, init, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (init)),
- vr->equiv);
+ min = init;
+
+ /* If we would create an invalid range, then just assume we
+ know absolutely nothing. This may be over-conservative,
+ but it's clearly safe. */
+ if (compare_values (min, max) == 1)
+ return;
+
+ set_value_range (vr, VR_RANGE, min, max, vr->equiv);
}
else if (vr->type == VR_RANGE)
{
else if (cmp_min != -2 && cmp_max != -2)
return boolean_false_node;
}
+ /* If [V0_MIN, V1_MAX] < [V1_MIN, V1_MAX] then V0 != V1. */
+ else if (compare_values (vr0->min, vr1->max) == 1
+ || compare_values (vr1->min, vr0->max) == 1)
+ return boolean_false_node;
return NULL_TREE;
}
|| comp == LE_EXPR)
return NULL_TREE;
- /* ~[VAL, VAL] == VAL is always false. */
- if (compare_values (vr->min, val) == 0
- && compare_values (vr->max, val) == 0)
+ /* ~[VAL_1, VAL_2] OP VAL is known if VAL_1 <= VAL <= VAL_2. */
+ if (value_inside_range (val, vr) == 1)
return (comp == NE_EXPR) ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node;
return NULL_TREE;
if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (cond))
{
- tree a = build (ASSERT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), v, cond);
- assertion = build (MODIFY_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), n, a);
+ tree a = build2 (ASSERT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), v, cond);
+ assertion = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), n, a);
}
else if (TREE_CODE (cond) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR)
{
/* Given !V, build the assignment N = false. */
tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
gcc_assert (op0 == v);
- assertion = build (MODIFY_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), n, boolean_false_node);
+ assertion = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), n, boolean_false_node);
}
else if (TREE_CODE (cond) == SSA_NAME)
{
/* Given V, build the assignment N = true. */
gcc_assert (v == cond);
- assertion = build (MODIFY_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), n, boolean_true_node);
+ assertion = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (v), n, boolean_true_node);
}
else
gcc_unreachable ();
if (tree_could_throw_p (stmt))
return false;
- if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op)))
+ /* If STMT is the last statement of a basic block with no
+ successors, there is no point inferring anything about any of its
+ operands. We would not be able to find a proper insertion point
+ for the assertion, anyway. */
+ if (stmt_ends_bb_p (stmt) && EDGE_COUNT (bb_for_stmt (stmt)->succs) == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ /* We can only assume that a pointer dereference will yield
+ non-NULL if -fdelete-null-pointer-checks is enabled. */
+ if (flag_delete_null_pointer_checks && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op)))
{
bool is_store;
unsigned num_uses, num_derefs;
count_uses_and_derefs (op, stmt, &num_uses, &num_derefs, &is_store);
- if (num_derefs > 0 && flag_delete_null_pointer_checks)
+ if (num_derefs > 0)
{
- /* We can only assume that a pointer dereference will yield
- non-NULL if -fdelete-null-pointer-checks is enabled. */
*val_p = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (op), 0);
*comp_code_p = NE_EXPR;
return true;
/* If we didn't find an assertion already registered for
NAME COMP_CODE VAL, add a new one at the end of the list of
assertions associated with NAME. */
- n = xmalloc (sizeof (*n));
+ n = XNEW (struct assert_locus_d);
n->bb = dest_bb;
n->e = e;
n->si = si;
/* Try to register an edge assertion for SSA name NAME on edge E for
- the conditional jump pointed by SI. Return true if an assertion
+ the conditional jump pointed to by SI. Return true if an assertion
for NAME could be registered. */
static bool
/* If the predicate is of the form VAL COMP NAME, flip
COMP around because we need to register NAME as the
first operand in the predicate. */
- comp_code = opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
+ comp_code = swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
val = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
}
else
need to invert the sign comparison. */
if (is_else_edge)
comp_code = invert_tree_comparison (comp_code, 0);
+
+ /* Do not register always-false predicates. FIXME, this
+ works around a limitation in fold() when dealing with
+ enumerations. Given 'enum { N1, N2 } x;', fold will not
+ fold 'if (x > N2)' to 'if (0)'. */
+ if ((comp_code == GT_EXPR || comp_code == LT_EXPR)
+ && (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val))
+ || SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val))))
+ {
+ tree min = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (val));
+ tree max = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (val));
+
+ if (comp_code == GT_EXPR && compare_values (val, max) == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ if (comp_code == LT_EXPR && compare_values (val, min) == 0)
+ return false;
+ }
}
}
else
/* Remove the COND_EXPR operands from the FOUND_IN_SUBGRAPH bitmap.
Otherwise, when we finish traversing each of the sub-graphs, we
won't know whether the variables were found in the sub-graphs or
- if they had been found in a block upstream from BB. */
+ if they had been found in a block upstream from BB.
+
+ This is actually a bad idea is some cases, particularly jump
+ threading. Consider a CFG like the following:
+
+ 0
+ /|
+ 1 |
+ \|
+ 2
+ / \
+ 3 4
+
+ Assume that one or more operands in the conditional at the
+ end of block 0 are used in a conditional in block 2, but not
+ anywhere in block 1. In this case we will not insert any
+ assert statements in block 1, which may cause us to miss
+ opportunities to optimize, particularly for jump threading. */
FOR_EACH_SSA_TREE_OPERAND (op, last, iter, SSA_OP_USE)
RESET_BIT (found_in_subgraph, SSA_NAME_VERSION (op));
operands it was looking for was present in the sub-graph. */
SET_BIT (found_in_subgraph, SSA_NAME_VERSION (op));
- /* If OP is used only once, namely in this STMT, don't
- bother creating an ASSERT_EXPR for it. Such an
- ASSERT_EXPR would do nothing but increase compile time.
- Experiments show that with this simple check, we can save
- more than 20% of ASSERT_EXPRs. */
- if (has_single_use (op))
- continue;
-
/* If OP is used in such a way that we can infer a value
range for it, and we don't find a previous assertion for
it, create a new assertion location node for OP. */
if (infer_value_range (stmt, op, &comp_code, &value))
{
- register_new_assert_for (op, comp_code, value, bb, NULL, si);
- need_assert = true;
+ /* If we are able to infer a nonzero value range for OP,
+ then walk backwards through the use-def chain to see if OP
+ was set via a typecast.
+
+ If so, then we can also infer a nonzero value range
+ for the operand of the NOP_EXPR. */
+ if (comp_code == NE_EXPR && integer_zerop (value))
+ {
+ tree t = op;
+ tree def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (t);
+
+ while (TREE_CODE (def_stmt) == MODIFY_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (def_stmt, 1)) == NOP_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (def_stmt, 1), 0)) == SSA_NAME
+ && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (def_stmt, 1), 0))))
+ {
+ t = TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (def_stmt, 1), 0);
+ def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (t);
+
+ /* Note we want to register the assert for the
+ operand of the NOP_EXPR after SI, not after the
+ conversion. */
+ if (! has_single_use (t))
+ {
+ register_new_assert_for (t, comp_code, value,
+ bb, NULL, si);
+ need_assert = true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* If OP is used only once, namely in this STMT, don't
+ bother creating an ASSERT_EXPR for it. Such an
+ ASSERT_EXPR would do nothing but increase compile time. */
+ if (!has_single_use (op))
+ {
+ register_new_assert_for (op, comp_code, value, bb, NULL, si);
+ need_assert = true;
+ }
}
}
edge_iterator ei;
edge e;
- cond = build (loc->comp_code, boolean_type_node, name, loc->val);
+ cond = build2 (loc->comp_code, boolean_type_node, name, loc->val);
assert_expr = build_assert_expr_for (cond, name);
if (loc->e)
sbitmap_zero (blocks_visited);
need_assert_for = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
- asserts_for = xmalloc (num_ssa_names * sizeof (assert_locus_t));
+ asserts_for = XNEWVEC (assert_locus_t, num_ssa_names);
memset (asserts_for, 0, num_ssa_names * sizeof (assert_locus_t));
calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
}
-/* Convert range assertion expressions into the implied copies.
+/* Convert range assertion expressions into the implied copies and
+ copy propagate away the copies. Doing the trivial copy propagation
+ here avoids the need to run the full copy propagation pass after
+ VRP.
FIXME, this will eventually lead to copy propagation removing the
names that had useful range information attached to them. For
things like jump threading.
The problem with keeping ASSERT_EXPRs around is that passes after
- VRP need to handle them appropriately. */
+ VRP need to handle them appropriately.
+
+ Another approach would be to make the range information a first
+ class property of the SSA_NAME so that it can be queried from
+ any pass. This is made somewhat more complex by the need for
+ multiple ranges to be associated with one SSA_NAME. */
static void
remove_range_assertions (void)
basic_block bb;
block_stmt_iterator si;
+ /* Note that the BSI iterator bump happens at the bottom of the
+ loop and no bump is necessary if we're removing the statement
+ referenced by the current BSI. */
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
- for (si = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (si); bsi_next (&si))
+ for (si = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (si);)
{
tree stmt = bsi_stmt (si);
+ tree use_stmt;
if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == MODIFY_EXPR
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1)) == ASSERT_EXPR)
{
- tree rhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1);
+ tree rhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1), var;
tree cond = fold (ASSERT_EXPR_COND (rhs));
+ use_operand_p use_p;
+ imm_use_iterator iter;
+
gcc_assert (cond != boolean_false_node);
- TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1) = ASSERT_EXPR_VAR (rhs);
- update_stmt (stmt);
+
+ /* Propagate the RHS into every use of the LHS. */
+ var = ASSERT_EXPR_VAR (rhs);
+ FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, iter, TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 0))
+ FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT (use_p, iter)
+ {
+ SET_USE (use_p, var);
+ gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (var) == SSA_NAME);
+ }
+
+ /* And finally, remove the copy, it is not needed. */
+ bsi_remove (&si, true);
}
+ else
+ bsi_next (&si);
}
+
+ sbitmap_free (blocks_visited);
}
else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == MODIFY_EXPR)
{
tree lhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 0);
+ tree rhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1);
+ /* In general, assignments with virtual operands are not useful
+ for deriving ranges, with the obvious exception of calls to
+ builtin functions. */
if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME
&& (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
|| POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs)))
- && ZERO_SSA_OPERANDS (stmt, SSA_OP_ALL_VIRTUALS))
+ && ((TREE_CODE (rhs) == CALL_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0)) == ADDR_EXPR
+ && DECL_P (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0), 0))
+ && DECL_IS_BUILTIN (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0), 0)))
+ || ZERO_SSA_OPERANDS (stmt, SSA_OP_ALL_VIRTUALS)))
return true;
}
else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == COND_EXPR || TREE_CODE (stmt) == SWITCH_EXPR)
}
-/* Initialize local data structures for VRP. Return true if VRP
- is worth running (i.e. if we found any statements that could
- benefit from range information). */
+/* Initialize local data structures for VRP. */
static void
vrp_initialize (void)
{
basic_block bb;
- vr_value = xmalloc (num_ssa_names * sizeof (value_range_t *));
+ vr_value = XNEWVEC (value_range_t *, num_ssa_names);
memset (vr_value, 0, num_ssa_names * sizeof (value_range_t *));
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
/* We only keep track of ranges in integral and pointer types. */
if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME
- && (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
+ && ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
+ /* It is valid to have NULL MIN/MAX values on a type. See
+ build_range_type. */
+ && TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
+ && TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (lhs)))
|| POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs))))
{
struct loop *l;
/* If STMT is inside a loop, we may be able to know something
else about the range of LHS by examining scalar evolution
information. */
- if (cfg_loops && (l = loop_containing_stmt (stmt)))
- adjust_range_with_scev (&new_vr, l, lhs);
+ if (current_loops && (l = loop_containing_stmt (stmt)))
+ adjust_range_with_scev (&new_vr, l, stmt, lhs);
if (update_value_range (lhs, &new_vr))
{
/* Given a comparison code COMP and names N1 and N2, compare all the
- ranges equivalent to N1 against all the ranges equivalente to N2
+ ranges equivalent to N1 against all the ranges equivalent to N2
to determine the value of N1 COMP N2. Return the same value
returned by compare_ranges. */
return compare_name_with_value (TREE_CODE (cond), op0, op1);
else if (TREE_CODE (op1) == SSA_NAME)
return compare_name_with_value (
- opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), op1, op0);
+ swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), op1, op0);
}
else
{
return compare_range_with_value (TREE_CODE (cond), vr0, op1);
else if (vr0 == NULL && vr1)
return compare_range_with_value (
- opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), vr1, op0);
+ swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), vr1, op0);
}
}
}
ann = stmt_ann (stmt);
- if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == MODIFY_EXPR
- && ZERO_SSA_OPERANDS (stmt, SSA_OP_ALL_VIRTUALS))
- return vrp_visit_assignment (stmt, output_p);
+ if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == MODIFY_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree rhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1);
+
+ /* In general, assignments with virtual operands are not useful
+ for deriving ranges, with the obvious exception of calls to
+ builtin functions. */
+ if ((TREE_CODE (rhs) == CALL_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0)) == ADDR_EXPR
+ && DECL_P (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0), 0))
+ && DECL_IS_BUILTIN (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0), 0)))
+ || ZERO_SSA_OPERANDS (stmt, SSA_OP_ALL_VIRTUALS))
+ return vrp_visit_assignment (stmt, output_p);
+ }
else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == COND_EXPR || TREE_CODE (stmt) == SWITCH_EXPR)
return vrp_visit_cond_stmt (stmt, taken_edge_p);
return;
}
- /* The resulting set of equivalencies is the intersection of
+ /* The resulting set of equivalences is the intersection of
the two sets. */
if (vr0->equiv && vr1->equiv && vr0->equiv != vr1->equiv)
bitmap_and_into (vr0->equiv, vr1->equiv);
+ else if (vr0->equiv && !vr1->equiv)
+ bitmap_clear (vr0->equiv);
set_value_range (vr0, vr0->type, min, max, vr0->equiv);
}
&& compare_values (vr0->max, vr1->max) == 0
&& compare_values (vr0->min, vr0->max) == 0)
{
- /* The resulting set of equivalencies is the intersection of
+ /* The resulting set of equivalences is the intersection of
the two sets. */
if (vr0->equiv && vr1->equiv && vr0->equiv != vr1->equiv)
bitmap_and_into (vr0->equiv, vr1->equiv);
+ else if (vr0->equiv && !vr1->equiv)
+ bitmap_clear (vr0->equiv);
}
else
goto no_meet;
&& !symbolic_range_p (vr1)
&& !value_ranges_intersect_p (vr0, vr1))
{
+ /* Copy most of VR1 into VR0. Don't copy VR1's equivalence
+ set. We need to compute the intersection of the two
+ equivalence sets. */
if (vr1->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
- copy_value_range (vr0, vr1);
+ set_value_range (vr0, vr1->type, vr1->min, vr1->max, vr0->equiv);
+
+ /* The resulting set of equivalences is the intersection of
+ the two sets. */
+ if (vr0->equiv && vr1->equiv && vr0->equiv != vr1->equiv)
+ bitmap_and_into (vr0->equiv, vr1->equiv);
+ else if (vr0->equiv && !vr1->equiv)
+ bitmap_clear (vr0->equiv);
}
else
goto no_meet;
no_meet:
/* The two range VR0 and VR1 do not meet. Before giving up and
setting the result to VARYING, see if we can at least derive a
- useful anti-range. */
+ useful anti-range. FIXME, all this nonsense about distinguishing
+ anti-ranges from ranges is necessary because of the odd
+ semantics of range_includes_zero_p and friends. */
if (!symbolic_range_p (vr0)
- && !range_includes_zero_p (vr0)
+ && ((vr0->type == VR_RANGE && !range_includes_zero_p (vr0))
+ || (vr0->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE && range_includes_zero_p (vr0)))
&& !symbolic_range_p (vr1)
- && !range_includes_zero_p (vr1))
- set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr0, TREE_TYPE (vr0->min));
+ && ((vr1->type == VR_RANGE && !range_includes_zero_p (vr1))
+ || (vr1->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE && range_includes_zero_p (vr1))))
+ {
+ set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr0, TREE_TYPE (vr0->min));
+
+ /* Since this meet operation did not result from the meeting of
+ two equivalent names, VR0 cannot have any equivalences. */
+ if (vr0->equiv)
+ bitmap_clear (vr0->equiv);
+ }
else
set_value_range_to_varying (vr0);
}
/* To prevent infinite iterations in the algorithm, derive ranges
when the new value is slightly bigger or smaller than the
previous one. */
- if (lhs_vr->type == VR_RANGE)
+ if (lhs_vr->type == VR_RANGE && vr_result.type == VR_RANGE)
{
if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs)))
{
return SSA_PROP_VARYING;
}
+/* Simplify a division or modulo operator to a right shift or
+ bitwise and if the first operand is unsigned or is greater
+ than zero and the second operand is an exact power of two. */
+
+static void
+simplify_div_or_mod_using_ranges (tree stmt, tree rhs, enum tree_code rhs_code)
+{
+ tree val = NULL;
+ tree op = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+ value_range_t *vr = get_value_range (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0));
+
+ if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (op)))
+ {
+ val = integer_one_node;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ val = compare_range_with_value (GT_EXPR, vr, integer_zero_node);
+ }
+
+ if (val && integer_onep (val))
+ {
+ tree t;
+ tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+ tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1);
+
+ if (rhs_code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR)
+ {
+ t = build_int_cst (NULL_TREE, tree_log2 (op1));
+ t = build2 (RSHIFT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), op0, t);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ t = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (op1), 1);
+ t = int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, op1, t, 0);
+ t = fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (op0), t);
+ t = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), op0, t);
+ }
+
+ TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1) = t;
+ update_stmt (stmt);
+ }
+}
+
+/* If the operand to an ABS_EXPR is >= 0, then eliminate the
+ ABS_EXPR. If the operand is <= 0, then simplify the
+ ABS_EXPR into a NEGATE_EXPR. */
+
+static void
+simplify_abs_using_ranges (tree stmt, tree rhs)
+{
+ tree val = NULL;
+ tree op = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+ tree type = TREE_TYPE (op);
+ value_range_t *vr = get_value_range (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0));
+
+ if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
+ {
+ val = integer_zero_node;
+ }
+ else if (vr)
+ {
+ val = compare_range_with_value (LE_EXPR, vr, integer_zero_node);
+ if (!val)
+ {
+ val = compare_range_with_value (GE_EXPR, vr, integer_zero_node);
+
+ if (val)
+ {
+ if (integer_zerop (val))
+ val = integer_one_node;
+ else if (integer_onep (val))
+ val = integer_zero_node;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (val
+ && (integer_onep (val) || integer_zerop (val)))
+ {
+ tree t;
+
+ if (integer_onep (val))
+ t = build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op), op);
+ else
+ t = op;
+
+ TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1) = t;
+ update_stmt (stmt);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/* We are comparing trees OP0 and OP1 using COND_CODE. OP0 has
+ a known value range VR.
+
+ If there is one and only one value which will satisfy the
+ conditional, then return that value. Else return NULL. */
+
+static tree
+test_for_singularity (enum tree_code cond_code, tree op0,
+ tree op1, value_range_t *vr)
+{
+ tree min = NULL;
+ tree max = NULL;
+
+ /* Extract minimum/maximum values which satisfy the
+ the conditional as it was written. */
+ if (cond_code == LE_EXPR || cond_code == LT_EXPR)
+ {
+ min = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
+
+ max = op1;
+ if (cond_code == LT_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree one = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (op0), 1);
+ max = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), max, one);
+ }
+ }
+ else if (cond_code == GE_EXPR || cond_code == GT_EXPR)
+ {
+ max = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
+
+ min = op1;
+ if (cond_code == GT_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree one = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (op0), 1);
+ min = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), min, one);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Now refine the minimum and maximum values using any
+ value range information we have for op0. */
+ if (min && max)
+ {
+ if (compare_values (vr->min, min) == -1)
+ min = min;
+ else
+ min = vr->min;
+ if (compare_values (vr->max, max) == 1)
+ max = max;
+ else
+ max = vr->max;
+
+ /* If the new min/max values have converged to a single value,
+ then there is only one value which can satisfy the condition,
+ return that value. */
+ if (operand_equal_p (min, max, 0) && is_gimple_min_invariant (min))
+ return min;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Simplify a conditional using a relational operator to an equality
+ test if the range information indicates only one value can satisfy
+ the original conditional. */
+
+static void
+simplify_cond_using_ranges (tree stmt)
+{
+ tree cond = COND_EXPR_COND (stmt);
+ tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
+ tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1);
+ enum tree_code cond_code = TREE_CODE (cond);
+
+ if (cond_code != NE_EXPR
+ && cond_code != EQ_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (op0) == SSA_NAME
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0))
+ && is_gimple_min_invariant (op1))
+ {
+ value_range_t *vr = get_value_range (op0);
+
+ /* If we have range information for OP0, then we might be
+ able to simplify this conditional. */
+ if (vr->type == VR_RANGE)
+ {
+ tree new = test_for_singularity (cond_code, op0, op1, vr);
+
+ if (new)
+ {
+ if (dump_file)
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Simplified relational ");
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, cond, 0);
+ fprintf (dump_file, " into ");
+ }
+
+ COND_EXPR_COND (stmt)
+ = build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0, new);
+ update_stmt (stmt);
+
+ if (dump_file)
+ {
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, COND_EXPR_COND (stmt), 0);
+ fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
+ }
+ return;
+
+ }
+
+ /* Try again after inverting the condition. We only deal
+ with integral types here, so no need to worry about
+ issues with inverting FP comparisons. */
+ cond_code = invert_tree_comparison (cond_code, false);
+ new = test_for_singularity (cond_code, op0, op1, vr);
+
+ if (new)
+ {
+ if (dump_file)
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Simplified relational ");
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, cond, 0);
+ fprintf (dump_file, " into ");
+ }
+
+ COND_EXPR_COND (stmt)
+ = build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0, new);
+ update_stmt (stmt);
+
+ if (dump_file)
+ {
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, COND_EXPR_COND (stmt), 0);
+ fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
+ }
+ return;
+
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/* Simplify STMT using ranges if possible. */
+
+void
+simplify_stmt_using_ranges (tree stmt)
+{
+ if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == MODIFY_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree rhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1);
+ enum tree_code rhs_code = TREE_CODE (rhs);
+
+ /* Transform TRUNC_DIV_EXPR and TRUNC_MOD_EXPR into RSHIFT_EXPR
+ and BIT_AND_EXPR respectively if the first operand is greater
+ than zero and the second operand is an exact power of two. */
+ if ((rhs_code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR || rhs_code == TRUNC_MOD_EXPR)
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0)))
+ && integer_pow2p (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1)))
+ simplify_div_or_mod_using_ranges (stmt, rhs, rhs_code);
+
+ /* Transform ABS (X) into X or -X as appropriate. */
+ if (rhs_code == ABS_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0)) == SSA_NAME
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0))))
+ simplify_abs_using_ranges (stmt, rhs);
+ }
+ else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == COND_EXPR
+ && COMPARISON_CLASS_P (COND_EXPR_COND (stmt)))
+ {
+ simplify_cond_using_ranges (stmt);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Stack of dest,src equivalency pairs that need to be restored after
+ each attempt to thread a block's incoming edge to an outgoing edge.
+
+ A NULL entry is used to mark the end of pairs which need to be
+ restored. */
+static VEC(tree,heap) *stack;
+
+/* A trivial wrapper so that we can present the generic jump
+ threading code with a simple API for simplifying statements. */
+static tree
+simplify_stmt_for_jump_threading (tree stmt)
+{
+ /* We only use VRP information to simplify conditionals. This is
+ overly conservative, but it's unclear if doing more would be
+ worth the compile time cost. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (stmt) != COND_EXPR)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return vrp_evaluate_conditional (COND_EXPR_COND (stmt), true);
+}
+
+/* Blocks which have more than one predecessor and more than
+ one successor present jump threading opportunities. ie,
+ when the block is reached from a specific predecessor, we
+ may be able to determine which of the outgoing edges will
+ be traversed. When this optimization applies, we are able
+ to avoid conditionals at runtime and we may expose secondary
+ optimization opportunities.
+
+ This routine is effectively a driver for the generic jump
+ threading code. It basically just presents the generic code
+ with edges that may be suitable for jump threading.
+
+ Unlike DOM, we do not iterate VRP if jump threading was successful.
+ While iterating may expose new opportunities for VRP, it is expected
+ those opportunities would be very limited and the compile time cost
+ to expose those opportunities would be significant.
+
+ As jump threading opportunities are discovered, they are registered
+ for later realization. */
+
+static void
+identify_jump_threads (void)
+{
+ basic_block bb;
+ tree dummy;
+
+ /* Ugh. When substituting values earlier in this pass we can
+ wipe the dominance information. So rebuild the dominator
+ information as we need it within the jump threading code. */
+ calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+
+ /* We do not allow VRP information to be used for jump threading
+ across a back edge in the CFG. Otherwise it becomes too
+ difficult to avoid eliminating loop exit tests. Of course
+ EDGE_DFS_BACK is not accurate at this time so we have to
+ recompute it. */
+ mark_dfs_back_edges ();
+
+ /* Allocate our unwinder stack to unwind any temporary equivalences
+ that might be recorded. */
+ stack = VEC_alloc (tree, heap, 20);
+
+ /* To avoid lots of silly node creation, we create a single
+ conditional and just modify it in-place when attempting to
+ thread jumps. */
+ dummy = build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, NULL, NULL);
+ dummy = build3 (COND_EXPR, void_type_node, dummy, NULL, NULL);
+
+ /* Walk through all the blocks finding those which present a
+ potential jump threading opportunity. We could set this up
+ as a dominator walker and record data during the walk, but
+ I doubt it's worth the effort for the classes of jump
+ threading opportunities we are trying to identify at this
+ point in compilation. */
+ FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
+ {
+ tree last, cond;
+
+ /* If the generic jump threading code does not find this block
+ interesting, then there is nothing to do. */
+ if (! potentially_threadable_block (bb))
+ continue;
+
+ /* We only care about blocks ending in a COND_EXPR. While there
+ may be some value in handling SWITCH_EXPR here, I doubt it's
+ terribly important. */
+ last = bsi_stmt (bsi_last (bb));
+ if (TREE_CODE (last) != COND_EXPR)
+ continue;
+
+ /* We're basically looking for any kind of conditional with
+ integral type arguments. */
+ cond = COND_EXPR_COND (last);
+ if ((TREE_CODE (cond) == SSA_NAME
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (cond)))
+ || (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (cond)
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0)) == SSA_NAME
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0)))
+ && (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)) == SSA_NAME
+ || is_gimple_min_invariant (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))))
+ {
+ edge_iterator ei;
+ edge e;
+
+ /* We've got a block with multiple predecessors and multiple
+ successors which also ends in a suitable conditional. For
+ each predecessor, see if we can thread it to a specific
+ successor. */
+ FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
+ {
+ /* Do not thread across back edges or abnormal edges
+ in the CFG. */
+ if (e->flags & (EDGE_DFS_BACK | EDGE_COMPLEX))
+ continue;
+
+ thread_across_edge (dummy, e, true,
+ &stack,
+ simplify_stmt_for_jump_threading);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* We do not actually update the CFG or SSA graphs at this point as
+ ASSERT_EXPRs are still in the IL and cfg cleanup code does not yet
+ handle ASSERT_EXPRs gracefully. */
+}
+
+/* We identified all the jump threading opportunities earlier, but could
+ not transform the CFG at that time. This routine transforms the
+ CFG and arranges for the dominator tree to be rebuilt if necessary.
+
+ Note the SSA graph update will occur during the normal TODO
+ processing by the pass manager. */
+static void
+finalize_jump_threads (void)
+{
+ bool cfg_altered = false;
+ cfg_altered = thread_through_all_blocks ();
+
+ /* If we threaded jumps, then we need to recompute the dominance
+ information, to safely do that we must clean up the CFG first. */
+ if (cfg_altered)
+ {
+ free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+ cleanup_tree_cfg ();
+ calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+ }
+ VEC_free (tree, heap, stack);
+}
+
/* Traverse all the blocks folding conditionals with known ranges. */
/* We may have ended with ranges that have exactly one value. Those
values can be substituted as any other copy/const propagated
value using substitute_and_fold. */
- single_val_range = xmalloc (num_ssa_names * sizeof (*single_val_range));
+ single_val_range = XNEWVEC (prop_value_t, num_ssa_names);
memset (single_val_range, 0, num_ssa_names * sizeof (*single_val_range));
do_value_subst_p = false;
substitute_and_fold (single_val_range, true);
+ /* We must identify jump threading opportunities before we release
+ the datastructures built by VRP. */
+ identify_jump_threads ();
+
/* Free allocated memory. */
for (i = 0; i < num_ssa_names; i++)
if (vr_value[i])
free (single_val_range);
free (vr_value);
+
+ /* So that we can distinguish between VRP data being available
+ and not available. */
+ vr_value = NULL;
}
code we can also determine that p_5 cannot be NULL and, if q_2 had
a non-varying range, p_5's range should also be compatible with it.
- These equivalencies are created by two expressions: ASSERT_EXPR and
+ These equivalences are created by two expressions: ASSERT_EXPR and
copy operations. Since p_5 is an assertion on p_4, and p_4 was the
result of another assertion, then we can use the fact that p_5 and
p_4 are equivalent when evaluating p_5's range.
- Together with value ranges, we also propagate these equivalencies
+ Together with value ranges, we also propagate these equivalences
between names so that we can take advantage of information from
multiple ranges when doing final replacement. Note that this
equivalency relation is transitive but not symmetric.
DON'T KNOW. In the future, it may be worthwhile to propagate
probabilities to aid branch prediction. */
-static void
+static unsigned int
execute_vrp (void)
{
insert_range_assertions ();
- cfg_loops = loop_optimizer_init (NULL);
- if (cfg_loops)
- scev_initialize (cfg_loops);
+ current_loops = loop_optimizer_init (LOOPS_NORMAL);
+ if (current_loops)
+ scev_initialize (current_loops);
vrp_initialize ();
ssa_propagate (vrp_visit_stmt, vrp_visit_phi_node);
vrp_finalize ();
- if (cfg_loops)
+ if (current_loops)
{
scev_finalize ();
- loop_optimizer_finalize (cfg_loops, NULL);
+ loop_optimizer_finalize (current_loops);
current_loops = NULL;
}
+ /* ASSERT_EXPRs must be removed before finalizing jump threads
+ as finalizing jump threads calls the CFG cleanup code which
+ does not properly handle ASSERT_EXPRs. */
remove_range_assertions ();
+
+ /* If we exposed any new variables, go ahead and put them into
+ SSA form now, before we handle jump threading. This simplifies
+ interactions between rewriting of _DECL nodes into SSA form
+ and rewriting SSA_NAME nodes into SSA form after block
+ duplication and CFG manipulation. */
+ update_ssa (TODO_update_ssa);
+
+ finalize_jump_threads ();
+ return 0;
}
static bool
TV_TREE_VRP, /* tv_id */
PROP_ssa | PROP_alias, /* properties_required */
0, /* properties_provided */
- 0, /* properties_destroyed */
+ PROP_smt_usage, /* properties_destroyed */
0, /* todo_flags_start */
TODO_cleanup_cfg
| TODO_ggc_collect
| TODO_verify_ssa
| TODO_dump_func
- | TODO_update_ssa, /* todo_flags_finish */
+ | TODO_update_ssa
+ | TODO_update_smt_usage, /* todo_flags_finish */
0 /* letter */
};
OSDN Git Service
