You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with GCC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to
-the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
-Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
+the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
+Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */
#include "config.h"
#include "system.h"
of values that SSA name N_I may take. */
static value_range_t **vr_value;
-/* Given a comparison code, return its opposite. Note that this is *not*
- the same as inverting its truth value (invert_tree_comparison). Here we
- just want to literally flip the comparison around.
-
- So, '<' gets '>', '<=' gets '>='. Both '==' and '!=' are returned
- unchanged. */
-
-static enum tree_code
-opposite_comparison (enum tree_code code)
-{
- switch (code)
- {
- case EQ_EXPR:
- case NE_EXPR:
- case ORDERED_EXPR:
- case UNORDERED_EXPR:
- case LTGT_EXPR:
- case UNEQ_EXPR:
- return code;
- case GT_EXPR:
- return LT_EXPR;
- case GE_EXPR:
- return LE_EXPR;
- case LT_EXPR:
- return GT_EXPR;
- case LE_EXPR:
- return GE_EXPR;
- case UNGT_EXPR:
- return UNLT_EXPR;
- case UNGE_EXPR:
- return UNLE_EXPR;
- case UNLT_EXPR:
- return UNGT_EXPR;
- case UNLE_EXPR:
- return UNGE_EXPR;
- default:
- gcc_unreachable ();
- }
-}
-
/* Return true if EXPR computes a non-zero value. */
to flip around the comparison code to create the proper range
for VAR. */
limit = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
- cond_code = opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
+ cond_code = swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
}
type = TREE_TYPE (limit);
if (cond_code == LT_EXPR)
{
tree one = build_int_cst (type, 1);
- max = fold (build (MINUS_EXPR, type, max, one));
+ max = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type, max, one);
}
set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
if (cond_code == GT_EXPR)
{
tree one = build_int_cst (type, 1);
- min = fold (build (PLUS_EXPR, type, min, one));
+ min = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, min, one);
}
set_value_range (vr_p, VR_RANGE, min, max, vr_p->equiv);
}
+/* Wrapper around int_const_binop. If the operation overflows and we
+ are not using wrapping arithmetic, then adjust the result to be
+ -INF or +INF depending on CODE, VAL1 and VAL2. */
+
+static inline tree
+vrp_int_const_binop (enum tree_code code, tree val1, tree val2)
+{
+ tree res;
+
+ if (flag_wrapv)
+ return int_const_binop (code, val1, val2, 0);
+
+ /* If we are not using wrapping arithmetic, operate symbolically
+ on -INF and +INF. */
+ res = int_const_binop (code, val1, val2, 0);
+
+ /* If the operation overflowed but neither VAL1 nor VAL2 are
+ overflown, return -INF or +INF depending on the operation
+ and the combination of signs of the operands. */
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (res)
+ && !TREE_OVERFLOW (val1)
+ && !TREE_OVERFLOW (val2))
+ {
+ int sgn1 = tree_int_cst_sgn (val1);
+ int sgn2 = tree_int_cst_sgn (val2);
+
+ /* Notice that we only need to handle the restricted set of
+ operations handled by extract_range_from_binary_expr.
+ Among them, only multiplication, addition and subtraction
+ can yield overflow without overflown operands because we
+ are working with integral types only... except in the
+ case VAL1 = -INF and VAL2 = -1 which overflows to +INF
+ for division too. */
+
+ /* For multiplication, the sign of the overflow is given
+ by the comparison of the signs of the operands. */
+ if ((code == MULT_EXPR && sgn1 == sgn2)
+ /* For addition, the operands must be of the same sign
+ to yield an overflow. Its sign is therefore that
+ of one of the operands, for example the first. */
+ || (code == PLUS_EXPR && sgn1 > 0)
+ /* For subtraction, the operands must be of different
+ signs to yield an overflow. Its sign is therefore
+ that of the first operand or the opposite of that
+ of the second operand. */
+ || (code == MINUS_EXPR && sgn1 > 0)
+ /* For division, the only case is -INF / -1 = +INF. */
+ || code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == FLOOR_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == CEIL_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == EXACT_DIV_EXPR
+ || code == ROUND_DIV_EXPR)
+ return TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (res));
+ else
+ return TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (res));
+ }
+
+ return res;
+}
+
+
/* Extract range information from a binary expression EXPR based on
the ranges of each of its operands and the expression code. */
ivopts is generating expressions with pointer multiplication
in them. */
if (code == PLUS_EXPR)
- set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ {
+ if (range_is_nonnull (&vr0) || range_is_nonnull (&vr1))
+ set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ else if (range_is_null (&vr0) && range_is_null (&vr1))
+ set_value_range_to_null (vr, TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ else
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ }
else
{
/* Subtracting from a pointer, may yield 0, so just drop the
max = fold_binary (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), vr0.max, vr1.max);
}
else if (code == PLUS_EXPR
- || code == MULT_EXPR
|| code == MIN_EXPR
|| code == MAX_EXPR)
{
+ /* If we have a PLUS_EXPR with two VR_ANTI_RANGEs, drop to
+ VR_VARYING. It would take more effort to compute a precise
+ range for such a case. For example, if we have op0 == 1 and
+ op1 == -1 with their ranges both being ~[0,0], we would have
+ op0 + op1 == 0, so we cannot claim that the sum is in ~[0,0].
+ Note that we are guaranteed to have vr0.type == vr1.type at
+ this point. */
+ if (code == PLUS_EXPR && vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
+ {
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* For operations that make the resulting range directly
proportional to the original ranges, apply the operation to
the same end of each range. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
+ min = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min);
+ max = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max);
}
- else if (code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
+ else if (code == MULT_EXPR
+ || code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
|| code == FLOOR_DIV_EXPR
|| code == CEIL_DIV_EXPR
|| code == EXACT_DIV_EXPR
|| code == ROUND_DIV_EXPR)
{
- tree zero;
-
- /* Divisions are a bit tricky to handle, depending on the mix of
- signs we have in the two range, we will need to divide
- different values to get the minimum and maximum values for
- the new range. If VR1 includes zero, the result is VARYING. */
- if (range_includes_zero_p (&vr1))
+ tree val[4];
+ size_t i;
+
+ /* If we have an unsigned MULT_EXPR with two VR_ANTI_RANGEs,
+ drop to VR_VARYING. It would take more effort to compute a
+ precise range for such a case. For example, if we have
+ op0 == 65536 and op1 == 65536 with their ranges both being
+ ~[0,0] on a 32-bit machine, we would have op0 * op1 == 0, so
+ we cannot claim that the product is in ~[0,0]. Note that we
+ are guaranteed to have vr0.type == vr1.type at this
+ point. */
+ if (code == MULT_EXPR
+ && vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE
+ && (flag_wrapv || TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (op0))))
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
}
- /* We have three main variations to handle for VR0: all negative
- values, all positive values and a mix of negative and
- positive. For each of these, we need to consider if VR1 is
- all negative or all positive. In total, there are 6
- combinations to handle. */
- zero = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (expr), 0);
- if (compare_values (vr0.max, zero) == -1)
- {
- /* VR0 is all negative. */
- if (compare_values (vr1.min, zero) == 1)
- {
- /* If VR1 is all positive, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MIN / VR1.MIN, VR0.MAX / VR1.MAX]. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
- }
- else
- {
- /* If VR1 is all negative, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MAX / VR1.MIN, VR0.MIN / VR1.MAX]. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr1.max, zero) == -1);
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- }
- }
- else if (range_includes_zero_p (&vr0))
+ /* Multiplications and divisions are a bit tricky to handle,
+ depending on the mix of signs we have in the two ranges, we
+ need to operate on different values to get the minimum and
+ maximum values for the new range. One approach is to figure
+ out all the variations of range combinations and do the
+ operations.
+
+ However, this involves several calls to compare_values and it
+ is pretty convoluted. It's simpler to do the 4 operations
+ (MIN0 OP MIN1, MIN0 OP MAX1, MAX0 OP MIN1 and MAX0 OP MAX0 OP
+ MAX1) and then figure the smallest and largest values to form
+ the new range. */
+
+ /* Divisions by zero result in a VARYING value. */
+ if (code != MULT_EXPR && range_includes_zero_p (&vr1))
{
- /* VR0 is a mix of negative and positive values. */
- if (compare_values (vr1.min, zero) == 1)
- {
- /* If VR1 is all positive, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MIN / VR1.MIN, VR0.MAX / VR1.MIN]. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- }
- else
- {
- /* If VR1 is all negative, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MAX / VR1.MAX, VR0.MIN / VR1.MAX]. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr1.max, zero) == -1);
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- }
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
}
- else
+
+ /* Compute the 4 cross operations. */
+ val[0] = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min);
+
+ val[1] = (vr1.max != vr1.min)
+ ? vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max)
+ : NULL_TREE;
+
+ val[2] = (vr0.max != vr0.min)
+ ? vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min)
+ : NULL_TREE;
+
+ val[3] = (vr0.min != vr1.min && vr0.max != vr1.max)
+ ? vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max)
+ : NULL_TREE;
+
+ /* Set MIN to the minimum of VAL[i] and MAX to the maximum
+ of VAL[i]. */
+ min = val[0];
+ max = val[0];
+ for (i = 1; i < 4; i++)
{
- /* VR0 is all positive. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr0.min, zero) == 1);
- if (compare_values (vr1.min, zero) == 1)
- {
- /* If VR1 is all positive, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MIN / VR1.MAX, VR0.MAX / VR1.MIN]. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- }
- else
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (min) || TREE_OVERFLOW (max))
+ break;
+
+ if (val[i])
{
- /* If VR1 is all negative, the new range is obtained
- with [VR0.MAX / VR1.MAX, VR0.MIN / VR1.MIN]. */
- gcc_assert (compare_values (vr1.max, zero) == -1);
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.min, 0);
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (val[i]))
+ {
+ /* If we found an overflowed value, set MIN and MAX
+ to it so that we set the resulting range to
+ VARYING. */
+ min = max = val[i];
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (compare_values (val[i], min) == -1)
+ min = val[i];
+
+ if (compare_values (val[i], max) == 1)
+ max = val[i];
}
}
}
else if (code == MINUS_EXPR)
{
- /* For MINUS_EXPR, apply the operation to the opposite ends of
- each range. */
- min = int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max, 0);
- max = int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min, 0);
- }
- else
- gcc_unreachable ();
-
- /* If MAX overflowed, then the result depends on whether we are
- using wrapping arithmetic or not. */
- if (TREE_OVERFLOW (max))
- {
- /* If we are using wrapping arithmetic, set the result to
- VARYING. */
- if (flag_wrapv)
+ /* If we have a MINUS_EXPR with two VR_ANTI_RANGEs, drop to
+ VR_VARYING. It would take more effort to compute a precise
+ range for such a case. For example, if we have op0 == 1 and
+ op1 == 1 with their ranges both being ~[0,0], we would have
+ op0 - op1 == 0, so we cannot claim that the difference is in
+ ~[0,0]. Note that we are guaranteed to have
+ vr0.type == vr1.type at this point. */
+ if (vr0.type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
{
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
return;
}
- /* Otherwise, set MAX to +INF. */
- max = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ /* For MINUS_EXPR, apply the operation to the opposite ends of
+ each range. */
+ min = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.min, vr1.max);
+ max = vrp_int_const_binop (code, vr0.max, vr1.min);
}
+ else
+ gcc_unreachable ();
- /* If MIN overflowed, then the result depends on whether we are
- using wrapping arithmetic or not. */
- if (TREE_OVERFLOW (min))
+ /* If either MIN or MAX overflowed, then set the resulting range to
+ VARYING. */
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (min) || TREE_OVERFLOW (max))
{
- /* If we are using wrapping arithmetic, set the result to
- VARYING. */
- if (flag_wrapv)
- {
- set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Otherwise, set MIN to -INF. */
- min = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (expr));
+ set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
+ return;
}
cmp = compare_values (min, max);
tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (op0);
tree outer_type = TREE_TYPE (expr);
+ /* If VR0 represents a simple range, then try to convert
+ the min and max values for the range to the same type
+ as OUTER_TYPE. If the results compare equal to VR0's
+ min and max values and the new min is still less than
+ or equal to the new max, then we can safely use the newly
+ computed range for EXPR. This allows us to compute
+ accurate ranges through many casts. */
+ if (vr0.type == VR_RANGE)
+ {
+ tree new_min, new_max;
+
+ /* Convert VR0's min/max to OUTER_TYPE. */
+ new_min = fold_convert (outer_type, vr0.min);
+ new_max = fold_convert (outer_type, vr0.max);
+
+ /* Verify the new min/max values are gimple values and
+ that they compare equal to VR0's min/max values. */
+ if (is_gimple_val (new_min)
+ && is_gimple_val (new_max)
+ && tree_int_cst_equal (new_min, vr0.min)
+ && tree_int_cst_equal (new_max, vr0.max)
+ && compare_values (new_min, new_max) <= 0
+ && compare_values (new_min, new_max) >= -2)
+ {
+ set_value_range (vr, VR_RANGE, new_min, new_max, vr->equiv);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
/* When converting types of different sizes, set the result to
VARYING. Things like sign extensions and precision loss may
change the range. For instance, if x_3 is of type 'long long
set_value_range_to_varying (vr);
}
-
-/* Given a range VR, a loop L and a variable VAR, determine whether it
+/* Given a range VR, a LOOP and a variable VAR, determine whether it
would be profitable to adjust VR using scalar evolution information
for VAR. If so, update VR with the new limits. */
static void
-adjust_range_with_scev (value_range_t *vr, struct loop *l, tree var)
+adjust_range_with_scev (value_range_t *vr, struct loop *loop, tree stmt,
+ tree var)
{
tree init, step, chrec;
bool init_is_max;
if (vr->type == VR_ANTI_RANGE)
return;
- chrec = analyze_scalar_evolution (l, var);
+ chrec = analyze_scalar_evolution (loop, var);
if (TREE_CODE (chrec) != POLYNOMIAL_CHREC)
return;
if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (step))
return;
- /* FIXME. When dealing with unsigned types,
- analyze_scalar_evolution sets STEP to very large unsigned values
- when the evolution goes backwards. This confuses this analysis
- because we think that INIT is the smallest value that the range
- can take, instead of the largest. Ignore these chrecs for now. */
- if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (step)) && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (step)))
+ /* Do not adjust ranges when chrec may wrap. */
+ if (scev_probably_wraps_p (chrec_type (chrec), init, step, stmt,
+ cfg_loops->parray[CHREC_VARIABLE (chrec)],
+ &init_is_max))
return;
- /* Do not adjust ranges when using wrapping arithmetic. */
- if (flag_wrapv)
- return;
-
- /* If STEP is negative, then INIT is the maximum value the range
- will take. Otherwise, INIT is the minimum value. */
- init_is_max = (tree_int_cst_sgn (step) < 0);
-
if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (init))
&& (vr->type == VR_VARYING || vr->type == VR_UNDEFINED))
{
/* If the predicate is of the form VAL COMP NAME, flip
COMP around because we need to register NAME as the
first operand in the predicate. */
- comp_code = opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
+ comp_code = swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond));
val = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
}
else
}
-/* Convert range assertion expressions into the implied copies.
+/* Convert range assertion expressions into the implied copies and
+ copy propagate away the copies. Doing the trivial copy propagation
+ here avoids the need to run the full copy propagation pass after
+ VRP.
FIXME, this will eventually lead to copy propagation removing the
names that had useful range information attached to them. For
things like jump threading.
The problem with keeping ASSERT_EXPRs around is that passes after
- VRP need to handle them appropriately. */
+ VRP need to handle them appropriately.
+
+ Another approach would be to make the range information a first
+ class property of the SSA_NAME so that it can be queried from
+ any pass. This is made somewhat more complex by the need for
+ multiple ranges to be associated with one SSA_NAME. */
static void
remove_range_assertions (void)
basic_block bb;
block_stmt_iterator si;
+ /* Note that the BSI iterator bump happens at the bottom of the
+ loop and no bump is necessary if we're removing the statement
+ referenced by the current BSI. */
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
- for (si = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (si); bsi_next (&si))
+ for (si = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (si);)
{
tree stmt = bsi_stmt (si);
{
tree rhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1);
tree cond = fold (ASSERT_EXPR_COND (rhs));
+ use_operand_p use_p;
+ imm_use_iterator iter;
+
gcc_assert (cond != boolean_false_node);
TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1) = ASSERT_EXPR_VAR (rhs);
update_stmt (stmt);
+
+ /* The statement is now a copy. Propagate the RHS into
+ every use of the LHS. */
+ FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_SAFE (use_p, iter, TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 0))
+ {
+ SET_USE (use_p, ASSERT_EXPR_VAR (rhs));
+ update_stmt (USE_STMT (use_p));
+ }
+
+ /* And finally, remove the copy, it is not needed. */
+ bsi_remove (&si);
}
+ else
+ bsi_next (&si);
}
}
else about the range of LHS by examining scalar evolution
information. */
if (cfg_loops && (l = loop_containing_stmt (stmt)))
- adjust_range_with_scev (&new_vr, l, lhs);
+ adjust_range_with_scev (&new_vr, l, stmt, lhs);
if (update_value_range (lhs, &new_vr))
{
return compare_name_with_value (TREE_CODE (cond), op0, op1);
else if (TREE_CODE (op1) == SSA_NAME)
return compare_name_with_value (
- opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), op1, op0);
+ swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), op1, op0);
}
else
{
return compare_range_with_value (TREE_CODE (cond), vr0, op1);
else if (vr0 == NULL && vr1)
return compare_range_with_value (
- opposite_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), vr1, op0);
+ swap_tree_comparison (TREE_CODE (cond)), vr1, op0);
}
}
return SSA_PROP_VARYING;
}
+/* Walk through the IL simplifying expressions using knowledge
+ gathered by VRP. */
+
+static void
+simplify_using_ranges (void)
+{
+ basic_block bb;
+
+ FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
+ {
+ block_stmt_iterator bsi;
+
+ for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next (&bsi))
+ {
+ tree stmt = bsi_stmt (bsi);
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == MODIFY_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree rhs = TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1);
+ enum tree_code rhs_code = TREE_CODE (rhs);
+
+ /* Transform TRUNC_DIV_EXPR and TRUNC_MOD_EXPR into RSHIFT_EXPR
+ and BIT_AND_EXPR respectively if the first operand is greater
+ than zero and the second operand is an exact power of two. */
+ if ((rhs_code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR || rhs_code == TRUNC_MOD_EXPR)
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0)))
+ && integer_pow2p (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1)))
+ {
+ tree val = NULL;
+ tree op = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+ value_range_t *vr = get_value_range (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0));
+
+ if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (op)))
+ {
+ val = integer_one_node;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ val = compare_range_with_value (GT_EXPR, vr,
+ integer_zero_node);
+ }
+
+ if (val && integer_onep (val))
+ {
+ tree t;
+ tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+ tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 1);
+
+ if (rhs_code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR)
+ {
+ t = build_int_cst (NULL_TREE, tree_log2 (op1));
+ t = build (RSHIFT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), op0, t);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ t = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (op1), 1);
+ t = int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, op1, t, 0);
+ t = fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (op0), t);
+ t = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), op0, t);
+ }
+
+ TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1) = t;
+ update_stmt (stmt);
+ }
+
+ }
+
+ /* Transform ABS (X) into X or -X as appropriate. */
+ if (rhs_code == ABS_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0)) == SSA_NAME
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0))))
+ {
+ tree val = NULL;
+ tree op = TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0);
+ tree type = TREE_TYPE (op);
+ value_range_t *vr = get_value_range (TREE_OPERAND (rhs, 0));
+
+ if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
+ {
+ val = integer_zero_node;
+ }
+ else if (vr)
+ {
+ val = compare_range_with_value (LE_EXPR, vr,
+ integer_zero_node);
+ if (!val)
+ {
+ val = compare_range_with_value (GE_EXPR, vr,
+ integer_zero_node);
+
+ if (val)
+ {
+ if (integer_zerop (val))
+ val = integer_one_node;
+ else if (integer_onep (val))
+ val = integer_zero_node;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (val
+ && (integer_onep (val) || integer_zerop (val)))
+ {
+ tree t;
+
+ if (integer_onep (val))
+ t = build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op), op);
+ else
+ t = op;
+
+ TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 1) = t;
+ update_stmt (stmt);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* TODO. Simplify conditionals. */
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/* Traverse all the blocks folding conditionals with known ranges. */
substitute_and_fold (single_val_range, true);
+ /* One could argue all simplifications should be done here
+ rather than using substitute_and_fold since this code
+ is going to have to perform a complete walk through the
+ IL anyway. */
+ simplify_using_ranges ();
+
/* Free allocated memory. */
for (i = 0; i < num_ssa_names; i++)
if (vr_value[i])
OSDN Git Service
