+
+/* PHI-ONLY copy and constant propagation. This pass is meant to clean
+ up degenerate PHIs created by or exposed by jump threading. */
+
+/* Given PHI, return its RHS if the PHI is a degenerate, otherwise return
+ NULL. */
+
+tree
+degenerate_phi_result (gimple phi)
+{
+ tree lhs = gimple_phi_result (phi);
+ tree val = NULL;
+ size_t i;
+
+ /* Ignoring arguments which are the same as LHS, if all the remaining
+ arguments are the same, then the PHI is a degenerate and has the
+ value of that common argument. */
+ for (i = 0; i < gimple_phi_num_args (phi); i++)
+ {
+ tree arg = gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, i);
+
+ if (arg == lhs)
+ continue;
+ else if (!arg)
+ break;
+ else if (!val)
+ val = arg;
+ else if (arg == val)
+ continue;
+ /* We bring in some of operand_equal_p not only to speed things
+ up, but also to avoid crashing when dereferencing the type of
+ a released SSA name. */
+ else if (TREE_CODE (val) != TREE_CODE (arg)
+ || TREE_CODE (val) == SSA_NAME
+ || !operand_equal_p (arg, val, 0))
+ break;
+ }
+ return (i == gimple_phi_num_args (phi) ? val : NULL);
+}
+
+/* Given a statement STMT, which is either a PHI node or an assignment,
+ remove it from the IL. */
+
+static void
+remove_stmt_or_phi (gimple stmt)
+{
+ gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (stmt);
+
+ if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
+ remove_phi_node (&gsi, true);
+ else
+ {
+ gsi_remove (&gsi, true);
+ release_defs (stmt);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Given a statement STMT, which is either a PHI node or an assignment,
+ return the "rhs" of the node, in the case of a non-degenerate
+ phi, NULL is returned. */
+
+static tree
+get_rhs_or_phi_arg (gimple stmt)
+{
+ if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
+ return degenerate_phi_result (stmt);
+ else if (gimple_assign_single_p (stmt))
+ return gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
+ else
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+}
+
+
+/* Given a statement STMT, which is either a PHI node or an assignment,
+ return the "lhs" of the node. */
+
+static tree
+get_lhs_or_phi_result (gimple stmt)
+{
+ if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
+ return gimple_phi_result (stmt);
+ else if (is_gimple_assign (stmt))
+ return gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
+ else
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+}
+
+/* Propagate RHS into all uses of LHS (when possible).
+
+ RHS and LHS are derived from STMT, which is passed in solely so
+ that we can remove it if propagation is successful.
+
+ When propagating into a PHI node or into a statement which turns
+ into a trivial copy or constant initialization, set the
+ appropriate bit in INTERESTING_NAMEs so that we will visit those
+ nodes as well in an effort to pick up secondary optimization
+ opportunities. */
+
+static void
+propagate_rhs_into_lhs (gimple stmt, tree lhs, tree rhs, bitmap interesting_names)
+{
+ /* First verify that propagation is valid and isn't going to move a
+ loop variant variable outside its loop. */
+ if (! SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (lhs)
+ && (TREE_CODE (rhs) != SSA_NAME
+ || ! SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (rhs))
+ && may_propagate_copy (lhs, rhs)
+ && loop_depth_of_name (lhs) >= loop_depth_of_name (rhs))
+ {
+ use_operand_p use_p;
+ imm_use_iterator iter;
+ gimple use_stmt;
+ bool all = true;
+
+ /* Dump details. */
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, " Replacing '");
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, lhs, dump_flags);
+ fprintf (dump_file, "' with %s '",
+ (TREE_CODE (rhs) != SSA_NAME ? "constant" : "variable"));
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, rhs, dump_flags);
+ fprintf (dump_file, "'\n");
+ }
+
+ /* Walk over every use of LHS and try to replace the use with RHS.
+ At this point the only reason why such a propagation would not
+ be successful would be if the use occurs in an ASM_EXPR. */
+ FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, iter, lhs)
+ {
+ /* Leave debug stmts alone. If we succeed in propagating
+ all non-debug uses, we'll drop the DEF, and propagation
+ into debug stmts will occur then. */
+ if (gimple_debug_bind_p (use_stmt))
+ continue;
+
+ /* It's not always safe to propagate into an ASM_EXPR. */
+ if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_ASM
+ && ! may_propagate_copy_into_asm (lhs))
+ {
+ all = false;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* It's not ok to propagate into the definition stmt of RHS.
+ <bb 9>:
+ # prephitmp.12_36 = PHI <g_67.1_6(9)>
+ g_67.1_6 = prephitmp.12_36;
+ goto <bb 9>;
+ While this is strictly all dead code we do not want to
+ deal with this here. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == SSA_NAME
+ && SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (rhs) == use_stmt)
+ {
+ all = false;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Dump details. */
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, " Original statement:");
+ print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, use_stmt, 0, dump_flags);
+ }
+
+ /* Propagate the RHS into this use of the LHS. */
+ FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT (use_p, iter)
+ propagate_value (use_p, rhs);
+
+ /* Special cases to avoid useless calls into the folding
+ routines, operand scanning, etc.
+
+ First, propagation into a PHI may cause the PHI to become
+ a degenerate, so mark the PHI as interesting. No other
+ actions are necessary.
+
+ Second, if we're propagating a virtual operand and the
+ propagation does not change the underlying _DECL node for
+ the virtual operand, then no further actions are necessary. */
+ if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI
+ || (! is_gimple_reg (lhs)
+ && TREE_CODE (rhs) == SSA_NAME
+ && SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs) == SSA_NAME_VAR (rhs)))
+ {
+ /* Dump details. */
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, " Updated statement:");
+ print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, use_stmt, 0, dump_flags);
+ }
+
+ /* Propagation into a PHI may expose new degenerate PHIs,
+ so mark the result of the PHI as interesting. */
+ if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
+ {
+ tree result = get_lhs_or_phi_result (use_stmt);
+ bitmap_set_bit (interesting_names, SSA_NAME_VERSION (result));
+ }
+
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* From this point onward we are propagating into a
+ real statement. Folding may (or may not) be possible,
+ we may expose new operands, expose dead EH edges,
+ etc. */
+ /* NOTE tuples. In the tuples world, fold_stmt_inplace
+ cannot fold a call that simplifies to a constant,
+ because the GIMPLE_CALL must be replaced by a
+ GIMPLE_ASSIGN, and there is no way to effect such a
+ transformation in-place. We might want to consider
+ using the more general fold_stmt here. */
+ {
+ gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (use_stmt);
+ fold_stmt_inplace (&gsi);
+ }
+
+ /* Sometimes propagation can expose new operands to the
+ renamer. */
+ update_stmt (use_stmt);
+
+ /* Dump details. */
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, " Updated statement:");
+ print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, use_stmt, 0, dump_flags);
+ }
+
+ /* If we replaced a variable index with a constant, then
+ we would need to update the invariant flag for ADDR_EXPRs. */
+ if (gimple_assign_single_p (use_stmt)
+ && TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (use_stmt)) == ADDR_EXPR)
+ recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr
+ (gimple_assign_rhs1 (use_stmt));
+
+ /* If we cleaned up EH information from the statement,
+ mark its containing block as needing EH cleanups. */
+ if (maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (use_stmt, use_stmt))
+ {
+ bitmap_set_bit (need_eh_cleanup, gimple_bb (use_stmt)->index);
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ fprintf (dump_file, " Flagged to clear EH edges.\n");
+ }
+
+ /* Propagation may expose new trivial copy/constant propagation
+ opportunities. */
+ if (gimple_assign_single_p (use_stmt)
+ && TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_lhs (use_stmt)) == SSA_NAME
+ && (TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (use_stmt)) == SSA_NAME
+ || is_gimple_min_invariant (gimple_assign_rhs1 (use_stmt))))
+ {
+ tree result = get_lhs_or_phi_result (use_stmt);
+ bitmap_set_bit (interesting_names, SSA_NAME_VERSION (result));
+ }
+
+ /* Propagation into these nodes may make certain edges in
+ the CFG unexecutable. We want to identify them as PHI nodes
+ at the destination of those unexecutable edges may become
+ degenerates. */
+ else if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_COND
+ || gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_SWITCH
+ || gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_GOTO)
+ {
+ tree val;
+
+ if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_COND)
+ val = fold_binary_loc (gimple_location (use_stmt),
+ gimple_cond_code (use_stmt),
+ boolean_type_node,
+ gimple_cond_lhs (use_stmt),
+ gimple_cond_rhs (use_stmt));
+ else if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_SWITCH)
+ val = gimple_switch_index (use_stmt);
+ else
+ val = gimple_goto_dest (use_stmt);
+
+ if (val && is_gimple_min_invariant (val))
+ {
+ basic_block bb = gimple_bb (use_stmt);
+ edge te = find_taken_edge (bb, val);
+ edge_iterator ei;
+ edge e;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator gsi, psi;
+
+ /* Remove all outgoing edges except TE. */
+ for (ei = ei_start (bb->succs); (e = ei_safe_edge (ei));)
+ {
+ if (e != te)
+ {
+ /* Mark all the PHI nodes at the destination of
+ the unexecutable edge as interesting. */
+ for (psi = gsi_start_phis (e->dest);
+ !gsi_end_p (psi);
+ gsi_next (&psi))
+ {
+ gimple phi = gsi_stmt (psi);
+
+ tree result = gimple_phi_result (phi);
+ int version = SSA_NAME_VERSION (result);
+
+ bitmap_set_bit (interesting_names, version);
+ }
+
+ te->probability += e->probability;
+
+ te->count += e->count;
+ remove_edge (e);
+ cfg_altered = true;
+ }
+ else
+ ei_next (&ei);
+ }
+
+ gsi = gsi_last_bb (gimple_bb (use_stmt));
+ gsi_remove (&gsi, true);
+
+ /* And fixup the flags on the single remaining edge. */
+ te->flags &= ~(EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE);
+ te->flags &= ~EDGE_ABNORMAL;
+ te->flags |= EDGE_FALLTHRU;
+ if (te->probability > REG_BR_PROB_BASE)
+ te->probability = REG_BR_PROB_BASE;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Ensure there is nothing else to do. */
+ gcc_assert (!all || has_zero_uses (lhs));
+
+ /* If we were able to propagate away all uses of LHS, then
+ we can remove STMT. */
+ if (all)
+ remove_stmt_or_phi (stmt);
+ }
+}
+
+/* STMT is either a PHI node (potentially a degenerate PHI node) or
+ a statement that is a trivial copy or constant initialization.
+
+ Attempt to eliminate T by propagating its RHS into all uses of
+ its LHS. This may in turn set new bits in INTERESTING_NAMES
+ for nodes we want to revisit later.
+
+ All exit paths should clear INTERESTING_NAMES for the result
+ of STMT. */
+
+static void
+eliminate_const_or_copy (gimple stmt, bitmap interesting_names)
+{
+ tree lhs = get_lhs_or_phi_result (stmt);
+ tree rhs;
+ int version = SSA_NAME_VERSION (lhs);
+
+ /* If the LHS of this statement or PHI has no uses, then we can
+ just eliminate it. This can occur if, for example, the PHI
+ was created by block duplication due to threading and its only
+ use was in the conditional at the end of the block which was
+ deleted. */
+ if (has_zero_uses (lhs))
+ {
+ bitmap_clear_bit (interesting_names, version);
+ remove_stmt_or_phi (stmt);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Get the RHS of the assignment or PHI node if the PHI is a
+ degenerate. */
+ rhs = get_rhs_or_phi_arg (stmt);
+ if (!rhs)
+ {
+ bitmap_clear_bit (interesting_names, version);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ propagate_rhs_into_lhs (stmt, lhs, rhs, interesting_names);
+
+ /* Note that STMT may well have been deleted by now, so do
+ not access it, instead use the saved version # to clear
+ T's entry in the worklist. */
+ bitmap_clear_bit (interesting_names, version);
+}
+
+/* The first phase in degenerate PHI elimination.
+
+ Eliminate the degenerate PHIs in BB, then recurse on the
+ dominator children of BB. */
+
+static void
+eliminate_degenerate_phis_1 (basic_block bb, bitmap interesting_names)
+{
+ gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
+ basic_block son;
+
+ for (gsi = gsi_start_phis (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
+ {
+ gimple phi = gsi_stmt (gsi);
+
+ eliminate_const_or_copy (phi, interesting_names);
+ }
+
+ /* Recurse into the dominator children of BB. */
+ for (son = first_dom_son (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb);
+ son;
+ son = next_dom_son (CDI_DOMINATORS, son))
+ eliminate_degenerate_phis_1 (son, interesting_names);
+}
+
+
+/* A very simple pass to eliminate degenerate PHI nodes from the
+ IL. This is meant to be fast enough to be able to be run several
+ times in the optimization pipeline.
+
+ Certain optimizations, particularly those which duplicate blocks
+ or remove edges from the CFG can create or expose PHIs which are
+ trivial copies or constant initializations.
+
+ While we could pick up these optimizations in DOM or with the
+ combination of copy-prop and CCP, those solutions are far too
+ heavy-weight for our needs.
+
+ This implementation has two phases so that we can efficiently
+ eliminate the first order degenerate PHIs and second order
+ degenerate PHIs.
+
+ The first phase performs a dominator walk to identify and eliminate
+ the vast majority of the degenerate PHIs. When a degenerate PHI
+ is identified and eliminated any affected statements or PHIs
+ are put on a worklist.
+
+ The second phase eliminates degenerate PHIs and trivial copies
+ or constant initializations using the worklist. This is how we
+ pick up the secondary optimization opportunities with minimal
+ cost. */
+
+static unsigned int
+eliminate_degenerate_phis (void)
+{
+ bitmap interesting_names;
+ bitmap interesting_names1;
+
+ /* Bitmap of blocks which need EH information updated. We can not
+ update it on-the-fly as doing so invalidates the dominator tree. */
+ need_eh_cleanup = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
+
+ /* INTERESTING_NAMES is effectively our worklist, indexed by
+ SSA_NAME_VERSION.
+
+ A set bit indicates that the statement or PHI node which
+ defines the SSA_NAME should be (re)examined to determine if
+ it has become a degenerate PHI or trivial const/copy propagation
+ opportunity.
+
+ Experiments have show we generally get better compilation
+ time behavior with bitmaps rather than sbitmaps. */
+ interesting_names = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
+ interesting_names1 = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
+
+ calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+ cfg_altered = false;
+
+ /* First phase. Eliminate degenerate PHIs via a dominator
+ walk of the CFG.
+
+ Experiments have indicated that we generally get better
+ compile-time behavior by visiting blocks in the first
+ phase in dominator order. Presumably this is because walking
+ in dominator order leaves fewer PHIs for later examination
+ by the worklist phase. */
+ eliminate_degenerate_phis_1 (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR, interesting_names);
+
+ /* Second phase. Eliminate second order degenerate PHIs as well
+ as trivial copies or constant initializations identified by
+ the first phase or this phase. Basically we keep iterating
+ until our set of INTERESTING_NAMEs is empty. */
+ while (!bitmap_empty_p (interesting_names))
+ {
+ unsigned int i;
+ bitmap_iterator bi;
+
+ /* EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP does not like its bitmap
+ changed during the loop. Copy it to another bitmap and
+ use that. */
+ bitmap_copy (interesting_names1, interesting_names);
+
+ EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (interesting_names1, 0, i, bi)
+ {
+ tree name = ssa_name (i);
+
+ /* Ignore SSA_NAMEs that have been released because
+ their defining statement was deleted (unreachable). */
+ if (name)
+ eliminate_const_or_copy (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (ssa_name (i)),
+ interesting_names);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (cfg_altered)
+ free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+
+ /* Propagation of const and copies may make some EH edges dead. Purge
+ such edges from the CFG as needed. */
+ if (!bitmap_empty_p (need_eh_cleanup))
+ {
+ gimple_purge_all_dead_eh_edges (need_eh_cleanup);
+ BITMAP_FREE (need_eh_cleanup);
+ }
+
+ BITMAP_FREE (interesting_names);
+ BITMAP_FREE (interesting_names1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct gimple_opt_pass pass_phi_only_cprop =
+{
+ {
+ GIMPLE_PASS,
+ "phicprop", /* name */
+ gate_dominator, /* gate */
+ eliminate_degenerate_phis, /* execute */
+ NULL, /* sub */
+ NULL, /* next */
+ 0, /* static_pass_number */
+ TV_TREE_PHI_CPROP, /* tv_id */
+ PROP_cfg | PROP_ssa, /* properties_required */
+ 0, /* properties_provided */
+ 0, /* properties_destroyed */
+ 0, /* todo_flags_start */
+ TODO_cleanup_cfg
+ | TODO_ggc_collect
+ | TODO_verify_ssa
+ | TODO_verify_stmts
+ | TODO_update_ssa /* todo_flags_finish */
+ }
+};