! Tests the fix for PR28496 in which initializer array constructors with
! a missing initial array index would cause an ICE.
!
+! Test for the fix of the initializer array constructor part of PR29975
+! was added later. Here, the indexing would get in a mess if the array
+! specification had a lower bound other than unity.
+!
! Contributed by Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
! Based on original test case from Samir Nordin <snordin_ng@yahoo.fr>
!
integer, dimension(3), parameter :: a=(/1,2,3/)
integer, dimension(3), parameter :: b=(/a(:)/)
integer, dimension(3,3), parameter :: c=reshape ((/(i, i = 1,9)/),(/3,3/))
- integer, dimension(2,3), parameter :: d=reshape ((/c(:2:-1,:)/),(/2,3/))
+ integer, dimension(2,3), parameter :: d=reshape ((/c(3:2:-1,:)/),(/2,3/))
integer, dimension(3,3), parameter :: e=reshape ((/a(:),a(:)+3,a(:)+6/),(/3,3/))
integer, dimension(2,3), parameter :: f=reshape ((/c(2:1:-1,:)/),(/2,3/))
+ CHARACTER (LEN=1), DIMENSION(3:7), PARAMETER :: g = &
+ (/ '+', '-', '*', '/', '^' /)
+ CHARACTER (LEN=3) :: h = "A+C"
+!
+! PR28496
+!
if (any (b .ne. (/1,2,3/))) call abort ()
if (any (reshape(d,(/6/)) .ne. (/3, 2, 6, 5, 9, 8/))) call abort ()
if (any (reshape(f,(/6/)) .ne. (/2, 1, 5, 4, 8, 7/))) call abort ()
+!
+! PR29975
+!
+ IF (all(h(2:2) /= g(3:4))) call abort ()
end