* gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c: Correct SPARC XFAIL indications.

	Remove spurious PowerPC-64 XFAIL indications.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@68033 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index ed61bcf..778351a 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2003-06-16  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+       * gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c: Correct SPARC XFAIL indications.
+       Remove spurious PowerPC-64 XFAIL indications.
+
 2003-06-16  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>
 
        * gcc.dg/i386-387-5.c: New test case.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c
index 35b5118..1574806 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
+/* On SPARC64/SPARC-V9 it fails, except with -m32.  On regular SPARC
+   it doesn't fail, except with -m64.  In other words, this test fails
+   on 64-bit SPARC.  Unfortunately, there's no way to encode that
+   information in the dg framework, so the test will XPASS on 32-bit
+   SPARC.  */
 /* h8300 does not have long long */
-/* PowerPC-64 doesn't handle this; see PR target/9680 */
-/* { dg-do assemble { xfail h8300-*-* powerpc64-*-* } } */
-/* On SPARC64/SPARC-V9 it fails, except with -m32. */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "PR target/9200" { "sparc64-*-*" "sparcv9-*-*" } { "*" } { "-m32" } } */
-/* On regular SPARC it doesn't fail, except with -m64. */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "PR target/9200" { "sparc*-*-*" } { "-m64" } { "" } } */
+/* { dg-excess-errors "PR target/9200" { xfail "sparc*-*-*" "h8300-*-*" } } */
 
 #define vector64 __attribute__((vector_size(8)))