+2002-04-18 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/5658
+ * search.c (setup_class_bindings): A class template qualifies as a
+ type binding.
+
2002-04-17 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/6316
return 0;
}
- /* Check throw specifier is subset. */
+ /* Check throw specifier is at least as strict. */
if (!comp_except_specs (base_throw, over_throw, 0))
{
cp_error_at ("looser throw specifier for `%#F'", overrider);
if (type_binding_p
&& (TREE_CODE (value_binding) == TYPE_DECL
+ || DECL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_P (value_binding)
|| (TREE_CODE (value_binding) == TREE_LIST
&& TREE_TYPE (value_binding) == error_mark_node
&& (TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (value_binding))
== TYPE_DECL))))
/* We found a type-binding, even when looking for a non-type
binding. This means that we already processed this binding
- above. */
- my_friendly_assert (type_binding_p, 19990401);
+ above. */;
else if (value_binding)
{
if (TREE_CODE (value_binding) == TREE_LIST
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/5658
+
+// Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+// Contributed by Theodore.Papadopoulo 11 Feb 2002 <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr>
+
+struct A {
+ typedef int iterator;
+};
+template <typename T>
+struct B: public A {
+ template <typename U>
+ struct iterator {
+ };
+ B() { }
+};
+int main()
+{
+ B<int> a;
+};