2000-03-27 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>

	* config/i386/tm-i386.h: Fix typo.  It is TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT
	instead of TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS.
	* config/i386/tm-i386mk.h: Likewise.

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index de355b8..ed318ad 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2000-03-27  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
+
+       * config/i386/tm-i386.h: Fix typo.  It is TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT
+       instead of TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS.
+       * config/i386/tm-i386mk.h: Likewise.
+
 2000-03-26  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
 
        Provide `long double' support for most i386 targets.

diff --git a/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386.h b/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386.h
index f241884..bcb99fc 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386.h
+++ b/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct type;
    bits, a `long double' actually takes up 96, probably to enforce
    alignment.  */
 
-#define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS 96
+#define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT 96
 
 /* Used for example in valprint.c:print_floating() to enable checking
    for NaN's */

diff --git a/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386mk.h b/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386mk.h
index de66a69..892dc30 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386mk.h
+++ b/gdb/config/i386/tm-i386mk.h
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@
    to `double'.  However, I'm not sure what is the consequence of:
 
    #define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_FORMAT TARGET_DOUBLE_FORMAT
-   #define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS TARGET_DOUBLE_BITS
+   #define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT TARGET_DOUBLE_BIT
 
    So I'll go with the current status quo instead.  It looks like this
    target won't compile anyway.  Perhaps it should be obsoleted?  */
    
 #undef TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_FORMAT
-#undef TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS
+#undef TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT