+2003-04-22 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
+
+ * function.c (purge_addressof_1): In (mem (addressof (reg))) case
+ for reg notes, if there are no substitutions, just use a SUBREG.
+
2003-04-21 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* Makefile.in (calls.o): Depend on except.h.
return true;
}
+ /* When we are processing the REG_NOTES of the last instruction
+ of a libcall, there will be typically no replacements
+ for that insn; the replacements happened before, piecemeal
+ fashion. OTOH we are not interested in the details of
+ this for the REG_EQUAL note, we want to know the big picture,
+ which can be succinctly described with a simple SUBREG.
+ Note that removing the REG_EQUAL note is not an option
+ on the last insn of a libcall, so we must do a replacement. */
+ if (! purge_addressof_replacements
+ && ! purge_bitfield_addressof_replacements)
+ {
+ /* In compile/990107-1.c:7 compiled at -O1 -m1 for sh-elf,
+ we got
+ (mem:DI (addressof:SI (reg/v:DF 160) 159 0x401c8510)
+ [0 S8 A32]), which can be expressed with a simple
+ same-size subreg */
+ if ((GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x))
+ == GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (sub)))
+ /* Again, invalid pointer casts (as in
+ compile/990203-1.c) can require paradoxical
+ subregs. */
+ || (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x)) > UNITS_PER_WORD
+ && (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x))
+ > GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (sub)))))
+ {
+ *loc = gen_rtx_SUBREG (GET_MODE (x), sub, 0);
+ return true;
+ }
+ /* ??? Are there other cases we should handle? */
+ }
/* Sometimes we may not be able to find the replacement. For
example when the original insn was a MEM in a wider mode,
and the note is part of a sign extension of a narrowed