+2010-08-05 Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com>
+
+ * sem.adb: Minor reformatting
+ * sem_ch4.adb (Analyze_Reference): Disable error message in CodePeer
+ mode, not useful.
+
2010-08-04 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/decl.c: Do not undefine IN_GCC_FRONTEND and do not
-- The body of a unit that is withed by the spec of the main unit
-- may in turn have a with_clause on that spec. In that case do not
-- traverse the body, to prevent loops. It can also happen that the
- -- main body as a with_clause on a child, which of course has an
- -- implicit with on its parent. It's ok to traverse the child body
+ -- main body has a with_clause on a child, which of course has an
+ -- implicit with on its parent. It's OK to traverse the child body
-- if the main spec has been processed, otherwise we also have a
-- circularity to avoid.
begin
CL := First (Context_Items (CU));
- -- Problem does not arise with main subprograms.
+ -- Problem does not arise with main subprograms
if Nkind (Unit (Main_CU)) /= N_Package_Body then
return False;
while Present (CL) loop
if Nkind (CL) = N_With_Clause
and then Library_Unit (CL) = Library_Unit (Main_CU)
- and then
- not Done (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Library_Unit (CL)))
+ and then not Done (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Library_Unit (CL)))
then
return True;
end if;
-- It is not clear if that can ever occur, but in case it does, we will
-- generate an error message. Not clear if this message can ever be
-- generated, and pretty clear that it represents a bug if it is, still
- -- seems worth checking!
+ -- seems worth checking, except in CodePeer mode where we do not really
+ -- care and don't want to bother the user.
T := Etype (P);
if Is_Entity_Name (P)
and then Is_Object_Reference (P)
+ and then not CodePeer_Mode
then
E := Entity (P);
T := Etype (P);