+2005-07-04 Kazu Hirata <kazu@codesourcery.com>
+
+ * gcc.dg/compare1.c: Skip on arm*-*-eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf*.
+ * gcc.dg/compare9.c: New.
+
2005-07-04 Francois-Xavier Coudert <coudert@clipper.ens.fr>
* gfortran.dg/io_invalid_1.f90: Fix expected error message.
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-Wsign-compare" } */
+/* This test would fail on targets with short enums being default. See
+ compare9.c. */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { arm*-*-eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf* } { "*" } { "" } } */
int tf = 1;
--- /dev/null
+/* Test for a bogus warning on comparison between signed and unsigned.
+ This was inspired by code in gcc. This testcase is identical to
+ compare1.c except that we add -fno-short-enums to accomodate
+ targets with short enums being default, such as arm*-*-eabi* and
+ arm*-*-symbianelf*. */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fno-short-enums -Wsign-compare" } */
+
+int tf = 1;
+
+/* This enumeration has an explicit negative value and is therefore signed. */
+enum mm1
+{
+ VOID, SI, DI, MAX = -1
+};
+
+/* This enumeration fits entirely in a signed int, but is unsigned anyway. */
+enum mm2
+{
+ VOID2, SI2, DI2, MAX2
+};
+
+int f(enum mm1 x)
+{
+ return x == (tf?DI:SI); /* { dg-bogus "signed and unsigned" "case 1" } */
+}
+
+int g(enum mm1 x)
+{
+ return x == (tf?DI:-1); /* { dg-bogus "signed and unsigned" "case 2" } */
+}
+
+int h(enum mm2 x)
+{
+ return x == (tf?DI2:SI2); /* { dg-bogus "signed and unsigned" "case 3" } */
+}
+
+int i(enum mm2 x)
+{
+ return x == (tf?DI2:-1); /* { dg-warning "signed and unsigned" "case 4" } */
+}