* testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc: Do not test long double

	in IBM long double case.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@118814 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
index 12c49bb..2118ba1 100644 (file)
--- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-11-14  Joseph Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>
+
+       * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc: Do not test long double
+       in IBM long double case.
+
 2006-11-13  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>
 
        * configure: Regenerated.

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc
index f5640de..22bdb5e 100644 (file)
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ void test01()
   d2 = 1.4;
   test01_do(d1, d2);
 
+#if __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ != 106
+  /* For IBM long double, epsilon is too small (since 1.0 plus any
+     double is representable) to be able to expect results within
+     epsilon * 100 (which may be much less than 1ulp for a particular
+     long double value).  */
   long double ld1 = -1.0l;
   long double ld2 = 0.5l;
   test01_do(ld1, ld2);
@@ -68,6 +73,7 @@ void test01()
   ld1 = -3.2l;
   ld2 = 1.4l;
   test01_do(ld1, ld2);
+#endif
 }
 
 int main()