* cris.h: Revert thinko in last patch.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@47280 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index e497f5c..0217226 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2001-11-22  Kaveh R. Ghazi  <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
+
+       * cris.h: Revert thinko in last patch.
+
 2001-11-23  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
 
        * ChangeLog.0, ChangeLog.2, ChangeLog.3, ChangeLog.4, ChangeLog,

diff --git a/gcc/config/cris/cris.h b/gcc/config/cris/cris.h
index b282dbd..2857788 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/config/cris/cris.h
+++ b/gcc/config/cris/cris.h
@@ -856,6 +856,15 @@ enum reg_class {NO_REGS, ALL_REGS, LIM_REG_CLASSES};
    TARGET_STACK_ALIGN and TARGET_ALIGN_BY_32.  */
 #define DWARF_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT -1
 
+/* If we would ever need an exact mapping between canonical register
+   number and dwarf frame register, we would either need to include all
+   registers in the gcc decription (with some marked fixed of course), or
+   an inverse mapping from dwarf register to gcc register.  There is one
+   need in dwarf2out.c:expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes.  Right now, I
+   don't see that we need exact correspondence between DWARF *frame*
+   registers and DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER, so map them onto GCC registers.  */
+#define DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM(REG) (REG)
+
 /* Node: Stack Checking */
 /* (no definitions) FIXME: Check.  */