+2003-10-20 Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
+
+ * gcc.dg/old-style-asm-1.c: Count jump_insns instead of labels.
+
2003-10-20 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
* gcc.dg/builtins-18.c: Wrap C99 tests with HAVE_C99_RUNTIME.
/* PR inline-asm/8832 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -dP" } */
/* Verify that GCC doesn't optimize
old style asm instructions. */
/* The purpose of the test below is to check that there are two branches
in the generated code, supposedly corresponding to the if-statements.
- Warning: this is fragile and assumes that the generated labels for the
- branches contain letter "L". That assumption is generally invalid,
- because for example it depends on the target macro
- ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL to generate such a name (as with the default
- definition). */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "L" 4 } } */
+ It tries to check for jump_insn (set (pc) pattern, so that jump_insns
+ corresponding to return are not taken into account. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?n)jump_insn.*set.*pc" 2 } } */