2004-06-27 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>

[pf3gnuchains/gcc-fork.git] / libstdc++-v3 / docs / html / 18_support / howto.html

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/18_support/howto.html b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/18_support/howto.html
index 070d3c3..eff1c75 100644 (file)
--- a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/18_support/howto.html
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/18_support/howto.html
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
       always a pointer.)
    </p>
    <p>In his book
-      <a href="http://cseng.aw.com/bookdetail.qry?ISBN=0-201-92488-9&amp;ptype=0"><em>Effective C++</em></a>,
+      <a href="http://www.awprofessional.com/titles/0-201-92488-9/"><em>Effective C++</em></a>,
       Scott Meyers points out that the best way to solve this problem is to
       not overload on pointer-vs-integer types to begin with.  He also
       offers a way to make your own magic NULL that will match pointers
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
    } NULL;                           // and whose name is NULL
    </pre>
    <p>(Cribbed from the published version of
-      <a href="http://www.awlonline.com/cseng/meyerscddemo/">the
+      <a href="http://www.awprofessional.com/titles/0-201-31015-5/">the
       Effective C++ CD</a>, reproduced here with permission.)
    </p>
    <p>If you aren't using g++ (why?), but you do have a compiler which
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
       print this stuff, it prompted him to run this code through current
       compilers to see what the state of the art is with respect to member
       template functions.  He posted
-      <a href="http://www.deja.com/threadmsg_md.xp?AN=644660779.1&amp;CONTEXT=964036823.871301239">an
+      <a href="http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&selm=an_644660779">an
       article to Usenet</a> after discovering that the code above is not
       valid!  Even though it has no data members, it still needs a
       user-defined constructor (which means that the class needs a type name