}
#endif
\f
+#ifdef L_bswapsi2
+UWtype
+__bswapsi2 (UWtype u)
+{
+ return ((((u) & 0xff000000) >> 24)
+ | (((u) & 0x00ff0000) >> 8)
+ | (((u) & 0x0000ff00) << 8)
+ | (((u) & 0x000000ff) << 24));
+}
+#endif
+#ifdef L_bswapdi2
+UDWtype
+__bswapdi2 (UDWtype u)
+{
+ return ((((u) & 0xff00000000000000ull) >> 56)
+ | (((u) & 0x00ff000000000000ull) >> 40)
+ | (((u) & 0x0000ff0000000000ull) >> 24)
+ | (((u) & 0x000000ff00000000ull) >> 8)
+ | (((u) & 0x00000000ff000000ull) << 8)
+ | (((u) & 0x0000000000ff0000ull) << 24)
+ | (((u) & 0x000000000000ff00ull) << 40)
+ | (((u) & 0x00000000000000ffull) << 56));
+}
+#endif
#ifdef L_ffssi2
#undef int
int
{
MTYPE denom, ratio, x, y;
- /* ??? We can get better behavior from logarithmic scaling instead of
+ /* ??? We can get better behavior from logarithmic scaling instead of
the division. But that would mean starting to link libgcc against
libm. We could implement something akin to ldexp/frexp as gcc builtins
fairly easily... */