You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with GCC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free
-Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
-02111-1307, USA. */
+Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
+02110-1301, USA. */
/* This is the pathetic reminder of old fame of the jump-optimization pass
- of the compiler. Now it contains basically set of utility function to
+ of the compiler. Now it contains basically a set of utility functions to
operate with jumps.
Each CODE_LABEL has a count of the times it is used
#include "reload.h"
#include "predict.h"
#include "timevar.h"
+#include "tree-pass.h"
+#include "target.h"
/* Optimize jump y; x: ... y: jumpif... x?
Don't know if it is worth bothering with. */
This simple pass moves barriers and removes duplicates so that the
old code is happy.
*/
-void
+unsigned int
cleanup_barriers (void)
{
rtx insn, next, prev;
reorder_insns (insn, insn, prev);
}
}
+ return 0;
}
-void
-purge_line_number_notes (rtx f)
+struct tree_opt_pass pass_cleanup_barriers =
+{
+ "barriers", /* name */
+ NULL, /* gate */
+ cleanup_barriers, /* execute */
+ NULL, /* sub */
+ NULL, /* next */
+ 0, /* static_pass_number */
+ 0, /* tv_id */
+ 0, /* properties_required */
+ 0, /* properties_provided */
+ 0, /* properties_destroyed */
+ 0, /* todo_flags_start */
+ TODO_dump_func, /* todo_flags_finish */
+ 0 /* letter */
+};
+
+unsigned int
+purge_line_number_notes (void)
{
rtx last_note = 0;
rtx insn;
extraneous. There should be some indication where that line belonged,
even if it became empty. */
- for (insn = f; insn; insn = NEXT_INSN (insn))
+ for (insn = get_insns (); insn; insn = NEXT_INSN (insn))
if (NOTE_P (insn))
{
if (NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (insn) == NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
last_note = insn;
}
}
+ return 0;
}
+
+struct tree_opt_pass pass_purge_lineno_notes =
+{
+ "elnotes", /* name */
+ NULL, /* gate */
+ purge_line_number_notes, /* execute */
+ NULL, /* sub */
+ NULL, /* next */
+ 0, /* static_pass_number */
+ 0, /* tv_id */
+ 0, /* properties_required */
+ 0, /* properties_provided */
+ 0, /* properties_destroyed */
+ 0, /* todo_flags_start */
+ TODO_dump_func, /* todo_flags_finish */
+ 0 /* letter */
+};
+
\f
/* Initialize LABEL_NUSES and JUMP_LABEL fields. Delete any REG_LABEL
notes whose labels don't occur in the insn any more. Returns the
{
/* But a LABEL_REF around the REG_LABEL note, so
that we can canonicalize it. */
- rtx label_ref = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode,
+ rtx label_ref = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (Pmode,
XEXP (label_note, 0));
mark_jump_label (label_ref, insn, 0);
}
}
\f
-/* Move all block-beg, block-end, loop-beg, loop-cont, loop-vtop, loop-end,
- notes between START and END out before START. START and END may be such
- notes. Returns the values of the new starting and ending insns, which
- may be different if the original ones were such notes.
- Return true if there were only such notes and no real instructions. */
+/* Move all block-beg, block-end and loop-beg notes between START and END out
+ before START. START and END may be such notes. Returns the values of the
+ new starting and ending insns, which may be different if the original ones
+ were such notes. Return true if there were only such notes and no real
+ instructions. */
bool
squeeze_notes (rtx* startp, rtx* endp)
next = NEXT_INSN (insn);
if (NOTE_P (insn)
&& (NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (insn) == NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_END
- || NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (insn) == NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_BEG
- || NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (insn) == NOTE_INSN_LOOP_BEG
- || NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (insn) == NOTE_INSN_LOOP_END))
+ || NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (insn) == NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_BEG))
{
/* BLOCK_BEG or BLOCK_END notes only exist in the `final' pass. */
gcc_assert (NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (insn) != NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_BEG
If the chain loops or we can't find end, return LABEL,
since that tells caller to avoid changing the insn.
- If RELOAD_COMPLETED is 0, we do not chain across a NOTE_INSN_LOOP_BEG or
- a USE or CLOBBER. */
+ If RELOAD_COMPLETED is 0, we do not chain across a USE or CLOBBER. */
rtx
follow_jumps (rtx label)
&& BARRIER_P (next));
depth++)
{
- /* Don't chain through the insn that jumps into a loop
- from outside the loop,
- since that would create multiple loop entry jumps
- and prevent loop optimization. */
rtx tem;
- if (!reload_completed)
- for (tem = value; tem != insn; tem = NEXT_INSN (tem))
- if (NOTE_P (tem)
- && (NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (tem) == NOTE_INSN_LOOP_BEG
- /* ??? Optional. Disables some optimizations, but makes
- gcov output more accurate with -O. */
- || (flag_test_coverage && NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (tem) > 0)))
- return value;
+ if (!reload_completed && flag_test_coverage)
+ {
+ /* ??? Optional. Disables some optimizations, but makes
+ gcov output more accurate with -O. */
+ for (tem = value; tem != insn; tem = NEXT_INSN (tem))
+ if (NOTE_P (tem) && NOTE_LINE_NUMBER (tem) > 0)
+ return value;
+ }
/* If we have found a cycle, make the insn jump to itself. */
if (JUMP_LABEL (insn) == label)
{
rtx n;
if (nlabel)
- n = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, nlabel);
+ n = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (Pmode, nlabel);
else
n = gen_rtx_RETURN (VOIDmode);
else if (code == RETURN && olabel == 0)
{
if (nlabel)
- x = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, nlabel);
+ x = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (Pmode, nlabel);
else
x = gen_rtx_RETURN (VOIDmode);
if (loc == &PATTERN (insn))
/* Like rtx_equal_p except that it considers two REGs as equal
if they renumber to the same value and considers two commutative
operations to be the same if the order of the operands has been
- reversed.
-
- ??? Addition is not commutative on the PA due to the weird implicit
- space register selection rules for memory addresses. Therefore, we
- don't consider a + b == b + a.
-
- We could/should make this test a little tighter. Possibly only
- disabling it on the PA via some backend macro or only disabling this
- case when the PLUS is inside a MEM. */
+ reversed. */
int
rtx_renumbered_equal_p (rtx x, rtx y)
case ADDR_VEC:
case ADDR_DIFF_VEC:
case CONST_INT:
+ case CONST_DOUBLE:
return 0;
case LABEL_REF:
return 0;
/* For commutative operations, the RTX match if the operand match in any
- order. Also handle the simple binary and unary cases without a loop.
-
- ??? Don't consider PLUS a commutative operator; see comments above. */
- if (COMMUTATIVE_P (x) && code != PLUS)
+ order. Also handle the simple binary and unary cases without a loop. */
+ if (targetm.commutative_p (x, UNKNOWN))
return ((rtx_renumbered_equal_p (XEXP (x, 0), XEXP (y, 0))
&& rtx_renumbered_equal_p (XEXP (x, 1), XEXP (y, 1)))
|| (rtx_renumbered_equal_p (XEXP (x, 0), XEXP (y, 1))
OSDN Git Service
