-- --
-- B o d y --
-- --
--- Copyright (C) 1992-2004, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- Copyright (C) 1992-2009, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
-- --
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
--- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
+-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
--- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
--- to the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, --
--- MA 02111-1307, USA. --
+-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
+-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
-- --
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
-- This package contains the routines to process package specifications and
-- bodies. The most important semantic aspects of package processing are the
--- handling of private and full declarations, and the construction of
--- dispatch tables for tagged types.
+-- handling of private and full declarations, and the construction of dispatch
+-- tables for tagged types.
with Atree; use Atree;
with Debug; use Debug;
with Elists; use Elists;
with Errout; use Errout;
with Exp_Disp; use Exp_Disp;
+with Exp_Dist; use Exp_Dist;
with Exp_Dbug; use Exp_Dbug;
with Lib; use Lib;
with Lib.Xref; use Lib.Xref;
with Opt; use Opt;
with Output; use Output;
with Sem; use Sem;
+with Sem_Aux; use Sem_Aux;
with Sem_Cat; use Sem_Cat;
with Sem_Ch3; use Sem_Ch3;
with Sem_Ch6; use Sem_Ch6;
with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8;
with Sem_Ch10; use Sem_Ch10;
with Sem_Ch12; use Sem_Ch12;
+with Sem_Disp; use Sem_Disp;
+with Sem_Prag; use Sem_Prag;
with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util;
with Sem_Warn; use Sem_Warn;
with Snames; use Snames;
with Sinfo; use Sinfo;
with Sinput; use Sinput;
with Style;
+with Uintp; use Uintp;
package body Sem_Ch7 is
-- Local Subprograms --
-----------------------
+ procedure Analyze_Package_Body_Helper (N : Node_Id);
+ -- Does all the real work of Analyze_Package_Body
+
+ procedure Check_Anonymous_Access_Types
+ (Spec_Id : Entity_Id;
+ P_Body : Node_Id);
+ -- If the spec of a package has a limited_with_clause, it may declare
+ -- anonymous access types whose designated type is a limited view, such an
+ -- anonymous access return type for a function. This access type cannot be
+ -- elaborated in the spec itself, but it may need an itype reference if it
+ -- is used within a nested scope. In that case the itype reference is
+ -- created at the beginning of the corresponding package body and inserted
+ -- before other body declarations.
+
procedure Install_Package_Entity (Id : Entity_Id);
- -- Basic procedure for the previous two. Places one entity on its
- -- visibility chain, and recurses on the visible part if the entity
- -- is an inner package.
+ -- Supporting procedure for Install_{Visible,Private}_Declarations. Places
+ -- one entity on its visibility chain, and recurses on the visible part if
+ -- the entity is an inner package.
function Is_Private_Base_Type (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
-- True for a private type that is not a subtype
function Is_Visible_Dependent (Dep : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
- -- If the private dependent is a private type whose full view is
- -- derived from the parent type, its full properties are revealed
- -- only if we are in the immediate scope of the private dependent.
- -- Should this predicate be tightened further???
+ -- If the private dependent is a private type whose full view is derived
+ -- from the parent type, its full properties are revealed only if we are in
+ -- the immediate scope of the private dependent. Should this predicate be
+ -- tightened further???
procedure Declare_Inherited_Private_Subprograms (Id : Entity_Id);
- -- Called upon entering the private part of a public child package
- -- and the body of a nested package, to potentially declare certain
- -- inherited subprograms that were inherited by types in the visible
- -- part, but whose declaration was deferred because the parent
- -- operation was private and not visible at that point. These
- -- subprograms are located by traversing the visible part declarations
- -- looking for non-private type extensions and then examining each of
- -- the primitive operations of such types to find those that were
- -- inherited but declared with a special internal name. Each such
- -- operation is now declared as an operation with a normal name (using
- -- the name of the parent operation) and replaces the previous implicit
- -- operation in the primitive operations list of the type. If the
- -- inherited private operation has been overridden, then it's
- -- replaced by the overriding operation.
+ -- Called upon entering the private part of a public child package and the
+ -- body of a nested package, to potentially declare certain inherited
+ -- subprograms that were inherited by types in the visible part, but whose
+ -- declaration was deferred because the parent operation was private and
+ -- not visible at that point. These subprograms are located by traversing
+ -- the visible part declarations looking for non-private type extensions
+ -- and then examining each of the primitive operations of such types to
+ -- find those that were inherited but declared with a special internal
+ -- name. Each such operation is now declared as an operation with a normal
+ -- name (using the name of the parent operation) and replaces the previous
+ -- implicit operation in the primitive operations list of the type. If the
+ -- inherited private operation has been overridden, then it's replaced by
+ -- the overriding operation.
--------------------------
-- Analyze_Package_Body --
--------------------------
procedure Analyze_Package_Body (N : Node_Id) is
- Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
+ Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
+
+ begin
+ if Debug_Flag_C then
+ Write_Str ("==> package body ");
+ Write_Name (Chars (Defining_Entity (N)));
+ Write_Str (" from ");
+ Write_Location (Loc);
+ Write_Eol;
+ Indent;
+ end if;
+
+ -- The real work is split out into the helper, so it can do "return;"
+ -- without skipping the debug output.
+
+ Analyze_Package_Body_Helper (N);
+
+ if Debug_Flag_C then
+ Outdent;
+ Write_Str ("<== package body ");
+ Write_Name (Chars (Defining_Entity (N)));
+ Write_Str (" from ");
+ Write_Location (Loc);
+ Write_Eol;
+ end if;
+ end Analyze_Package_Body;
+
+ ---------------------------------
+ -- Analyze_Package_Body_Helper --
+ ---------------------------------
+
+ procedure Analyze_Package_Body_Helper (N : Node_Id) is
HSS : Node_Id;
Body_Id : Entity_Id;
Spec_Id : Entity_Id;
Pack_Decl : Node_Id;
procedure Install_Composite_Operations (P : Entity_Id);
- -- Composite types declared in the current scope may depend on
- -- types that were private at the point of declaration, and whose
- -- full view is now in scope. Indicate that the corresponding
- -- operations on the composite type are available.
+ -- Composite types declared in the current scope may depend on types
+ -- that were private at the point of declaration, and whose full view
+ -- is now in scope. Indicate that the corresponding operations on the
+ -- composite type are available.
----------------------------------
-- Install_Composite_Operations --
begin
Id := First_Entity (P);
-
while Present (Id) loop
-
if Is_Type (Id)
and then (Is_Limited_Composite (Id)
or else Is_Private_Composite (Id))
end loop;
end Install_Composite_Operations;
- -- Start of processing for Analyze_Package_Body
+ -- Start of processing for Analyze_Package_Body_Helper
begin
- -- Find corresponding package specification, and establish the
- -- current scope. The visible defining entity for the package is the
- -- defining occurrence in the spec. On exit from the package body, all
- -- body declarations are attached to the defining entity for the body,
- -- but the later is never used for name resolution. In this fashion
- -- there is only one visible entity that denotes the package.
-
- if Debug_Flag_C then
- Write_Str ("==== Compiling package body ");
- Write_Name (Chars (Defining_Entity (N)));
- Write_Str (" from ");
- Write_Location (Loc);
- Write_Eol;
- end if;
+ -- Find corresponding package specification, and establish the current
+ -- scope. The visible defining entity for the package is the defining
+ -- occurrence in the spec. On exit from the package body, all body
+ -- declarations are attached to the defining entity for the body, but
+ -- the later is never used for name resolution. In this fashion there
+ -- is only one visible entity that denotes the package.
- -- Set Body_Id. Note that this Will be reset to point to the
- -- generic copy later on in the generic case.
+ -- Set Body_Id. Note that this Will be reset to point to the generic
+ -- copy later on in the generic case.
Body_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
if Present (Corresponding_Spec (N)) then
- -- Body is body of package instantiation. Corresponding spec
- -- has already been set.
+ -- Body is body of package instantiation. Corresponding spec has
+ -- already been set.
Spec_Id := Corresponding_Spec (N);
Pack_Decl := Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id);
Spec_Id := Current_Entity_In_Scope (Defining_Entity (N));
if Present (Spec_Id)
- and then Is_Package (Spec_Id)
+ and then Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Spec_Id)
then
Pack_Decl := Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id);
return;
end if;
- if Is_Package (Spec_Id)
+ if Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Spec_Id)
and then
(Scope (Spec_Id) = Standard_Standard
or else Is_Child_Unit (Spec_Id))
if Ekind (Spec_Id) = E_Generic_Package then
- -- Disable expansion and perform semantic analysis on copy.
- -- The unannotated body will be used in all instantiations.
+ -- Disable expansion and perform semantic analysis on copy. The
+ -- unannotated body will be used in all instantiations.
Body_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
Set_Ekind (Body_Id, E_Package_Body);
Set_Scope (Body_Id, Scope (Spec_Id));
+ Set_Is_Obsolescent (Body_Id, Is_Obsolescent (Spec_Id));
Set_Body_Entity (Spec_Id, Body_Id);
Set_Spec_Entity (Body_Id, Spec_Id);
New_N := Copy_Generic_Node (N, Empty, Instantiating => False);
Rewrite (N, New_N);
- -- Update Body_Id to point to the copied node for the remainder
- -- of the processing.
+ -- Update Body_Id to point to the copied node for the remainder of
+ -- the processing.
Body_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
Start_Generic;
end if;
-- The Body_Id is that of the copied node in the generic case, the
- -- current node otherwise. Note that N was rewritten above, so we
- -- must be sure to get the latest Body_Id value.
+ -- current node otherwise. Note that N was rewritten above, so we must
+ -- be sure to get the latest Body_Id value.
Set_Ekind (Body_Id, E_Package_Body);
Set_Body_Entity (Spec_Id, Body_Id);
Set_Spec_Entity (Body_Id, Spec_Id);
- -- Defining name for the package body is not a visible entity: Only
- -- the defining name for the declaration is visible.
+ -- Defining name for the package body is not a visible entity: Only the
+ -- defining name for the declaration is visible.
Set_Etype (Body_Id, Standard_Void_Type);
Set_Scope (Body_Id, Scope (Spec_Id));
Set_Has_Completion (Spec_Id);
Last_Spec_Entity := Last_Entity (Spec_Id);
- New_Scope (Spec_Id);
+ Push_Scope (Spec_Id);
Set_Categorization_From_Pragmas (N);
Install_Private_With_Clauses (Spec_Id);
Install_Composite_Operations (Spec_Id);
+ Check_Anonymous_Access_Types (Spec_Id, N);
+
if Ekind (Spec_Id) = E_Generic_Package then
Set_Use (Generic_Formal_Declarations (Pack_Decl));
end if;
Set_Use (Visible_Declarations (Specification (Pack_Decl)));
Set_Use (Private_Declarations (Specification (Pack_Decl)));
- -- This is a nested package, so it may be necessary to declare
- -- certain inherited subprograms that are not yet visible because
- -- the parent type's subprograms are now visible.
+ -- This is a nested package, so it may be necessary to declare certain
+ -- inherited subprograms that are not yet visible because the parent
+ -- type's subprograms are now visible.
if Ekind (Scope (Spec_Id)) = E_Package
and then Scope (Spec_Id) /= Standard_Standard
if Present (Declarations (N)) then
Analyze_Declarations (Declarations (N));
+ Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion (Declarations (N));
+ end if;
+
+ -- Analyze_Declarations has caused freezing of all types. Now generate
+ -- bodies for RACW primitives and stream attributes, if any.
+
+ if Ekind (Spec_Id) = E_Package and then Has_RACW (Spec_Id) then
+
+ -- Attach subprogram bodies to support RACWs declared in spec
+
+ Append_RACW_Bodies (Declarations (N), Spec_Id);
+ Analyze_List (Declarations (N));
end if;
HSS := Handled_Statement_Sequence (N);
Generate_Reference (Spec_Id, Body_Id, 'b', Set_Ref => False);
- -- For a generic package, collect global references and mark
- -- them on the original body so that they are not resolved
- -- again at the point of instantiation.
+ -- For a generic package, collect global references and mark them on
+ -- the original body so that they are not resolved again at the point
+ -- of instantiation.
if Ekind (Spec_Id) /= E_Package then
Save_Global_References (Original_Node (N));
End_Generic;
end if;
- -- The entities of the package body have so far been chained onto
- -- the declaration chain for the spec. That's been fine while we
- -- were in the body, since we wanted them to be visible, but now
- -- that we are leaving the package body, they are no longer visible,
- -- so we remove them from the entity chain of the package spec entity,
- -- and copy them to the entity chain of the package body entity, where
- -- they will never again be visible.
+ -- The entities of the package body have so far been chained onto the
+ -- declaration chain for the spec. That's been fine while we were in the
+ -- body, since we wanted them to be visible, but now that we are leaving
+ -- the package body, they are no longer visible, so we remove them from
+ -- the entity chain of the package spec entity, and copy them to the
+ -- entity chain of the package body entity, where they will never again
+ -- be visible.
if Present (Last_Spec_Entity) then
Set_First_Entity (Body_Id, Next_Entity (Last_Spec_Entity));
begin
E := First_Entity (Body_Id);
-
while Present (E) loop
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (E, False);
Set_Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (E, False);
Set_Is_Hidden (E);
- -- Child units may appear on the entity list (for example if
- -- they appear in the context of a subunit) but they are not
- -- body entities.
+ -- Child units may appear on the entity list (e.g. if they appear
+ -- in the context of a subunit) but they are not body entities.
if not Is_Child_Unit (E) then
Set_Is_Package_Body_Entity (E);
-- following loop runs backwards from the end of the entities of the
-- package body making these entities invisible until we reach a
-- referencer, i.e. a declaration that could reference a previous
- -- declaration, a generic body or an inlined body, or a stub (which
- -- may contain either of these). This is of course an approximation,
- -- but it is conservative and definitely correct.
+ -- declaration, a generic body or an inlined body, or a stub (which may
+ -- contain either of these). This is of course an approximation, but it
+ -- is conservative and definitely correct.
-- We only do this at the outer (library) level non-generic packages.
-- The reason is simply to cut down on the number of external symbols
Outer : Boolean)
return Boolean;
-- Traverse the given list of declarations in reverse order.
- -- Return True as soon as a referencer is reached. Return
- -- False if none is found. The Outer parameter is True for
- -- the outer level call, and False for inner level calls for
- -- nested packages. If Outer is True, then any entities up
- -- to the point of hitting a referencer get their Is_Public
- -- flag cleared, so that the entities will be treated as
- -- static entities in the C sense, and need not have fully
- -- qualified names. For inner levels, we need all names to
- -- be fully qualified to deal with the same name appearing
- -- in parallel packages (right now this is tied to their
+ -- Return True as soon as a referencer is reached. Return False if
+ -- none is found. The Outer parameter is True for the outer level
+ -- call, and False for inner level calls for nested packages. If
+ -- Outer is True, then any entities up to the point of hitting a
+ -- referencer get their Is_Public flag cleared, so that the
+ -- entities will be treated as static entities in the C sense, and
+ -- need not have fully qualified names. For inner levels, we need
+ -- all names to be fully qualified to deal with the same name
+ -- appearing in parallel packages (right now this is tied to their
-- being external).
--------------------
end if;
D := Last (L);
-
while Present (D) loop
K := Nkind (D);
-- Note that we test Has_Pragma_Inline here rather
-- than Is_Inlined. We are compiling this for a
- -- client, and it is the client who will decide
- -- if actual inlining should occur, so we need to
- -- assume that the procedure could be inlined for
- -- the purpose of accessing global entities.
+ -- client, and it is the client who will decide if
+ -- actual inlining should occur, so we need to assume
+ -- that the procedure could be inlined for the purpose
+ -- of accessing global entities.
if Has_Pragma_Inline (E) then
return True;
then
E := Corresponding_Spec (D);
- -- Generic package body is a referencer. It would
- -- seem that we only have to consider generics that
- -- can be exported, i.e. where the corresponding spec
- -- is the spec of the current package, but because of
- -- nested instantiations, a fully private generic
- -- body may export other private body entities.
+ -- Generic package body is a referencer. It would seem
+ -- that we only have to consider generics that can be
+ -- exported, i.e. where the corresponding spec is the
+ -- spec of the current package, but because of nested
+ -- instantiations, a fully private generic body may
+ -- export other private body entities.
if Is_Generic_Unit (E) then
return True;
- -- For non-generic package body, recurse into body
- -- unless this is an instance, we ignore instances
- -- since they cannot have references that affect
- -- outer entities.
+ -- For non-generic package body, recurse into body unless
+ -- this is an instance, we ignore instances since they
+ -- cannot have references that affect outer entities.
elsif not Is_Generic_Instance (E) then
if Has_Referencer
end if;
end if;
- -- Objects and exceptions need not be public if we have
- -- not encountered a referencer so far. We only reset
- -- the flag for outer level entities that are not
- -- imported/exported, and which have no interface name.
+ -- Objects and exceptions need not be public if we have not
+ -- encountered a referencer so far. We only reset the flag
+ -- for outer level entities that are not imported/exported,
+ -- and which have no interface name.
- elsif K = N_Object_Declaration
- or else K = N_Exception_Declaration
- or else K = N_Subprogram_Declaration
+ elsif Nkind_In (K, N_Object_Declaration,
+ N_Exception_Declaration,
+ N_Subprogram_Declaration)
then
E := Defining_Entity (D);
end if;
-- If expander is not active, then here is where we turn off the
- -- In_Package_Body flag, otherwise it is turned off at the end of
- -- the corresponding expansion routine. If this is an instance body,
- -- we need to qualify names of local entities, because the body may
- -- have been compiled as a preliminary to another instantiation.
+ -- In_Package_Body flag, otherwise it is turned off at the end of the
+ -- corresponding expansion routine. If this is an instance body, we need
+ -- to qualify names of local entities, because the body may have been
+ -- compiled as a preliminary to another instantiation.
if not Expander_Active then
Set_In_Package_Body (Spec_Id, False);
Qualify_Entity_Names (N);
end if;
end if;
- end Analyze_Package_Body;
+ end Analyze_Package_Body_Helper;
---------------------------------
-- Analyze_Package_Declaration --
procedure Analyze_Package_Declaration (N : Node_Id) is
Id : constant Node_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
+
PF : Boolean;
+ -- True when in the context of a declared pure library unit
+
+ Body_Required : Boolean;
+ -- True when this package declaration requires a corresponding body
+
+ Comp_Unit : Boolean;
+ -- True when this package declaration is not a nested declaration
begin
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI-217): Check if the package has been erroneously named
+ -- in a limited-with clause of its own context. In this case the error
+ -- has been previously notified by Analyze_Context.
+
+ -- limited with Pkg; -- ERROR
+ -- package Pkg is ...
+
+ if From_With_Type (Id) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if Debug_Flag_C then
+ Write_Str ("==> package spec ");
+ Write_Name (Chars (Id));
+ Write_Str (" from ");
+ Write_Location (Sloc (N));
+ Write_Eol;
+ Indent;
+ end if;
+
Generate_Definition (Id);
Enter_Name (Id);
Set_Ekind (Id, E_Package);
Set_Etype (Id, Standard_Void_Type);
- New_Scope (Id);
+ Push_Scope (Id);
PF := Is_Pure (Enclosing_Lib_Unit_Entity);
Set_Is_Pure (Id, PF);
Set_Categorization_From_Pragmas (N);
- if Debug_Flag_C then
- Write_Str ("==== Compiling package spec ");
- Write_Name (Chars (Id));
- Write_Str (" from ");
- Write_Location (Sloc (N));
- Write_Eol;
- end if;
-
Analyze (Specification (N));
Validate_Categorization_Dependency (N, Id);
- End_Package_Scope (Id);
- -- For a compilation unit, indicate whether it needs a body, and
- -- whether elaboration warnings may be meaningful on it.
+ Body_Required := Unit_Requires_Body (Id);
- if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Compilation_Unit then
- Set_Body_Required (Parent (N), Unit_Requires_Body (Id));
+ -- When this spec does not require an explicit body, we know that there
+ -- are no entities requiring completion in the language sense; we call
+ -- Check_Completion here only to ensure that any nested package
+ -- declaration that requires an implicit body gets one. (In the case
+ -- where a body is required, Check_Completion is called at the end of
+ -- the body's declarative part.)
- if not Body_Required (Parent (N)) then
+ if not Body_Required then
+ Check_Completion;
+ end if;
+
+ Comp_Unit := Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Compilation_Unit;
+ if Comp_Unit then
+
+ -- Set Body_Required indication on the compilation unit node, and
+ -- determine whether elaboration warnings may be meaningful on it.
+
+ Set_Body_Required (Parent (N), Body_Required);
+
+ if not Body_Required then
Set_Suppress_Elaboration_Warnings (Id);
end if;
+ end if;
+
+ End_Package_Scope (Id);
+
+ -- For the declaration of a library unit that is a remote types package,
+ -- check legality rules regarding availability of stream attributes for
+ -- types that contain non-remote access values. This subprogram performs
+ -- visibility tests that rely on the fact that we have exited the scope
+ -- of Id.
+
+ if Comp_Unit then
Validate_RT_RAT_Component (N);
end if;
+
+ if Debug_Flag_C then
+ Outdent;
+ Write_Str ("<== package spec ");
+ Write_Name (Chars (Id));
+ Write_Str (" from ");
+ Write_Location (Sloc (N));
+ Write_Eol;
+ end if;
end Analyze_Package_Declaration;
-----------------------------------
-- Analyze_Package_Specification --
-----------------------------------
- -- Note that this code is shared for the analysis of generic package
- -- specs (see Sem_Ch12.Analyze_Generic_Package_Declaration for details).
+ -- Note that this code is shared for the analysis of generic package specs
+ -- (see Sem_Ch12.Analyze_Generic_Package_Declaration for details).
procedure Analyze_Package_Specification (N : Node_Id) is
Id : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
L : Entity_Id;
Public_Child : Boolean;
+ Private_With_Clauses_Installed : Boolean := False;
+ -- In Ada 2005, private with_clauses are visible in the private part
+ -- of a nested package, even if it appears in the public part of the
+ -- enclosing package. This requires a separate step to install these
+ -- private_with_clauses, and remove them at the end of the nested
+ -- package.
+
+ procedure Analyze_PPCs (Decls : List_Id);
+ -- Given a list of declarations, go through looking for subprogram
+ -- specs, and for each one found, analyze any pre/postconditions that
+ -- are chained to the spec. This is the implementation of the late
+ -- visibility analysis for preconditions and postconditions in specs.
+
procedure Clear_Constants (Id : Entity_Id; FE : Entity_Id);
- -- Clears constant indications (Never_Set_In_Source, Constant_Value,
- -- and Is_True_Constant) on all variables that are entities of Id,
- -- and on the chain whose first element is FE. A recursive call is
- -- made for all packages and generic packages.
+ -- Clears constant indications (Never_Set_In_Source, Constant_Value, and
+ -- Is_True_Constant) on all variables that are entities of Id, and on
+ -- the chain whose first element is FE. A recursive call is made for all
+ -- packages and generic packages.
procedure Generate_Parent_References;
-- For a child unit, generate references to parent units, for
-- Child and Unit are entities of compilation units. True if Child
-- is a public child of Parent as defined in 10.1.1
- procedure Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion;
- -- Examines the deferred constants in the private part of the package
- -- specification. Emits the error message "constant declaration requires
- -- initialization expression " if not completed by an Import pragma.
-
procedure Inspect_Unchecked_Union_Completion (Decls : List_Id);
-- Detects all incomplete or private type declarations having a known
-- discriminant part that are completed by an Unchecked_Union. Emits
-- the error message "Unchecked_Union may not complete discriminated
-- partial view".
+ procedure Install_Parent_Private_Declarations (Inst_Id : Entity_Id);
+ -- Given the package entity of a generic package instantiation or
+ -- formal package whose corresponding generic is a child unit, installs
+ -- the private declarations of each of the child unit's parents.
+ -- This has to be done at the point of entering the instance package's
+ -- private part rather than being done in Sem_Ch12.Install_Parent
+ -- (which is where the parents' visible declarations are installed).
+
+ ------------------
+ -- Analyze_PPCs --
+ ------------------
+
+ procedure Analyze_PPCs (Decls : List_Id) is
+ Decl : Node_Id;
+ Spec : Node_Id;
+ Sent : Entity_Id;
+ Prag : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Decl := First (Decls);
+ while Present (Decl) loop
+ if Nkind (Original_Node (Decl)) = N_Subprogram_Declaration then
+ Spec := Specification (Original_Node (Decl));
+ Sent := Defining_Unit_Name (Spec);
+ Prag := Spec_PPC_List (Sent);
+ while Present (Prag) loop
+ Analyze_PPC_In_Decl_Part (Prag, Sent);
+ Prag := Next_Pragma (Prag);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Decl);
+ end loop;
+ end Analyze_PPCs;
+
---------------------
-- Clear_Constants --
---------------------
E : Entity_Id;
begin
- -- Ignore package renamings, not interesting and they can
- -- cause self referential loops in the code below.
+ -- Ignore package renamings, not interesting and they can cause self
+ -- referential loops in the code below.
if Nkind (Parent (Id)) = N_Package_Renaming_Declaration then
return;
end if;
- -- Note: in the loop below, the check for Next_Entity pointing
- -- back to the package entity seems very odd, but it is needed,
- -- because this kind of unexpected circularity does occur ???
+ -- Note: in the loop below, the check for Next_Entity pointing back
+ -- to the package entity may seem odd, but it is needed, because a
+ -- package can contain a renaming declaration to itself, and such
+ -- renamings are generated automatically within package instances.
E := FE;
while Present (E) and then E /= Id loop
- if Ekind (E) = E_Variable then
+ if Is_Assignable (E) then
Set_Never_Set_In_Source (E, False);
Set_Is_True_Constant (E, False);
Set_Current_Value (E, Empty);
- Set_Is_Known_Non_Null (E, False);
+ Set_Is_Known_Null (E, False);
+ Set_Last_Assignment (E, Empty);
- elsif Ekind (E) = E_Package
- or else
- Ekind (E) = E_Generic_Package
- then
+ if not Can_Never_Be_Null (E) then
+ Set_Is_Known_Non_Null (E, False);
+ end if;
+
+ elsif Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (E) then
Clear_Constants (E, First_Entity (E));
Clear_Constants (E, First_Private_Entity (E));
end if;
then
Generate_Reference (Id, Scope (Id), 'k', False);
- elsif Nkind (Unit (Cunit (Main_Unit))) /= N_Subprogram_Body
- and then Nkind (Unit (Cunit (Main_Unit))) /= N_Subunit
+ elsif not Nkind_In (Unit (Cunit (Main_Unit)), N_Subprogram_Body,
+ N_Subunit)
then
- -- If current unit is an ancestor of main unit, generate
- -- a reference to its own parent.
+ -- If current unit is an ancestor of main unit, generate a
+ -- reference to its own parent.
declare
U : Node_Id;
end if;
end Is_Public_Child;
- ------------------------------------------
- -- Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion --
- ------------------------------------------
-
- procedure Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion is
- Decl : Node_Id;
-
- begin
- Decl := First (Priv_Decls);
- while Present (Decl) loop
-
- -- Deferred constant signature
-
- if Nkind (Decl) = N_Object_Declaration
- and then Constant_Present (Decl)
- and then No (Expression (Decl))
-
- -- No need to check internally generated constants
-
- and then Comes_From_Source (Decl)
-
- -- The constant is not completed. A full object declaration
- -- or a pragma Import complete a deferred constant.
-
- and then not Has_Completion (Defining_Identifier (Decl))
- then
- Error_Msg_N
- ("constant declaration requires initialization expression",
- Defining_Identifier (Decl));
- end if;
-
- Decl := Next (Decl);
- end loop;
- end Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion;
-
----------------------------------------
-- Inspect_Unchecked_Union_Completion --
----------------------------------------
procedure Inspect_Unchecked_Union_Completion (Decls : List_Id) is
- Decl : Node_Id := First (Decls);
+ Decl : Node_Id;
begin
+ Decl := First (Decls);
while Present (Decl) loop
-- We are looking at an incomplete or private type declaration
-- with a known_discriminant_part whose full view is an
-- Unchecked_Union.
- if (Nkind (Decl) = N_Incomplete_Type_Declaration
- or else
- Nkind (Decl) = N_Private_Type_Declaration)
+ if Nkind_In (Decl, N_Incomplete_Type_Declaration,
+ N_Private_Type_Declaration)
and then Has_Discriminants (Defining_Identifier (Decl))
and then Present (Full_View (Defining_Identifier (Decl)))
- and then Is_Unchecked_Union
- (Full_View (Defining_Identifier (Decl)))
+ and then
+ Is_Unchecked_Union (Full_View (Defining_Identifier (Decl)))
then
- Error_Msg_N ("completion of discriminated partial view" &
- " cannot be an Unchecked_Union",
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("completion of discriminated partial view "
+ & "cannot be an Unchecked_Union",
Full_View (Defining_Identifier (Decl)));
end if;
end loop;
end Inspect_Unchecked_Union_Completion;
+ -----------------------------------------
+ -- Install_Parent_Private_Declarations --
+ -----------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Install_Parent_Private_Declarations (Inst_Id : Entity_Id) is
+ Inst_Par : Entity_Id;
+ Gen_Par : Entity_Id;
+ Inst_Node : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Inst_Par := Inst_Id;
+
+ Gen_Par :=
+ Generic_Parent (Specification (Unit_Declaration_Node (Inst_Par)));
+ while Present (Gen_Par) and then Is_Child_Unit (Gen_Par) loop
+ Inst_Node := Get_Package_Instantiation_Node (Inst_Par);
+
+ if Nkind_In (Inst_Node, N_Package_Instantiation,
+ N_Formal_Package_Declaration)
+ and then Nkind (Name (Inst_Node)) = N_Expanded_Name
+ then
+ Inst_Par := Entity (Prefix (Name (Inst_Node)));
+
+ if Present (Renamed_Entity (Inst_Par)) then
+ Inst_Par := Renamed_Entity (Inst_Par);
+ end if;
+
+ Gen_Par :=
+ Generic_Parent
+ (Specification (Unit_Declaration_Node (Inst_Par)));
+
+ -- Install the private declarations and private use clauses
+ -- of a parent instance of the child instance, unless the
+ -- parent instance private declarations have already been
+ -- installed earlier in Analyze_Package_Specification, which
+ -- happens when a generic child is instantiated, and the
+ -- instance is a child of the parent instance.
+
+ -- Installing the use clauses of the parent instance twice
+ -- is both unnecessary and wrong, because it would cause the
+ -- clauses to be chained to themselves in the use clauses
+ -- list of the scope stack entry. That in turn would cause
+ -- an endless loop from End_Use_Clauses upon scope exit.
+
+ -- The parent is now fully visible. It may be a hidden open
+ -- scope if we are currently compiling some child instance
+ -- declared within it, but while the current instance is being
+ -- compiled the parent is immediately visible. In particular
+ -- its entities must remain visible if a stack save/restore
+ -- takes place through a call to Rtsfind.
+
+ if Present (Gen_Par) then
+ if not In_Private_Part (Inst_Par) then
+ Install_Private_Declarations (Inst_Par);
+ Set_Use (Private_Declarations
+ (Specification
+ (Unit_Declaration_Node (Inst_Par))));
+ Set_Is_Hidden_Open_Scope (Inst_Par, False);
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we've reached the end of the generic instance parents,
+ -- then finish off by looping through the nongeneric parents
+ -- and installing their private declarations.
+
+ else
+ while Present (Inst_Par)
+ and then Inst_Par /= Standard_Standard
+ and then (not In_Open_Scopes (Inst_Par)
+ or else not In_Private_Part (Inst_Par))
+ loop
+ Install_Private_Declarations (Inst_Par);
+ Set_Use (Private_Declarations
+ (Specification
+ (Unit_Declaration_Node (Inst_Par))));
+ Inst_Par := Scope (Inst_Par);
+ end loop;
+
+ exit;
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ exit;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end Install_Parent_Private_Declarations;
+
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Package_Specification
begin
if Present (Vis_Decls) then
Analyze_Declarations (Vis_Decls);
+ Analyze_PPCs (Vis_Decls);
end if;
-- Verify that incomplete types have received full declarations
Validate_RCI_Declarations (Id);
end if;
- -- Save global references in the visible declarations, before
- -- installing private declarations of parent unit if there is one,
- -- because the privacy status of types defined in the parent will
- -- change. This is only relevant for generic child units, but is
- -- done in all cases for uniformity.
+ -- Save global references in the visible declarations, before installing
+ -- private declarations of parent unit if there is one, because the
+ -- privacy status of types defined in the parent will change. This is
+ -- only relevant for generic child units, but is done in all cases for
+ -- uniformity.
if Ekind (Id) = E_Generic_Package
and then Nkind (Orig_Decl) = N_Generic_Package_Declaration
then
declare
- Orig_Spec : constant Node_Id := Specification (Orig_Decl);
+ Orig_Spec : constant Node_Id := Specification (Orig_Decl);
Save_Priv : constant List_Id := Private_Declarations (Orig_Spec);
begin
end;
end if;
- -- If package is a public child unit, then make the private
- -- declarations of the parent visible.
+ -- If package is a public child unit, then make the private declarations
+ -- of the parent visible.
Public_Child := False;
Par := Id;
Par_Spec := Parent_Spec (Parent (N));
- -- If the package is formal package of an enclosing generic, is is
+ -- If the package is formal package of an enclosing generic, it is
-- transformed into a local generic declaration, and compiled to make
-- its spec available. We need to retrieve the original generic to
-- determine whether it is a child unit, and install its parents.
while Scope (Par) /= Standard_Standard
and then Is_Public_Child (Id, Par)
+ and then In_Open_Scopes (Par)
loop
Public_Child := True;
Par := Scope (Par);
if Is_Compilation_Unit (Id) then
Install_Private_With_Clauses (Id);
+ else
+
+ -- The current compilation unit may include private with_clauses,
+ -- which are visible in the private part of the current nested
+ -- package, and have to be installed now. This is not done for
+ -- nested instantiations, where the private with_clauses of the
+ -- enclosing unit have no effect once the instantiation info is
+ -- established and we start analyzing the package declaration.
+
+ declare
+ Comp_Unit : constant Entity_Id := Cunit_Entity (Current_Sem_Unit);
+ begin
+ if Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Comp_Unit)
+ and then not In_Private_Part (Comp_Unit)
+ and then not In_Instance
+ then
+ Install_Private_With_Clauses (Comp_Unit);
+ Private_With_Clauses_Installed := True;
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If this is a package associated with a generic instance or formal
+ -- package, then the private declarations of each of the generic's
+ -- parents must be installed at this point.
+
+ if Is_Generic_Instance (Id) then
+ Install_Parent_Private_Declarations (Id);
end if;
- -- Analyze private part if present. The flag In_Private_Part is
- -- reset in End_Package_Scope.
+ -- Analyze private part if present. The flag In_Private_Part is reset
+ -- in End_Package_Scope.
L := Last_Entity (Id);
if Present (Priv_Decls) then
Set_In_Private_Part (Id);
- -- Upon entering a public child's private part, it may be
- -- necessary to declare subprograms that were derived in
- -- the package visible part but not yet made visible.
+ -- Upon entering a public child's private part, it may be necessary
+ -- to declare subprograms that were derived in the package's visible
+ -- part but not yet made visible.
if Public_Child then
Declare_Inherited_Private_Subprograms (Id);
end if;
Analyze_Declarations (Priv_Decls);
+ Analyze_PPCs (Priv_Decls);
-- Check the private declarations for incomplete deferred constants
- Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion;
+ Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion (Priv_Decls);
-- The first private entity is the immediate follower of the last
-- visible entity, if there was one.
Set_First_Private_Entity (Id, First_Entity (Id));
end if;
- -- There may be inherited private subprograms that need to be
- -- declared, even in the absence of an explicit private part.
- -- If there are any public declarations in the package and
- -- the package is a public child unit, then an implicit private
- -- part is assumed.
+ -- There may be inherited private subprograms that need to be declared,
+ -- even in the absence of an explicit private part. If there are any
+ -- public declarations in the package and the package is a public child
+ -- unit, then an implicit private part is assumed.
elsif Present (L) and then Public_Child then
Set_In_Private_Part (Id);
Set_First_Private_Entity (Id, Next_Entity (L));
end if;
- -- Check rule of 3.6(11), which in general requires
- -- waiting till all full types have been seen.
-
E := First_Entity (Id);
while Present (E) loop
+
+ -- Check rule of 3.6(11), which in general requires waiting till all
+ -- full types have been seen.
+
if Ekind (E) = E_Record_Type or else Ekind (E) = E_Array_Type then
Check_Aliased_Component_Types (E);
end if;
+ -- Check preelaborable initialization for full type completing a
+ -- private type for which pragma Preelaborable_Initialization given.
+
+ if Is_Type (E)
+ and then Must_Have_Preelab_Init (E)
+ and then not Has_Preelaborable_Initialization (E)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("full view of & does not have preelaborable initialization", E);
+ end if;
+
Next_Entity (E);
end loop;
Process_End_Label (N, 'e', Id);
- -- For the case of a library level package, we must go through all
- -- the entities clearing the indications that the value may be
- -- constant and not modified. Why? Because any client of this
- -- package may modify these values freely from anywhere. This
- -- also applies to any nested packages or generic packages.
+ -- Remove private_with_clauses of enclosing compilation unit, if they
+ -- were installed.
+
+ if Private_With_Clauses_Installed then
+ Remove_Private_With_Clauses (Cunit (Current_Sem_Unit));
+ end if;
+
+ -- For the case of a library level package, we must go through all the
+ -- entities clearing the indications that the value may be constant and
+ -- not modified. Why? Because any client of this package may modify
+ -- these values freely from anywhere. This also applies to any nested
+ -- packages or generic packages.
- -- For now we unconditionally clear constants for packages that
- -- are instances of generic packages. The reason is that we do not
- -- have the body yet, and we otherwise think things are unreferenced
- -- when they are not. This should be fixed sometime (the effect is
- -- not terrible, we just lose some warnings, and also some cases
- -- of value propagation) ???
+ -- For now we unconditionally clear constants for packages that are
+ -- instances of generic packages. The reason is that we do not have the
+ -- body yet, and we otherwise think things are unreferenced when they
+ -- are not. This should be fixed sometime (the effect is not terrible,
+ -- we just lose some warnings, and also some cases of value propagation)
+ -- ???
if Is_Library_Level_Entity (Id)
or else Is_Generic_Instance (Id)
Set_Is_Pure (Id, PF);
Init_Size_Align (Id);
- if (Ekind (Current_Scope) /= E_Package
- and then Ekind (Current_Scope) /= E_Generic_Package)
+ if not Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Current_Scope)
or else In_Private_Part (Current_Scope)
then
Error_Msg_N ("invalid context for private declaration", N);
Set_Depends_On_Private (Id);
end Analyze_Private_Type_Declaration;
- -------------------------------------------
- -- Declare_Inherited_Private_Subprograms --
- -------------------------------------------
-
- procedure Declare_Inherited_Private_Subprograms (Id : Entity_Id) is
- E : Entity_Id;
- Op_List : Elist_Id;
- Op_Elmt : Elmt_Id;
- Op_Elmt_2 : Elmt_Id;
- Prim_Op : Entity_Id;
- New_Op : Entity_Id := Empty;
- Parent_Subp : Entity_Id;
- Found_Explicit : Boolean;
- Decl_Privates : Boolean;
-
- function Has_Overriding_Pragma (Subp : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
- -- Check whether a pragma Overriding has been provided for a primitive
- -- operation that is found to be overriding in the private part.
+ ----------------------------------
+ -- Check_Anonymous_Access_Types --
+ ----------------------------------
- function Is_Primitive_Of (T : Entity_Id; S : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
- -- Check whether an inherited subprogram is an operation of an
- -- untagged derived type.
+ procedure Check_Anonymous_Access_Types
+ (Spec_Id : Entity_Id;
+ P_Body : Node_Id)
+ is
+ E : Entity_Id;
+ IR : Node_Id;
- ---------------------------
- -- Has_Overriding_Pragma --
- ---------------------------
+ begin
+ -- Itype references are only needed by gigi, to force elaboration of
+ -- itypes. In the absence of code generation, they are not needed.
- function Has_Overriding_Pragma (Subp : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
- Decl : constant Node_Id := Unit_Declaration_Node (Subp);
- Prag : Node_Id;
+ if not Expander_Active then
+ return;
+ end if;
- begin
- if No (Decl)
- or else Nkind (Decl) /= N_Subprogram_Declaration
- or else No (Next (Decl))
+ E := First_Entity (Spec_Id);
+ while Present (E) loop
+ if Ekind (E) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
+ and then From_With_Type (E)
then
- return False;
-
- else
- Prag := Next (Decl);
+ IR := Make_Itype_Reference (Sloc (P_Body));
+ Set_Itype (IR, E);
- while Present (Prag)
- and then Nkind (Prag) = N_Pragma
- loop
- if Chars (Prag) = Name_Overriding
- or else Chars (Prag) = Name_Optional_Overriding
- then
- return True;
- else
- Next (Prag);
- end if;
- end loop;
+ if No (Declarations (P_Body)) then
+ Set_Declarations (P_Body, New_List (IR));
+ else
+ Prepend (IR, Declarations (P_Body));
+ end if;
end if;
- return False;
- end Has_Overriding_Pragma;
+ Next_Entity (E);
+ end loop;
+ end Check_Anonymous_Access_Types;
+
+ -------------------------------------------
+ -- Declare_Inherited_Private_Subprograms --
+ -------------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Declare_Inherited_Private_Subprograms (Id : Entity_Id) is
+
+ function Is_Primitive_Of (T : Entity_Id; S : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Check whether an inherited subprogram is an operation of an untagged
+ -- derived type.
---------------------
-- Is_Primitive_Of --
Formal : Entity_Id;
begin
- if Etype (S) = T then
+ -- If the full view is a scalar type, the type is the anonymous base
+ -- type, but the operation mentions the first subtype, so check the
+ -- signature against the base type.
+
+ if Base_Type (Etype (S)) = Base_Type (T) then
return True;
else
Formal := First_Formal (S);
-
while Present (Formal) loop
- if Etype (Formal) = T then
+ if Base_Type (Etype (Formal)) = Base_Type (T) then
return True;
end if;
end if;
end Is_Primitive_Of;
+ -- Local variables
+
+ E : Entity_Id;
+ Op_List : Elist_Id;
+ Op_Elmt : Elmt_Id;
+ Op_Elmt_2 : Elmt_Id;
+ Prim_Op : Entity_Id;
+ New_Op : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ Parent_Subp : Entity_Id;
+ Tag : Entity_Id;
+
-- Start of processing for Declare_Inherited_Private_Subprograms
begin
E := First_Entity (Id);
while Present (E) loop
- -- If the entity is a nonprivate type extension whose parent
- -- type is declared in an open scope, then the type may have
- -- inherited operations that now need to be made visible.
- -- Ditto if the entity is a formal derived type in a child unit.
+ -- If the entity is a nonprivate type extension whose parent type
+ -- is declared in an open scope, then the type may have inherited
+ -- operations that now need to be made visible. Ditto if the entity
+ -- is a formal derived type in a child unit.
if ((Is_Derived_Type (E) and then not Is_Private_Type (E))
or else
and then E = Base_Type (E)
then
if Is_Tagged_Type (E) then
- Op_List := Primitive_Operations (E);
- New_Op := Empty;
- Decl_Privates := False;
+ Op_List := Primitive_Operations (E);
+ New_Op := Empty;
+ Tag := First_Tag_Component (E);
Op_Elmt := First_Elmt (Op_List);
while Present (Op_Elmt) loop
Prim_Op := Node (Op_Elmt);
- -- If the primitive operation is an implicit operation
- -- with an internal name whose parent operation has
- -- a normal name, then we now need to either declare the
- -- operation (i.e., make it visible), or replace it
- -- by an overriding operation if one exists.
+ -- Search primitives that are implicit operations with an
+ -- internal name whose parent operation has a normal name.
if Present (Alias (Prim_Op))
+ and then Find_Dispatching_Type (Alias (Prim_Op)) /= E
and then not Comes_From_Source (Prim_Op)
and then Is_Internal_Name (Chars (Prim_Op))
and then not Is_Internal_Name (Chars (Alias (Prim_Op)))
then
Parent_Subp := Alias (Prim_Op);
- Found_Explicit := False;
+ -- Case 1: Check if the type has also an explicit
+ -- overriding for this primitive.
+
Op_Elmt_2 := Next_Elmt (Op_Elmt);
while Present (Op_Elmt_2) loop
if Chars (Node (Op_Elmt_2)) = Chars (Parent_Subp)
and then Type_Conformant (Prim_Op, Node (Op_Elmt_2))
then
-- The private inherited operation has been
- -- overridden by an explicit subprogram, so
- -- change the private op's list element to
- -- designate the explicit so the explicit
- -- one will get the right dispatching slot.
+ -- overridden by an explicit subprogram: replace
+ -- the former by the latter.
New_Op := Node (Op_Elmt_2);
Replace_Elmt (Op_Elmt, New_Op);
- Remove_Elmt (Op_List, Op_Elmt_2);
- Found_Explicit := True;
- Decl_Privates := True;
+ Remove_Elmt (Op_List, Op_Elmt_2);
+ Set_Is_Overriding_Operation (New_Op);
+ Set_Overridden_Operation (New_Op, Parent_Subp);
- -- If explicit_overriding is in effect, check that
- -- the overriding operation is properly labelled.
+ -- We don't need to inherit its dispatching slot.
+ -- Set_All_DT_Position has previously ensured that
+ -- the same slot was assigned to the two primitives
- if Explicit_Overriding
- and then Comes_From_Source (New_Op)
- and then not Has_Overriding_Pragma (New_Op)
+ if Present (Tag)
+ and then Present (DTC_Entity (New_Op))
+ and then Present (DTC_Entity (Prim_Op))
then
- Error_Msg_NE
- ("Missing overriding pragma for&",
- New_Op, New_Op);
+ pragma Assert (DT_Position (New_Op)
+ = DT_Position (Prim_Op));
+ null;
end if;
- exit;
+ goto Next_Primitive;
end if;
Next_Elmt (Op_Elmt_2);
end loop;
- if not Found_Explicit then
- Derive_Subprogram
- (New_Op, Alias (Prim_Op), E, Etype (E));
+ -- Case 2: We have not found any explicit overriding and
+ -- hence we need to declare the operation (i.e., make it
+ -- visible).
- pragma Assert
- (Is_Dispatching_Operation (New_Op)
- and then Node (Last_Elmt (Op_List)) = New_Op);
-
- -- Substitute the new operation for the old one
- -- in the type's primitive operations list. Since
- -- the new operation was also just added to the end
- -- of list, the last element must be removed.
+ Derive_Subprogram (New_Op, Alias (Prim_Op), E, Etype (E));
- -- (Question: is there a simpler way of declaring
- -- the operation, say by just replacing the name
- -- of the earlier operation, reentering it in the
- -- in the symbol table (how?), and marking it as
- -- private???)
+ -- Inherit the dispatching slot if E is already frozen
- Replace_Elmt (Op_Elmt, New_Op);
- Remove_Last_Elmt (Op_List);
- Decl_Privates := True;
+ if Is_Frozen (E)
+ and then Present (DTC_Entity (Alias (Prim_Op)))
+ then
+ Set_DTC_Entity_Value (E, New_Op);
+ Set_DT_Position (New_Op,
+ DT_Position (Alias (Prim_Op)));
end if;
+
+ pragma Assert
+ (Is_Dispatching_Operation (New_Op)
+ and then Node (Last_Elmt (Op_List)) = New_Op);
+
+ -- Substitute the new operation for the old one in the
+ -- type's primitive operations list. Since the new
+ -- operation was also just added to the end of list,
+ -- the last element must be removed.
+
+ -- (Question: is there a simpler way of declaring the
+ -- operation, say by just replacing the name of the
+ -- earlier operation, reentering it in the in the symbol
+ -- table (how?), and marking it as private???)
+
+ Replace_Elmt (Op_Elmt, New_Op);
+ Remove_Last_Elmt (Op_List);
end if;
+ <<Next_Primitive>>
Next_Elmt (Op_Elmt);
end loop;
- -- The type's DT attributes need to be recalculated
- -- in the case where private dispatching operations
- -- have been added or overridden. Normally this action
- -- occurs during type freezing, but we force it here
- -- since the type may already have been frozen (e.g.,
- -- if the type's package has an empty private part).
- -- This can only be done if expansion is active, otherwise
- -- Tag may not be present.
-
- if Decl_Privates
- and then Expander_Active
- then
- Set_All_DT_Position (E);
+ -- Generate listing showing the contents of the dispatch table
+
+ if Debug_Flag_ZZ then
+ Write_DT (E);
end if;
else
- -- Non-tagged type, scan forward to locate
- -- inherited hidden operations.
+ -- Non-tagged type, scan forward to locate inherited hidden
+ -- operations.
Prim_Op := Next_Entity (E);
-
while Present (Prim_Op) loop
if Is_Subprogram (Prim_Op)
and then Present (Alias (Prim_Op))
Next2 := Next_Entity (Full_Id);
H2 := Homonym (Full_Id);
- -- Reset full declaration pointer to reflect the switched entities
- -- and readjust the next entity chains.
+ -- Reset full declaration pointer to reflect the switched entities and
+ -- readjust the next entity chains.
Exchange_Entities (Id, Full_Id);
Full : Entity_Id;
begin
- -- First exchange declarations for private types, so that the
- -- full declaration is visible. For each private type, we check
- -- its Private_Dependents list and also exchange any subtypes of
- -- or derived types from it. Finally, if this is a Taft amendment
- -- type, the incomplete declaration is irrelevant, and we want to
- -- link the eventual full declaration with the original private
- -- one so we also skip the exchange.
+ -- First exchange declarations for private types, so that the full
+ -- declaration is visible. For each private type, we check its
+ -- Private_Dependents list and also exchange any subtypes of or derived
+ -- types from it. Finally, if this is a Taft amendment type, the
+ -- incomplete declaration is irrelevant, and we want to link the
+ -- eventual full declaration with the original private one so we also
+ -- skip the exchange.
Id := First_Entity (P);
while Present (Id) and then Id /= First_Private_Entity (P) loop
-
if Is_Private_Base_Type (Id)
and then Comes_From_Source (Full_View (Id))
and then Present (Full_View (Id))
-- can only happen in a package nested within a child package,
-- when the parent type is defined in the parent unit. At this
-- point the current type is not private either, and we have to
- -- install the underlying full view, which is now visible.
+ -- install the underlying full view, which is now visible. Save
+ -- the current full view as well, so that all views can be
+ -- restored on exit. It may seem that after compiling the child
+ -- body there are not environments to restore, but the back-end
+ -- expects those links to be valid, and freeze nodes depend on
+ -- them.
if No (Full_View (Full))
and then Present (Underlying_Full_View (Full))
then
Set_Full_View (Id, Underlying_Full_View (Full));
+ Set_Underlying_Full_View (Id, Full);
+
Set_Underlying_Full_View (Full, Empty);
Set_Is_Frozen (Full_View (Id));
end if;
Priv := Node (Priv_Elmt);
-- Before the exchange, verify that the presence of the
- -- Full_View field. It will be empty if the entity
- -- has already been installed due to a previous call.
+ -- Full_View field. It will be empty if the entity has already
+ -- been installed due to a previous call.
if Present (Full_View (Priv))
and then Is_Visible_Dependent (Priv)
-- Next make other declarations in the private part visible as well
Id := First_Private_Entity (P);
-
while Present (Id) loop
Install_Package_Entity (Id);
Set_Is_Hidden (Id, False);
----------------------------------
procedure Install_Visible_Declarations (P : Entity_Id) is
- Id : Entity_Id;
+ Id : Entity_Id;
+ Last_Entity : Entity_Id;
begin
- Id := First_Entity (P);
+ pragma Assert
+ (Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (P) or else Is_Record_Type (P));
- while Present (Id) and then Id /= First_Private_Entity (P) loop
+ if Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (P) then
+ Last_Entity := First_Private_Entity (P);
+ else
+ Last_Entity := Empty;
+ end if;
+
+ Id := First_Entity (P);
+ while Present (Id) and then Id /= Last_Entity loop
Install_Package_Entity (Id);
Next_Entity (Id);
end loop;
S : constant Entity_Id := Scope (Dep);
begin
- -- Renamings created for actual types have the visibility of the
- -- actual.
+ -- Renamings created for actual types have the visibility of the actual
if Ekind (S) = E_Package
and then Is_Generic_Instance (S)
elsif not (Is_Derived_Type (Dep))
and then Is_Derived_Type (Full_View (Dep))
then
- -- When instantiating a package body, the scope stack is empty,
- -- so check instead whether the dependent type is defined in
- -- the same scope as the instance itself.
+ -- When instantiating a package body, the scope stack is empty, so
+ -- check instead whether the dependent type is defined in the same
+ -- scope as the instance itself.
return In_Open_Scopes (S)
or else (Is_Generic_Instance (Current_Scope)
begin
if not Has_Completion (E)
and then Nkind (P) = N_Package_Declaration
- and then Present (Activation_Chain_Entity (P))
+ and then (Present (Activation_Chain_Entity (P)) or else Has_RACW (E))
then
B :=
Make_Package_Body (Sloc (E),
No (Discriminant_Specifications (N))
and then not Unknown_Discriminants_Present (N));
- -- Set tagged flag before processing discriminants, to catch
- -- illegal usage.
+ -- Set tagged flag before processing discriminants, to catch illegal
+ -- usage.
Set_Is_Tagged_Type (Id, Tagged_Present (Def));
Set_Stored_Constraint (Id, No_Elist);
if Present (Discriminant_Specifications (N)) then
- New_Scope (Id);
+ Push_Scope (Id);
Process_Discriminants (N);
End_Scope;
if Tagged_Present (Def) then
Set_Ekind (Id, E_Record_Type_With_Private);
- Make_Class_Wide_Type (Id);
Set_Primitive_Operations (Id, New_Elmt_List);
- Set_Is_Abstract (Id, Abstract_Present (Def));
+ Set_Is_Abstract_Type (Id, Abstract_Present (Def));
Set_Is_Limited_Record (Id, Limited_Present (Def));
Set_Has_Delayed_Freeze (Id, True);
+ -- Create a class-wide type with the same attributes
+
+ Make_Class_Wide_Type (Id);
+
elsif Abstract_Present (Def) then
Error_Msg_N ("only a tagged type can be abstract", N);
end if;
Priv_Sub : Entity_Id;
procedure Preserve_Full_Attributes (Priv, Full : Entity_Id);
- -- Copy to the private declaration the attributes of the full view
- -- that need to be available for the partial view also.
+ -- Copy to the private declaration the attributes of the full view that
+ -- need to be available for the partial view also.
function Type_In_Use (T : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
-- Check whether type or base type appear in an active use_type clause
begin
Set_Size_Info (Priv, (Full));
- Set_RM_Size (Priv, RM_Size (Full));
- Set_Size_Known_At_Compile_Time (Priv, Size_Known_At_Compile_Time
- (Full));
- Set_Is_Volatile (Priv, Is_Volatile (Full));
- Set_Treat_As_Volatile (Priv, Treat_As_Volatile (Full));
+ Set_RM_Size (Priv, RM_Size (Full));
+ Set_Size_Known_At_Compile_Time
+ (Priv, Size_Known_At_Compile_Time (Full));
+ Set_Is_Volatile (Priv, Is_Volatile (Full));
+ Set_Treat_As_Volatile (Priv, Treat_As_Volatile (Full));
+ Set_Is_Ada_2005_Only (Priv, Is_Ada_2005_Only (Full));
+ Set_Has_Pragma_Unreferenced (Priv, Has_Pragma_Unreferenced (Full));
+ Set_Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Objects
+ (Priv, Has_Pragma_Unreferenced_Objects
+ (Full));
+ if Is_Unchecked_Union (Full) then
+ Set_Is_Unchecked_Union (Base_Type (Priv));
+ end if;
+ -- Why is atomic not copied here ???
if Referenced (Full) then
Set_Referenced (Priv);
and then not Error_Posted (Full)
then
if Priv_Is_Base_Type then
- Set_Access_Disp_Table (Priv, Access_Disp_Table
- (Base_Type (Full)));
+
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI-345): The full view of a type implementing an
+ -- interface can be a task type.
+
+ -- type T is new I with private;
+ -- private
+ -- task type T is new I with ...
+
+ if Is_Interface (Etype (Priv))
+ and then Is_Concurrent_Type (Base_Type (Full))
+ then
+ -- Protect the frontend against previous errors
+
+ if Present (Corresponding_Record_Type
+ (Base_Type (Full)))
+ then
+ Set_Access_Disp_Table
+ (Priv, Access_Disp_Table
+ (Corresponding_Record_Type (Base_Type (Full))));
+
+ -- Generic context, or previous errors
+
+ else
+ null;
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ Set_Access_Disp_Table
+ (Priv, Access_Disp_Table (Base_Type (Full)));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ if Is_Tagged_Type (Priv) then
+
+ -- If the type is tagged, the tag itself must be available on
+ -- the partial view, for expansion purposes.
+
+ Set_First_Entity (Priv, First_Entity (Full));
+
+ -- If there are discriminants in the partial view, these remain
+ -- visible. Otherwise only the tag itself is visible, and there
+ -- are no nameable components in the partial view.
+
+ if No (Last_Entity (Priv)) then
+ Set_Last_Entity (Priv, First_Entity (Priv));
+ end if;
end if;
- Set_First_Entity (Priv, First_Entity (Full));
- Set_Last_Entity (Priv, Last_Entity (Full));
Set_Has_Discriminants (Priv, Has_Discriminants (Full));
end if;
end Preserve_Full_Attributes;
function Type_In_Use (T : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
begin
return Scope (Base_Type (T)) = P
- and then (In_Use (T) or else In_Use (Base_Type (T)));
+ and then (In_Use (T) or else In_Use (Base_Type (T)));
end Type_In_Use;
-- Start of processing for Uninstall_Declarations
begin
Id := First_Entity (P);
-
while Present (Id) and then Id /= First_Private_Entity (P) loop
if Debug_Flag_E then
Write_Str ("unlinking visible entity ");
Type_In_Use
(Etype (Next_Formal (First_Formal (Id))))));
else
- Set_Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (Id,
- In_Use (P) and not Is_Hidden (Id));
+ if In_Use (P) and then not Is_Hidden (Id) then
+
+ -- A child unit of a use-visible package remains use-visible
+ -- only if it is itself a visible child unit. Otherwise it
+ -- would remain visible in other contexts where P is use-
+ -- visible, because once compiled it stays in the entity list
+ -- of its parent unit.
+
+ if Is_Child_Unit (Id) then
+ Set_Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (Id,
+ Is_Visible_Child_Unit (Id));
+ else
+ Set_Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (Id);
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ Set_Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (Id, False);
+ end if;
end if;
-- Local entities are not immediately visible outside of the package
if Is_Tagged_Type (Id) and then Ekind (Id) = E_Record_Type then
Check_Abstract_Overriding (Id);
+ Check_Conventions (Id);
end if;
if (Ekind (Id) = E_Private_Type
("missing full declaration for private extension", Id);
end if;
+ -- Case of constant, check for deferred constant declaration with
+ -- no full view. Likely just a matter of a missing expression, or
+ -- accidental use of the keyword constant.
+
elsif Ekind (Id) = E_Constant
+
+ -- OK if constant value present
+
and then No (Constant_Value (Id))
+
+ -- OK if full view present
+
and then No (Full_View (Id))
+
+ -- OK if imported, since that provides the completion
+
and then not Is_Imported (Id)
- and then (Nkind (Parent (Id)) /= N_Object_Declaration
- or else not No_Initialization (Parent (Id)))
+
+ -- OK if object declaration replaced by renaming declaration as
+ -- a result of OK_To_Rename processing (e.g. for concatenation)
+
+ and then Nkind (Parent (Id)) /= N_Object_Renaming_Declaration
+
+ -- OK if object declaration with the No_Initialization flag set
+
+ and then not (Nkind (Parent (Id)) = N_Object_Declaration
+ and then No_Initialization (Parent (Id)))
then
+ -- If no private declaration is present, we assume the user did
+ -- not intend a deferred constant declaration and the problem
+ -- is simply that the initializing expression is missing.
+
if not Has_Private_Declaration (Etype (Id)) then
- -- We assume that the user did not not intend a deferred
- -- constant declaration, and the expression is just missing.
+ -- We assume that the user did not intend a deferred constant
+ -- declaration, and the expression is just missing.
Error_Msg_N
("constant declaration requires initialization expression",
if Is_Limited_Type (Etype (Id)) then
Error_Msg_N
- ("\else remove keyword CONSTANT from declaration",
+ ("\if variable intended, remove CONSTANT from declaration",
Parent (Id));
end if;
+ -- Otherwise if a private declaration is present, then we are
+ -- missing the full declaration for the deferred constant.
+
else
Error_Msg_N
- ("missing full declaration for deferred constant ('R'M 7.4)",
+ ("missing full declaration for deferred constant (RM 7.4)",
Id);
if Is_Limited_Type (Etype (Id)) then
Error_Msg_N
- ("\else remove keyword CONSTANT from declaration",
+ ("\if variable intended, remove CONSTANT from declaration",
Parent (Id));
end if;
end if;
end if;
-- Make private entities invisible and exchange full and private
- -- declarations for private types.
+ -- declarations for private types. Id is now the first private entity
+ -- in the package.
while Present (Id) loop
if Debug_Flag_E then
if Is_Tagged_Type (Id) and then Ekind (Id) = E_Record_Type then
Check_Abstract_Overriding (Id);
+ Check_Conventions (Id);
end if;
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (Id, False);
then
Full := Full_View (Id);
- -- If the partial view is not declared in the visible part
- -- of the package (as is the case when it is a type derived
- -- from some other private type in the private part of the
- -- current package), no exchange takes place.
+ -- If the partial view is not declared in the visible part of the
+ -- package (as is the case when it is a type derived from some
+ -- other private type in the private part of the current package),
+ -- no exchange takes place.
if No (Parent (Id))
or else List_Containing (Parent (Id))
-- The entry in the private part points to the full declaration,
-- which is currently visible. Exchange them so only the private
- -- type declaration remains accessible, and link private and
- -- full declaration in the opposite direction. Before the actual
- -- exchange, we copy back attributes of the full view that
- -- must be available to the partial view too.
+ -- type declaration remains accessible, and link private and full
+ -- declaration in the opposite direction. Before the actual
+ -- exchange, we copy back attributes of the full view that must
+ -- be available to the partial view too.
Preserve_Full_Attributes (Id, Full);
end if;
Priv_Elmt := First_Elmt (Private_Dependents (Id));
- Exchange_Declarations (Id);
-- Swap out the subtypes and derived types of Id that were
-- compiled in this scope, or installed previously by
-- Install_Private_Declarations.
- -- Before we do the swap, we verify the presence of the
- -- Full_View field which may be empty due to a swap by
- -- a previous call to End_Package_Scope (e.g. from the
- -- freezing mechanism).
+
+ -- Before we do the swap, we verify the presence of the Full_View
+ -- field which may be empty due to a swap by a previous call to
+ -- End_Package_Scope (e.g. from the freezing mechanism).
while Present (Priv_Elmt) loop
Priv_Sub := Node (Priv_Elmt);
Next_Elmt (Priv_Elmt);
end loop;
+ -- Now restore the type itself to its private view
+
+ Exchange_Declarations (Id);
+
+ -- If we have installed an underlying full view for a type derived
+ -- from a private type in a child unit, restore the proper views
+ -- of private and full view. See corresponding code in
+ -- Install_Private_Declarations.
+
+ -- After the exchange, Full denotes the private type in the
+ -- visible part of the package.
+
+ if Is_Private_Base_Type (Full)
+ and then Present (Full_View (Full))
+ and then Present (Underlying_Full_View (Full))
+ and then In_Package_Body (Current_Scope)
+ then
+ Set_Full_View (Full, Underlying_Full_View (Full));
+ Set_Underlying_Full_View (Full, Empty);
+ end if;
+
elsif Ekind (Id) = E_Incomplete_Type
+ and then Comes_From_Source (Id)
and then No (Full_View (Id))
then
- -- Mark Taft amendment types
+ -- Mark Taft amendment types. Verify that there are no primitive
+ -- operations declared for the type (3.10.1(9)).
Set_Has_Completion_In_Body (Id);
+ declare
+ Elmt : Elmt_Id;
+ Subp : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Elmt := First_Elmt (Private_Dependents (Id));
+ while Present (Elmt) loop
+ Subp := Node (Elmt);
+
+ if Is_Overloadable (Subp) then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("type& must be completed in the private part",
+ Parent (Subp), Id);
+
+ -- The return type of an access_to_function cannot be a
+ -- Taft-amendment type.
+
+ elsif Ekind (Subp) = E_Subprogram_Type then
+ if Etype (Subp) = Id
+ or else
+ (Is_Class_Wide_Type (Etype (Subp))
+ and then Etype (Etype (Subp)) = Id)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("type& must be completed in the private part",
+ Associated_Node_For_Itype (Subp), Id);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Elmt (Elmt);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+
elsif not Is_Child_Unit (Id)
and then (not Is_Private_Type (Id)
or else No (Full_View (Id)))
E : Entity_Id;
begin
- -- Imported entity never requires body. Right now, only
- -- subprograms can be imported, but perhaps in the future
- -- we will allow import of packages.
+ -- Imported entity never requires body. Right now, only subprograms can
+ -- be imported, but perhaps in the future we will allow import of
+ -- packages.
if Is_Imported (P) then
return False;
then
declare
G_P : constant Entity_Id := Generic_Parent (Parent (P));
-
begin
if Has_Pragma_Elaborate_Body (G_P) then
return True;
then
null;
- -- Otherwise test to see if entity requires a completion
+ -- Otherwise test to see if entity requires a completion.
+ -- Note that subprogram entities whose declaration does not come
+ -- from source are ignored here on the basis that we assume the
+ -- expander will provide an implicit completion at some point.
elsif (Is_Overloadable (E)
and then Ekind (E) /= E_Enumeration_Literal
and then Ekind (E) /= E_Operator
- and then not Is_Abstract (E)
- and then not Has_Completion (E))
+ and then not Is_Abstract_Subprogram (E)
+ and then not Has_Completion (E)
+ and then Comes_From_Source (Parent (E)))
or else
(Ekind (E) = E_Package
OSDN Git Service
