-- --
-- B o d y --
-- --
--- Copyright (C) 1992-2005, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- Copyright (C) 1992-2009, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
-- --
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
--- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
+-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
--- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
--- to the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, --
--- Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. --
+-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
+-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
-- --
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
with Lib; use Lib;
with Lib.Xref; use Lib.Xref;
with Namet; use Namet;
+with Namet.Sp; use Namet.Sp;
with Nlists; use Nlists;
with Nmake; use Nmake;
with Opt; use Opt;
with Restrict; use Restrict;
with Rident; use Rident;
with Sem; use Sem;
+with Sem_Aux; use Sem_Aux;
with Sem_Cat; use Sem_Cat;
with Sem_Ch3; use Sem_Ch3;
+with Sem_Ch6; use Sem_Ch6;
with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8;
+with Sem_SCIL; use Sem_SCIL;
+with Sem_Disp; use Sem_Disp;
with Sem_Dist; use Sem_Dist;
with Sem_Eval; use Sem_Eval;
with Sem_Res; use Sem_Res;
with Snames; use Snames;
with Tbuild; use Tbuild;
-with GNAT.Spelling_Checker; use GNAT.Spelling_Checker;
-
package body Sem_Ch4 is
-----------------------
-- Local Subprograms --
-----------------------
+ procedure Analyze_Concatenation_Rest (N : Node_Id);
+ -- Does the "rest" of the work of Analyze_Concatenation, after the left
+ -- operand has been analyzed. See Analyze_Concatenation for details.
+
procedure Analyze_Expression (N : Node_Id);
-- For expressions that are not names, this is just a call to analyze.
-- If the expression is a name, it may be a call to a parameterless
-- function, and if so must be converted into an explicit call node
-- and analyzed as such. This deproceduring must be done during the first
-- pass of overload resolution, because otherwise a procedure call with
- -- overloaded actuals may fail to resolve. See 4327-001 for an example.
+ -- overloaded actuals may fail to resolve.
procedure Analyze_Operator_Call (N : Node_Id; Op_Id : Entity_Id);
-- Analyze a call of the form "+"(x, y), etc. The prefix of the call
procedure Check_Misspelled_Selector
(Prefix : Entity_Id;
Sel : Node_Id);
- -- Give possible misspelling diagnostic if Sel is likely to be
- -- a misspelling of one of the selectors of the Prefix.
- -- This is called by Analyze_Selected_Component after producing
- -- an invalid selector error message.
+ -- Give possible misspelling diagnostic if Sel is likely to be a mis-
+ -- spelling of one of the selectors of the Prefix. This is called by
+ -- Analyze_Selected_Component after producing an invalid selector error
+ -- message.
function Defined_In_Scope (T : Entity_Id; S : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
- -- Verify that type T is declared in scope S. Used to find intepretations
+ -- Verify that type T is declared in scope S. Used to find interpretations
-- for operators given by expanded names. This is abstracted as a separate
-- function to handle extensions to System, where S is System, but T is
-- declared in the extension.
-- interpretation of the other operand. N can be an operator node, or
-- a function call whose name is an operator designator.
+ function Find_Primitive_Operation (N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Find candidate interpretations for the name Obj.Proc when it appears
+ -- in a subprogram renaming declaration.
+
procedure Find_Unary_Types
(R : Node_Id;
Op_Id : Entity_Id;
-- a valid pair for the given operator, and record the corresponding
-- interpretation of the operator node. The node N may be an operator
-- node (the usual case) or a function call whose prefix is an operator
- -- designator. In both cases Op_Id is the operator name itself.
+ -- designator. In both cases Op_Id is the operator name itself.
procedure Diagnose_Call (N : Node_Id; Nam : Node_Id);
-- Give detailed information on overloaded call where none of the
-- type is not directly visible. The routine uses this type to emit a more
-- informative message.
- procedure Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix
+ function Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix
(E : Entity_Id;
- P : Node_Id);
+ P : Node_Id) return Entity_Id;
-- Called when P is the prefix of an implicit dereference, denoting an
- -- object E. If in semantics only mode (-gnatc or generic), record that is
- -- a reference to E. Normally, such a reference is generated only when the
- -- implicit dereference is expanded into an explicit one. E may be empty,
- -- in which case this procedure does nothing.
+ -- object E. The function returns the designated type of the prefix, taking
+ -- into account that the designated type of an anonymous access type may be
+ -- a limited view, when the non-limited view is visible.
+ -- If in semantics only mode (-gnatc or generic), the function also records
+ -- that the prefix is a reference to E, if any. Normally, such a reference
+ -- is generated only when the implicit dereference is expanded into an
+ -- explicit one, but for consistency we must generate the reference when
+ -- expansion is disabled as well.
procedure Remove_Abstract_Operations (N : Node_Id);
-- Ada 2005: implementation of AI-310. An abstract non-dispatching
-- operation is not a candidate interpretation.
function Try_Indexed_Call
- (N : Node_Id;
- Nam : Entity_Id;
- Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
- -- If a function has defaults for all its actuals, a call to it may
- -- in fact be an indexing on the result of the call. Try_Indexed_Call
- -- attempts the interpretation as an indexing, prior to analysis as
- -- a call. If both are possible, the node is overloaded with both
- -- interpretations (same symbol but two different types).
+ (N : Node_Id;
+ Nam : Entity_Id;
+ Typ : Entity_Id;
+ Skip_First : Boolean) return Boolean;
+ -- If a function has defaults for all its actuals, a call to it may in fact
+ -- be an indexing on the result of the call. Try_Indexed_Call attempts the
+ -- interpretation as an indexing, prior to analysis as a call. If both are
+ -- possible, the node is overloaded with both interpretations (same symbol
+ -- but two different types). If the call is written in prefix form, the
+ -- prefix becomes the first parameter in the call, and only the remaining
+ -- actuals must be checked for the presence of defaults.
function Try_Indirect_Call
(N : Node_Id;
Nam : Entity_Id;
Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
- -- Similarly, a function F that needs no actuals can return an access
- -- to a subprogram, and the call F (X) interpreted as F.all (X). In
- -- this case the call may be overloaded with both interpretations.
+ -- Similarly, a function F that needs no actuals can return an access to a
+ -- subprogram, and the call F (X) interpreted as F.all (X). In this case
+ -- the call may be overloaded with both interpretations.
function Try_Object_Operation (N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
- -- Ada 2005 (AI-252): Give support to the object operation notation
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI-252): Support the object.operation notation
+
+ procedure wpo (T : Entity_Id);
+ pragma Warnings (Off, wpo);
+ -- Used for debugging: obtain list of primitive operations even if
+ -- type is not frozen and dispatch table is not built yet.
------------------------
-- Ambiguous_Operands --
-- Start of processing for Ambiguous_Operands
begin
- if Nkind (N) = N_In
- or else Nkind (N) = N_Not_In
- then
+ if Nkind (N) in N_Membership_Test then
Error_Msg_N ("ambiguous operands for membership", N);
- elsif Nkind (N) = N_Op_Eq
- or else Nkind (N) = N_Op_Ne
- then
+ elsif Nkind_In (N, N_Op_Eq, N_Op_Ne) then
Error_Msg_N ("ambiguous operands for equality", N);
else
procedure Analyze_Allocator (N : Node_Id) is
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
Sav_Errs : constant Nat := Serious_Errors_Detected;
- E : Node_Id := Expression (N);
+ E : Node_Id := Expression (N);
Acc_Type : Entity_Id;
Type_Id : Entity_Id;
begin
- Check_Restriction (No_Allocators, N);
+ -- In accordance with H.4(7), the No_Allocators restriction only applies
+ -- to user-written allocators.
+
+ if Comes_From_Source (N) then
+ Check_Restriction (No_Allocators, N);
+ end if;
if Nkind (E) = N_Qualified_Expression then
Acc_Type := Create_Itype (E_Allocator_Type, N);
Set_Etype (Acc_Type, Acc_Type);
- Init_Size_Align (Acc_Type);
Find_Type (Subtype_Mark (E));
- Type_Id := Entity (Subtype_Mark (E));
- Check_Fully_Declared (Type_Id, N);
+
+ -- Analyze the qualified expression, and apply the name resolution
+ -- rule given in 4.7 (3).
+
+ Analyze (E);
+ Type_Id := Etype (E);
Set_Directly_Designated_Type (Acc_Type, Type_Id);
+ Resolve (Expression (E), Type_Id);
+
if Is_Limited_Type (Type_Id)
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
and then not In_Instance_Body
then
- -- Ada 2005 (AI-287): Do not post an error if the expression
- -- corresponds to a limited aggregate. Limited aggregates
- -- are checked in sem_aggr in a per-component manner
- -- (compare with handling of Get_Value subprogram).
-
- if Ada_Version >= Ada_05
- and then Nkind (Expression (E)) = N_Aggregate
- then
- null;
- else
+ if not OK_For_Limited_Init (Type_Id, Expression (E)) then
Error_Msg_N ("initialization not allowed for limited types", N);
Explain_Limited_Type (Type_Id, N);
end if;
end if;
- Analyze_And_Resolve (Expression (E), Type_Id);
-
-- A qualified expression requires an exact match of the type,
-- class-wide matching is not allowed.
- if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Type_Id)
- and then Base_Type (Etype (Expression (E))) /= Base_Type (Type_Id)
- then
- Wrong_Type (Expression (E), Type_Id);
- end if;
+ -- if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Type_Id)
+ -- and then Base_Type
+ -- (Etype (Expression (E))) /= Base_Type (Type_Id)
+ -- then
+ -- Wrong_Type (Expression (E), Type_Id);
+ -- end if;
Check_Non_Static_Context (Expression (E));
Set_Etype (E, Type_Id);
- -- Case where no qualified expression is present
+ -- Case where allocator has a subtype indication
else
declare
then
Error_Msg_N ("constraint not allowed here", E);
- if Nkind (Constraint (E))
- = N_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint
+ if Nkind (Constraint (E)) =
+ N_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint
then
- Error_Msg_N
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
("\if qualified expression was meant, " &
"use apostrophe", Constraint (E));
end if;
Subtype_Indication => Relocate_Node (E)));
if Sav_Errs /= Serious_Errors_Detected
- and then Nkind (Constraint (E))
- = N_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint
+ and then Nkind (Constraint (E)) =
+ N_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint
then
- Error_Msg_N
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
("if qualified expression was meant, " &
"use apostrophe!", Constraint (E));
end if;
Type_Id := Process_Subtype (E, N);
Acc_Type := Create_Itype (E_Allocator_Type, N);
Set_Etype (Acc_Type, Acc_Type);
- Init_Size_Align (Acc_Type);
Set_Directly_Designated_Type (Acc_Type, Type_Id);
Check_Fully_Declared (Type_Id, N);
- -- Ada 2005 (AI-231)
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI-231): If the designated type is itself an access
+ -- type that excludes null, its default initialization will
+ -- be a null object, and we can insert an unconditional raise
+ -- before the allocator.
if Can_Never_Be_Null (Type_Id) then
- Error_Msg_N ("(Ada 2005) qualified expression required",
- Expression (N));
+ declare
+ Not_Null_Check : constant Node_Id :=
+ Make_Raise_Constraint_Error (Sloc (E),
+ Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed);
+ begin
+ if Expander_Active then
+ Insert_Action (N, Not_Null_Check);
+ Analyze (Not_Null_Check);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N ("null value not allowed here?", E);
+ end if;
+ end;
end if;
-- Check restriction against dynamically allocated protected
-- Check for missing initialization. Skip this check if we already
-- had errors on analyzing the allocator, since in that case these
- -- are probably cascaded errors
+ -- are probably cascaded errors.
if Is_Indefinite_Subtype (Type_Id)
and then Serious_Errors_Detected = Sav_Errs
Error_Msg_N
("initialization required in class-wide allocation", N);
else
- Error_Msg_N
- ("initialization required in unconstrained allocation", N);
+ if Ada_Version < Ada_05
+ and then Is_Limited_Type (Type_Id)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N ("unconstrained allocation not allowed", N);
+
+ if Is_Array_Type (Type_Id) then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\constraint with array bounds required", N);
+
+ elsif Has_Unknown_Discriminants (Type_Id) then
+ null;
+
+ else pragma Assert (Has_Discriminants (Type_Id));
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\constraint with discriminant values required", N);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Limited Ada 2005 and general non-limited case
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("uninitialized unconstrained allocation not allowed",
+ N);
+
+ if Is_Array_Type (Type_Id) then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\qualified expression or constraint with " &
+ "array bounds required", N);
+
+ elsif Has_Unknown_Discriminants (Type_Id) then
+ Error_Msg_N ("\qualified expression required", N);
+
+ else pragma Assert (Has_Discriminants (Type_Id));
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\qualified expression or constraint with " &
+ "discriminant values required", N);
+ end if;
+ end if;
end if;
end if;
end;
end if;
- if Is_Abstract (Type_Id) then
+ if Is_Abstract_Type (Type_Id) then
Error_Msg_N ("cannot allocate abstract object", E);
end if;
Analyze_Expression (L);
Analyze_Expression (R);
- -- If the entity is already set, the node is the instantiation of
- -- a generic node with a non-local reference, or was manufactured
- -- by a call to Make_Op_xxx. In either case the entity is known to
- -- be valid, and we do not need to collect interpretations, instead
- -- we just get the single possible interpretation.
+ -- If the entity is already set, the node is the instantiation of a
+ -- generic node with a non-local reference, or was manufactured by a
+ -- call to Make_Op_xxx. In either case the entity is known to be valid,
+ -- and we do not need to collect interpretations, instead we just get
+ -- the single possible interpretation.
Op_Id := Entity (N);
if Present (Op_Id) then
if Ekind (Op_Id) = E_Operator then
- if (Nkind (N) = N_Op_Divide or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Mod or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Multiply or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Rem)
+ if Nkind_In (N, N_Op_Divide, N_Op_Mod, N_Op_Multiply, N_Op_Rem)
and then Treat_Fixed_As_Integer (N)
then
null;
procedure Analyze_Call (N : Node_Id) is
Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
- Nam : Node_Id := Name (N);
+ Nam : Node_Id;
X : Interp_Index;
It : Interp;
Nam_Ent : Entity_Id;
Success : Boolean := False;
+ Deref : Boolean := False;
+ -- Flag indicates whether an interpretation of the prefix is a
+ -- parameterless call that returns an access_to_subprogram.
+
function Name_Denotes_Function return Boolean;
- -- If the type of the name is an access to subprogram, this may be
- -- the type of a name, or the return type of the function being called.
- -- If the name is not an entity then it can denote a protected function.
- -- Until we distinguish Etype from Return_Type, we must use this
- -- routine to resolve the meaning of the name in the call.
+ -- If the type of the name is an access to subprogram, this may be the
+ -- type of a name, or the return type of the function being called. If
+ -- the name is not an entity then it can denote a protected function.
+ -- Until we distinguish Etype from Return_Type, we must use this routine
+ -- to resolve the meaning of the name in the call.
+
+ procedure No_Interpretation;
+ -- Output error message when no valid interpretation exists
---------------------------
-- Name_Denotes_Function --
end if;
end Name_Denotes_Function;
+ -----------------------
+ -- No_Interpretation --
+ -----------------------
+
+ procedure No_Interpretation is
+ L : constant Boolean := Is_List_Member (N);
+ K : constant Node_Kind := Nkind (Parent (N));
+
+ begin
+ -- If the node is in a list whose parent is not an expression then it
+ -- must be an attempted procedure call.
+
+ if L and then K not in N_Subexpr then
+ if Ekind (Entity (Nam)) = E_Generic_Procedure then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("must instantiate generic procedure& before call",
+ Nam, Entity (Nam));
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("procedure or entry name expected", Nam);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Check for tasking cases where only an entry call will do
+
+ elsif not L
+ and then Nkind_In (K, N_Entry_Call_Alternative,
+ N_Triggering_Alternative)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N ("entry name expected", Nam);
+
+ -- Otherwise give general error message
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N ("invalid prefix in call", Nam);
+ end if;
+ end No_Interpretation;
+
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Call
begin
Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
+ Nam := Name (N);
+
if not Is_Overloaded (Nam) then
-- Only one interpretation to check
-- name, or if it is a function name in the context of a procedure
-- call. In this latter case, we have a call to a parameterless
-- function that returns a pointer_to_procedure which is the entity
- -- being called.
+ -- being called. Finally, F (X) may be a call to a parameterless
+ -- function that returns a pointer to a function with parameters.
elsif Is_Access_Type (Etype (Nam))
and then Ekind (Designated_Type (Etype (Nam))) = E_Subprogram_Type
and then
(not Name_Denotes_Function
- or else Nkind (N) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement)
+ or else Nkind (N) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement
+ or else
+ (Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Explicit_Dereference
+ and then Is_Entity_Name (Nam)
+ and then No (First_Formal (Entity (Nam)))
+ and then Present (Actuals)))
then
Nam_Ent := Designated_Type (Etype (Nam));
Insert_Explicit_Dereference (Nam);
-- kinds of call into this form.
elsif Nkind (Nam) = N_Indexed_Component then
-
if Nkind (Prefix (Nam)) = N_Selected_Component then
Nam_Ent := Entity (Selector_Name (Prefix (Nam)));
else
-- If no interpretations, give error message
if not Is_Overloadable (Nam_Ent) then
- declare
- L : constant Boolean := Is_List_Member (N);
- K : constant Node_Kind := Nkind (Parent (N));
-
- begin
- -- If the node is in a list whose parent is not an
- -- expression then it must be an attempted procedure call.
-
- if L and then K not in N_Subexpr then
- if Ekind (Entity (Nam)) = E_Generic_Procedure then
- Error_Msg_NE
- ("must instantiate generic procedure& before call",
- Nam, Entity (Nam));
- else
- Error_Msg_N
- ("procedure or entry name expected", Nam);
- end if;
-
- -- Check for tasking cases where only an entry call will do
-
- elsif not L
- and then (K = N_Entry_Call_Alternative
- or else K = N_Triggering_Alternative)
- then
- Error_Msg_N ("entry name expected", Nam);
-
- -- Otherwise give general error message
+ No_Interpretation;
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end if;
- else
- Error_Msg_N ("invalid prefix in call", Nam);
- end if;
+ -- Operations generated for RACW stub types are called only through
+ -- dispatching, and can never be the static interpretation of a call.
- return;
- end;
- end if;
+ if Is_RACW_Stub_Type_Operation (Nam_Ent) then
+ No_Interpretation;
+ return;
end if;
Analyze_One_Call (N, Nam_Ent, True, Success);
-- the return type of the access_to_subprogram.
if Success
- and then Nkind (Nam) = N_Explicit_Dereference
+ and then Nkind (Nam) = N_Explicit_Dereference
and then Ekind (Etype (N)) = E_Incomplete_Type
and then Present (Full_View (Etype (N)))
then
end if;
else
- -- An overloaded selected component must denote overloaded
- -- operations of a concurrent type. The interpretations are
- -- attached to the simple name of those operations.
+ -- An overloaded selected component must denote overloaded operations
+ -- of a concurrent type. The interpretations are attached to the
+ -- simple name of those operations.
if Nkind (Nam) = N_Selected_Component then
Nam := Selector_Name (Nam);
while Present (It.Nam) loop
Nam_Ent := It.Nam;
+ Deref := False;
-- Name may be call that returns an access to subprogram, or more
-- generally an overloaded expression one of whose interpretations
Nam_Ent := Designated_Type (Nam_Ent);
elsif Is_Access_Type (Etype (Nam_Ent))
- and then not Is_Entity_Name (Nam)
+ and then
+ (not Is_Entity_Name (Nam)
+ or else Nkind (N) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement)
and then Ekind (Designated_Type (Etype (Nam_Ent)))
= E_Subprogram_Type
then
Nam_Ent := Designated_Type (Etype (Nam_Ent));
+
+ if Is_Entity_Name (Nam) then
+ Deref := True;
+ end if;
end if;
Analyze_One_Call (N, Nam_Ent, False, Success);
-- guation is done directly in Resolve.
if Success then
- Set_Etype (Nam, It.Typ);
+ if Deref
+ and then Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Explicit_Dereference
+ then
+ Set_Entity (Nam, It.Nam);
+ Insert_Explicit_Dereference (Nam);
+ Set_Etype (Nam, Nam_Ent);
+
+ else
+ Set_Etype (Nam, It.Typ);
+ end if;
- elsif Nkind (Name (N)) = N_Selected_Component
- or else Nkind (Name (N)) = N_Function_Call
+ elsif Nkind_In (Name (N), N_Selected_Component,
+ N_Function_Call)
then
Remove_Interp (X);
end if;
elsif not Is_Overloaded (N)
and then Is_Entity_Name (Nam)
then
- -- Resolution yields a single interpretation. Verify that
- -- is has the proper capitalization.
+ -- Resolution yields a single interpretation. Verify that the
+ -- reference has capitalization consistent with the declaration.
Set_Entity_With_Style_Check (Nam, Entity (Nam));
Generate_Reference (Entity (Nam), Nam);
-- Analyze_Concatenation --
---------------------------
+ procedure Analyze_Concatenation (N : Node_Id) is
+
+ -- We wish to avoid deep recursion, because concatenations are often
+ -- deeply nested, as in A&B&...&Z. Therefore, we walk down the left
+ -- operands nonrecursively until we find something that is not a
+ -- concatenation (A in this case), or has already been analyzed. We
+ -- analyze that, and then walk back up the tree following Parent
+ -- pointers, calling Analyze_Concatenation_Rest to do the rest of the
+ -- work at each level. The Parent pointers allow us to avoid recursion,
+ -- and thus avoid running out of memory.
+
+ NN : Node_Id := N;
+ L : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Candidate_Type := Empty;
+
+ -- The following code is equivalent to:
+
+ -- Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
+ -- Analyze_Expression (Left_Opnd (N));
+ -- Analyze_Concatenation_Rest (N);
+
+ -- where the Analyze_Expression call recurses back here if the left
+ -- operand is a concatenation.
+
+ -- Walk down left operands
+
+ loop
+ Set_Etype (NN, Any_Type);
+ L := Left_Opnd (NN);
+ exit when Nkind (L) /= N_Op_Concat or else Analyzed (L);
+ NN := L;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Now (given the above example) NN is A&B and L is A
+
+ -- First analyze L ...
+
+ Analyze_Expression (L);
+
+ -- ... then walk NN back up until we reach N (where we started), calling
+ -- Analyze_Concatenation_Rest along the way.
+
+ loop
+ Analyze_Concatenation_Rest (NN);
+ exit when NN = N;
+ NN := Parent (NN);
+ end loop;
+ end Analyze_Concatenation;
+
+ --------------------------------
+ -- Analyze_Concatenation_Rest --
+ --------------------------------
+
-- If the only one-dimensional array type in scope is String,
-- this is the resulting type of the operation. Otherwise there
-- will be a concatenation operation defined for each user-defined
-- one-dimensional array.
- procedure Analyze_Concatenation (N : Node_Id) is
+ procedure Analyze_Concatenation_Rest (N : Node_Id) is
L : constant Node_Id := Left_Opnd (N);
R : constant Node_Id := Right_Opnd (N);
Op_Id : Entity_Id := Entity (N);
RT : Entity_Id;
begin
- Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
- Candidate_Type := Empty;
-
- Analyze_Expression (L);
Analyze_Expression (R);
- -- If the entity is present, the node appears in an instance,
- -- and denotes a predefined concatenation operation. The resulting
- -- type is obtained from the arguments when possible. If the arguments
- -- are aggregates, the array type and the concatenation type must be
+ -- If the entity is present, the node appears in an instance, and
+ -- denotes a predefined concatenation operation. The resulting type is
+ -- obtained from the arguments when possible. If the arguments are
+ -- aggregates, the array type and the concatenation type must be
-- visible.
if Present (Op_Id) then
end if;
Operator_Check (N);
- end Analyze_Concatenation;
+ end Analyze_Concatenation_Rest;
------------------------------------
-- Analyze_Conditional_Expression --
Condition : constant Node_Id := First (Expressions (N));
Then_Expr : constant Node_Id := Next (Condition);
Else_Expr : constant Node_Id := Next (Then_Expr);
+
begin
+ if Comes_From_Source (N) then
+ Check_Compiler_Unit (N);
+ end if;
+
Analyze_Expression (Condition);
Analyze_Expression (Then_Expr);
- Analyze_Expression (Else_Expr);
- Set_Etype (N, Etype (Then_Expr));
+
+ if Present (Else_Expr) then
+ Analyze_Expression (Else_Expr);
+ end if;
+
+ if not Is_Overloaded (Then_Expr) then
+ Set_Etype (N, Etype (Then_Expr));
+ else
+ declare
+ I : Interp_Index;
+ It : Interp;
+
+ begin
+ Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
+ Get_First_Interp (Then_Expr, I, It);
+ while Present (It.Nam) loop
+ if Has_Compatible_Type (Else_Expr, It.Typ) then
+ Add_One_Interp (N, It.Typ, It.Typ);
+ end if;
+
+ Get_Next_Interp (I, It);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end if;
end Analyze_Conditional_Expression;
-------------------------
Make_Op_Not (Loc,
Right_Opnd =>
Make_Op_Eq (Loc,
- Left_Opnd => Relocate_Node (Left_Opnd (N)),
- Right_Opnd => Relocate_Node (Right_Opnd (N)))));
+ Left_Opnd => Left_Opnd (N),
+ Right_Opnd => Right_Opnd (N))));
Set_Entity (Right_Opnd (N), Op_Id);
Analyze (N);
if not Is_Overloaded (P) then
if Is_Access_Type (Etype (P)) then
- -- Set the Etype. We need to go thru Is_For_Access_Subtypes
- -- to avoid other problems caused by the Private_Subtype
- -- and it is safe to go to the Base_Type because this is the
- -- same as converting the access value to its Base_Type.
+ -- Set the Etype. We need to go through Is_For_Access_Subtypes to
+ -- avoid other problems caused by the Private_Subtype and it is
+ -- safe to go to the Base_Type because this is the same as
+ -- converting the access value to its Base_Type.
declare
DT : Entity_Id := Designated_Type (Etype (P));
DT := Base_Type (DT);
end if;
- Set_Etype (N, DT);
+ -- An explicit dereference is a legal occurrence of an
+ -- incomplete type imported through a limited_with clause,
+ -- if the full view is visible.
+
+ if From_With_Type (DT)
+ and then not From_With_Type (Scope (DT))
+ and then
+ (Is_Immediately_Visible (Scope (DT))
+ or else
+ (Is_Child_Unit (Scope (DT))
+ and then Is_Visible_Child_Unit (Scope (DT))))
+ then
+ Set_Etype (N, Available_View (DT));
+
+ else
+ Set_Etype (N, DT);
+ end if;
end;
elsif Etype (P) /= Any_Type then
-- where the prefix might include functions that return access to
-- subprograms and others that return a regular type. Disambiguation
-- of those has to take place in Resolve.
- -- See e.g. 7117-014 and E317-001.
New_N :=
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
and then Is_Overloaded (N)
then
-- The prefix may include access to subprograms and other access
- -- types. If the context selects the interpretation that is a call,
- -- we cannot rewrite the node yet, but we include the result of
- -- the call interpretation.
+ -- types. If the context selects the interpretation that is a
+ -- function call (not a procedure call) we cannot rewrite the node
+ -- yet, but we include the result of the call interpretation.
Get_First_Interp (N, I, It);
while Present (It.Nam) loop
if Ekind (Base_Type (It.Typ)) = E_Subprogram_Type
and then Etype (Base_Type (It.Typ)) /= Standard_Void_Type
+ and then Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Procedure_Call_Statement
then
Add_One_Interp (N, Etype (It.Typ), Etype (It.Typ));
end if;
Set_Name (N, P);
Set_Parameter_Associations (N, Exprs);
+ -- Analyze actuals prior to analyzing the call itself
+
Actual := First (Parameter_Associations (N));
while Present (Actual) loop
Analyze (Actual);
Check_Parameterless_Call (Actual);
- Next_Actual (Actual);
+
+ -- Move to next actual. Note that we use Next, not Next_Actual
+ -- here. The reason for this is a bit subtle. If a function call
+ -- includes named associations, the parser recognizes the node as
+ -- a call, and it is analyzed as such. If all associations are
+ -- positional, the parser builds an indexed_component node, and
+ -- it is only after analysis of the prefix that the construct
+ -- is recognized as a call, in which case Process_Function_Call
+ -- rewrites the node and analyzes the actuals. If the list of
+ -- actuals is malformed, the parser may leave the node as an
+ -- indexed component (despite the presence of named associations).
+ -- The iterator Next_Actual is equivalent to Next if the list is
+ -- positional, but follows the normalized chain of actuals when
+ -- named associations are present. In this case normalization has
+ -- not taken place, and actuals remain unanalyzed, which leads to
+ -- subsequent crashes or loops if there is an attempt to continue
+ -- analysis of the program.
+
+ Next (Actual);
end loop;
Analyze_Call (N);
-------------------------------
procedure Process_Indexed_Component is
- Exp : Node_Id;
- Array_Type : Entity_Id;
- Index : Node_Id;
- Pent : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ Exp : Node_Id;
+ Array_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Index : Node_Id;
+ Pent : Entity_Id := Empty;
begin
Exp := First (Exprs);
-- account a possible implicit dereference.
if Is_Access_Type (Array_Type) then
- Array_Type := Designated_Type (Array_Type);
Error_Msg_NW (Warn_On_Dereference, "?implicit dereference", N);
- Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix (Pent, P);
+ Array_Type := Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix (Pent, P);
end if;
if Is_Array_Type (Array_Type) then
end loop;
if Etype (N) = Any_Type then
- Error_Msg_N ("no legal interpetation for indexed component", N);
+ Error_Msg_N ("no legal interpretation for indexed component", N);
Set_Is_Overloaded (N, False);
end if;
-- Get name of array, function or type
Analyze (P);
- if Nkind (N) = N_Function_Call
- or else Nkind (N) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement
- then
+
+ if Nkind_In (N, N_Function_Call, N_Procedure_Call_Statement) then
+
-- If P is an explicit dereference whose prefix is of a
-- remote access-to-subprogram type, then N has already
-- been rewritten as a subprogram call and analyzed.
then
U_N := Entity (P);
- if Ekind (U_N) in Type_Kind then
+ if Is_Type (U_N) then
-- Reformat node as a type conversion
Set_Etype (L, T_F);
end if;
-
end Try_One_Interp;
+ procedure Analyze_Set_Membership;
+ -- If a set of alternatives is present, analyze each and find the
+ -- common type to which they must all resolve.
+
+ ----------------------------
+ -- Analyze_Set_Membership --
+ ----------------------------
+
+ procedure Analyze_Set_Membership is
+ Alt : Node_Id;
+ Index : Interp_Index;
+ It : Interp;
+ Candidate_Interps : Node_Id;
+ Common_Type : Entity_Id := Empty;
+
+ begin
+ Analyze (L);
+ Candidate_Interps := L;
+
+ if not Is_Overloaded (L) then
+ Common_Type := Etype (L);
+
+ Alt := First (Alternatives (N));
+ while Present (Alt) loop
+ Analyze (Alt);
+
+ if not Has_Compatible_Type (Alt, Common_Type) then
+ Wrong_Type (Alt, Common_Type);
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Alt);
+ end loop;
+
+ else
+ Alt := First (Alternatives (N));
+ while Present (Alt) loop
+ Analyze (Alt);
+ if not Is_Overloaded (Alt) then
+ Common_Type := Etype (Alt);
+
+ else
+ Get_First_Interp (Alt, Index, It);
+ while Present (It.Typ) loop
+ if not
+ Has_Compatible_Type (Candidate_Interps, It.Typ)
+ then
+ Remove_Interp (Index);
+ end if;
+
+ Get_Next_Interp (Index, It);
+ end loop;
+
+ Get_First_Interp (Alt, Index, It);
+
+ if No (It.Typ) then
+ Error_Msg_N ("alternative has no legal type", Alt);
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If alternative is not overloaded, we have a unique type
+ -- for all of them.
+
+ Set_Etype (Alt, It.Typ);
+ Get_Next_Interp (Index, It);
+
+ if No (It.Typ) then
+ Set_Is_Overloaded (Alt, False);
+ Common_Type := Etype (Alt);
+ end if;
+
+ Candidate_Interps := Alt;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Alt);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
+ Set_Etype (N, Standard_Boolean);
+
+ if Present (Common_Type) then
+ Set_Etype (L, Common_Type);
+ Set_Is_Overloaded (L, False);
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N ("cannot resolve membership operation", N);
+ end if;
+ end Analyze_Set_Membership;
+
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Membership_Op
begin
Analyze_Expression (L);
+ if No (R)
+ and then Extensions_Allowed
+ then
+ Analyze_Set_Membership;
+ return;
+ end if;
+
if Nkind (R) = N_Range
or else (Nkind (R) = N_Attribute_Reference
and then Attribute_Name (R) = Name_Range)
-- in any case.
Set_Etype (N, Standard_Boolean);
+
+ if Comes_From_Source (N)
+ and then Present (Right_Opnd (N))
+ and then Is_CPP_Class (Etype (Etype (Right_Opnd (N))))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N ("membership test not applicable to cpp-class types", N);
+ end if;
end Analyze_Membership_Op;
----------------------
Success : out Boolean;
Skip_First : Boolean := False)
is
- Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
- Prev_T : constant Entity_Id := Etype (N);
- Formal : Entity_Id;
- Actual : Node_Id;
- Is_Indexed : Boolean := False;
- Subp_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Nam);
- Norm_OK : Boolean;
+ Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
+ Prev_T : constant Entity_Id := Etype (N);
+
+ Must_Skip : constant Boolean := Skip_First
+ or else Nkind (Original_Node (N)) = N_Selected_Component
+ or else
+ (Nkind (Original_Node (N)) = N_Indexed_Component
+ and then Nkind (Prefix (Original_Node (N)))
+ = N_Selected_Component);
+ -- The first formal must be omitted from the match when trying to find
+ -- a primitive operation that is a possible interpretation, and also
+ -- after the call has been rewritten, because the corresponding actual
+ -- is already known to be compatible, and because this may be an
+ -- indexing of a call with default parameters.
+
+ Formal : Entity_Id;
+ Actual : Node_Id;
+ Is_Indexed : Boolean := False;
+ Is_Indirect : Boolean := False;
+ Subp_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Nam);
+ Norm_OK : Boolean;
+
+ function Operator_Hidden_By (Fun : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- There may be a user-defined operator that hides the current
+ -- interpretation. We must check for this independently of the
+ -- analysis of the call with the user-defined operation, because
+ -- the parameter names may be wrong and yet the hiding takes place.
+ -- This fixes a problem with ACATS test B34014O.
+ --
+ -- When the type Address is a visible integer type, and the DEC
+ -- system extension is visible, the predefined operator may be
+ -- hidden as well, by one of the address operations in auxdec.
+ -- Finally, The abstract operations on address do not hide the
+ -- predefined operator (this is the purpose of making them abstract).
procedure Indicate_Name_And_Type;
-- If candidate interpretation matches, indicate name and type of
end if;
end Indicate_Name_And_Type;
+ ------------------------
+ -- Operator_Hidden_By --
+ ------------------------
+
+ function Operator_Hidden_By (Fun : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ Act1 : constant Node_Id := First_Actual (N);
+ Act2 : constant Node_Id := Next_Actual (Act1);
+ Form1 : constant Entity_Id := First_Formal (Fun);
+ Form2 : constant Entity_Id := Next_Formal (Form1);
+
+ begin
+ if Ekind (Fun) /= E_Function
+ or else Is_Abstract_Subprogram (Fun)
+ then
+ return False;
+
+ elsif not Has_Compatible_Type (Act1, Etype (Form1)) then
+ return False;
+
+ elsif Present (Form2) then
+ if
+ No (Act2) or else not Has_Compatible_Type (Act2, Etype (Form2))
+ then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ elsif Present (Act2) then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Now we know that the arity of the operator matches the function,
+ -- and the function call is a valid interpretation. The function
+ -- hides the operator if it has the right signature, or if one of
+ -- its operands is a non-abstract operation on Address when this is
+ -- a visible integer type.
+
+ return Hides_Op (Fun, Nam)
+ or else Is_Descendent_Of_Address (Etype (Form1))
+ or else
+ (Present (Form2)
+ and then Is_Descendent_Of_Address (Etype (Form2)));
+ end Operator_Hidden_By;
+
-- Start of processing for Analyze_One_Call
begin
Success := False;
- -- If the subprogram has no formals, or if all the formals have
- -- defaults, and the return type is an array type, the node may
- -- denote an indexing of the result of a parameterless call.
+ -- If the subprogram has no formals or if all the formals have defaults,
+ -- and the return type is an array type, the node may denote an indexing
+ -- of the result of a parameterless call. In Ada 2005, the subprogram
+ -- may have one non-defaulted formal, and the call may have been written
+ -- in prefix notation, so that the rebuilt parameter list has more than
+ -- one actual.
+
+ if not Is_Overloadable (Nam)
+ and then Ekind (Nam) /= E_Subprogram_Type
+ and then Ekind (Nam) /= E_Entry_Family
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- An indexing requires at least one actual
- if Needs_No_Actuals (Nam)
- and then Present (Actuals)
+ if not Is_Empty_List (Actuals)
+ and then
+ (Needs_No_Actuals (Nam)
+ or else
+ (Needs_One_Actual (Nam)
+ and then Present (Next_Actual (First (Actuals)))))
then
if Is_Array_Type (Subp_Type) then
- Is_Indexed := Try_Indexed_Call (N, Nam, Subp_Type);
+ Is_Indexed := Try_Indexed_Call (N, Nam, Subp_Type, Must_Skip);
elsif Is_Access_Type (Subp_Type)
and then Is_Array_Type (Designated_Type (Subp_Type))
then
Is_Indexed :=
- Try_Indexed_Call (N, Nam, Designated_Type (Subp_Type));
+ Try_Indexed_Call
+ (N, Nam, Designated_Type (Subp_Type), Must_Skip);
-- The prefix can also be a parameterless function that returns an
- -- access to subprogram. in which case this is an indirect call.
+ -- access to subprogram, in which case this is an indirect call.
+ -- If this succeeds, an explicit dereference is added later on,
+ -- in Analyze_Call or Resolve_Call.
elsif Is_Access_Type (Subp_Type)
- and then Ekind (Designated_Type (Subp_Type)) = E_Subprogram_Type
+ and then Ekind (Designated_Type (Subp_Type)) = E_Subprogram_Type
then
- Is_Indexed := Try_Indirect_Call (N, Nam, Subp_Type);
+ Is_Indirect := Try_Indirect_Call (N, Nam, Subp_Type);
end if;
end if;
- Normalize_Actuals (N, Nam, (Report and not Is_Indexed), Norm_OK);
+ -- If the call has been transformed into a slice, it is of the form
+ -- F (Subtype) where F is parameterless. The node has been rewritten in
+ -- Try_Indexed_Call and there is nothing else to do.
+
+ if Is_Indexed
+ and then Nkind (N) = N_Slice
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Normalize_Actuals
+ (N, Nam, (Report and not Is_Indexed and not Is_Indirect), Norm_OK);
if not Norm_OK then
+ -- If an indirect call is a possible interpretation, indicate
+ -- success to the caller.
+
+ if Is_Indirect then
+ Success := True;
+ return;
+
-- Mismatch in number or names of parameters
- if Debug_Flag_E then
+ elsif Debug_Flag_E then
Write_Str (" normalization fails in call ");
Write_Int (Int (N));
Write_Str (" with subprogram ");
then
return;
- elsif not Present (Actuals) then
+ elsif No (Actuals) then
-- If Normalize succeeds, then there are default parameters for
-- all formals.
if Etype (N) /= Prev_T then
- -- There may be a user-defined operator that hides the
- -- current interpretation. We must check for this independently
- -- of the analysis of the call with the user-defined operation,
- -- because the parameter names may be wrong and yet the hiding
- -- takes place. Fixes b34014o.
+ -- Check that operator is not hidden by a function interpretation
if Is_Overloaded (Name (N)) then
declare
begin
Get_First_Interp (Name (N), I, It);
while Present (It.Nam) loop
- if Ekind (It.Nam) /= E_Operator
- and then Hides_Op (It.Nam, Nam)
- and then
- Has_Compatible_Type
- (First_Actual (N), Etype (First_Formal (It.Nam)))
- and then (No (Next_Actual (First_Actual (N)))
- or else Has_Compatible_Type
- (Next_Actual (First_Actual (N)),
- Etype (Next_Formal (First_Formal (It.Nam)))))
- then
+ if Operator_Hidden_By (It.Nam) then
Set_Etype (N, Prev_T);
return;
end if;
-- skip first actual, which may be rewritten later as an
-- explicit dereference.
- if Skip_First then
+ if Must_Skip then
Next_Actual (Actual);
Next_Formal (Formal);
end if;
if Nkind (Parent (Actual)) /= N_Parameter_Association
or else Chars (Selector_Name (Parent (Actual))) = Chars (Formal)
then
- if Has_Compatible_Type (Actual, Etype (Formal)) then
+ -- The actual can be compatible with the formal, but we must
+ -- also check that the context is not an address type that is
+ -- visibly an integer type, as is the case in VMS_64. In this
+ -- case the use of literals is illegal, except in the body of
+ -- descendents of system, where arithmetic operations on
+ -- address are of course used.
+
+ if Has_Compatible_Type (Actual, Etype (Formal))
+ and then
+ (Etype (Actual) /= Universal_Integer
+ or else not Is_Descendent_Of_Address (Etype (Formal))
+ or else
+ Is_Predefined_File_Name
+ (Unit_File_Name (Get_Source_Unit (N))))
+ then
Next_Actual (Actual);
Next_Formal (Formal);
Write_Eol;
end if;
- if Report and not Is_Indexed then
+ if Report and not Is_Indexed and not Is_Indirect then
-- Ada 2005 (AI-251): Complete the error notification
- -- to help new Ada 2005 users
+ -- to help new Ada 2005 users.
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Etype (Formal))
and then Is_Interface (Etype (Etype (Formal)))
Formal := First_Formal (Nam);
while Present (Formal) loop
if Chars (Left_Opnd (Actual)) = Chars (Formal) then
- Error_Msg_N
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
("possible misspelling of `='>`!", Actual);
exit;
end if;
and then not Comes_From_Source (Nam)
then
Error_Msg_NE
- (" =='> in call to &#(inherited)!", Actual, Nam);
+ ("\\ =='> in call to inherited operation & #!",
+ Actual, Nam);
elsif Ekind (Nam) = E_Subprogram_Type then
declare
(Associated_Node_For_Itype (Nam));
begin
Error_Msg_NE (
- " =='> in call to dereference of &#!",
+ "\\ =='> in call to dereference of &#!",
Actual, Access_To_Subprogram_Typ);
end;
else
- Error_Msg_NE (" =='> in call to &#!", Actual, Nam);
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("\\ =='> in call to &#!", Actual, Nam);
end if;
end if;
end if;
if Is_Record_Type (T) then
- Comp := First_Entity (T);
+
+ -- If the prefix is a class-wide type, the visible components are
+ -- those of the base type.
+
+ if Is_Class_Wide_Type (T) then
+ T := Etype (T);
+ end if;
+
+ Comp := First_Entity (T);
while Present (Comp) loop
if Chars (Comp) = Chars (Sel)
and then Is_Visible_Component (Comp)
then
- Set_Entity_With_Style_Check (Sel, Comp);
- Generate_Reference (Comp, Sel);
- Set_Etype (Sel, Etype (Comp));
- Add_One_Interp (N, Etype (Comp), Etype (Comp));
+ -- AI05-105: if the context is an object renaming with
+ -- an anonymous access type, the expected type of the
+ -- object must be anonymous. This is a name resolution rule.
- -- This also specifies a candidate to resolve the name.
- -- Further overloading will be resolved from context.
+ if Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Object_Renaming_Declaration
+ or else No (Access_Definition (Parent (N)))
+ or else Ekind (Etype (Comp)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
+ or else
+ Ekind (Etype (Comp)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Subprogram_Type
+ then
+ Set_Entity (Sel, Comp);
+ Set_Etype (Sel, Etype (Comp));
+ Add_One_Interp (N, Etype (Comp), Etype (Comp));
- Set_Etype (Nam, It.Typ);
+ -- This also specifies a candidate to resolve the name.
+ -- Further overloading will be resolved from context.
+ -- The selector name itself does not carry overloading
+ -- information.
+
+ Set_Etype (Nam, It.Typ);
+
+ else
+ -- Named access type in the context of a renaming
+ -- declaration with an access definition. Remove
+ -- inapplicable candidate.
+
+ Remove_Interp (I);
+ end if;
end if;
Next_Entity (Comp);
Set_Etype (N, Etype (Comp));
Set_Etype (Nam, It.Typ);
- -- For access type case, introduce explicit deference for
- -- more uniform treatment of entry calls.
+ -- For access type case, introduce explicit dereference for
+ -- more uniform treatment of entry calls. Do this only once
+ -- if several interpretations yield an access type.
- if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Nam)) then
+ if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Nam))
+ and then Nkind (Nam) /= N_Explicit_Dereference
+ then
Insert_Explicit_Dereference (Nam);
Error_Msg_NW
(Warn_On_Dereference, "?implicit dereference", N);
Get_Next_Interp (I, It);
end loop;
- if Etype (N) = Any_Type then
+ if Etype (N) = Any_Type
+ and then not Try_Object_Operation (N)
+ then
Error_Msg_NE ("undefined selector& for overloaded prefix", N, Sel);
Set_Entity (Sel, Any_Id);
Set_Etype (Sel, Any_Type);
procedure Analyze_Qualified_Expression (N : Node_Id) is
Mark : constant Entity_Id := Subtype_Mark (N);
+ Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
+ I : Interp_Index;
+ It : Interp;
T : Entity_Id;
begin
+ Analyze_Expression (Expr);
+
Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
Find_Type (Mark);
T := Entity (Mark);
+ Set_Etype (N, T);
if T = Any_Type then
return;
end if;
Check_Fully_Declared (T, N);
- Analyze_Expression (Expression (N));
+
+ -- If expected type is class-wide, check for exact match before
+ -- expansion, because if the expression is a dispatching call it
+ -- may be rewritten as explicit dereference with class-wide result.
+ -- If expression is overloaded, retain only interpretations that
+ -- will yield exact matches.
+
+ if Is_Class_Wide_Type (T) then
+ if not Is_Overloaded (Expr) then
+ if Base_Type (Etype (Expr)) /= Base_Type (T) then
+ if Nkind (Expr) = N_Aggregate then
+ Error_Msg_N ("type of aggregate cannot be class-wide", Expr);
+ else
+ Wrong_Type (Expr, T);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ Get_First_Interp (Expr, I, It);
+
+ while Present (It.Nam) loop
+ if Base_Type (It.Typ) /= Base_Type (T) then
+ Remove_Interp (I);
+ end if;
+
+ Get_Next_Interp (I, It);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
Set_Etype (N, T);
end Analyze_Qualified_Expression;
procedure Check_Common_Type (T1, T2 : Entity_Id) is
begin
- if Covers (T1, T2) or else Covers (T2, T1) then
+ if Covers (T1 => T1, T2 => T2)
+ or else
+ Covers (T1 => T2, T2 => T1)
+ then
if T1 = Universal_Integer
or else T1 = Universal_Real
or else T1 = Any_Character
procedure Analyze_Reference (N : Node_Id) is
P : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
+ E : Entity_Id;
+ T : Entity_Id;
Acc_Type : Entity_Id;
+
begin
Analyze (P);
+
+ -- An interesting error check, if we take the 'Reference of an object
+ -- for which a pragma Atomic or Volatile has been given, and the type
+ -- of the object is not Atomic or Volatile, then we are in trouble. The
+ -- problem is that no trace of the atomic/volatile status will remain
+ -- for the backend to respect when it deals with the resulting pointer,
+ -- since the pointer type will not be marked atomic (it is a pointer to
+ -- the base type of the object).
+
+ -- It is not clear if that can ever occur, but in case it does, we will
+ -- generate an error message. Not clear if this message can ever be
+ -- generated, and pretty clear that it represents a bug if it is, still
+ -- seems worth checking!
+
+ T := Etype (P);
+
+ if Is_Entity_Name (P)
+ and then Is_Object_Reference (P)
+ then
+ E := Entity (P);
+ T := Etype (P);
+
+ if (Has_Atomic_Components (E)
+ and then not Has_Atomic_Components (T))
+ or else
+ (Has_Volatile_Components (E)
+ and then not Has_Volatile_Components (T))
+ or else (Is_Atomic (E) and then not Is_Atomic (T))
+ or else (Is_Volatile (E) and then not Is_Volatile (T))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N ("cannot take reference to Atomic/Volatile object", N);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Carry on with normal processing
+
Acc_Type := Create_Itype (E_Allocator_Type, N);
- Set_Etype (Acc_Type, Acc_Type);
- Init_Size_Align (Acc_Type);
+ Set_Etype (Acc_Type, Acc_Type);
Set_Directly_Designated_Type (Acc_Type, Etype (P));
Set_Etype (N, Acc_Type);
end Analyze_Reference;
-- later case, the selector must denote a visible entry.
procedure Analyze_Selected_Component (N : Node_Id) is
- Name : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
- Sel : constant Node_Id := Selector_Name (N);
- Comp : Entity_Id;
- Entity_List : Entity_Id;
- Prefix_Type : Entity_Id;
- Pent : Entity_Id := Empty;
- Act_Decl : Node_Id;
- In_Scope : Boolean;
- Parent_N : Node_Id;
+ Name : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
+ Sel : constant Node_Id := Selector_Name (N);
+ Act_Decl : Node_Id;
+ Comp : Entity_Id;
+ Has_Candidate : Boolean := False;
+ In_Scope : Boolean;
+ Parent_N : Node_Id;
+ Pent : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ Prefix_Type : Entity_Id;
+
+ Type_To_Use : Entity_Id;
+ -- In most cases this is the Prefix_Type, but if the Prefix_Type is
+ -- a class-wide type, we use its root type, whose components are
+ -- present in the class-wide type.
+
+ function Has_Mode_Conformant_Spec (Comp : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- It is known that the parent of N denotes a subprogram call. Comp
+ -- is an overloadable component of the concurrent type of the prefix.
+ -- Determine whether all formals of the parent of N and Comp are mode
+ -- conformant. If the parent node is not analyzed yet it may be an
+ -- indexed component rather than a function call.
+
+ ------------------------------
+ -- Has_Mode_Conformant_Spec --
+ ------------------------------
+
+ function Has_Mode_Conformant_Spec (Comp : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ Comp_Param : Entity_Id;
+ Param : Node_Id;
+ Param_Typ : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Comp_Param := First_Formal (Comp);
+
+ if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Indexed_Component then
+ Param := First (Expressions (Parent (N)));
+ else
+ Param := First (Parameter_Associations (Parent (N)));
+ end if;
+
+ while Present (Comp_Param)
+ and then Present (Param)
+ loop
+ Param_Typ := Find_Parameter_Type (Param);
+
+ if Present (Param_Typ)
+ and then
+ not Conforming_Types
+ (Etype (Comp_Param), Param_Typ, Mode_Conformant)
+ then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Formal (Comp_Param);
+ Next (Param);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- One of the specs has additional formals
+
+ if Present (Comp_Param) or else Present (Param) then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ return True;
+ end Has_Mode_Conformant_Spec;
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Selected_Component
-- A RACW object can never be used as prefix of a selected
-- component since that means it is dereferenced without
-- being a controlling operand of a dispatching operation
- -- (RM E.2.2(15)).
+ -- (RM E.2.2(16/1)). Before reporting an error, we must check
+ -- whether this is actually a dispatching call in prefix form.
if Is_Remote_Access_To_Class_Wide_Type (Prefix_Type)
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
then
- Error_Msg_N
- ("invalid dereference of a remote access to class-wide value",
- N);
+ if Try_Object_Operation (N) then
+ return;
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("invalid dereference of a remote access-to-class-wide value",
+ N);
+ end if;
-- Normal case of selected component applied to access type
Pent := Entity (Selector_Name (Name));
end if;
- Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix (Pent, Name);
+ Prefix_Type := Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix (Pent, Name);
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we have an explicit dereference of a remote access-to-class-wide
+ -- value, then issue an error (see RM-E.2.2(16/1)). However we first
+ -- have to check for the case of a prefix that is a controlling operand
+ -- of a prefixed dispatching call, as the dereference is legal in that
+ -- case. Normally this condition is checked in Validate_Remote_Access_
+ -- To_Class_Wide_Type, but we have to defer the checking for selected
+ -- component prefixes because of the prefixed dispatching call case.
+ -- Note that implicit dereferences are checked for this just above.
+
+ elsif Nkind (Name) = N_Explicit_Dereference
+ and then Is_Remote_Access_To_Class_Wide_Type (Etype (Prefix (Name)))
+ and then Comes_From_Source (N)
+ then
+ if Try_Object_Operation (N) then
+ return;
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("invalid dereference of a remote access-to-class-wide value",
+ N);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- (Ada 2005): if the prefix is the limited view of a type, and
+ -- the context already includes the full view, use the full view
+ -- in what follows, either to retrieve a component of to find
+ -- a primitive operation. If the prefix is an explicit dereference,
+ -- set the type of the prefix to reflect this transformation.
+ -- If the non-limited view is itself an incomplete type, get the
+ -- full view if available.
+
+ if Is_Incomplete_Type (Prefix_Type)
+ and then From_With_Type (Prefix_Type)
+ and then Present (Non_Limited_View (Prefix_Type))
+ then
+ Prefix_Type := Get_Full_View (Non_Limited_View (Prefix_Type));
+
+ if Nkind (N) = N_Explicit_Dereference then
+ Set_Etype (Prefix (N), Prefix_Type);
end if;
- Prefix_Type := Designated_Type (Prefix_Type);
+ elsif Ekind (Prefix_Type) = E_Class_Wide_Type
+ and then From_With_Type (Prefix_Type)
+ and then Present (Non_Limited_View (Etype (Prefix_Type)))
+ then
+ Prefix_Type :=
+ Class_Wide_Type (Non_Limited_View (Etype (Prefix_Type)));
+
+ if Nkind (N) = N_Explicit_Dereference then
+ Set_Etype (Prefix (N), Prefix_Type);
+ end if;
end if;
if Ekind (Prefix_Type) = E_Private_Subtype then
Prefix_Type := Base_Type (Prefix_Type);
end if;
- Entity_List := Prefix_Type;
+ Type_To_Use := Prefix_Type;
-- For class-wide types, use the entity list of the root type. This
-- indirection is specially important for private extensions because
-- only the root type get switched (not the class-wide type).
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Prefix_Type) then
- Entity_List := Root_Type (Prefix_Type);
+ Type_To_Use := Root_Type (Prefix_Type);
end if;
- Comp := First_Entity (Entity_List);
+ Comp := First_Entity (Type_To_Use);
-- If the selector has an original discriminant, the node appears in
-- an instance. Replace the discriminant with the corresponding one
and then Is_Visible_Component (Comp)
then
Set_Entity_With_Style_Check (Sel, Comp);
- Generate_Reference (Comp, Sel);
-
Set_Etype (Sel, Etype (Comp));
if Ekind (Comp) = E_Discriminant then
Resolve (Name);
- -- Ada 2005 (AI-50217): Check wrong use of incomplete type.
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI-50217): Check wrong use of incomplete types or
+ -- subtypes in a package specification.
-- Example:
-- limited with Pkg;
-- package Pkg is
-- type Acc_Inc is access Pkg.T;
-- X : Acc_Inc;
- -- N : Natural := X.all.Comp; -- ERROR
- -- end Pkg;
+ -- N : Natural := X.all.Comp; -- ERROR, limited view
+ -- end Pkg; -- Comp is not visible
if Nkind (Name) = N_Explicit_Dereference
and then From_With_Type (Etype (Prefix (Name)))
and then not Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (Etype (Name))
+ and then Nkind (Parent (Cunit_Entity (Current_Sem_Unit))) =
+ N_Package_Specification
then
Error_Msg_NE
("premature usage of incomplete}", Prefix (Name),
if not Is_Packed (Etype (Comp))
and then
((Nkind (Parent_N) = N_Indexed_Component
- and then Nkind (Name) /= N_Selected_Component)
+ and then Nkind (Name) /= N_Selected_Component)
or else
(Nkind (Parent_N) = N_Attribute_Reference
and then (Attribute_Name (Parent_N) = Name_First
return;
end if;
+ -- If the prefix is a private extension, check only the visible
+ -- components of the partial view. This must include the tag,
+ -- which can appear in expanded code in a tag check.
+
+ if Ekind (Type_To_Use) = E_Record_Type_With_Private
+ and then Chars (Selector_Name (N)) /= Name_uTag
+ then
+ exit when Comp = Last_Entity (Type_To_Use);
+ end if;
+
Next_Entity (Comp);
end loop;
- -- Ada 2005 (AI-252)
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI-252): The selected component can be interpreted as
+ -- a prefixed view of a subprogram. Depending on the context, this is
+ -- either a name that can appear in a renaming declaration, or part
+ -- of an enclosing call given in prefix form.
+
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI05-0030): In the case of dispatching requeue, the
+ -- selected component should resolve to a name.
if Ada_Version >= Ada_05
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Prefix_Type)
- and then Try_Object_Operation (N)
+ and then not Is_Concurrent_Type (Prefix_Type)
then
- return;
+ if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Generic_Association
+ or else Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Requeue_Statement
+ or else Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
+ then
+ if Find_Primitive_Operation (N) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ elsif Try_Object_Operation (N) then
+ return;
+ end if;
-- If the transformation fails, it will be necessary to redo the
-- analysis with all errors enabled, to indicate candidate
-- do the same here.
if No (Full_View (Prefix_Type)) then
- Entity_List := Root_Type (Base_Type (Prefix_Type));
- Comp := First_Entity (Entity_List);
+ Type_To_Use := Root_Type (Base_Type (Prefix_Type));
+ Comp := First_Entity (Type_To_Use);
end if;
while Present (Comp) loop
Set_Etype (N, Etype (Comp));
if Is_Generic_Type (Prefix_Type)
- or else
- Is_Generic_Type (Root_Type (Prefix_Type))
+ or else Is_Generic_Type (Root_Type (Prefix_Type))
then
Set_Original_Discriminant (Sel, Comp);
end if;
+ -- Before declaring an error, check whether this is tagged
+ -- private type and a call to a primitive operation.
+
+ elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_05
+ and then Is_Tagged_Type (Prefix_Type)
+ and then Try_Object_Operation (N)
+ then
+ return;
+
else
Error_Msg_NE
("invisible selector for }",
elsif Is_Concurrent_Type (Prefix_Type) then
- -- Prefix is concurrent type. Find visible operation with given name
- -- For a task, this can only include entries or discriminants if the
- -- task type is not an enclosing scope. If it is an enclosing scope
- -- (e.g. in an inner task) then all entities are visible, but the
- -- prefix must denote the enclosing scope, i.e. can only be a direct
- -- name or an expanded name.
+ -- Find visible operation with given name. For a protected type,
+ -- the possible candidates are discriminants, entries or protected
+ -- procedures. For a task type, the set can only include entries or
+ -- discriminants if the task type is not an enclosing scope. If it
+ -- is an enclosing scope (e.g. in an inner task) then all entities
+ -- are visible, but the prefix must denote the enclosing scope, i.e.
+ -- can only be a direct name or an expanded name.
- Set_Etype (Sel, Any_Type);
+ Set_Etype (Sel, Any_Type);
In_Scope := In_Open_Scopes (Prefix_Type);
while Present (Comp) loop
if Is_Overloadable (Comp) then
Add_One_Interp (Sel, Comp, Etype (Comp));
+ -- If the prefix is tagged, the correct interpretation may
+ -- lie in the primitive or class-wide operations of the
+ -- type. Perform a simple conformance check to determine
+ -- whether Try_Object_Operation should be invoked even if
+ -- a visible entity is found.
+
+ if Is_Tagged_Type (Prefix_Type)
+ and then
+ Nkind_In (Parent (N), N_Procedure_Call_Statement,
+ N_Function_Call,
+ N_Indexed_Component)
+ and then Has_Mode_Conformant_Spec (Comp)
+ then
+ Has_Candidate := True;
+ end if;
+
elsif Ekind (Comp) = E_Discriminant
or else Ekind (Comp) = E_Entry_Family
or else (In_Scope
Set_Original_Discriminant (Sel, Comp);
end if;
- -- For access type case, introduce explicit deference for more
- -- uniform treatment of entry calls.
+ -- For access type case, introduce explicit dereference for
+ -- more uniform treatment of entry calls.
if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Name)) then
Insert_Explicit_Dereference (Name);
Comp = First_Private_Entity (Base_Type (Prefix_Type));
end loop;
+ -- If there is no visible entity with the given name or none of the
+ -- visible entities are plausible interpretations, check whether
+ -- there is some other primitive operation with that name.
+
+ if Ada_Version >= Ada_05
+ and then Is_Tagged_Type (Prefix_Type)
+ then
+ if (Etype (N) = Any_Type
+ or else not Has_Candidate)
+ and then Try_Object_Operation (N)
+ then
+ return;
+
+ -- If the context is not syntactically a procedure call, it
+ -- may be a call to a primitive function declared outside of
+ -- the synchronized type.
+
+ -- If the context is a procedure call, there might still be
+ -- an overloading between an entry and a primitive procedure
+ -- declared outside of the synchronized type, called in prefix
+ -- notation. This is harder to disambiguate because in one case
+ -- the controlling formal is implicit ???
+
+ elsif Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Procedure_Call_Statement
+ and then Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Indexed_Component
+ and then Try_Object_Operation (N)
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
Set_Is_Overloaded (N, Is_Overloaded (Sel));
else
Error_Msg_Node_2 := Entity (Name);
Error_Msg_NE ("no selector& for&", N, Sel);
- Check_Misspelled_Selector (Entity_List, Sel);
+ Check_Misspelled_Selector (Type_To_Use, Sel);
elsif Is_Generic_Type (Prefix_Type)
and then Ekind (Prefix_Type) = E_Record_Type_With_Private
Set_Entity_With_Style_Check (Sel, Comp);
Set_Etype (Sel, Etype (Comp));
Set_Etype (N, Etype (Comp));
- exit;
+ return;
end if;
Next_Component (Comp);
Error_Msg_Node_2 := First_Subtype (Prefix_Type);
Error_Msg_NE ("no selector& for}", N, Sel);
- Check_Misspelled_Selector (Entity_List, Sel);
-
+ Check_Misspelled_Selector (Type_To_Use, Sel);
end if;
Set_Entity (Sel, Any_Id);
Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
if not Is_Overloaded (L) then
-
if Root_Type (Etype (L)) = Standard_Boolean
and then Has_Compatible_Type (R, Etype (L))
then
end loop;
end if;
- -- Here we have failed to find an interpretation. Clearly we
- -- know that it is not the case that both operands can have
- -- an interpretation of Boolean, but this is by far the most
- -- likely intended interpretation. So we simply resolve both
- -- operands as Booleans, and at least one of these resolutions
- -- will generate an error message, and we do not need to give
- -- a further error message on the short circuit operation itself.
+ -- Here we have failed to find an interpretation. Clearly we know that
+ -- it is not the case that both operands can have an interpretation of
+ -- Boolean, but this is by far the most likely intended interpretation.
+ -- So we simply resolve both operands as Booleans, and at least one of
+ -- these resolutions will generate an error message, and we do not need
+ -- to give another error message on the short circuit operation itself.
if Etype (N) = Any_Type then
Resolve (L, Standard_Boolean);
T : Entity_Id;
begin
+ -- Check if the expression is a function call for which we need to
+ -- adjust a SCIL dispatching node.
+
+ if Generate_SCIL
+ and then Nkind (Expr) = N_Function_Call
+ then
+ Adjust_SCIL_Node (N, Expr);
+ end if;
+
-- If Conversion_OK is set, then the Etype is already set, and the
-- only processing required is to analyze the expression. This is
-- used to construct certain "illegal" conversions which are not
if not Comes_From_Source (N) then
return;
+ -- If there was an error in a generic unit, no need to replicate the
+ -- error message. Conversely, constant-folding in the generic may
+ -- transform the argument of a conversion into a string literal, which
+ -- is legal. Therefore the following tests are not performed in an
+ -- instance.
+
+ elsif In_Instance then
+ return;
+
elsif Nkind (Expr) = N_Null then
Error_Msg_N ("argument of conversion cannot be null", N);
Error_Msg_N ("\use qualified expression instead", N);
then
Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Etype (Op_Id));
+ -- If the left operand is overloaded, indicate that the
+ -- current type is a viable candidate. This is redundant
+ -- in most cases, but for equality and comparison operators
+ -- where the context does not impose a type on the operands,
+ -- setting the proper type is necessary to avoid subsequent
+ -- ambiguities during resolution, when both user-defined and
+ -- predefined operators may be candidates.
+
+ if Is_Overloaded (Left_Opnd (N)) then
+ Set_Etype (Left_Opnd (N), Etype (F1));
+ end if;
+
if Debug_Flag_E then
Write_Str ("user defined operator ");
Write_Name (Chars (Op_Id));
Op_Id : Entity_Id;
N : Node_Id)
is
- Op_Name : constant Name_Id := Chars (Op_Id);
+ Op_Name : constant Name_Id := Chars (Op_Id);
function Has_Fixed_Op (Typ : Entity_Id; Op : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
-- Check whether the fixed-point type Typ has a user-defined operator
-- predefined operator. Used to implement Ada 2005 AI-264, to make
-- such operators more visible and therefore useful.
+ -- If the name of the operation is an expanded name with prefix
+ -- Standard, the predefined universal fixed operator is available,
+ -- as specified by AI-420 (RM 4.5.5 (19.1/2)).
+
function Specific_Type (T1, T2 : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
-- Get specific type (i.e. non-universal type if there is one)
------------------
function Has_Fixed_Op (Typ : Entity_Id; Op : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ Bas : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Typ);
Ent : Entity_Id;
F1 : Entity_Id;
F2 : Entity_Id;
begin
+ -- If the universal_fixed operation is given explicitly the rule
+ -- concerning primitive operations of the type do not apply.
+
+ if Nkind (N) = N_Function_Call
+ and then Nkind (Name (N)) = N_Expanded_Name
+ and then Entity (Prefix (Name (N))) = Standard_Standard
+ then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
-- The operation is treated as primitive if it is declared in the
-- same scope as the type, and therefore on the same entity chain.
F2 := Next_Formal (F1);
-- The operation counts as primitive if either operand or
- -- result are of the given type, and both operands are fixed
- -- point types.
+ -- result are of the given base type, and both operands are
+ -- fixed point types.
- if (Etype (F1) = Typ
+ if (Base_Type (Etype (F1)) = Bas
and then Is_Fixed_Point_Type (Etype (F2)))
or else
- (Etype (F2) = Typ
+ (Base_Type (Etype (F2)) = Bas
and then Is_Fixed_Point_Type (Etype (F1)))
or else
- (Etype (Ent) = Typ
+ (Base_Type (Etype (Ent)) = Bas
and then Is_Fixed_Point_Type (Etype (F1))
and then Is_Fixed_Point_Type (Etype (F2)))
then
if Is_Numeric_Type (T1)
and then Is_Numeric_Type (T2)
- and then (Covers (T1, T2) or else Covers (T2, T1))
+ and then (Covers (T1 => T1, T2 => T2)
+ or else
+ Covers (T1 => T2, T2 => T1))
then
Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Specific_Type (T1, T2));
end if;
if (Nkind (N) not in N_Op
or else not Treat_Fixed_As_Integer (N))
and then
- (not (Ada_Version >= Ada_05 and then Has_Fixed_Op (T1, Op_Id))
+ (not Has_Fixed_Op (T1, Op_Id)
or else Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Type_Conversion)
then
Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Universal_Fixed);
or else not Treat_Fixed_As_Integer (N))
and then T1 = Universal_Real
and then
- (not (Ada_Version >= Ada_05 and then Has_Fixed_Op (T1, Op_Id))
+ (not Has_Fixed_Op (T1, Op_Id)
or else Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Type_Conversion)
then
Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Universal_Fixed);
elsif Is_Numeric_Type (T1)
and then Is_Numeric_Type (T2)
- and then (Covers (T1, T2) or else Covers (T2, T1))
+ and then (Covers (T1 => T1, T2 => T2)
+ or else
+ Covers (T1 => T2, T2 => T1))
then
Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Specific_Type (T1, T2));
-- already set (case of operation constructed by Exp_Fixed).
if Is_Integer_Type (T1)
- and then (Covers (T1, T2) or else Covers (T2, T1))
+ and then (Covers (T1 => T1, T2 => T2)
+ or else
+ Covers (T1 => T2, T2 => T1))
then
Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Specific_Type (T1, T2));
end if;
return;
end if;
- Get_Name_String (Chars (Sel));
-
- declare
- S : constant String (1 .. Name_Len) := Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len);
-
- begin
- Comp := First_Entity (Prefix);
- while Nr_Of_Suggestions <= Max_Suggestions
- and then Present (Comp)
- loop
- if Is_Visible_Component (Comp) then
- Get_Name_String (Chars (Comp));
-
- if Is_Bad_Spelling_Of (Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len), S) then
- Nr_Of_Suggestions := Nr_Of_Suggestions + 1;
-
- case Nr_Of_Suggestions is
- when 1 => Suggestion_1 := Comp;
- when 2 => Suggestion_2 := Comp;
- when others => exit;
- end case;
- end if;
+ Comp := First_Entity (Prefix);
+ while Nr_Of_Suggestions <= Max_Suggestions and then Present (Comp) loop
+ if Is_Visible_Component (Comp) then
+ if Is_Bad_Spelling_Of (Chars (Comp), Chars (Sel)) then
+ Nr_Of_Suggestions := Nr_Of_Suggestions + 1;
+
+ case Nr_Of_Suggestions is
+ when 1 => Suggestion_1 := Comp;
+ when 2 => Suggestion_2 := Comp;
+ when others => exit;
+ end case;
end if;
+ end if;
- Comp := Next_Entity (Comp);
- end loop;
+ Comp := Next_Entity (Comp);
+ end loop;
- -- Report at most two suggestions
+ -- Report at most two suggestions
- if Nr_Of_Suggestions = 1 then
- Error_Msg_NE ("\possible misspelling of&", Sel, Suggestion_1);
+ if Nr_Of_Suggestions = 1 then
+ Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
+ ("\possible misspelling of&", Sel, Suggestion_1);
- elsif Nr_Of_Suggestions = 2 then
- Error_Msg_Node_2 := Suggestion_2;
- Error_Msg_NE ("\possible misspelling of& or&",
- Sel, Suggestion_1);
- end if;
- end;
+ elsif Nr_Of_Suggestions = 2 then
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Suggestion_2;
+ Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
+ ("\possible misspelling of& or&", Sel, Suggestion_1);
+ end if;
end Check_Misspelled_Selector;
----------------------
Actual : Node_Id;
X : Interp_Index;
It : Interp;
- Success : Boolean;
Err_Mode : Boolean;
New_Nam : Node_Id;
Void_Interp_Seen : Boolean := False;
+ Success : Boolean;
+ pragma Warnings (Off, Boolean);
+
begin
if Ada_Version >= Ada_05 then
Actual := First_Actual (N);
if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Selected_Component
and then N = Prefix (Parent (N))
then
- Error_Msg_N (
- "\period should probably be semicolon", Parent (N));
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("\period should probably be semicolon", Parent (N));
end if;
elsif Nkind (N) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement
end if;
end Check_Right_Argument;
- -- Start processing for Find_Arithmetic_Types
+ -- Start of processing for Find_Arithmetic_Types
begin
if not Is_Overloaded (L) then
end loop;
end if;
+ -- If operands are aggregates, we must assume that they may be
+ -- boolean arrays, and leave disambiguation for the second pass.
+ -- If only one is an aggregate, verify that the other one has an
+ -- interpretation as a boolean array
+
+ elsif Nkind (L) = N_Aggregate then
+ if Nkind (R) = N_Aggregate then
+ Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Etype (L));
+
+ elsif not Is_Overloaded (R) then
+ if Valid_Boolean_Arg (Etype (R)) then
+ Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, Etype (R));
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ Get_First_Interp (R, Index, It);
+ while Present (It.Typ) loop
+ if Valid_Boolean_Arg (It.Typ) then
+ Add_One_Interp (N, Op_Id, It.Typ);
+ end if;
+
+ Get_Next_Interp (Index, It);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
elsif Valid_Boolean_Arg (Etype (L))
and then Has_Compatible_Type (R, Etype (L))
then
end if;
end Try_One_Interp;
- -- Start processing for Find_Comparison_Types
+ -- Start of processing for Find_Comparison_Types
begin
-- If left operand is aggregate, the right operand has to
if Nkind (L) = N_Aggregate
and then Nkind (R) /= N_Aggregate
then
- Find_Comparison_Types (R, L, Op_Id, N);
+ Find_Comparison_Types (L => R, R => L, Op_Id => Op_Id, N => N);
return;
end if;
Scop : Entity_Id := Empty;
procedure Try_One_Interp (T1 : Entity_Id);
- -- The context of the operator plays no role in resolving the
- -- arguments, so that if there is more than one interpretation
- -- of the operands that is compatible with equality, the construct
- -- is ambiguous and an error can be emitted now, after trying to
- -- disambiguate, i.e. applying preference rules.
+ -- The context of the equality operator plays no role in resolving the
+ -- arguments, so that if there is more than one interpretation of the
+ -- operands that is compatible with equality, the construct is ambiguous
+ -- and an error can be emitted now, after trying to disambiguate, i.e.
+ -- applying preference rules.
--------------------
-- Try_One_Interp --
--------------------
procedure Try_One_Interp (T1 : Entity_Id) is
+ Bas : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (T1);
+
begin
-- If the operator is an expanded name, then the type of the operand
-- must be defined in the corresponding scope. If the type is
-- universal, the context will impose the correct type. An anonymous
-- type for a 'Access reference is also universal in this sense, as
-- the actual type is obtained from context.
+ -- In Ada 2005, the equality operator for anonymous access types
+ -- is declared in Standard, and preference rules apply to it.
- if Present (Scop)
- and then not Defined_In_Scope (T1, Scop)
- and then T1 /= Universal_Integer
- and then T1 /= Universal_Real
- and then T1 /= Any_Access
- and then T1 /= Any_String
- and then T1 /= Any_Composite
- and then (Ekind (T1) /= E_Access_Subprogram_Type
- or else Comes_From_Source (T1))
+ if Present (Scop) then
+ if Defined_In_Scope (T1, Scop)
+ or else T1 = Universal_Integer
+ or else T1 = Universal_Real
+ or else T1 = Any_Access
+ or else T1 = Any_String
+ or else T1 = Any_Composite
+ or else (Ekind (T1) = E_Access_Subprogram_Type
+ and then not Comes_From_Source (T1))
+ then
+ null;
+
+ elsif Ekind (T1) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
+ and then Scop = Standard_Standard
+ then
+ null;
+
+ else
+ -- The scope does not contain an operator for the type
+
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we have infix notation, the operator must be usable.
+ -- Within an instance, if the type is already established we
+ -- know it is correct.
+ -- In Ada 2005, the equality on anonymous access types is declared
+ -- in Standard, and is always visible.
+
+ elsif In_Open_Scopes (Scope (Bas))
+ or else Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (Bas)
+ or else In_Use (Bas)
+ or else (In_Use (Scope (Bas))
+ and then not Is_Hidden (Bas))
+ or else (In_Instance
+ and then First_Subtype (T1) = First_Subtype (Etype (R)))
+ or else Ekind (T1) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
then
+ null;
+
+ else
+ -- Save candidate type for subsquent error message, if any
+
+ if not Is_Limited_Type (T1) then
+ Candidate_Type := T1;
+ end if;
+
return;
end if;
if Etype (N) = Any_Type then
Found := False;
end if;
+
+ elsif Scop = Standard_Standard
+ and then Ekind (T1) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
+ then
+ Found := True;
end if;
end Try_One_Interp;
if Nkind (L) = N_Aggregate
and then Nkind (R) /= N_Aggregate
then
- Find_Equality_Types (R, L, Op_Id, N);
+ Find_Equality_Types (L => R, R => L, Op_Id => Op_Id, N => N);
return;
end if;
end if;
end Find_Negation_Types;
+ ------------------------------
+ -- Find_Primitive_Operation --
+ ------------------------------
+
+ function Find_Primitive_Operation (N : Node_Id) return Boolean is
+ Obj : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
+ Op : constant Node_Id := Selector_Name (N);
+
+ Prim : Elmt_Id;
+ Prims : Elist_Id;
+ Typ : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Set_Etype (Op, Any_Type);
+
+ if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Obj)) then
+ Typ := Designated_Type (Etype (Obj));
+ else
+ Typ := Etype (Obj);
+ end if;
+
+ if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ) then
+ Typ := Root_Type (Typ);
+ end if;
+
+ Prims := Primitive_Operations (Typ);
+
+ Prim := First_Elmt (Prims);
+ while Present (Prim) loop
+ if Chars (Node (Prim)) = Chars (Op) then
+ Add_One_Interp (Op, Node (Prim), Etype (Node (Prim)));
+ Set_Etype (N, Etype (Node (Prim)));
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Elmt (Prim);
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Now look for class-wide operations of the type or any of its
+ -- ancestors by iterating over the homonyms of the selector.
+
+ declare
+ Cls_Type : constant Entity_Id := Class_Wide_Type (Typ);
+ Hom : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Hom := Current_Entity (Op);
+ while Present (Hom) loop
+ if (Ekind (Hom) = E_Procedure
+ or else
+ Ekind (Hom) = E_Function)
+ and then Scope (Hom) = Scope (Typ)
+ and then Present (First_Formal (Hom))
+ and then
+ (Base_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Hom))) = Cls_Type
+ or else
+ (Is_Access_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Hom)))
+ and then
+ Ekind (Etype (First_Formal (Hom))) =
+ E_Anonymous_Access_Type
+ and then
+ Base_Type
+ (Designated_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Hom)))) =
+ Cls_Type))
+ then
+ Add_One_Interp (Op, Hom, Etype (Hom));
+ Set_Etype (N, Etype (Hom));
+ end if;
+
+ Hom := Homonym (Hom);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+
+ return Etype (Op) /= Any_Type;
+ end Find_Primitive_Operation;
+
----------------------
-- Find_Unary_Types --
----------------------
if Etype (N) = Any_Type then
declare
- L : Node_Id;
- R : Node_Id;
+ L : Node_Id;
+ R : Node_Id;
+ Op_Id : Entity_Id := Empty;
begin
R := Right_Opnd (N);
-- pretty much know that the other operand should be Boolean, so
-- resolve it that way (generating an error)
- elsif Nkind (N) = N_Op_And
- or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Or
- or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Xor
- then
+ elsif Nkind_In (N, N_Op_And, N_Op_Or, N_Op_Xor) then
if Etype (L) = Standard_Boolean then
Resolve (R, Standard_Boolean);
return;
-- is not the same numeric type. If it is a non-numeric type,
-- then probably it is intended to match the other operand.
- elsif Nkind (N) = N_Op_Add or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Divide or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Ge or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Gt or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Le or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Lt or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Mod or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Multiply or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Rem or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Subtract
+ elsif Nkind_In (N, N_Op_Add,
+ N_Op_Divide,
+ N_Op_Ge,
+ N_Op_Gt,
+ N_Op_Le)
+ or else
+ Nkind_In (N, N_Op_Lt,
+ N_Op_Mod,
+ N_Op_Multiply,
+ N_Op_Rem,
+ N_Op_Subtract)
then
if Is_Numeric_Type (Etype (L))
and then not Is_Numeric_Type (Etype (R))
-- Comparisons on A'Access are common enough to deserve a
-- special message.
- elsif (Nkind (N) = N_Op_Eq or else
- Nkind (N) = N_Op_Ne)
+ elsif Nkind_In (N, N_Op_Eq, N_Op_Ne)
and then Ekind (Etype (L)) = E_Access_Attribute_Type
and then Ekind (Etype (R)) = E_Access_Attribute_Type
then
Error_Msg_N
("two access attributes cannot be compared directly", N);
Error_Msg_N
- ("\they must be converted to an explicit type for comparison",
+ ("\use qualified expression for one of the operands",
N);
return;
and then Valid_Boolean_Arg (Etype (R))
then
Error_Msg_N ("invalid operands for concatenation", N);
- Error_Msg_N ("\maybe AND was meant", N);
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("\maybe AND was meant", N);
return;
-- A special case for comparison of access parameter with null
Error_Msg_N ("access parameter is not allowed to be null", L);
Error_Msg_N ("\(call would raise Constraint_Error)", L);
return;
- end if;
- -- If we fall through then just give general message. Note that in
- -- the following messages, if the operand is overloaded we choose
- -- an arbitrary type to complain about, but that is probably more
+ -- Another special case for exponentiation, where the right
+ -- operand must be Natural, independently of the base.
+
+ elsif Nkind (N) = N_Op_Expon
+ and then Is_Numeric_Type (Etype (L))
+ and then not Is_Overloaded (R)
+ and then
+ First_Subtype (Base_Type (Etype (R))) /= Standard_Integer
+ and then Base_Type (Etype (R)) /= Universal_Integer
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("exponent must be of type Natural, found}", R, Etype (R));
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If we fall through then just give general message. Note that in
+ -- the following messages, if the operand is overloaded we choose
+ -- an arbitrary type to complain about, but that is probably more
-- useful than not giving a type at all.
if Nkind (N) in N_Unary_Op then
Error_Msg_N ("there is no applicable operator& for}", N);
else
- Error_Msg_N ("invalid operand types for operator&", N);
+ -- Another attempt to find a fix: one of the candidate
+ -- interpretations may not be use-visible. This has
+ -- already been checked for predefined operators, so
+ -- we examine only user-defined functions.
+
+ Op_Id := Get_Name_Entity_Id (Chars (N));
+
+ while Present (Op_Id) loop
+ if Ekind (Op_Id) /= E_Operator
+ and then Is_Overloadable (Op_Id)
+ then
+ if not Is_Immediately_Visible (Op_Id)
+ and then not In_Use (Scope (Op_Id))
+ and then not Is_Abstract_Subprogram (Op_Id)
+ and then not Is_Hidden (Op_Id)
+ and then Ekind (Scope (Op_Id)) = E_Package
+ and then
+ Has_Compatible_Type
+ (L, Etype (First_Formal (Op_Id)))
+ and then Present
+ (Next_Formal (First_Formal (Op_Id)))
+ and then
+ Has_Compatible_Type
+ (R,
+ Etype (Next_Formal (First_Formal (Op_Id))))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("No legal interpretation for operator&", N);
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("\use clause on& would make operation legal",
+ N, Scope (Op_Id));
+ exit;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Op_Id := Homonym (Op_Id);
+ end loop;
+
+ if No (Op_Id) then
+ Error_Msg_N ("invalid operand types for operator&", N);
- if Nkind (N) /= N_Op_Concat then
- Error_Msg_NE ("\left operand has}!", N, Etype (L));
- Error_Msg_NE ("\right operand has}!", N, Etype (R));
+ if Nkind (N) /= N_Op_Concat then
+ Error_Msg_NE ("\left operand has}!", N, Etype (L));
+ Error_Msg_NE ("\right operand has}!", N, Etype (R));
+ end if;
end if;
end if;
end if;
-- Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix --
-----------------------------------------
- procedure Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix
+ function Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix
(E : Entity_Id;
- P : Entity_Id)
+ P : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id
is
Ref : Node_Id;
+ Typ : constant Entity_Id := Designated_Type (Etype (P));
begin
if Present (E)
Set_Comes_From_Source (Ref, Comes_From_Source (P));
Generate_Reference (E, Ref);
end if;
+
+ -- An implicit dereference is a legal occurrence of an
+ -- incomplete type imported through a limited_with clause,
+ -- if the full view is visible.
+
+ if From_With_Type (Typ)
+ and then not From_With_Type (Scope (Typ))
+ and then
+ (Is_Immediately_Visible (Scope (Typ))
+ or else
+ (Is_Child_Unit (Scope (Typ))
+ and then Is_Visible_Child_Unit (Scope (Typ))))
+ then
+ return Available_View (Typ);
+ else
+ return Typ;
+ end if;
+
end Process_Implicit_Dereference_Prefix;
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
procedure Remove_Abstract_Operations (N : Node_Id) is
- I : Interp_Index;
- It : Interp;
- Abstract_Op : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ Abstract_Op : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ Address_Kludge : Boolean := False;
+ I : Interp_Index;
+ It : Interp;
-- AI-310: If overloaded, remove abstract non-dispatching operations. We
-- activate this if either extensions are enabled, or if the abstract
end if;
if Is_Descendent_Of_Address (Etype (Formal)) then
+ Address_Kludge := True;
Remove_Interp (I);
end if;
Get_First_Interp (N, I, It);
while Present (It.Nam) loop
- if not Is_Type (It.Nam)
- and then Is_Abstract (It.Nam)
+ if Is_Overloadable (It.Nam)
+ and then Is_Abstract_Subprogram (It.Nam)
and then not Is_Dispatching_Operation (It.Nam)
- and then
- (Ada_Version >= Ada_05
- or else Is_Predefined_File_Name
- (Unit_File_Name (Get_Source_Unit (It.Nam))))
-
then
Abstract_Op := It.Nam;
- Remove_Interp (I);
- exit;
+
+ if Is_Descendent_Of_Address (It.Typ) then
+ Address_Kludge := True;
+ Remove_Interp (I);
+ exit;
+
+ -- In Ada 2005, this operation does not participate in Overload
+ -- resolution. If the operation is defined in a predefined
+ -- unit, it is one of the operations declared abstract in some
+ -- variants of System, and it must be removed as well.
+
+ elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_05
+ or else Is_Predefined_File_Name
+ (Unit_File_Name (Get_Source_Unit (It.Nam)))
+ then
+ Remove_Interp (I);
+ exit;
+ end if;
end if;
Get_Next_Interp (I, It);
end loop;
if No (Abstract_Op) then
- return;
+
+ -- If some interpretation yields an integer type, it is still
+ -- possible that there are address interpretations. Remove them
+ -- if one operand is a literal, to avoid spurious ambiguities
+ -- on systems where Address is a visible integer type.
+
+ if Is_Overloaded (N)
+ and then Nkind (N) in N_Op
+ and then Is_Integer_Type (Etype (N))
+ then
+ if Nkind (N) in N_Binary_Op then
+ if Nkind (Right_Opnd (N)) = N_Integer_Literal then
+ Remove_Address_Interpretations (Second_Op);
+
+ elsif Nkind (Right_Opnd (N)) = N_Integer_Literal then
+ Remove_Address_Interpretations (First_Op);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
elsif Nkind (N) in N_Op then
- -- Remove interpretations that treat literals as addresses.
- -- This is never appropriate.
+ -- Remove interpretations that treat literals as addresses. This
+ -- is never appropriate, even when Address is defined as a visible
+ -- Integer type. The reason is that we would really prefer Address
+ -- to behave as a private type, even in this case, which is there
+ -- only to accommodate oddities of VMS address sizes. If Address
+ -- is a visible integer type, we get lots of overload ambiguities.
if Nkind (N) in N_Binary_Op then
declare
end;
end if;
- -- If the removal has left no valid interpretations, emit
- -- error message now and label node as illegal.
+ -- If the removal has left no valid interpretations, emit an error
+ -- message now and label node as illegal.
if Present (Abstract_Op) then
Get_First_Interp (N, I, It);
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Abstract_Op);
Error_Msg_NE
("cannot call abstract operation& declared#", N, Abstract_Op);
+
+ -- In Ada 2005, an abstract operation may disable predefined
+ -- operators. Since the context is not yet known, we mark the
+ -- predefined operators as potentially hidden. Do not include
+ -- predefined operators when addresses are involved since this
+ -- case is handled separately.
+
+ elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_05
+ and then not Address_Kludge
+ then
+ while Present (It.Nam) loop
+ if Is_Numeric_Type (It.Typ)
+ and then Scope (It.Typ) = Standard_Standard
+ then
+ Set_Abstract_Op (I, Abstract_Op);
+ end if;
+
+ Get_Next_Interp (I, It);
+ end loop;
end if;
end if;
end if;
Nam : Entity_Id;
Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean
is
- Actual : Node_Id;
- Formal : Entity_Id;
+ Actual : Node_Id;
+ Formal : Entity_Id;
+
Call_OK : Boolean;
+ pragma Warnings (Off, Call_OK);
begin
Normalize_Actuals (N, Designated_Type (Typ), False, Call_OK);
----------------------
function Try_Indexed_Call
- (N : Node_Id;
- Nam : Entity_Id;
- Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean
+ (N : Node_Id;
+ Nam : Entity_Id;
+ Typ : Entity_Id;
+ Skip_First : Boolean) return Boolean
is
- Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
- Actual : Node_Id;
- Index : Entity_Id;
+ Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
+ Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
+ Actual : Node_Id;
+ Index : Entity_Id;
begin
Actual := First (Actuals);
+
+ -- If the call was originally written in prefix form, skip the first
+ -- actual, which is obviously not defaulted.
+
+ if Skip_First then
+ Next (Actual);
+ end if;
+
Index := First_Index (Typ);
while Present (Actual) and then Present (Index) loop
return False;
end if;
- if not Has_Compatible_Type (Actual, Etype (Index)) then
+ if Is_Entity_Name (Actual)
+ and then Is_Type (Entity (Actual))
+ and then No (Next (Actual))
+ then
+ Rewrite (N,
+ Make_Slice (Loc,
+ Prefix => Make_Function_Call (Loc,
+ Name => Relocate_Node (Name (N))),
+ Discrete_Range =>
+ New_Occurrence_Of (Entity (Actual), Sloc (Actual))));
+
+ Analyze (N);
+ return True;
+
+ elsif not Has_Compatible_Type (Actual, Etype (Index)) then
return False;
end if;
--------------------------
function Try_Object_Operation (N : Node_Id) return Boolean is
- K : constant Node_Kind := Nkind (Parent (N));
- Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
- Is_Subprg_Call : constant Boolean := K = N_Procedure_Call_Statement
- or else K = N_Function_Call;
- Obj : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
- Subprog : constant Node_Id := Selector_Name (N);
+ K : constant Node_Kind := Nkind (Parent (N));
+ Is_Subprg_Call : constant Boolean := Nkind_In
+ (K, N_Procedure_Call_Statement,
+ N_Function_Call);
+ Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
+ Obj : constant Node_Id := Prefix (N);
+ Subprog : constant Node_Id :=
+ Make_Identifier (Sloc (Selector_Name (N)),
+ Chars => Chars (Selector_Name (N)));
+ -- Identifier on which possible interpretations will be collected
+
+ Report_Error : Boolean := False;
+ -- If no candidate interpretation matches the context, redo the
+ -- analysis with error enabled to provide additional information.
Actual : Node_Id;
- New_Call_Node : Node_Id := Empty;
+ Candidate : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ New_Call_Node : Node_Id := Empty;
Node_To_Replace : Node_Id;
Obj_Type : Entity_Id := Etype (Obj);
+ Success : Boolean := False;
+
+ function Valid_Candidate
+ (Success : Boolean;
+ Call : Node_Id;
+ Subp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
+ -- If the subprogram is a valid interpretation, record it, and add
+ -- to the list of interpretations of Subprog.
procedure Complete_Object_Operation
(Call_Node : Node_Id;
- Node_To_Replace : Node_Id;
- Subprog : Node_Id);
+ Node_To_Replace : Node_Id);
-- Make Subprog the name of Call_Node, replace Node_To_Replace with
-- Call_Node, insert the object (or its dereference) as the first actual
-- in the call, and complete the analysis of the call.
+ procedure Report_Ambiguity (Op : Entity_Id);
+ -- If a prefixed procedure call is ambiguous, indicate whether the
+ -- call includes an implicit dereference or an implicit 'Access.
+
procedure Transform_Object_Operation
(Call_Node : out Node_Id;
- Node_To_Replace : out Node_Id;
- Subprog : Node_Id);
+ Node_To_Replace : out Node_Id);
-- Transform Obj.Operation (X, Y,,) into Operation (Obj, X, Y ..)
- -- Call_Node is the resulting subprogram call,
- -- Node_To_Replace is either N or the parent of N, and Subprog
- -- is a reference to the subprogram we are trying to match.
+ -- Call_Node is the resulting subprogram call, Node_To_Replace is
+ -- either N or the parent of N, and Subprog is a reference to the
+ -- subprogram we are trying to match.
function Try_Class_Wide_Operation
(Call_Node : Node_Id;
-- Traverse all ancestor types looking for a class-wide subprogram
-- for which the current operation is a valid non-dispatching call.
+ procedure Try_One_Prefix_Interpretation (T : Entity_Id);
+ -- If prefix is overloaded, its interpretation may include different
+ -- tagged types, and we must examine the primitive operations and
+ -- the class-wide operations of each in order to find candidate
+ -- interpretations for the call as a whole.
+
function Try_Primitive_Operation
(Call_Node : Node_Id;
Node_To_Replace : Node_Id) return Boolean;
-- Traverse the list of primitive subprograms looking for a dispatching
-- operation for which the current node is a valid call .
+ ---------------------
+ -- Valid_Candidate --
+ ---------------------
+
+ function Valid_Candidate
+ (Success : Boolean;
+ Call : Node_Id;
+ Subp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id
+ is
+ Arr_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Comp_Type : Entity_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- If the subprogram is a valid interpretation, record it in global
+ -- variable Subprog, to collect all possible overloadings.
+
+ if Success then
+ if Subp /= Entity (Subprog) then
+ Add_One_Interp (Subprog, Subp, Etype (Subp));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If the call may be an indexed call, retrieve component type of
+ -- resulting expression, and add possible interpretation.
+
+ Arr_Type := Empty;
+ Comp_Type := Empty;
+
+ if Nkind (Call) = N_Function_Call
+ and then Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Indexed_Component
+ and then Needs_One_Actual (Subp)
+ then
+ if Is_Array_Type (Etype (Subp)) then
+ Arr_Type := Etype (Subp);
+
+ elsif Is_Access_Type (Etype (Subp))
+ and then Is_Array_Type (Designated_Type (Etype (Subp)))
+ then
+ Arr_Type := Designated_Type (Etype (Subp));
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ if Present (Arr_Type) then
+
+ -- Verify that the actuals (excluding the object)
+ -- match the types of the indices.
+
+ declare
+ Actual : Node_Id;
+ Index : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Actual := Next (First_Actual (Call));
+ Index := First_Index (Arr_Type);
+ while Present (Actual) and then Present (Index) loop
+ if not Has_Compatible_Type (Actual, Etype (Index)) then
+ Arr_Type := Empty;
+ exit;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Actual (Actual);
+ Next_Index (Index);
+ end loop;
+
+ if No (Actual)
+ and then No (Index)
+ and then Present (Arr_Type)
+ then
+ Comp_Type := Component_Type (Arr_Type);
+ end if;
+ end;
+
+ if Present (Comp_Type)
+ and then Etype (Subprog) /= Comp_Type
+ then
+ Add_One_Interp (Subprog, Subp, Comp_Type);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ if Etype (Call) /= Any_Type then
+ return Subp;
+ else
+ return Empty;
+ end if;
+ end Valid_Candidate;
+
-------------------------------
-- Complete_Object_Operation --
-------------------------------
procedure Complete_Object_Operation
(Call_Node : Node_Id;
- Node_To_Replace : Node_Id;
- Subprog : Node_Id)
+ Node_To_Replace : Node_Id)
is
+ Control : constant Entity_Id := First_Formal (Entity (Subprog));
+ Formal_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Control);
First_Actual : Node_Id;
begin
- First_Actual := First (Parameter_Associations (Call_Node));
+ -- Place the name of the operation, with its interpretations,
+ -- on the rewritten call.
+
Set_Name (Call_Node, Subprog);
+ First_Actual := First (Parameter_Associations (Call_Node));
+
+ -- For cross-reference purposes, treat the new node as being in
+ -- the source if the original one is.
+
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Subprog, Comes_From_Source (N));
+ Set_Comes_From_Source (Call_Node, Comes_From_Source (N));
+
if Nkind (N) = N_Selected_Component
and then not Inside_A_Generic
then
end if;
-- If need be, rewrite first actual as an explicit dereference
+ -- If the call is overloaded, the rewriting can only be done
+ -- once the primitive operation is identified.
+
+ if Is_Overloaded (Subprog) then
+
+ -- The prefix itself may be overloaded, and its interpretations
+ -- must be propagated to the new actual in the call.
+
+ if Is_Overloaded (Obj) then
+ Save_Interps (Obj, First_Actual);
+ end if;
+
+ Rewrite (First_Actual, Obj);
- if not Is_Access_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Entity (Subprog))))
+ elsif not Is_Access_Type (Formal_Type)
and then Is_Access_Type (Etype (Obj))
then
Rewrite (First_Actual,
Make_Explicit_Dereference (Sloc (Obj), Obj));
Analyze (First_Actual);
+
+ -- If we need to introduce an explicit dereference, verify that
+ -- the resulting actual is compatible with the mode of the formal.
+
+ if Ekind (First_Formal (Entity (Subprog))) /= E_In_Parameter
+ and then Is_Access_Constant (Etype (Obj))
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("expect variable in call to&", Prefix (N), Entity (Subprog));
+ end if;
+
+ -- Conversely, if the formal is an access parameter and the object
+ -- is not, replace the actual with a 'Access reference. Its analysis
+ -- will check that the object is aliased.
+
+ elsif Is_Access_Type (Formal_Type)
+ and then not Is_Access_Type (Etype (Obj))
+ then
+ -- A special case: A.all'access is illegal if A is an access to a
+ -- constant and the context requires an access to a variable.
+
+ if not Is_Access_Constant (Formal_Type) then
+ if (Nkind (Obj) = N_Explicit_Dereference
+ and then Is_Access_Constant (Etype (Prefix (Obj))))
+ or else not Is_Variable (Obj)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("actual for& must be a variable", Obj, Control);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ Rewrite (First_Actual,
+ Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
+ Attribute_Name => Name_Access,
+ Prefix => Relocate_Node (Obj)));
+
+ if not Is_Aliased_View (Obj) then
+ Error_Msg_NE
+ ("object in prefixed call to& must be aliased"
+ & " (RM-2005 4.3.1 (13))",
+ Prefix (First_Actual), Subprog);
+ end if;
+
+ Analyze (First_Actual);
+
else
+ if Is_Overloaded (Obj) then
+ Save_Interps (Obj, First_Actual);
+ end if;
+
Rewrite (First_Actual, Obj);
end if;
Rewrite (Node_To_Replace, Call_Node);
- Analyze (Node_To_Replace);
+
+ -- Propagate the interpretations collected in subprog to the new
+ -- function call node, to be resolved from context.
+
+ if Is_Overloaded (Subprog) then
+ Save_Interps (Subprog, Node_To_Replace);
+ else
+ Analyze (Node_To_Replace);
+ end if;
end Complete_Object_Operation;
+ ----------------------
+ -- Report_Ambiguity --
+ ----------------------
+
+ procedure Report_Ambiguity (Op : Entity_Id) is
+ Access_Formal : constant Boolean :=
+ Is_Access_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Op)));
+ Access_Actual : constant Boolean :=
+ Is_Access_Type (Etype (Prefix (N)));
+
+ begin
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Op);
+
+ if Access_Formal and then not Access_Actual then
+ if Nkind (Parent (Op)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\possible interpretation"
+ & " (inherited, with implicit 'Access) #", N);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\possible interpretation (with implicit 'Access) #", N);
+ end if;
+
+ elsif not Access_Formal and then Access_Actual then
+ if Nkind (Parent (Op)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\possible interpretation"
+ & " ( inherited, with implicit dereference) #", N);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("\possible interpretation (with implicit dereference) #", N);
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ if Nkind (Parent (Op)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration then
+ Error_Msg_N ("\possible interpretation (inherited)#", N);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
+ ("\possible interpretation#", N);
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end Report_Ambiguity;
+
--------------------------------
-- Transform_Object_Operation --
--------------------------------
procedure Transform_Object_Operation
(Call_Node : out Node_Id;
- Node_To_Replace : out Node_Id;
- Subprog : Node_Id)
+ Node_To_Replace : out Node_Id)
is
- Parent_Node : constant Node_Id := Parent (N);
-
Dummy : constant Node_Id := New_Copy (Obj);
-- Placeholder used as a first parameter in the call, replaced
-- eventually by the proper object.
- Actuals : List_Id;
+ Parent_Node : constant Node_Id := Parent (N);
+
Actual : Node_Id;
+ Actuals : List_Id;
begin
-- Common case covering 1) Call to a procedure and 2) Call to a
-- function that has some additional actuals.
- if (Nkind (Parent_Node) = N_Function_Call
- or else
- Nkind (Parent_Node) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement)
+ if Nkind_In (Parent_Node, N_Function_Call,
+ N_Procedure_Call_Statement)
-- N is a selected component node containing the name of the
-- subprogram. If N is not the name of the parent node we must
if Nkind (Parent_Node) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement then
Call_Node :=
Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
- Name => New_Copy_Tree (Subprog),
+ Name => New_Copy (Subprog),
Parameter_Associations => Actuals);
else
Call_Node :=
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
- Name => New_Copy_Tree (Subprog),
+ Name => New_Copy (Subprog),
Parameter_Associations => Actuals);
end if;
- -- Before analysis, the function call appears as an indexed component
+ -- Before analysis, a function call appears as an indexed component
-- if there are no named associations.
elsif Nkind (Parent_Node) = N_Indexed_Component
Call_Node :=
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
- Name => New_Copy_Tree (Subprog),
+ Name => New_Copy (Subprog),
Parameter_Associations => Actuals);
- -- Parameterless call: Obj.F is rewritten as F (Obj)
+ -- Parameterless call: Obj.F is rewritten as F (Obj)
else
Node_To_Replace := N;
Call_Node :=
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
- Name => New_Copy_Tree (Subprog),
+ Name => New_Copy (Subprog),
Parameter_Associations => New_List (Dummy));
end if;
end Transform_Object_Operation;
(Call_Node : Node_Id;
Node_To_Replace : Node_Id) return Boolean
is
- Anc_Type : Entity_Id;
- Hom : Entity_Id;
- Hom_Ref : Node_Id;
- Success : Boolean;
-
- begin
- -- Loop through ancestor types, traverse the homonym chain of the
- -- subprogram, and try out those homonyms whose first formal has the
- -- class-wide type of the ancestor.
+ Anc_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Matching_Op : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ Error : Boolean;
+
+ procedure Traverse_Homonyms
+ (Anc_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Error : out Boolean);
+ -- Traverse the homonym chain of the subprogram searching for those
+ -- homonyms whose first formal has the Anc_Type's class-wide type,
+ -- or an anonymous access type designating the class-wide type. If
+ -- an ambiguity is detected, then Error is set to True.
+
+ procedure Traverse_Interfaces
+ (Anc_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Error : out Boolean);
+ -- Traverse the list of interfaces, if any, associated with Anc_Type
+ -- and search for acceptable class-wide homonyms associated with each
+ -- interface. If an ambiguity is detected, then Error is set to True.
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- Traverse_Homonyms --
+ -----------------------
+
+ procedure Traverse_Homonyms
+ (Anc_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Error : out Boolean)
+ is
+ Cls_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Hom : Entity_Id;
+ Hom_Ref : Node_Id;
+ Success : Boolean;
- -- Should we verify that it is declared in the same package as the
- -- ancestor type ???
+ begin
+ Error := False;
- Anc_Type := Obj_Type;
+ Cls_Type := Class_Wide_Type (Anc_Type);
- loop
Hom := Current_Entity (Subprog);
+
+ -- Find operation whose first parameter is of the class-wide
+ -- type, a subtype thereof, or an anonymous access to same.
+
while Present (Hom) loop
if (Ekind (Hom) = E_Procedure
or else
Ekind (Hom) = E_Function)
+ and then Scope (Hom) = Scope (Anc_Type)
and then Present (First_Formal (Hom))
- and then Etype (First_Formal (Hom)) =
- Class_Wide_Type (Anc_Type)
+ and then
+ (Base_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Hom))) = Cls_Type
+ or else
+ (Is_Access_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Hom)))
+ and then
+ Ekind (Etype (First_Formal (Hom))) =
+ E_Anonymous_Access_Type
+ and then
+ Base_Type
+ (Designated_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Hom)))) =
+ Cls_Type))
then
- Hom_Ref := New_Reference_To (Hom, Loc);
-
Set_Etype (Call_Node, Any_Type);
- Set_Parent (Call_Node, Parent (Node_To_Replace));
-
- Set_Name (Call_Node, Hom_Ref);
+ Set_Is_Overloaded (Call_Node, False);
+ Success := False;
- Analyze_One_Call
- (N => Call_Node,
- Nam => Hom,
- Report => False,
- Success => Success,
- Skip_First => True);
+ if No (Matching_Op) then
+ Hom_Ref := New_Reference_To (Hom, Sloc (Subprog));
+ Set_Etype (Call_Node, Any_Type);
+ Set_Parent (Call_Node, Parent (Node_To_Replace));
- if Success then
+ Set_Name (Call_Node, Hom_Ref);
- -- Reformat into the proper call
+ Analyze_One_Call
+ (N => Call_Node,
+ Nam => Hom,
+ Report => Report_Error,
+ Success => Success,
+ Skip_First => True);
- Complete_Object_Operation
- (Call_Node => Call_Node,
- Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace,
- Subprog => Hom_Ref);
+ Matching_Op :=
+ Valid_Candidate (Success, Call_Node, Hom);
- return True;
+ else
+ Analyze_One_Call
+ (N => Call_Node,
+ Nam => Hom,
+ Report => Report_Error,
+ Success => Success,
+ Skip_First => True);
+
+ if Present (Valid_Candidate (Success, Call_Node, Hom))
+ and then Nkind (Call_Node) /= N_Function_Call
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE ("ambiguous call to&", N, Hom);
+ Report_Ambiguity (Matching_Op);
+ Report_Ambiguity (Hom);
+ Error := True;
+ return;
+ end if;
end if;
end if;
Hom := Homonym (Hom);
end loop;
+ end Traverse_Homonyms;
+
+ -------------------------
+ -- Traverse_Interfaces --
+ -------------------------
+
+ procedure Traverse_Interfaces
+ (Anc_Type : Entity_Id;
+ Error : out Boolean)
+ is
+ Intface_List : constant List_Id :=
+ Abstract_Interface_List (Anc_Type);
+ Intface : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Error := False;
+
+ if Is_Non_Empty_List (Intface_List) then
+ Intface := First (Intface_List);
+ while Present (Intface) loop
+
+ -- Look for acceptable class-wide homonyms associated with
+ -- the interface.
+
+ Traverse_Homonyms (Etype (Intface), Error);
+
+ if Error then
+ return;
+ end if;
- -- Examine other ancestor types
+ -- Continue the search by looking at each of the interface's
+ -- associated interface ancestors.
+
+ Traverse_Interfaces (Etype (Intface), Error);
+
+ if Error then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Intface);
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end Traverse_Interfaces;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Try_Class_Wide_Operation
+
+ begin
+ -- Loop through ancestor types (including interfaces), traversing
+ -- the homonym chain of the subprogram, trying out those homonyms
+ -- whose first formal has the class-wide type of the ancestor, or
+ -- an anonymous access type designating the class-wide type.
+
+ Anc_Type := Obj_Type;
+ loop
+ -- Look for a match among homonyms associated with the ancestor
+
+ Traverse_Homonyms (Anc_Type, Error);
+
+ if Error then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Continue the search for matches among homonyms associated with
+ -- any interfaces implemented by the ancestor.
+
+ Traverse_Interfaces (Anc_Type, Error);
+
+ if Error then
+ return True;
+ end if;
exit when Etype (Anc_Type) = Anc_Type;
Anc_Type := Etype (Anc_Type);
end loop;
- -- Nothing matched
+ if Present (Matching_Op) then
+ Set_Etype (Call_Node, Etype (Matching_Op));
+ end if;
- return False;
+ return Present (Matching_Op);
end Try_Class_Wide_Operation;
+ -----------------------------------
+ -- Try_One_Prefix_Interpretation --
+ -----------------------------------
+
+ procedure Try_One_Prefix_Interpretation (T : Entity_Id) is
+ begin
+ Obj_Type := T;
+
+ if Is_Access_Type (Obj_Type) then
+ Obj_Type := Designated_Type (Obj_Type);
+ end if;
+
+ if Ekind (Obj_Type) = E_Private_Subtype then
+ Obj_Type := Base_Type (Obj_Type);
+ end if;
+
+ if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Obj_Type) then
+ Obj_Type := Etype (Class_Wide_Type (Obj_Type));
+ end if;
+
+ -- The type may have be obtained through a limited_with clause,
+ -- in which case the primitive operations are available on its
+ -- non-limited view. If still incomplete, retrieve full view.
+
+ if Ekind (Obj_Type) = E_Incomplete_Type
+ and then From_With_Type (Obj_Type)
+ then
+ Obj_Type := Get_Full_View (Non_Limited_View (Obj_Type));
+ end if;
+
+ -- If the object is not tagged, or the type is still an incomplete
+ -- type, this is not a prefixed call.
+
+ if not Is_Tagged_Type (Obj_Type)
+ or else Is_Incomplete_Type (Obj_Type)
+ then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ if Try_Primitive_Operation
+ (Call_Node => New_Call_Node,
+ Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace)
+ or else
+ Try_Class_Wide_Operation
+ (Call_Node => New_Call_Node,
+ Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace)
+ then
+ null;
+ end if;
+ end Try_One_Prefix_Interpretation;
+
-----------------------------
-- Try_Primitive_Operation --
-----------------------------
is
Elmt : Elmt_Id;
Prim_Op : Entity_Id;
- Prim_Op_Ref : Node_Id;
- Success : Boolean;
+ Matching_Op : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ Prim_Op_Ref : Node_Id := Empty;
+
+ Corr_Type : Entity_Id := Empty;
+ -- If the prefix is a synchronized type, the controlling type of
+ -- the primitive operation is the corresponding record type, else
+ -- this is the object type itself.
+
+ Success : Boolean := False;
+
+ function Collect_Generic_Type_Ops (T : Entity_Id) return Elist_Id;
+ -- For tagged types the candidate interpretations are found in
+ -- the list of primitive operations of the type and its ancestors.
+ -- For formal tagged types we have to find the operations declared
+ -- in the same scope as the type (including in the generic formal
+ -- part) because the type itself carries no primitive operations,
+ -- except for formal derived types that inherit the operations of
+ -- the parent and progenitors.
+ -- If the context is a generic subprogram body, the generic formals
+ -- are visible by name, but are not in the entity list of the
+ -- subprogram because that list starts with the subprogram formals.
+ -- We retrieve the candidate operations from the generic declaration.
+
+ function Is_Private_Overriding (Op : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- An operation that overrides an inherited operation in the private
+ -- part of its package may be hidden, but if the inherited operation
+ -- is visible a direct call to it will dispatch to the private one,
+ -- which is therefore a valid candidate.
function Valid_First_Argument_Of (Op : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
-- Verify that the prefix, dereferenced if need be, is a valid
-- controlling argument in a call to Op. The remaining actuals
-- are checked in the subsequent call to Analyze_One_Call.
+ ------------------------------
+ -- Collect_Generic_Type_Ops --
+ ------------------------------
+
+ function Collect_Generic_Type_Ops (T : Entity_Id) return Elist_Id is
+ Bas : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (T);
+ Candidates : constant Elist_Id := New_Elmt_List;
+ Subp : Entity_Id;
+ Formal : Entity_Id;
+
+ procedure Check_Candidate;
+ -- The operation is a candidate if its first parameter is a
+ -- controlling operand of the desired type.
+
+ -----------------------
+ -- Check_Candidate; --
+ -----------------------
+
+ procedure Check_Candidate is
+ begin
+ Formal := First_Formal (Subp);
+
+ if Present (Formal)
+ and then Is_Controlling_Formal (Formal)
+ and then
+ (Base_Type (Etype (Formal)) = Bas
+ or else
+ (Is_Access_Type (Etype (Formal))
+ and then Designated_Type (Etype (Formal)) = Bas))
+ then
+ Append_Elmt (Subp, Candidates);
+ end if;
+ end Check_Candidate;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Collect_Generic_Type_Ops
+
+ begin
+ if Is_Derived_Type (T) then
+ return Primitive_Operations (T);
+
+ elsif Ekind (Scope (T)) = E_Procedure
+ or else Ekind (Scope (T)) = E_Function
+ then
+ -- Scan the list of generic formals to find subprograms
+ -- that may have a first controlling formal of the type.
+
+ declare
+ Decl : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ Decl :=
+ First (Generic_Formal_Declarations
+ (Unit_Declaration_Node (Scope (T))));
+ while Present (Decl) loop
+ if Nkind (Decl) in N_Formal_Subprogram_Declaration then
+ Subp := Defining_Entity (Decl);
+ Check_Candidate;
+ end if;
+
+ Next (Decl);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+
+ return Candidates;
+
+ else
+ -- Scan the list of entities declared in the same scope as
+ -- the type. In general this will be an open scope, given that
+ -- the call we are analyzing can only appear within a generic
+ -- declaration or body (either the one that declares T, or a
+ -- child unit).
+
+ Subp := First_Entity (Scope (T));
+ while Present (Subp) loop
+ if Is_Overloadable (Subp) then
+ Check_Candidate;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Entity (Subp);
+ end loop;
+
+ return Candidates;
+ end if;
+ end Collect_Generic_Type_Ops;
+
+ ---------------------------
+ -- Is_Private_Overriding --
+ ---------------------------
+
+ function Is_Private_Overriding (Op : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
+ Visible_Op : constant Entity_Id := Homonym (Op);
+
+ begin
+ return Present (Visible_Op)
+ and then not Comes_From_Source (Visible_Op)
+ and then Alias (Visible_Op) = Op
+ and then not Is_Hidden (Visible_Op);
+ end Is_Private_Overriding;
+
-----------------------------
-- Valid_First_Argument_Of --
-----------------------------
function Valid_First_Argument_Of (Op : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
- Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (First_Formal (Op));
+ Typ : Entity_Id := Etype (First_Formal (Op));
begin
- -- Simple case
+ if Is_Concurrent_Type (Typ)
+ and then Present (Corresponding_Record_Type (Typ))
+ then
+ Typ := Corresponding_Record_Type (Typ);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Simple case. Object may be a subtype of the tagged type or
+ -- may be the corresponding record of a synchronized type.
- return Base_Type (Obj_Type) = Typ
+ return Obj_Type = Typ
+ or else Base_Type (Obj_Type) = Typ
+ or else Corr_Type = Typ
- -- Prefix can be dereferenced
+ -- Prefix can be dereferenced
or else
- (Is_Access_Type (Obj_Type)
- and then Designated_Type (Obj_Type) = Typ)
+ (Is_Access_Type (Corr_Type)
+ and then Designated_Type (Corr_Type) = Typ)
- -- Formal is an access parameter, for which the object
- -- can provide an access.
+ -- Formal is an access parameter, for which the object
+ -- can provide an access.
or else
(Ekind (Typ) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
- and then Designated_Type (Typ) = Obj_Type);
+ and then Designated_Type (Typ) = Base_Type (Corr_Type));
end Valid_First_Argument_Of;
-- Start of processing for Try_Primitive_Operation
begin
- -- Look for the subprogram in the list of primitive operations
+ -- Look for subprograms in the list of primitive operations. The name
+ -- must be identical, and the kind of call indicates the expected
+ -- kind of operation (function or procedure). If the type is a
+ -- (tagged) synchronized type, the primitive ops are attached to the
+ -- corresponding record (base) type.
+
+ if Is_Concurrent_Type (Obj_Type) then
+ if not Present (Corresponding_Record_Type (Obj_Type)) then
+ return False;
+ end if;
+
+ Corr_Type := Base_Type (Corresponding_Record_Type (Obj_Type));
+ Elmt := First_Elmt (Primitive_Operations (Corr_Type));
+
+ elsif not Is_Generic_Type (Obj_Type) then
+ Corr_Type := Obj_Type;
+ Elmt := First_Elmt (Primitive_Operations (Obj_Type));
+
+ else
+ Corr_Type := Obj_Type;
+ Elmt := First_Elmt (Collect_Generic_Type_Ops (Obj_Type));
+ end if;
- Elmt := First_Elmt (Primitive_Operations (Obj_Type));
while Present (Elmt) loop
Prim_Op := Node (Elmt);
if Chars (Prim_Op) = Chars (Subprog)
and then Present (First_Formal (Prim_Op))
and then Valid_First_Argument_Of (Prim_Op)
+ and then
+ (Nkind (Call_Node) = N_Function_Call)
+ = (Ekind (Prim_Op) = E_Function)
then
- Prim_Op_Ref := New_Reference_To (Prim_Op, Loc);
+ -- Ada 2005 (AI-251): If this primitive operation corresponds
+ -- with an immediate ancestor interface there is no need to add
+ -- it to the list of interpretations; the corresponding aliased
+ -- primitive is also in this list of primitive operations and
+ -- will be used instead.
+
+ if (Present (Interface_Alias (Prim_Op))
+ and then Is_Ancestor (Find_Dispatching_Type
+ (Alias (Prim_Op)), Corr_Type))
+
+ -- Do not consider hidden primitives unless the type is in an
+ -- open scope or we are within an instance, where visibility
+ -- is known to be correct, or else if this is an overriding
+ -- operation in the private part for an inherited operation.
+
+ or else (Is_Hidden (Prim_Op)
+ and then not Is_Immediately_Visible (Obj_Type)
+ and then not In_Instance
+ and then not Is_Private_Overriding (Prim_Op))
+ then
+ goto Continue;
+ end if;
Set_Etype (Call_Node, Any_Type);
- Set_Parent (Call_Node, Parent (Node_To_Replace));
+ Set_Is_Overloaded (Call_Node, False);
- Set_Name (Call_Node, Prim_Op_Ref);
+ if No (Matching_Op) then
+ Prim_Op_Ref := New_Reference_To (Prim_Op, Sloc (Subprog));
+ Candidate := Prim_Op;
- Analyze_One_Call
- (N => Call_Node,
- Nam => Prim_Op,
- Report => False,
- Success => Success,
- Skip_First => True);
+ Set_Parent (Call_Node, Parent (Node_To_Replace));
- if Success then
- Complete_Object_Operation
- (Call_Node => Call_Node,
- Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace,
- Subprog => Prim_Op_Ref);
+ Set_Name (Call_Node, Prim_Op_Ref);
+ Success := False;
- return True;
+ Analyze_One_Call
+ (N => Call_Node,
+ Nam => Prim_Op,
+ Report => Report_Error,
+ Success => Success,
+ Skip_First => True);
+
+ Matching_Op := Valid_Candidate (Success, Call_Node, Prim_Op);
+
+ -- More than one interpretation, collect for subsequent
+ -- disambiguation. If this is a procedure call and there
+ -- is another match, report ambiguity now.
+
+ else
+ Analyze_One_Call
+ (N => Call_Node,
+ Nam => Prim_Op,
+ Report => Report_Error,
+ Success => Success,
+ Skip_First => True);
+
+ if Present (Valid_Candidate (Success, Call_Node, Prim_Op))
+ and then Nkind (Call_Node) /= N_Function_Call
+ then
+ Error_Msg_NE ("ambiguous call to&", N, Prim_Op);
+ Report_Ambiguity (Matching_Op);
+ Report_Ambiguity (Prim_Op);
+ return True;
+ end if;
end if;
end if;
+ <<Continue>>
Next_Elmt (Elmt);
end loop;
- return False;
+ if Present (Matching_Op) then
+ Set_Etype (Call_Node, Etype (Matching_Op));
+ end if;
+
+ return Present (Matching_Op);
end Try_Primitive_Operation;
-- Start of processing for Try_Object_Operation
begin
- if Is_Access_Type (Obj_Type) then
- Obj_Type := Designated_Type (Obj_Type);
- end if;
-
- if Ekind (Obj_Type) = E_Private_Subtype then
- Obj_Type := Base_Type (Obj_Type);
- end if;
-
- if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Obj_Type) then
- Obj_Type := Etype (Class_Wide_Type (Obj_Type));
- end if;
-
- -- The type may have be obtained through a limited_with clause,
- -- in which case the primitive operations are available on its
- -- non-limited view.
-
- if Ekind (Obj_Type) = E_Incomplete_Type
- and then From_With_Type (Obj_Type)
- then
- Obj_Type := Non_Limited_View (Obj_Type);
- end if;
-
- if not Is_Tagged_Type (Obj_Type) then
- return False;
- end if;
+ Analyze_Expression (Obj);
- -- Analyze the actuals if node is know to be a subprogram call
+ -- Analyze the actuals if node is known to be a subprogram call
if Is_Subprg_Call and then N = Name (Parent (N)) then
Actual := First (Parameter_Associations (Parent (N)));
end loop;
end if;
- Analyze_Expression (Obj);
-
-- Build a subprogram call node, using a copy of Obj as its first
-- actual. This is a placeholder, to be replaced by an explicit
-- dereference when needed.
Transform_Object_Operation
(Call_Node => New_Call_Node,
- Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace,
- Subprog => Subprog);
+ Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace);
Set_Etype (New_Call_Node, Any_Type);
+ Set_Etype (Subprog, Any_Type);
Set_Parent (New_Call_Node, Parent (Node_To_Replace));
- return
- Try_Primitive_Operation
- (Call_Node => New_Call_Node,
- Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace)
+ if not Is_Overloaded (Obj) then
+ Try_One_Prefix_Interpretation (Obj_Type);
+
+ else
+ declare
+ I : Interp_Index;
+ It : Interp;
+ begin
+ Get_First_Interp (Obj, I, It);
+ while Present (It.Nam) loop
+ Try_One_Prefix_Interpretation (It.Typ);
+ Get_Next_Interp (I, It);
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end if;
- or else
- Try_Class_Wide_Operation
+ if Etype (New_Call_Node) /= Any_Type then
+ Complete_Object_Operation
(Call_Node => New_Call_Node,
Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace);
+ return True;
+
+ elsif Present (Candidate) then
+
+ -- The argument list is not type correct. Re-analyze with error
+ -- reporting enabled, and use one of the possible candidates.
+ -- In All_Errors_Mode, re-analyze all failed interpretations.
+
+ if All_Errors_Mode then
+ Report_Error := True;
+ if Try_Primitive_Operation
+ (Call_Node => New_Call_Node,
+ Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace)
+
+ or else
+ Try_Class_Wide_Operation
+ (Call_Node => New_Call_Node,
+ Node_To_Replace => Node_To_Replace)
+ then
+ null;
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ Analyze_One_Call
+ (N => New_Call_Node,
+ Nam => Candidate,
+ Report => True,
+ Success => Success,
+ Skip_First => True);
+ end if;
+
+ -- No need for further errors
+
+ return True;
+
+ else
+ -- There was no candidate operation, so report it as an error
+ -- in the caller: Analyze_Selected_Component.
+
+ return False;
+ end if;
end Try_Object_Operation;
+ ---------
+ -- wpo --
+ ---------
+
+ procedure wpo (T : Entity_Id) is
+ Op : Entity_Id;
+ E : Elmt_Id;
+
+ begin
+ if not Is_Tagged_Type (T) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ E := First_Elmt (Primitive_Operations (Base_Type (T)));
+ while Present (E) loop
+ Op := Node (E);
+ Write_Int (Int (Op));
+ Write_Str (" === ");
+ Write_Name (Chars (Op));
+ Write_Str (" in ");
+ Write_Name (Chars (Scope (Op)));
+ Next_Elmt (E);
+ Write_Eol;
+ end loop;
+ end wpo;
+
end Sem_Ch4;
OSDN Git Service
