-- --
-- B o d y --
-- --
--- Copyright (C) 2001-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- Copyright (C) 2001-2011, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
-- --
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
with Opt; use Opt;
with Repinfo; use Repinfo;
with Sem; use Sem;
+with Sem_Aux; use Sem_Aux;
with Sem_Ch13; use Sem_Ch13;
with Sem_Eval; use Sem_Eval;
with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util;
Left_Opnd : Node_Id;
Right_Opnd : Node_Id) return Node_Id;
-- This is like Make_Op_Multiply except that it optimizes some cases
- -- knowing that associative rearrangement is allowed for constant
- -- folding if one of the operands is a compile time known value
+ -- knowing that associative rearrangement is allowed for constant folding
+ -- if one of the operands is a compile time known value
function Assoc_Subtract
(Loc : Source_Ptr;
Left_Opnd : Node_Id;
Right_Opnd : Node_Id) return Node_Id;
-- This is like Make_Op_Subtract except that it optimizes some cases
- -- knowing that associative rearrangement is allowed for constant
- -- folding if one of the operands is a compile time known value
+ -- knowing that associative rearrangement is allowed for constant folding
+ -- if one of the operands is a compile time known value
function Bits_To_SU (N : Node_Id) return Node_Id;
-- This is used when we cross the boundary from static sizes in bits to
-- are of an enumeration type (so that the subtraction cannot be
-- done directly) by applying the Pos operator to Hi/Lo first.
+ procedure Compute_Size_Depends_On_Discriminant (E : Entity_Id);
+ -- Given an array type or an array subtype E, compute whether its size
+ -- depends on the value of one or more discriminants and set the flag
+ -- Size_Depends_On_Discriminant accordingly. This need not be called
+ -- in front end layout mode since it does the computation on its own.
+
function Expr_From_SO_Ref
(Loc : Source_Ptr;
D : SO_Ref;
-- Front-end layout of record type
procedure Rewrite_Integer (N : Node_Id; V : Uint);
- -- Rewrite node N with an integer literal whose value is V. The Sloc
- -- for the new node is taken from N, and the type of the literal is
- -- set to a copy of the type of N on entry.
+ -- Rewrite node N with an integer literal whose value is V. The Sloc for
+ -- the new node is taken from N, and the type of the literal is set to a
+ -- copy of the type of N on entry.
procedure Set_And_Check_Static_Size
(E : Entity_Id;
Esiz : SO_Ref;
RM_Siz : SO_Ref);
- -- This procedure is called to check explicit given sizes (possibly
- -- stored in the Esize and RM_Size fields of E) against computed
- -- Object_Size (Esiz) and Value_Size (RM_Siz) values. Appropriate
- -- errors and warnings are posted if specified sizes are inconsistent
- -- with specified sizes. On return, the Esize and RM_Size fields of
- -- E are set (either from previously given values, or from the newly
- -- computed values, as appropriate).
+ -- This procedure is called to check explicit given sizes (possibly stored
+ -- in the Esize and RM_Size fields of E) against computed Object_Size
+ -- (Esiz) and Value_Size (RM_Siz) values. Appropriate errors and warnings
+ -- are posted if specified sizes are inconsistent with specified sizes. On
+ -- return, Esize and RM_Size fields of E are set (either from previously
+ -- given values, or from the newly computed values, as appropriate).
procedure Set_Composite_Alignment (E : Entity_Id);
-- This procedure is called for record types and subtypes, and also for
-- which must be obeyed. If so, we cannot increase the size in this
-- routine.
- -- For a type, the issue is whether an object size clause has been
- -- set. A normal size clause constrains only the value size (RM_Size)
+ -- For a type, the issue is whether an object size clause has been set.
+ -- A normal size clause constrains only the value size (RM_Size)
if Is_Type (E) then
Esize_Set := Has_Object_Size_Clause (E);
return;
end if;
- -- Here we have a situation where the Esize is not a multiple of
- -- the alignment. We must either increase Esize or reduce the
- -- alignment to correct this situation.
+ -- Here we have a situation where the Esize is not a multiple of the
+ -- alignment. We must either increase Esize or reduce the alignment to
+ -- correct this situation.
-- The case in which we can decrease the alignment is where the
-- alignment was not set by an alignment clause, and the type in
- -- question is a discrete type, where it is definitely safe to
- -- reduce the alignment. For example:
+ -- question is a discrete type, where it is definitely safe to reduce
+ -- the alignment. For example:
-- t : integer range 1 .. 2;
-- for t'size use 8;
return;
end if;
- -- Now the only possible approach left is to increase the Esize
- -- but we can't do that if the size was set by a specific clause.
+ -- Now the only possible approach left is to increase the Esize but we
+ -- can't do that if the size was set by a specific clause.
if Esize_Set then
Error_Msg_NE
Ent := Get_Dynamic_SO_Entity (D);
if Is_Discrim_SO_Function (Ent) then
- -- If a component is passed in whose type matches the type
- -- of the function formal, then select that component from
- -- the "V" parameter rather than passing "V" directly.
+
+ -- If a component is passed in whose type matches the type of
+ -- the function formal, then select that component from the "V"
+ -- parameter rather than passing "V" directly.
if Present (Comp)
and then Base_Type (Etype (Comp))
Name => New_Occurrence_Of (Ent, Loc),
Parameter_Associations => New_List (
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
- Prefix => Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars => Vname),
+ Prefix => Make_Identifier (Loc, Vname),
Selector_Name => New_Occurrence_Of (Comp, Loc))));
else
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
Name => New_Occurrence_Of (Ent, Loc),
Parameter_Associations => New_List (
- Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars => Vname)));
+ Make_Identifier (Loc, Vname)));
end if;
else
when Dynamic => Nod : Node_Id;
end case;
end record;
- -- Shows the status of the value so far. Const means that the value
- -- is constant, and Val is the current constant value. Dynamic means
- -- that the value is dynamic, and in this case Nod is the Node_Id of
- -- the expression to compute the value.
+ -- Shows the status of the value so far. Const means that the value is
+ -- constant, and Val is the current constant value. Dynamic means that
+ -- the value is dynamic, and in this case Nod is the Node_Id of the
+ -- expression to compute the value.
Size : Val_Type;
-- Calculated value so far if Size.Status = Const,
-- or expression value so far if Size.Status = Dynamic.
SU_Convert_Required : Boolean := False;
- -- This is set to True if the final result must be converted from
- -- bits to storage units (rounding up to a storage unit boundary).
+ -- This is set to True if the final result must be converted from bits
+ -- to storage units (rounding up to a storage unit boundary).
-----------------------
-- Local Subprograms --
Size := (Dynamic, Expr_From_SO_Ref (Loc, Component_Size (E)));
end if;
- -- Loop through indices
+ -- Loop through indexes
Indx := First_Index (E);
while Present (Indx) loop
(Dynamic, Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Size.Val / SSU));
SU_Convert_Required := False;
- -- Otherwise, we go ahead and convert the value in bits,
- -- and set SU_Convert_Required to True to ensure that the
- -- final value is indeed properly converted.
+ -- Otherwise, we go ahead and convert the value in bits, and
+ -- set SU_Convert_Required to True to ensure that the final
+ -- value is indeed properly converted.
else
Size := (Dynamic, Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Size.Val));
Len := Convert_To (Standard_Unsigned, Len);
- -- If we cannot verify that range cannot be super-flat,
- -- we need a max with zero, since length must be non-neg.
+ -- If we cannot verify that range cannot be super-flat, we need
+ -- a max with zero, since length must be non-negative.
if not OK or else LLo < 0 then
Len :=
Next_Index (Indx);
end loop;
- -- Here after processing all bounds to set sizes. If the value is
- -- a constant, then it is bits, so we convert to storage units.
+ -- Here after processing all bounds to set sizes. If the value is a
+ -- constant, then it is bits, so we convert to storage units.
if Size.Status = Const then
return Bits_To_SU (Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Size.Val));
-- How An Array Type is Laid Out --
------------------------------------
- -- Here is what goes on. We need to multiply the component size of
- -- the array (which has already been set) by the length of each of
- -- the indexes. If all these values are known at compile time, then
- -- the resulting size of the array is the appropriate constant value.
+ -- Here is what goes on. We need to multiply the component size of the
+ -- array (which has already been set) by the length of each of the
+ -- indexes. If all these values are known at compile time, then the
+ -- resulting size of the array is the appropriate constant value.
-- If the component size or at least one bound is dynamic (but no
-- discriminants are present), then the size will be computed as an
-- Value of size computed so far. See comments above
Vtyp : Entity_Id := Empty;
- -- Variant record type for the formal parameter of the
- -- discriminant function V if Status = Discrim.
+ -- Variant record type for the formal parameter of the discriminant
+ -- function V if Status = Discrim.
SU_Convert_Required : Boolean := False;
-- This is set to True if the final result must be converted from
N :=
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
- Prefix => Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars => Vname),
+ Prefix => Make_Identifier (Loc, Vname),
Selector_Name => New_Occurrence_Of (Entity (N), Loc));
-- Set the Etype attributes of the selected name and its prefix.
Size := (Dynamic, Expr_From_SO_Ref (Loc, Component_Size (E)));
end if;
- -- Loop to process array indices
+ -- Loop to process array indexes
Indx := First_Index (E);
while Present (Indx) loop
Ityp := Etype (Indx);
- -- If an index of the array is a generic formal type then there's
+ -- If an index of the array is a generic formal type then there is
-- no point in determining a size for the array type.
if Is_Generic_Type (Ityp) then
(Dynamic, Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Size.Val / SSU));
SU_Convert_Required := False;
- -- If the current value is a factor of the storage unit,
- -- then we can use a value of one for the size and reduce
- -- the strength of the later division.
+ -- If the current value is a factor of the storage unit, then
+ -- we can use a value of one for the size and reduce the
+ -- strength of the later division.
elsif SSU mod Size.Val = 0 then
Storage_Divisor := SSU / Size.Val;
Size := (Dynamic, Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Uint_1));
SU_Convert_Required := True;
- -- Otherwise, we go ahead and convert the value in bits,
- -- and set SU_Convert_Required to True to ensure that the
- -- final value is indeed properly converted.
+ -- Otherwise, we go ahead and convert the value in bits, and
+ -- set SU_Convert_Required to True to ensure that the final
+ -- value is indeed properly converted.
else
Size := (Dynamic, Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Size.Val));
Len := Compute_Length (Lo, Hi);
- -- If Len isn't a Length attribute, then its range needs to
- -- be checked a possible Max with zero needs to be computed.
+ -- If Len isn't a Length attribute, then its range needs to be
+ -- checked a possible Max with zero needs to be computed.
if Nkind (Len) /= N_Attribute_Reference
or else Attribute_Name (Len) /= Name_Length
return;
end if;
- -- If we cannot verify that range cannot be super-flat,
- -- we need a maximum with zero, since length cannot be
- -- negative.
+ -- If we cannot verify that range cannot be super-flat, we
+ -- need a max with zero, since length cannot be negative.
if not OK or else LLo < 0 then
Len :=
Next_Index (Indx);
end loop;
- -- Here after processing all bounds to set sizes. If the value is
- -- a constant, then it is bits, and the only thing we need to do
- -- is to check against explicit given size and do alignment adjust.
+ -- Here after processing all bounds to set sizes. If the value is a
+ -- constant, then it is bits, and the only thing we need to do is to
+ -- check against explicit given size and do alignment adjust.
if Size.Status = Const then
Set_And_Check_Static_Size (E, Size.Val, Size.Val);
end;
end if;
- -- Now set the dynamic size (the Value_Size is always the same
- -- as the Object_Size for arrays whose length is dynamic).
+ -- Now set the dynamic size (the Value_Size is always the same as the
+ -- Object_Size for arrays whose length is dynamic).
-- ??? If Size.Status = Dynamic, Vtyp will not have been set.
-- The added initialization sets it to Empty now, but is this
end if;
end Layout_Array_Type;
+ ------------------------------------------
+ -- Compute_Size_Depends_On_Discriminant --
+ ------------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Compute_Size_Depends_On_Discriminant (E : Entity_Id) is
+ Indx : Node_Id;
+ Ityp : Entity_Id;
+ Lo : Node_Id;
+ Hi : Node_Id;
+ Res : Boolean := False;
+
+ begin
+ -- Loop to process array indexes
+
+ Indx := First_Index (E);
+ while Present (Indx) loop
+ Ityp := Etype (Indx);
+
+ -- If an index of the array is a generic formal type then there is
+ -- no point in determining a size for the array type.
+
+ if Is_Generic_Type (Ityp) then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ Lo := Type_Low_Bound (Ityp);
+ Hi := Type_High_Bound (Ityp);
+
+ if (Nkind (Lo) = N_Identifier
+ and then Ekind (Entity (Lo)) = E_Discriminant)
+ or else
+ (Nkind (Hi) = N_Identifier
+ and then Ekind (Entity (Hi)) = E_Discriminant)
+ then
+ Res := True;
+ end if;
+
+ Next_Index (Indx);
+ end loop;
+
+ if Res then
+ Set_Size_Depends_On_Discriminant (E);
+ end if;
+ end Compute_Size_Depends_On_Discriminant;
+
-------------------
-- Layout_Object --
-------------------
return;
end if;
- -- Set size if not set for object and known for type. Use the
- -- RM_Size if that is known for the type and Esize is not.
+ -- Set size if not set for object and known for type. Use the RM_Size if
+ -- that is known for the type and Esize is not.
if Unknown_Esize (E) then
if Known_Esize (T) then
Adjust_Esize_Alignment (E);
- -- Final adjustment, if we don't know the alignment, and the Esize
- -- was not set by an explicit Object_Size attribute clause, then
- -- we reset the Esize to unknown, since we really don't know it.
+ -- Final adjustment, if we don't know the alignment, and the Esize was
+ -- not set by an explicit Object_Size attribute clause, then we reset
+ -- the Esize to unknown, since we really don't know it.
if Unknown_Alignment (E)
and then not Has_Size_Clause (E)
New_Fbit := (New_Fbit + SSU - 1) / SSU * SSU;
end if;
- -- If old normalized position is static, we can go ahead
- -- and compute the new normalized position directly.
+ -- If old normalized position is static, we can go ahead and
+ -- compute the new normalized position directly.
if Known_Static_Normalized_Position (Prev_Comp) then
New_Npos := Old_Npos;
return;
end if;
- -- Check case of type of component has a scope of the record we
- -- are laying out. When this happens, the type in question is an
- -- Itype that has not yet been laid out (that's because such
- -- types do not get frozen in the normal manner, because there
- -- is no place for the freeze nodes).
+ -- Check case of type of component has a scope of the record we are
+ -- laying out. When this happens, the type in question is an Itype
+ -- that has not yet been laid out (that's because such types do not
+ -- get frozen in the normal manner, because there is no place for
+ -- the freeze nodes).
if Scope (Ctyp) = E then
Layout_Type (Ctyp);
end if;
-- Set size of component from type. We use the Esize except in a
- -- packed record, where we use the RM_Size (since that is exactly
- -- what the RM_Size value, as distinct from the Object_Size is
- -- useful for!)
+ -- packed record, where we use the RM_Size (since that is what the
+ -- RM_Size value, as distinct from the Object_Size is useful for!)
if Is_Packed (E) then
Set_Esize (Comp, RM_Size (Ctyp));
RM_Siz_Expr : Node_Id := Empty;
-- Expression for the evolving RM_Siz value. This is typically a
- -- conditional expression which involves tests of discriminant
- -- values that are formed as references to the entity V. At
- -- the end of scanning all the components, a suitable function
- -- is constructed in which V is the parameter.
+ -- conditional expression which involves tests of discriminant values
+ -- that are formed as references to the entity V. At the end of
+ -- scanning all the components, a suitable function is constructed
+ -- in which V is the parameter.
-----------------------
-- Local Subprograms --
(Clist : Node_Id;
Esiz : out SO_Ref;
RM_Siz_Expr : out Node_Id);
- -- Recursive procedure, called to lay out one component list
- -- Esiz and RM_Siz_Expr are set to the Object_Size and Value_Size
- -- values respectively representing the record size up to and
- -- including the last component in the component list (including
- -- any variants in this component list). RM_Siz_Expr is returned
- -- as an expression which may in the general case involve some
- -- references to the discriminants of the current record value,
- -- referenced by selecting from the entity V.
+ -- Recursive procedure, called to lay out one component list Esiz
+ -- and RM_Siz_Expr are set to the Object_Size and Value_Size values
+ -- respectively representing the record size up to and including the
+ -- last component in the component list (including any variants in
+ -- this component list). RM_Siz_Expr is returned as an expression
+ -- which may in the general case involve some references to the
+ -- discriminants of the current record value, referenced by selecting
+ -- from the entity V.
---------------------------
-- Layout_Component_List --
else
RMS_Ent := Get_Dynamic_SO_Entity (RM_Siz);
- -- If the size is represented by a function, then we
- -- create an appropriate function call using V as
- -- the parameter to the call.
+ -- If the size is represented by a function, then we create
+ -- an appropriate function call using V as the parameter to
+ -- the call.
if Is_Discrim_SO_Function (RMS_Ent) then
RM_Siz_Expr :=
Make_Function_Call (Loc,
Name => New_Occurrence_Of (RMS_Ent, Loc),
Parameter_Associations => New_List (
- Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars => Vname)));
+ Make_Identifier (Loc, Vname)));
-- If the size is represented by a constant, then the
-- expression we want is a reference to this constant
-- individual variants, and xxDx are the discriminant
-- checking functions generated for the variant type.
- -- If this is the first variant, we simply set the
- -- result as the expression. Note that this takes
- -- care of the others case.
+ -- If this is the first variant, we simply set the result
+ -- as the expression. Note that this takes care of the
+ -- others case.
if No (RM_Siz_Expr) then
RM_Siz_Expr := Bits_To_SU (RM_SizV);
Discrim :=
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
Prefix =>
- Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars => Vname),
+ Make_Identifier (Loc, Vname),
Selector_Name =>
New_Occurrence_Of
(Entity (Name (Vpart)), Loc));
Append (
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
Prefix =>
- Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars => Vname),
+ Make_Identifier (Loc, Vname),
Selector_Name =>
- New_Occurrence_Of
- (D_Entity, Loc)),
+ New_Occurrence_Of (D_Entity, Loc)),
D_List);
D_Entity := Next_Discriminant (D_Entity);
-- All other cases
else
- -- Initialize alignment conservatively to 1. This value will
- -- be increased as necessary during processing of the record.
+ -- Initialize alignment conservatively to 1. This value will be
+ -- increased as necessary during processing of the record.
if Unknown_Alignment (E) then
Set_Alignment (E, Uint_1);
end if;
- -- Initialize previous component. This is Empty unless there
- -- are components which have already been laid out by component
- -- clauses. If there are such components, we start our lay out of
- -- the remaining components following the last such component.
+ -- Initialize previous component. This is Empty unless there are
+ -- components which have already been laid out by component clauses.
+ -- If there are such components, we start our lay out of the
+ -- remaining components following the last such component.
Prev_Comp := Empty;
Desig_Type : Entity_Id;
begin
- -- For string literal types, for now, kill the size always, this
- -- is because gigi does not like or need the size to be set ???
+ -- For string literal types, for now, kill the size always, this is
+ -- because gigi does not like or need the size to be set ???
if Ekind (E) = E_String_Literal_Subtype then
Set_Esize (E, Uint_0);
return;
end if;
- -- For access types, set size/alignment. This is system address
- -- size, except for fat pointers (unconstrained array access types),
- -- where the size is two times the address size, to accommodate the
- -- two pointers that are required for a fat pointer (data and
- -- template). Note that E_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type is not
- -- an access type for this purpose since it is not a pointer but is
- -- equivalent to a record. For access subtypes, copy the size from
- -- the base type since Gigi represents them the same way.
+ -- For access types, set size/alignment. This is system address size,
+ -- except for fat pointers (unconstrained array access types), where the
+ -- size is two times the address size, to accommodate the two pointers
+ -- that are required for a fat pointer (data and template). Note that
+ -- E_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type is not an access type for this
+ -- purpose since it is not a pointer but is equivalent to a record. For
+ -- access subtypes, copy the size from the base type since Gigi
+ -- represents them the same way.
if Is_Access_Type (E) then
Desig_Type := Non_Limited_View (Designated_Type (E));
end if;
- -- If Esize already set (e.g. by a size clause), then nothing
- -- further to be done here.
+ -- If Esize already set (e.g. by a size clause), then nothing further
+ -- to be done here.
if Known_Esize (E) then
null;
- -- Access to subprogram is a strange beast, and we let the
- -- backend figure out what is needed (it may be some kind
- -- of fat pointer, including the static link for example.
+ -- Access to subprogram is a strange beast, and we let the backend
+ -- figure out what is needed (it may be some kind of fat pointer,
+ -- including the static link for example.
elsif Is_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type (E) then
null;
Set_Size_Info (E, Base_Type (E));
Set_RM_Size (E, RM_Size (Base_Type (E)));
- -- For other access types, we use either address size, or, if
- -- a fat pointer is used (pointer-to-unconstrained array case),
- -- twice the address size to accommodate a fat pointer.
+ -- For other access types, we use either address size, or, if a fat
+ -- pointer is used (pointer-to-unconstrained array case), twice the
+ -- address size to accommodate a fat pointer.
elsif Present (Desig_Type)
and then Is_Array_Type (Desig_Type)
("?this access type does not correspond to C pointer", E);
end if;
- -- If the designated type is a limited view it is unanalyzed. We
- -- can examine the declaration itself to determine whether it will
- -- need a fat pointer.
+ -- If the designated type is a limited view it is unanalyzed. We can
+ -- examine the declaration itself to determine whether it will need a
+ -- fat pointer.
elsif Present (Desig_Type)
and then Present (Parent (Desig_Type))
Init_Size (E, 2 * System_Address_Size);
-- When the target is AAMP, access-to-subprogram types are fat
- -- pointers consisting of the subprogram address and a static
- -- link (with the exception of library-level access types,
- -- where a simple subprogram address is used).
+ -- pointers consisting of the subprogram address and a static link
+ -- (with the exception of library-level access types, where a simple
+ -- subprogram address is used).
elsif AAMP_On_Target
and then
-- On VMS, reset size to 32 for convention C access type if no
-- explicit size clause is given and the default size is 64. Really
-- we do not know the size, since depending on options for the VMS
- -- compiler, the size of a pointer type can be 32 or 64, but
- -- choosing 32 as the default improves compatibility with legacy
- -- VMS code.
+ -- compiler, the size of a pointer type can be 32 or 64, but choosing
+ -- 32 as the default improves compatibility with legacy VMS code.
-- Note: we do not use Has_Size_Clause in the test below, because we
- -- want to catch the case of a derived type inheriting a size
- -- clause. We want to consider this to be an explicit size clause
- -- for this purpose, since it would be weird not to inherit the size
- -- in this case.
+ -- want to catch the case of a derived type inheriting a size clause.
+ -- We want to consider this to be an explicit size clause for this
+ -- purpose, since it would be weird not to inherit the size in this
+ -- case.
-- We do NOT do this if we are in -gnatdm mode on a non-VMS target
-- since in that case we want the normal pointer representation.
elsif Is_Scalar_Type (E) then
- -- For discrete types, the RM_Size and Esize must be set
- -- already, since this is part of the earlier processing
- -- and the front end is always required to lay out the
- -- sizes of such types (since they are available as static
- -- attributes). All we do is to check that this rule is
- -- indeed obeyed!
+ -- For discrete types, the RM_Size and Esize must be set already,
+ -- since this is part of the earlier processing and the front end is
+ -- always required to lay out the sizes of such types (since they are
+ -- available as static attributes). All we do is to check that this
+ -- rule is indeed obeyed!
if Is_Discrete_Type (E) then
Init_Esize (E, S);
exit;
- -- If the RM_Size is greater than 64 (happens only
- -- when strange values are specified by the user,
- -- then Esize is simply a copy of RM_Size, it will
- -- be further refined later on)
+ -- If the RM_Size is greater than 64 (happens only when
+ -- strange values are specified by the user, then Esize
+ -- is simply a copy of RM_Size, it will be further
+ -- refined later on)
elsif S = 64 then
Set_Esize (E, RM_Size (E));
end;
end if;
- -- For non-discrete scalar types, if the RM_Size is not set,
- -- then set it now to a copy of the Esize if the Esize is set.
+ -- For non-discrete scalar types, if the RM_Size is not set, then set
+ -- it now to a copy of the Esize if the Esize is set.
else
if Known_Esize (E) and then Unknown_RM_Size (E) then
-- Non-elementary (composite) types
else
- -- If RM_Size is known, set Esize if not known
+ -- For packed arrays, take size and alignment values from the packed
+ -- array type if a packed array type has been created and the fields
+ -- are not currently set.
- if Known_RM_Size (E) and then Unknown_Esize (E) then
+ if Is_Array_Type (E) and then Present (Packed_Array_Type (E)) then
+ declare
+ PAT : constant Entity_Id := Packed_Array_Type (E);
- -- If the alignment is known, we bump the Esize up to the
- -- next alignment boundary if it is not already on one.
+ begin
+ if Unknown_Esize (E) then
+ Set_Esize (E, Esize (PAT));
+ end if;
- if Known_Alignment (E) then
- declare
- A : constant Uint := Alignment_In_Bits (E);
- S : constant SO_Ref := RM_Size (E);
- begin
- Set_Esize (E, (S + A - 1) / A * A);
- end;
- end if;
+ if Unknown_RM_Size (E) then
+ Set_RM_Size (E, RM_Size (PAT));
+ end if;
+
+ if Unknown_Alignment (E) then
+ Set_Alignment (E, Alignment (PAT));
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
- -- If Esize is set, and RM_Size is not, RM_Size is copied from
- -- Esize at least for now this seems reasonable, and is in any
- -- case needed for compatibility with old versions of gigi.
- -- look to be unknown.
+ -- If Esize is set, and RM_Size is not, RM_Size is copied from Esize.
+ -- At least for now this seems reasonable, and is in any case needed
+ -- for compatibility with old versions of gigi.
- elsif Known_Esize (E) and then Unknown_RM_Size (E) then
+ if Known_Esize (E) and then Unknown_RM_Size (E) then
Set_RM_Size (E, Esize (E));
end if;
- -- For array base types, set component size if object size of
- -- the component type is known and is a small power of 2 (8,
- -- 16, 32, 64), since this is what will always be used.
+ -- For array base types, set component size if object size of the
+ -- component type is known and is a small power of 2 (8, 16, 32, 64),
+ -- since this is what will always be used.
if Ekind (E) = E_Array_Type
and then Unknown_Component_Size (E)
CT : constant Entity_Id := Component_Type (E);
begin
- -- For some reasons, access types can cause trouble,
- -- So let's just do this for discrete types ???
+ -- For some reasons, access types can cause trouble, So let's
+ -- just do this for scalar types ???
if Present (CT)
- and then Is_Discrete_Type (CT)
+ and then Is_Scalar_Type (CT)
and then Known_Static_Esize (CT)
then
declare
S : constant Uint := Esize (CT);
-
begin
- if S = 8 or else
- S = 16 or else
- S = 32 or else
- S = 64
- then
- Set_Component_Size (E, Esize (CT));
+ if Addressable (S) then
+ Set_Component_Size (E, S);
end if;
end;
end if;
Set_Alignment (E, Uint_1);
end if;
end if;
+
+ -- We need to know whether the size depends on the value of one
+ -- or more discriminants to select the return mechanism. Skip if
+ -- errors are present, to prevent cascaded messages.
+
+ if Serious_Errors_Detected = 0 then
+ Compute_Size_Depends_On_Discriminant (E);
+ end if;
+
end if;
end if;
begin
Set_Esize (E, RM_Size (E));
- -- For scalar types, increase Object_Size to power of 2,
- -- but not less than a storage unit in any case (i.e.,
- -- normally this means it will be storage-unit addressable).
+ -- For scalar types, increase Object_Size to power of 2, but
+ -- not less than a storage unit in any case (i.e., normally
+ -- this means it will be storage-unit addressable).
if Is_Scalar_Type (E) then
if Size <= System_Storage_Unit then
procedure Rewrite_Integer (N : Node_Id; V : Uint) is
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (N);
-
begin
Rewrite (N, Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Intval => V));
Set_Etype (N, Typ);
SC : Node_Id;
procedure Check_Size_Too_Small (Spec : Uint; Min : Uint);
- -- Spec is the number of bit specified in the size clause, and
- -- Min is the minimum computed size. An error is given that the
- -- specified size is too small if Spec < Min, and in this case
- -- both Esize and RM_Size are set to unknown in E. The error
- -- message is posted on node SC.
+ -- Spec is the number of bit specified in the size clause, and Min is
+ -- the minimum computed size. An error is given that the specified size
+ -- is too small if Spec < Min, and in this case both Esize and RM_Size
+ -- are set to unknown in E. The error message is posted on node SC.
procedure Check_Unused_Bits (Spec : Uint; Max : Uint);
- -- Spec is the number of bits specified in the size clause, and
- -- Max is the maximum computed size. A warning is given about
- -- unused bits if Spec > Max. This warning is posted on node SC.
+ -- Spec is the number of bits specified in the size clause, and Max is
+ -- the maximum computed size. A warning is given about unused bits if
+ -- Spec > Max. This warning is posted on node SC.
--------------------------
-- Check_Size_Too_Small --
begin
if Spec < Min then
Error_Msg_Uint_1 := Min;
- Error_Msg_NE
- ("size for & too small, minimum allowed is ^", SC, E);
+ Error_Msg_NE ("size for & too small, minimum allowed is ^", SC, E);
Init_Esize (E);
Init_RM_Size (E);
end if;
end if;
end if;
- -- Case where Value_Size (RM_Size) is set by specific Value_Size
- -- clause (we do not need to worry about Value_Size being set by
- -- a Size clause, since that will have set Esize as well, and we
- -- already took care of that case).
+ -- Case where Value_Size (RM_Size) is set by specific Value_Size clause
+ -- (we do not need to worry about Value_Size being set by a Size clause,
+ -- since that will have set Esize as well, and we already took care of
+ -- that case).
if Known_Static_RM_Size (E) then
SC := Get_Attribute_Definition_Clause (E, Attribute_Value_Size);
end if;
end if;
- -- Set chosen alignment, and increase Esize if necessary to match
- -- the chosen alignment.
+ -- Set chosen alignment, and increase Esize if necessary to match the
+ -- chosen alignment.
Set_Alignment (E, UI_From_Int (Align));
FST : constant Entity_Id := First_Subtype (Def_Id);
begin
- -- All discrete types except for the base types in standard
- -- are constrained, so indicate this by setting Is_Constrained.
+ -- All discrete types except for the base types in standard are
+ -- constrained, so indicate this by setting Is_Constrained.
Set_Is_Constrained (Def_Id);
- -- We set generic types to have an unknown size, since the
- -- representation of a generic type is irrelevant, in view
- -- of the fact that they have nothing to do with code.
+ -- Set generic types to have an unknown size, since the representation
+ -- of a generic type is irrelevant, in view of the fact that they have
+ -- nothing to do with code.
if Is_Generic_Type (Root_Type (FST)) then
Set_RM_Size (Def_Id, Uint_0);
- -- If the subtype statically matches the first subtype, then
- -- it is required to have exactly the same layout. This is
- -- required by aliasing considerations.
+ -- If the subtype statically matches the first subtype, then it is
+ -- required to have exactly the same layout. This is required by
+ -- aliasing considerations.
elsif Def_Id /= FST and then
Subtypes_Statically_Match (Def_Id, FST)
Set_RM_Size (Def_Id, RM_Size (FST));
Set_Size_Info (Def_Id, FST);
- -- In all other cases the RM_Size is set to the minimum size.
- -- Note that this routine is never called for subtypes for which
- -- the RM_Size is set explicitly by an attribute clause.
+ -- In all other cases the RM_Size is set to the minimum size. Note that
+ -- this routine is never called for subtypes for which the RM_Size is
+ -- set explicitly by an attribute clause.
else
Set_RM_Size (Def_Id, UI_From_Int (Minimum_Size (Def_Id)));
return;
end if;
- -- Here we calculate the alignment as the largest power of two
- -- multiple of System.Storage_Unit that does not exceed either
- -- the actual size of the type, or the maximum allowed alignment.
+ -- Here we calculate the alignment as the largest power of two multiple
+ -- of System.Storage_Unit that does not exceed either the object size of
+ -- the type, or the maximum allowed alignment.
declare
- S : constant Int :=
- UI_To_Int (Esize (E)) / SSU;
- A : Nat;
+ S : constant Int := UI_To_Int (Esize (E)) / SSU;
+ A : Nat;
+ Max_Alignment : Nat;
begin
+ -- If the default alignment of "double" floating-point types is
+ -- specifically capped, enforce the cap.
+
+ if Ttypes.Target_Double_Float_Alignment > 0
+ and then S = 8
+ and then Is_Floating_Point_Type (E)
+ then
+ Max_Alignment := Ttypes.Target_Double_Float_Alignment;
+
+ -- If the default alignment of "double" or larger scalar types is
+ -- specifically capped, enforce the cap.
+
+ elsif Ttypes.Target_Double_Scalar_Alignment > 0
+ and then S >= 8
+ and then Is_Scalar_Type (E)
+ then
+ Max_Alignment := Ttypes.Target_Double_Scalar_Alignment;
+
+ -- Otherwise enforce the overall alignment cap
+
+ else
+ Max_Alignment := Ttypes.Maximum_Alignment;
+ end if;
+
A := 1;
- while 2 * A <= Ttypes.Maximum_Alignment
- and then 2 * A <= S
- loop
+ while 2 * A <= Max_Alignment and then 2 * A <= S loop
A := 2 * A;
end loop;
- -- Now we think we should set the alignment to A, but we
- -- skip this if an alignment is already set to a value
- -- greater than A (happens for derived types).
+ -- If alignment is currently not set, then we can safetly set it to
+ -- this new calculated value.
+
+ if Unknown_Alignment (E) then
+ Init_Alignment (E, A);
+
+ -- Cases where we have inherited an alignment
+
+ -- For constructed types, always reset the alignment, these are
+ -- Generally invisible to the user anyway, and that way we are
+ -- sure that no constructed types have weird alignments.
+
+ elsif not Comes_From_Source (E) then
+ Init_Alignment (E, A);
- -- However, if the alignment is known and too small it
- -- must be increased, this happens in a case like:
+ -- If this inherited alignment is the same as the one we computed,
+ -- then obviously everything is fine, and we do not need to reset it.
- -- type R is new Character;
- -- for R'Size use 16;
+ elsif Alignment (E) = A then
+ null;
- -- Here the alignment inherited from Character is 1, but
- -- it must be increased to 2 to reflect the increased size.
+ -- Now we come to the difficult cases where we have inherited an
+ -- alignment and size, but overridden the size but not the alignment.
+
+ elsif Has_Size_Clause (E) or else Has_Object_Size_Clause (E) then
+
+ -- This is tricky, it might be thought that we should try to
+ -- inherit the alignment, since that's what the RM implies, but
+ -- that leads to complex rules and oddities. Consider for example:
+
+ -- type R is new Character;
+ -- for R'Size use 16;
+
+ -- It seems quite bogus in this case to inherit an alignment of 1
+ -- from the parent type Character. Furthermore, if that's what the
+ -- programmer really wanted for some odd reason, then they could
+ -- specify the alignment they wanted.
+
+ -- Furthermore we really don't want to inherit the alignment in
+ -- the case of a specified Object_Size for a subtype, since then
+ -- there would be no way of overriding to give a reasonable value
+ -- (we don't have an Object_Subtype attribute). Consider:
+
+ -- subtype R is new Character;
+ -- for R'Object_Size use 16;
+
+ -- If we inherit the alignment of 1, then we have an odd
+ -- inefficient alignment for the subtype, which cannot be fixed.
+
+ -- So we make the decision that if Size (or Object_Size) is given
+ -- (and, in the case of a first subtype, the alignment is not set
+ -- with a specific alignment clause). We reset the alignment to
+ -- the appropriate value for the specified size. This is a nice
+ -- simple rule to implement and document.
+
+ -- There is one slight glitch, which is that a confirming size
+ -- clause can now change the alignment, which, if we really think
+ -- that confirming rep clauses should have no effect, is a no-no.
+
+ -- type R is new Character;
+ -- for R'Alignment use 2;
+ -- type S is new R;
+ -- for S'Size use Character'Size;
+
+ -- Now the alignment of S is 1 instead of 2, as a result of
+ -- applying the above rule to the confirming rep clause for S. Not
+ -- clear this is worth worrying about. If we recorded whether a
+ -- size clause was confirming we could avoid this, but right now
+ -- we have no way of doing that or easily figuring it out, so we
+ -- don't bother.
+
+ -- Historical note. In versions of GNAT prior to Nov 6th, 2010, an
+ -- odd distinction was made between inherited alignments greater
+ -- than the computed alignment (where the larger alignment was
+ -- inherited) and inherited alignments smaller than the computed
+ -- alignment (where the smaller alignment was overridden). This
+ -- was a dubious fix to get around an ACATS problem which seems
+ -- to have disappeared anyway, and in any case, this peculiarity
+ -- was never documented.
- if Unknown_Alignment (E) or else Alignment (E) < A then
Init_Alignment (E, A);
+
+ -- If no Size (or Object_Size) was specified, then we inherited the
+ -- object size, so we should inherit the alignment as well and not
+ -- modify it. This takes care of cases like:
+
+ -- type R is new Integer;
+ -- for R'Alignment use 1;
+ -- subtype S is R;
+
+ -- Here we have R has a default Object_Size of 32, and a specified
+ -- alignment of 1, and it seeems right for S to inherit both values.
+
+ else
+ null;
end if;
end;
end Set_Elem_Alignment;
Make_Func : Boolean := False) return Dynamic_SO_Ref
is
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (Ins_Type);
-
- K : constant Entity_Id :=
- Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc,
- Chars => New_Internal_Name ('K'));
-
+ K : constant Entity_Id := Make_Temporary (Loc, 'K');
Decl : Node_Id;
Vtype_Primary_View : Entity_Id;
Make_Simple_Return_Statement (Loc,
Expression => Expr))));
- -- The caller requests that the expression be encapsulated in
- -- a parameterless function.
+ -- The caller requests that the expression be encapsulated in a
+ -- parameterless function.
elsif Make_Func then
Decl :=
OSDN Git Service
