-- --
-- B o d y --
-- --
--- $Revision$
--- --
--- Copyright (C) 1992-2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- Copyright (C) 1992-2007, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
-- --
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
--- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
+-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
--- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
--- to the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, --
--- MA 02111-1307, USA. --
+-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
+-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
-- --
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
--- It is now maintained by Ada Core Technologies Inc (http://www.gnat.com). --
+-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
-- --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
package body Bcheck is
- -- Local subprograms
+ -----------------------
+ -- Local Subprograms --
+ -----------------------
- -- The following checking subprograms make up the parts
- -- of the configuration consistency check.
+ -- The following checking subprograms make up the parts of the
+ -- configuration consistency check.
+ procedure Check_Consistent_Dispatching_Policy;
procedure Check_Consistent_Dynamic_Elaboration_Checking;
procedure Check_Consistent_Floating_Point_Format;
+ procedure Check_Consistent_Interrupt_States;
procedure Check_Consistent_Locking_Policy;
procedure Check_Consistent_Normalize_Scalars;
procedure Check_Consistent_Queuing_Policy;
+ procedure Check_Consistent_Restrictions;
procedure Check_Consistent_Zero_Cost_Exception_Handling;
- procedure Check_Partition_Restrictions;
procedure Consistency_Error_Msg (Msg : String);
- -- Produce an error or a warning message, depending on whether
- -- an inconsistent configuration is permitted or not.
+ -- Produce an error or a warning message, depending on whether an
+ -- inconsistent configuration is permitted or not.
- ------------------------------------
- -- Check_Consistent_Configuration --
- ------------------------------------
+ function Same_Unit (U1 : Unit_Name_Type; U2 : Name_Id) return Boolean;
+ -- Used to compare two unit names for No_Dependence checks. U1 is in
+ -- standard unit name format, and U2 is in literal form with periods.
+
+ -------------------------------------
+ -- Check_Configuration_Consistency --
+ -------------------------------------
procedure Check_Configuration_Consistency is
begin
Check_Consistent_Normalize_Scalars;
Check_Consistent_Dynamic_Elaboration_Checking;
- Check_Partition_Restrictions;
+ Check_Consistent_Restrictions;
+ Check_Consistent_Interrupt_States;
+ Check_Consistent_Dispatching_Policy;
end Check_Configuration_Consistency;
+ -----------------------
+ -- Check_Consistency --
+ -----------------------
+
+ procedure Check_Consistency is
+ Src : Source_Id;
+ -- Source file Id for this Sdep entry
+
+ ALI_Path_Id : File_Name_Type;
+
+ begin
+ -- First, we go through the source table to see if there are any cases
+ -- in which we should go after source files and compute checksums of
+ -- the source files. We need to do this for any file for which we have
+ -- mismatching time stamps and (so far) matching checksums.
+
+ for S in Source.First .. Source.Last loop
+
+ -- If all time stamps for a file match, then there is nothing to
+ -- do, since we will not be checking checksums in that case anyway
+
+ if Source.Table (S).All_Timestamps_Match then
+ null;
+
+ -- If we did not find the source file, then we can't compute its
+ -- checksum anyway. Note that when we have a time stamp mismatch,
+ -- we try to find the source file unconditionally (i.e. if
+ -- Check_Source_Files is False).
+
+ elsif not Source.Table (S).Source_Found then
+ null;
+
+ -- If we already have non-matching or missing checksums, then no
+ -- need to try going after source file, since we won't trust the
+ -- checksums in any case.
+
+ elsif not Source.Table (S).All_Checksums_Match then
+ null;
+
+ -- Now we have the case where we have time stamp mismatches, and
+ -- the source file is around, but so far all checksums match. This
+ -- is the case where we need to compute the checksum from the source
+ -- file, since otherwise we would ignore the time stamp mismatches,
+ -- and that is wrong if the checksum of the source does not agree
+ -- with the checksums in the ALI files.
+
+ elsif Check_Source_Files then
+ if not Checksums_Match
+ (Source.Table (S).Checksum,
+ Get_File_Checksum (Source.Table (S).Sfile))
+ then
+ Source.Table (S).All_Checksums_Match := False;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Loop through ALI files
+
+ ALIs_Loop : for A in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
+
+ -- Loop through Sdep entries in one ALI file
+
+ Sdep_Loop : for D in
+ ALIs.Table (A).First_Sdep .. ALIs.Table (A).Last_Sdep
+ loop
+ if Sdep.Table (D).Dummy_Entry then
+ goto Continue;
+ end if;
+
+ Src := Source_Id (Get_Name_Table_Info (Sdep.Table (D).Sfile));
+
+ -- If the time stamps match, or all checksums match, then we
+ -- are OK, otherwise we have a definite error.
+
+ if Sdep.Table (D).Stamp /= Source.Table (Src).Stamp
+ and then not Source.Table (Src).All_Checksums_Match
+ then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := Sdep.Table (D).Sfile;
+
+ -- Two styles of message, depending on whether or not
+ -- the updated file is the one that must be recompiled
+
+ if Error_Msg_File_1 = Error_Msg_File_2 then
+ if Tolerate_Consistency_Errors then
+ Error_Msg
+ ("?{ has been modified and should be recompiled");
+ else
+ Error_Msg
+ ("{ has been modified and must be recompiled");
+ end if;
+
+ else
+ ALI_Path_Id :=
+ Osint.Find_File ((ALIs.Table (A).Afile), Osint.Library);
+ if Osint.Is_Readonly_Library (ALI_Path_Id) then
+ if Tolerate_Consistency_Errors then
+ Error_Msg ("?{ should be recompiled");
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALI_Path_Id;
+ Error_Msg ("?({ is obsolete and read-only)");
+ else
+ Error_Msg ("{ must be compiled");
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALI_Path_Id;
+ Error_Msg ("({ is obsolete and read-only)");
+ end if;
+
+ elsif Tolerate_Consistency_Errors then
+ Error_Msg
+ ("?{ should be recompiled ({ has been modified)");
+
+ else
+ Error_Msg ("{ must be recompiled ({ has been modified)");
+ end if;
+ end if;
+
+ if (not Tolerate_Consistency_Errors) and Verbose_Mode then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := Sdep.Table (D).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg
+ ("{ time stamp " & String (Source.Table (Src).Stamp));
+
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := Sdep.Table (D).Sfile;
+ -- Something wrong here, should be different file ???
+
+ Error_Msg
+ (" conflicts with { timestamp " &
+ String (Sdep.Table (D).Stamp));
+ end if;
+
+ -- Exit from the loop through Sdep entries once we find one
+ -- that does not match.
+
+ exit Sdep_Loop;
+ end if;
+
+ <<Continue>>
+ null;
+ end loop Sdep_Loop;
+ end loop ALIs_Loop;
+ end Check_Consistency;
+
+ -----------------------------------------
+ -- Check_Consistent_Dispatching_Policy --
+ -----------------------------------------
+
+ -- The rule is that all files for which the dispatching policy is
+ -- significant must meet the following rules:
+
+ -- 1. All files for which a task dispatching policy is significant must
+ -- be compiled with the same setting.
+
+ -- 2. If a partition contains one or more Priority_Specific_Dispatching
+ -- pragmas it cannot contain a Task_Dispatching_Policy pragma.
+
+ -- 3. No overlap is allowed in the priority ranges specified in
+ -- Priority_Specific_Dispatching pragmas within the same partition.
+
+ -- 4. If a partition contains one or more Priority_Specific_Dispatching
+ -- pragmas then the Ceiling_Locking policy is the only one allowed for
+ -- the partition.
+
+ procedure Check_Consistent_Dispatching_Policy is
+ Max_Prio : Nat := 0;
+ -- Maximum priority value for which a Priority_Specific_Dispatching
+ -- pragma has been specified.
+
+ TDP_Pragma_Afile : ALI_Id := No_ALI_Id;
+ -- ALI file where a Task_Dispatching_Policy pragma appears
+
+ begin
+ -- Consistency checks in units specifying a Task_Dispatching_Policy
+
+ if Task_Dispatching_Policy_Specified /= ' ' then
+ Find_Policy : for A1 in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
+ if ALIs.Table (A1).Task_Dispatching_Policy /= ' ' then
+
+ -- Store the place where the first task dispatching pragma
+ -- appears. We may need this value for issuing consistency
+ -- errors if Priority_Specific_Dispatching pragmas are used.
+
+ TDP_Pragma_Afile := A1;
+
+ Check_Policy : declare
+ Policy : constant Character :=
+ ALIs.Table (A1).Task_Dispatching_Policy;
+
+ begin
+ for A2 in A1 + 1 .. ALIs.Last loop
+ if ALIs.Table (A2).Task_Dispatching_Policy /= ' '
+ and then
+ ALIs.Table (A2).Task_Dispatching_Policy /= Policy
+ then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (A2).Sfile;
+
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ ("{ and { compiled with different task" &
+ " dispatching policies");
+ exit Find_Policy;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end Check_Policy;
+
+ exit Find_Policy;
+ end if;
+ end loop Find_Policy;
+ end if;
+
+ -- If no Priority_Specific_Dispatching entries, nothing else to do
+
+ if Specific_Dispatching.Last >= Specific_Dispatching.First then
+
+ -- Find out the maximum priority value for which one of the
+ -- Priority_Specific_Dispatching pragmas applies.
+
+ Max_Prio := 0;
+ for J in Specific_Dispatching.First .. Specific_Dispatching.Last loop
+ if Specific_Dispatching.Table (J).Last_Priority > Max_Prio then
+ Max_Prio := Specific_Dispatching.Table (J).Last_Priority;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Now establish tables to be used for consistency checking
+
+ declare
+ -- The following record type is used to record locations of the
+ -- Priority_Specific_Dispatching pragmas applying to the Priority.
+
+ type Specific_Dispatching_Entry is record
+ Dispatching_Policy : Character := ' ';
+ -- First character (upper case) of corresponding policy name
+
+ Afile : ALI_Id := No_ALI_Id;
+ -- ALI file that generated Priority Specific Dispatching
+ -- entry for consistency message.
+
+ Loc : Nat := 0;
+ -- Line numbers from Priority_Specific_Dispatching pragma
+ end record;
+
+ PSD_Table : array (0 .. Max_Prio) of Specific_Dispatching_Entry :=
+ (others => Specific_Dispatching_Entry'
+ (Dispatching_Policy => ' ',
+ Afile => No_ALI_Id,
+ Loc => 0));
+ -- Array containing an entry per priority containing the location
+ -- where there is a Priority_Specific_Dispatching pragma that
+ -- applies to the priority.
+
+ begin
+ for F in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
+ for K in ALIs.Table (F).First_Specific_Dispatching ..
+ ALIs.Table (F).Last_Specific_Dispatching
+ loop
+ declare
+ DTK : Specific_Dispatching_Record
+ renames Specific_Dispatching.Table (K);
+ begin
+ -- Check whether pragma Task_Dispatching_Policy and
+ -- pragma Priority_Specific_Dispatching are used in the
+ -- same partition.
+
+ if Task_Dispatching_Policy_Specified /= ' ' then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (F).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 :=
+ ALIs.Table (TDP_Pragma_Afile).Sfile;
+
+ Error_Msg_Nat_1 := DTK.PSD_Pragma_Line;
+
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ ("Priority_Specific_Dispatching at {:#" &
+ " incompatible with Task_Dispatching_Policy at {");
+ end if;
+
+ -- Ceiling_Locking must also be specified for a partition
+ -- with at least one Priority_Specific_Dispatching
+ -- pragma.
+
+ if Locking_Policy_Specified /= ' '
+ and then Locking_Policy_Specified /= 'C'
+ then
+ for A in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
+ if ALIs.Table (A).Locking_Policy /= ' '
+ and then ALIs.Table (A).Locking_Policy /= 'C'
+ then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (F).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
+
+ Error_Msg_Nat_1 := DTK.PSD_Pragma_Line;
+
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ ("Priority_Specific_Dispatching at {:#" &
+ " incompatible with Locking_Policy at {");
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Check overlapping priority ranges
+
+ Find_Overlapping : for Prio in
+ DTK.First_Priority .. DTK.Last_Priority
+ loop
+ if PSD_Table (Prio).Afile = No_ALI_Id then
+ PSD_Table (Prio) :=
+ (Dispatching_Policy => DTK.Dispatching_Policy,
+ Afile => F, Loc => DTK.PSD_Pragma_Line);
+
+ elsif PSD_Table (Prio).Dispatching_Policy /=
+ DTK.Dispatching_Policy
+
+ then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 :=
+ ALIs.Table (PSD_Table (Prio).Afile).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (F).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_Nat_1 := PSD_Table (Prio).Loc;
+ Error_Msg_Nat_2 := DTK.PSD_Pragma_Line;
+
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ ("overlapping priority ranges at {:# and {:#");
+
+ exit Find_Overlapping;
+ end if;
+ end loop Find_Overlapping;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end if;
+ end Check_Consistent_Dispatching_Policy;
+
---------------------------------------------------
-- Check_Consistent_Dynamic_Elaboration_Checking --
---------------------------------------------------
-- Issue warning, not one of the safe cases
else
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := UR.Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := UR.Sfile;
Error_Msg
- ("?% has dynamic elaboration checks " &
+ ("?{ has dynamic elaboration checks " &
"and with's");
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := WU.Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := WU.Sfile;
Error_Msg
- ("? % which has static elaboration " &
+ ("? { which has static elaboration " &
"checks");
Warnings_Detected := Warnings_Detected - 1;
begin
for A2 in A1 + 1 .. ALIs.Last loop
if ALIs.Table (A2).Float_Format /= Format then
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
- Error_Msg_Name_2 := ALIs.Table (A2).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (A2).Sfile;
Consistency_Error_Msg
- ("% and % compiled with different " &
+ ("{ and { compiled with different " &
"floating-point representations");
exit Find_Format;
end if;
end loop Find_Format;
end Check_Consistent_Floating_Point_Format;
+ ---------------------------------------
+ -- Check_Consistent_Interrupt_States --
+ ---------------------------------------
+
+ -- The rule is that if the state of a given interrupt is specified
+ -- in more than one unit, it must be specified with a consistent state.
+
+ procedure Check_Consistent_Interrupt_States is
+ Max_Intrup : Nat;
+
+ begin
+ -- If no Interrupt_State entries, nothing to do
+
+ if Interrupt_States.Last < Interrupt_States.First then
+ return;
+ end if;
+
+ -- First find out the maximum interrupt value
+
+ Max_Intrup := 0;
+ for J in Interrupt_States.First .. Interrupt_States.Last loop
+ if Interrupt_States.Table (J).Interrupt_Id > Max_Intrup then
+ Max_Intrup := Interrupt_States.Table (J).Interrupt_Id;
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- Now establish tables to be used for consistency checking
+
+ declare
+ Istate : array (0 .. Max_Intrup) of Character := (others => 'n');
+ -- Interrupt state entries, 'u'/'s'/'r' or 'n' to indicate an
+ -- entry that has not been set.
+
+ Afile : array (0 .. Max_Intrup) of ALI_Id;
+ -- ALI file that generated Istate entry for consistency message
+
+ Loc : array (0 .. Max_Intrup) of Nat;
+ -- Line numbers from IS pragma generating Istate entry
+
+ Inum : Nat;
+ -- Interrupt number from entry being tested
+
+ Stat : Character;
+ -- Interrupt state from entry being tested
+
+ Lnum : Nat;
+ -- Line number from entry being tested
+
+ begin
+ for F in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
+ for K in ALIs.Table (F).First_Interrupt_State ..
+ ALIs.Table (F).Last_Interrupt_State
+ loop
+ Inum := Interrupt_States.Table (K).Interrupt_Id;
+ Stat := Interrupt_States.Table (K).Interrupt_State;
+ Lnum := Interrupt_States.Table (K).IS_Pragma_Line;
+
+ if Istate (Inum) = 'n' then
+ Istate (Inum) := Stat;
+ Afile (Inum) := F;
+ Loc (Inum) := Lnum;
+
+ elsif Istate (Inum) /= Stat then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (Afile (Inum)).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (F).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_Nat_1 := Loc (Inum);
+ Error_Msg_Nat_2 := Lnum;
+
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ ("inconsistent interrupt states at {:# and {:#");
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end Check_Consistent_Interrupt_States;
+
-------------------------------------
-- Check_Consistent_Locking_Policy --
-------------------------------------
if ALIs.Table (A2).Locking_Policy /= ' ' and
ALIs.Table (A2).Locking_Policy /= Policy
then
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
- Error_Msg_Name_2 := ALIs.Table (A2).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (A2).Sfile;
Consistency_Error_Msg
- ("% and % compiled with different locking policies");
+ ("{ and { compiled with different locking policies");
exit Find_Policy;
end if;
end loop;
and then
ALIs.Table (A2).Queuing_Policy /= Policy
then
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
- Error_Msg_Name_2 := ALIs.Table (A2).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (A2).Sfile;
Consistency_Error_Msg
- ("% and % compiled with different queuing policies");
+ ("{ and { compiled with different queuing policies");
exit Find_Policy;
end if;
end loop;
end loop Find_Policy;
end Check_Consistent_Queuing_Policy;
- ---------------------------------------------------
- -- Check_Consistent_Zero_Cost_Exception_Handling --
- ---------------------------------------------------
-
- -- Check consistent zero cost exception handling. The rule is that
- -- all units must have the same exception handling mechanism.
-
- procedure Check_Consistent_Zero_Cost_Exception_Handling is
- begin
- Check_Mechanism : for A1 in ALIs.First + 1 .. ALIs.Last loop
- if ALIs.Table (A1).Zero_Cost_Exceptions /=
- ALIs.Table (ALIs.First).Zero_Cost_Exceptions
-
- then
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
- Error_Msg_Name_2 := ALIs.Table (ALIs.First).Sfile;
-
- Consistency_Error_Msg ("% and % compiled with different "
- & "exception handling mechanisms");
- end if;
- end loop Check_Mechanism;
- end Check_Consistent_Zero_Cost_Exception_Handling;
-
- ----------------------------------
- -- Check_Partition_Restrictions --
- ----------------------------------
+ -----------------------------------
+ -- Check_Consistent_Restrictions --
+ -----------------------------------
-- The rule is that if a restriction is specified in any unit,
-- then all units must obey the restriction. The check applies
-- only to restrictions which require partition wide consistency,
-- and not to internal units.
- -- The check is done in two steps. First for every restriction
- -- a unit specifying that restriction is found, if any.
- -- Second, all units are verified against the specified restrictions.
-
- procedure Check_Partition_Restrictions is
- No_Restriction_List : array (All_Restrictions) of Boolean :=
- (No_Implicit_Conditionals => True,
- -- This could modify and pessimize generated code
-
- No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code => True,
- -- This could modify and pessimize generated code
-
- No_Implicit_Loops => True,
- -- This could modify and pessimize generated code
-
- No_Recursion => True,
- -- Not checkable at compile time
-
- No_Reentrancy => True,
- -- Not checkable at compile time
-
- others => False);
- -- Define those restrictions that should be output if the gnatbind -r
- -- switch is used. Not all restrictions are output for the reasons given
- -- above in the list, and this array is used to test whether the
- -- corresponding pragma should be listed. True means that it should not
- -- be listed.
-
- R : array (All_Restrictions) of ALI_Id := (others => No_ALI_Id);
- -- Record the first unit specifying each compilation unit restriction
-
- V : array (All_Restrictions) of ALI_Id := (others => No_ALI_Id);
- -- Record the last unit violating each partition restriction. Note
- -- that entries in this array that do not correspond to partition
- -- restrictions can never be modified.
-
- Additional_Restrictions_Listed : Boolean := False;
- -- Set True if we have listed header for restrictions
-
- begin
- -- Loop to find restrictions
-
- for A in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
- for J in All_Restrictions loop
- if R (J) = No_ALI_Id and ALIs.Table (A).Restrictions (J) = 'r' then
- R (J) := A;
- end if;
- end loop;
- end loop;
+ procedure Check_Consistent_Restrictions is
+ Restriction_File_Output : Boolean;
+ -- Shows if we have output header messages for restriction violation
- -- Loop to find violations
+ procedure Print_Restriction_File (R : All_Restrictions);
+ -- Print header line for R if not printed yet
- for A in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
- for J in All_Restrictions loop
- if ALIs.Table (A).Restrictions (J) = 'v'
- and then not Is_Internal_File_Name (ALIs.Table (A).Sfile)
- then
- -- A violation of a restriction was found
+ ----------------------------
+ -- Print_Restriction_File --
+ ----------------------------
- V (J) := A;
+ procedure Print_Restriction_File (R : All_Restrictions) is
+ begin
+ if not Restriction_File_Output then
+ Restriction_File_Output := True;
- -- If this is a paritition restriction, and the restriction
- -- was specified in some unit in the partition, then this
- -- is a violation of the consistency requirement, so we
- -- generate an appropriate error message.
+ -- Find an ali file specifying the restriction
- if R (J) /= No_ALI_Id
- and then J in Partition_Restrictions
+ for A in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
+ if ALIs.Table (A).Restrictions.Set (R)
+ and then (R in All_Boolean_Restrictions
+ or else ALIs.Table (A).Restrictions.Value (R) =
+ Cumulative_Restrictions.Value (R))
then
+ -- We have found that ALI file A specifies the restriction
+ -- that is being violated (the minimum value is specified
+ -- in the case of a parameter restriction).
+
declare
- M1 : constant String := "% has Restriction (";
- S : constant String := Restriction_Id'Image (J);
- M2 : String (1 .. M1'Length + S'Length + 1);
+ M1 : constant String := "{ has restriction ";
+ S : constant String := Restriction_Id'Image (R);
+ M2 : String (1 .. 200); -- big enough!
+ P : Integer;
begin
Name_Buffer (1 .. S'Length) := S;
Name_Len := S'Length;
- Set_Casing
- (Units.Table (ALIs.Table (R (J)).First_Unit).Icasing);
+ Set_Casing (Mixed_Case);
M2 (M1'Range) := M1;
- M2 (M1'Length + 1 .. M2'Last - 1) :=
- Name_Buffer (1 .. S'Length);
- M2 (M2'Last) := ')';
-
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (R (J)).Sfile;
- Consistency_Error_Msg (M2);
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
+ P := M1'Length + 1;
+ M2 (P .. P + S'Length - 1) := Name_Buffer (1 .. S'Length);
+ P := P + S'Length;
+
+ if R in All_Parameter_Restrictions then
+ M2 (P .. P + 4) := " => #";
+ Error_Msg_Nat_1 :=
+ Int (Cumulative_Restrictions.Value (R));
+ P := P + 5;
+ end if;
+
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
+ Consistency_Error_Msg (M2 (1 .. P - 1));
Consistency_Error_Msg
- ("but file % violates this restriction");
+ ("but the following files violate this restriction:");
+ return;
end;
end if;
- end if;
- end loop;
- end loop;
+ end loop;
+ end if;
+ end Print_Restriction_File;
+
+ -- Start of processing for Check_Consistent_Restrictions
- -- List applicable restrictions if option set
+ begin
+ -- Loop through all restriction violations
- if List_Restrictions then
+ for R in All_Restrictions loop
- -- List any restrictions which were not violated and not specified
+ -- Check for violation of this restriction
- for J in All_Restrictions loop
- if V (J) = No_ALI_Id
- and then R (J) = No_ALI_Id
- and then not No_Restriction_List (J)
- then
- if not Additional_Restrictions_Listed then
- Write_Eol;
- Write_Line
- ("The following additional restrictions may be" &
- " applied to this partition:");
- Additional_Restrictions_Listed := True;
- end if;
+ if Cumulative_Restrictions.Set (R)
+ and then Cumulative_Restrictions.Violated (R)
+ and then (R in Partition_Boolean_Restrictions
+ or else (R in All_Parameter_Restrictions
+ and then
+ Cumulative_Restrictions.Count (R) >
+ Cumulative_Restrictions.Value (R)))
+ then
+ Restriction_File_Output := False;
- Write_Str ("pragma Restrictions (");
+ -- Loop through files looking for violators
+ for A2 in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
declare
- S : constant String := Restriction_Id'Image (J);
+ T : ALIs_Record renames ALIs.Table (A2);
begin
- Name_Len := S'Length;
- Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len) := S;
+ if T.Restrictions.Violated (R) then
+
+ -- We exclude predefined files from the list of
+ -- violators. This should be rethought. It is not
+ -- clear that this is the right thing to do, that
+ -- is particularly the case for restricted runtimes.
+
+ if not Is_Internal_File_Name (T.Sfile) then
+
+ -- Case of Boolean restriction, just print file name
+
+ if R in All_Boolean_Restrictions then
+ Print_Restriction_File (R);
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := T.Sfile;
+ Consistency_Error_Msg (" {");
+
+ -- Case of Parameter restriction where violation
+ -- count exceeds restriction value, print file
+ -- name and count, adding "at least" if the
+ -- exact count is not known.
+
+ elsif R in Checked_Add_Parameter_Restrictions
+ or else T.Restrictions.Count (R) >
+ Cumulative_Restrictions.Value (R)
+ then
+ Print_Restriction_File (R);
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := T.Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_Nat_1 := Int (T.Restrictions.Count (R));
+
+ if T.Restrictions.Unknown (R) then
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ (" { (count = at least #)");
+ else
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ (" % (count = #)");
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
+ end if;
end;
-
- Set_Casing (Mixed_Case);
- Write_Str (Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len));
- Write_Str (");");
- Write_Eol;
- end if;
- end loop;
- end if;
- end Check_Partition_Restrictions;
-
- -----------------------
- -- Check_Consistency --
- -----------------------
-
- procedure Check_Consistency is
- Src : Source_Id;
- -- Source file Id for this Sdep entry
-
- begin
- -- First, we go through the source table to see if there are any cases
- -- in which we should go after source files and compute checksums of
- -- the source files. We need to do this for any file for which we have
- -- mismatching time stamps and (so far) matching checksums.
-
- for S in Source.First .. Source.Last loop
-
- -- If all time stamps for a file match, then there is nothing to
- -- do, since we will not be checking checksums in that case anyway
-
- if Source.Table (S).All_Timestamps_Match then
- null;
-
- -- If we did not find the source file, then we can't compute its
- -- checksum anyway. Note that when we have a time stamp mismatch,
- -- we try to find the source file unconditionally (i.e. if
- -- Check_Source_Files is False).
-
- elsif not Source.Table (S).Source_Found then
- null;
-
- -- If we already have non-matching or missing checksums, then no
- -- need to try going after source file, since we won't trust the
- -- checksums in any case.
-
- elsif not Source.Table (S).All_Checksums_Match then
- null;
-
- -- Now we have the case where we have time stamp mismatches, and
- -- the source file is around, but so far all checksums match. This
- -- is the case where we need to compute the checksum from the source
- -- file, since otherwise we would ignore the time stamp mismatches,
- -- and that is wrong if the checksum of the source does not agree
- -- with the checksums in the ALI files.
-
- elsif Check_Source_Files then
- if not Checksums_Match
- (Source.Table (S).Checksum,
- Get_File_Checksum (Source.Table (S).Sfile))
- then
- Source.Table (S).All_Checksums_Match := False;
- end if;
+ end loop;
end if;
end loop;
- -- Loop through ALI files
-
- ALIs_Loop : for A in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
-
- -- Loop through Sdep entries in one ALI file
-
- Sdep_Loop : for D in
- ALIs.Table (A).First_Sdep .. ALIs.Table (A).Last_Sdep
- loop
- if Sdep.Table (D).Dummy_Entry then
- goto Continue;
- end if;
-
- Src := Source_Id (Get_Name_Table_Info (Sdep.Table (D).Sfile));
-
- -- If the time stamps match, or all checksums match, then we
- -- are OK, otherwise we have a definite error.
+ -- Now deal with No_Dependence indications. Note that we put the loop
+ -- through entries in the no dependency table first, since this loop
+ -- is most often empty (no such pragma Restrictions in use).
- if Sdep.Table (D).Stamp /= Source.Table (Src).Stamp
- and then not Source.Table (Src).All_Checksums_Match
- then
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
- Error_Msg_Name_2 := Sdep.Table (D).Sfile;
-
- -- Two styles of message, depending on whether or not
- -- the updated file is the one that must be recompiled
-
- if Error_Msg_Name_1 = Error_Msg_Name_2 then
- if Tolerate_Consistency_Errors then
- Error_Msg
- ("?% has been modified and should be recompiled");
- else
- Error_Msg
- ("% has been modified and must be recompiled");
- end if;
-
- else
- if Tolerate_Consistency_Errors then
- Error_Msg
- ("?% should be recompiled (% has been modified)");
+ for ND in No_Deps.First .. No_Deps.Last loop
+ declare
+ ND_Unit : constant Name_Id :=
+ No_Deps.Table (ND).No_Dep_Unit;
- else
- Error_Msg ("% must be recompiled (% has been modified)");
- end if;
- end if;
+ begin
+ for J in ALIs.First .. ALIs.Last loop
+ declare
+ A : ALIs_Record renames ALIs.Table (J);
- if (not Tolerate_Consistency_Errors) and Verbose_Mode then
- declare
- Msg : constant String := "file % has time stamp ";
- Buf : String (1 .. Msg'Length + Time_Stamp_Length);
+ begin
+ for K in A.First_Unit .. A.Last_Unit loop
+ declare
+ U : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (K);
+ begin
+ for L in U.First_With .. U.Last_With loop
+ if Same_Unit
+ (Withs.Table (L).Uname, ND_Unit)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := U.Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_Name_1 := ND_Unit;
+ Consistency_Error_Msg
+ ("file { violates restriction " &
+ "No_Dependence => %");
+ end if;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+ end;
+ end loop;
+ end Check_Consistent_Restrictions;
- begin
- Buf (1 .. Msg'Length) := Msg;
- Buf (Msg'Length + 1 .. Buf'Length) :=
- String (Source.Table (Src).Stamp);
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
- Error_Msg (Buf);
-
- Buf (Msg'Length + 1 .. Buf'Length) :=
- String (Sdep.Table (D).Stamp);
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := Sdep.Table (D).Sfile;
- Error_Msg (Buf);
- end;
- end if;
+ ---------------------------------------------------
+ -- Check_Consistent_Zero_Cost_Exception_Handling --
+ ---------------------------------------------------
- -- Exit from the loop through Sdep entries once we find one
- -- that does not match.
+ -- Check consistent zero cost exception handling. The rule is that
+ -- all units must have the same exception handling mechanism.
- exit Sdep_Loop;
- end if;
+ procedure Check_Consistent_Zero_Cost_Exception_Handling is
+ begin
+ Check_Mechanism : for A1 in ALIs.First + 1 .. ALIs.Last loop
+ if ALIs.Table (A1).Zero_Cost_Exceptions /=
+ ALIs.Table (ALIs.First).Zero_Cost_Exceptions
+ then
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A1).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (ALIs.First).Sfile;
- <<Continue>>
- null;
- end loop Sdep_Loop;
- end loop ALIs_Loop;
- end Check_Consistency;
+ Consistency_Error_Msg ("{ and { compiled with different "
+ & "exception handling mechanisms");
+ end if;
+ end loop Check_Mechanism;
+ end Check_Consistent_Zero_Cost_Exception_Handling;
-------------------------------
-- Check_Duplicated_Subunits --
for K in Boolean loop
if K then
Name_Buffer (Name_Len) := 'b';
-
else
Name_Buffer (Name_Len) := 's';
end if;
declare
- Info : constant Int := Get_Name_Table_Info (Name_Find);
+ Unit : constant Unit_Name_Type := Name_Find;
+ Info : constant Int := Get_Name_Table_Info (Unit);
begin
if Info /= 0 then
or else ALIs.Table (A).Ver (1 .. VL) /=
ALIs.Table (ALIs.First).Ver (1 .. VL)
then
- Error_Msg_Name_1 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
- Error_Msg_Name_2 := ALIs.Table (ALIs.First).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_1 := ALIs.Table (A).Sfile;
+ Error_Msg_File_2 := ALIs.Table (ALIs.First).Sfile;
Consistency_Error_Msg
- ("% and % compiled with different GNAT versions");
+ ("{ and { compiled with different GNAT versions");
end if;
end loop;
end Check_Versions;
end if;
end Consistency_Error_Msg;
+ ---------------
+ -- Same_Unit --
+ ---------------
+
+ function Same_Unit (U1 : Unit_Name_Type; U2 : Name_Id) return Boolean is
+ begin
+ -- Note, the string U1 has a terminating %s or %b, U2 does not
+
+ if Length_Of_Name (U1) - 2 = Length_Of_Name (U2) then
+ Get_Name_String (U1);
+
+ declare
+ U1_Str : constant String := Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len - 2);
+ begin
+ Get_Name_String (U2);
+ return U1_Str = Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len);
+ end;
+
+ else
+ return False;
+ end if;
+ end Same_Unit;
+
end Bcheck;
OSDN Git Service
