+ /* Building a distinct copy of a tagged type is inappropriate; it
+ causes breakage in code that expects there to be a one-to-one
+ relationship between a struct and its fields.
+ build_duplicate_type is another solution (as used in
+ handle_transparent_union_attribute), but that doesn't play well
+ with the stronger C++ type identity model. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (ttype) == RECORD_TYPE
+ || TREE_CODE (ttype) == UNION_TYPE
+ || TREE_CODE (ttype) == QUAL_UNION_TYPE
+ || TREE_CODE (ttype) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
+ {
+ warning (OPT_Wattributes,
+ "ignoring attributes applied to %qT after definition",
+ TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (ttype));
+ return build_qualified_type (ttype, quals);
+ }