* decl.c, decl2.c, parser.c: Fix comment typos. Follow

	spelling conventions.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@114169 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index 45d25bb..ebbca93 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-05-28  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@codesourcery.com>
+
+       * decl.c, decl2.c, parser.c: Fix comment typos.  Follow
+       spelling conventions.
+
 2006-05-24  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
        PR c++/20103

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index fef09ed..5178bdf 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ struct named_label_entry GTY(())
 
   /* The following bits are set after the label is defined, and are
      updated as scopes are popped.  They indicate that a backward jump
-     to the label will illegally enter a scope of the given flavour.  */
+     to the label will illegally enter a scope of the given flavor.  */
   bool in_try_scope;
   bool in_catch_scope;
   bool in_omp_scope;

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.c b/gcc/cp/decl2.c
index c0bea8c..0949944 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/decl2.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.c
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ start_objects (int method_type, int initp)
 
   /* We cannot allow these functions to be elided, even if they do not
      have external linkage.  And, there's no point in deferring
-     compilation of thes functions; they're all going to have to be
+     compilation of these functions; they're all going to have to be
      out anyhow.  */
   DECL_INLINE (current_function_decl) = 0;
   DECL_UNINLINABLE (current_function_decl) = 1;

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 74934fb..60a53c8 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -13107,7 +13107,7 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser,
         define a class that has already been declared with this
         syntax.
 
-        The proposed resolution for Core Issue 180 says that whever
+        The proposed resolution for Core Issue 180 says that wherever
         you see `class T::X' you should treat `X' as a type-name.
 
         It is OK to define an inaccessible class; for example: