/* Define this if you wish to imitate the way many other C compilers handle
alignment of bitfields and the structures that contain them.
- The behavior is that the type written for a bitfield (`int', `short', or
+ The behavior is that the type written for a bit-field (`int', `short', or
other integer type) imposes an alignment for the entire structure, as if the
structure really did contain an ordinary field of that type. In addition,
- the bitfield is placed within the structure so that it would fit within such
+ the bit-field is placed within the structure so that it would fit within such
a field, not crossing a boundary for it.
- Thus, on most machines, a bitfield whose type is written as `int' would not
+ Thus, on most machines, a bit-field whose type is written as `int' would not
cross a four-byte boundary, and would force four-byte alignment for the
whole structure. (The alignment used may not be four bytes; it is
controlled by the other alignment parameters.)
`STRUCTURE_SIZE_BOUNDARY' as large as `BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT'. Then every
structure can be accessed with fullwords.
- Unless the machine has bitfield instructions or you define
+ Unless the machine has bit-field instructions or you define
`STRUCTURE_SIZE_BOUNDARY' that way, you must define
`PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS' to have a nonzero value.