From: krebbel <krebbel@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:08:01 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: 2007-04-25  Wolfgang Gellerich  <gellerich@de.ibm.com>
X-Git-Url: http://git.sourceforge.jp/view?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4618299960f085b99e80e4698391d9e7645b3ca2;p=pf3gnuchains%2Fgcc-fork.git

2007-04-25  Wolfgang Gellerich  <gellerich@de.ibm.com>

	* gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90 (set_arrays): Replaced subroutine
	with two new subroutines to avoid parameter-induced aliasing.
	* gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90 (set_array_listpr): New.
	* gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90 (set_array_lisbit): New.



git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@124146 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index aa19f36f36f..52629abbdbe 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2007-04-25  Wolfgang Gellerich  <gellerich@de.ibm.com>
+
+	* gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90 (set_arrays): Replaced subroutine
+	with two new subroutines to avoid parameter-induced aliasing.
+	* gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90 (set_array_listpr): New.
+	* gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90 (set_array_lisbit): New.
+
 2007-04-24  John David Anglin  <dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
 
 	* gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c: XFAIL test on 32-bit hppa targets.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90
index 92ba769ff49..1ab1a051373 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_6.f90
@@ -14,7 +14,13 @@ program check_6
               (lispat(1),listpr(10))
   lischk = (/0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, &
              2, 0, 0, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 0/)
-  call set_arrays (listpr, lisbit)
+
+! These two calls replace the previously made call to subroutine
+! set_arrays which was erroneous because of parameter-induced 
+! aliasing.
+  call set_array_listpr (listpr)
+  call set_array_lisbit (lisbit)
+
   if (any (listpr.ne.lischk)) call abort ()
   call sub1
   call sub2
@@ -28,7 +34,8 @@ subroutine sub1
   equivalence (listpr(10),lisbit(1)), &
               (listpr(10),mwkx(10)),  &
               (listpr(10),lispat(1))
-  call set_arrays (listpr, lisbit)
+  call set_array_listpr (listpr)
+  call set_array_lisbit (lisbit)
   if (any (listpr .ne. lischk)) call abort ()
 end
 !
@@ -41,7 +48,8 @@ subroutine sub2
   dimension    listpr(20),lisbit(10),lispat(8)
   equivalence (lispat(1),listpr(10)), &
               (mwkx(10),lisbit(1),listpr(10))
-  call set_arrays (listpr, lisbit)
+  call set_array_listpr (listpr)
+  call set_array_lisbit (lisbit)
   if (any (listpr .ne. lischk)) call abort ()
 end
 ! This gave correct results because the order in which the
@@ -52,12 +60,18 @@ subroutine sub3
   dimension    listpr(20),lisbit(10),lispat(8)
   equivalence (listpr(10),lisbit(1),mwkx(10)), &
               (lispat(1),listpr(10))
-  call set_arrays (listpr, lisbit)
+  call set_array_listpr (listpr)
+  call set_array_lisbit (lisbit)
   if (any (listpr .ne. lischk)) call abort ()
 end
-subroutine set_arrays (listpr, lisbit)
-  dimension listpr(20),lisbit(10)
+
+subroutine set_array_listpr (listpr)
+  dimension listpr(20)
   listpr = 0
+end
+
+subroutine set_array_lisbit (lisbit)
+  dimension lisbit(10)
   lisbit = (/(i, i = 1, 10)/)
   lisbit((/3,4/)) = 0
 end