X-Git-Url: http://git.sourceforge.jp/view?a=blobdiff_plain;f=gcc%2Ftestsuite%2Fgcc.dg%2Fvect%2Fvect-91.c;h=d72bd4c8cf016b90537194e20e339096b59bd8cd;hb=516849c7cdbe9be15bb886db53588d1cc868e795;hp=96099f4fe0b0b3e77388d9fed1abac43d75d3144;hpb=e8089f751c03c2f2d0709b475a22b42e0cc402a2;p=pf3gnuchains%2Fgcc-fork.git

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c
index 96099f4fe0b..d72bd4c8cf0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c
@@ -11,10 +11,7 @@ extern int a[N];
 /* The alignment of 'pa' is unknown. 
    Yet we do know that both the read access and write access have 
    the same alignment. Peeling to align one of the accesses will 
-   align the other.
-
-   Not vectorized yet due to problems in dataref analysis that
-   are fixed in autovect-branch but not yet in mainline.  */
+   align the other.  */
 
 int
 main1 (int * pa)
@@ -60,11 +57,8 @@ main3 ()
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* Currently only the loops in main2 and main3 get vectorized. After the merge 
-   of the datarefs-analysis cleanups from autovect-branch to mainline, the loop
-   in main1 will also be vectorized.  */ 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 2 "vect" { xfail vect_no_int_add } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 3 "vect" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "accesses have the same alignment." 2 "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 2 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "accesses have the same alignment." 3 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 3 "vect" } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */